Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Surg Oncol ; 18(1): 313, 2020 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33256819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management after neoadjuvant treatment in low rectal cancer enables organ preservation and avoids surgical morbidity. Our aim is to compare oncological outcomes in patients with clinical complete response in watch and wait strategy with those who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery with a pathological complete response. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment with clinical complete response in watch and wait approach (group 1, n = 26) and complete pathological responders (ypT0N0) after chemoradiotherapy and surgery (group 2, n = 22), between January 2011 and October 2018, were included retrospectively, and all of them evaluated and followed in a multidisciplinary team. A comparative analysis of local and distant recurrence rates and disease-free and overall survival between both groups was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: No differences were found between patient's demographic characteristics in both groups. Group 1: distance from the anal verge mean 5 cm (r = 1-12), 10 (38%) stage III, and 7 (27%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up of 47 months (r = 6, a 108). Group 2: distance from the anal verge mean 7 cm (r = 2-12), 16 (72%) stage III, and 13 (59%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up 49.5 months (r = 3, a 112). Local recurrence: 2 patients in group 1 (8.3%) and 1 in group 2 (4.8%) (p = 0.6235). Distant recurrence: 1 patient in group 1 (3.8%) and 3 in group 2 (19.2%) (p = 0.2237). Disease-free survival: 87.9% in group 1, 80% in group 2 (p = 0.7546). Overall survival: 86% in group 1 and 85% in group 2 (p = 0.5367). CONCLUSION: Oncological results in operated patients with pathological complete response were similar to those in patients under a watch and wait strategy mediating a systematic and personalized evaluation. Surgery can safely be deferred in clinical complete responders.


Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais , Quimiorradioterapia , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Conduta Expectante
2.
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam ; 39(3): 179-83, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19845256

RESUMO

PATIENTS: Fecal incontinence has been reported in 5.5% to 45% of patients after ileoanal pouch construction, predominantly at night. It has been shown that alpha1-adrenergic agonists as phenylephrine increase anal sphincter pressure in healthy volunteers and in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. The median duration of action of topical phenylephrine is seven hours. Carapeti et al have demonstrated its usefulness in patients after ileoanal pouch construction. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the administration of a single dose of topical 10% phenylephrine at night is effective for the treatment of nocturnal anal incontinence in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomized 12 patients in two groups. Group A (control) received a placebo cream and group B received a 10% phenylephrine cream. The study was prospective, randomized and double-blind. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, follow-up time since the closure of ileostomy and pre-treatment and intra-treatment leaks. Control group had 7 episodes of incontinence pre-treatment and 9 intra-treatment. Treated group had 3 and 5.4, respectively. (p = NS) No patient had side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Given the small number of patients included, we can not yet rule out that topical 10% phenylephrine is useful for the treatment of nocturnal fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch construction. It would be necessary to continue with studies, increasing the number of patients treated with this drug, in order to have a better evidence of its clinical utility.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Bolsas Cólicas/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Fecal/tratamento farmacológico , Fenilefrina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA