Comparison of fluoride profiles by SIMS with mineral density of subsurface enamel lesions treated intra-orally with a fluoride-releasing device.

A variety of intra-oral model systems has evolved which allows for the study of remineralization of coronal and/or root-surface lesions following application of topical fluoride (F) agents. The problem of interpretation of the results has led to a variety of analytical methods (i.e., microhardness, F biopsy, microradiography, and polarizing light microscopy), each of which provides important but limited information related to the overall understanding of remineralization. Microhardness measures change in mineral content which is more precisely localized by microradiography and polarized light microscopy. F biopsy allows for assessment of the F uptake of lesions, but does not suggest the chemical state of the F. Previous work has demonstrated that patterns of mineral deposition during remineralization do not necessarily parallel the F uptake profiles, and fluoridated apatites cannot be distinguished from non-specifically-adsorbed F (Clark et al., 1988). Because artificial lesions demonstrate variations in depth and mineral content, complementary analytical methods that demonstrate profiles of both F content and mineral density curves on the same section are needed so that the process of remineralization can be more clearly understood. This study used secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) for F profiles and quantitative microradiography for assessment of mineral deposition on the same section. These state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the precision with which information about remineralization can be obtained. Subsurface lesions in human enamel specimens were developed by immersion in 0.1 M lactate buffer with 1% CMC at a pH of 4.5 for 48 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intra-oral effects on acid-softened enamel of NaF lozenges administered in divided daily doses.

The purpose of this investigation was to study the intra-oral effects of multiple daily applications of NaF lozenges upon acid-softened enamel. Bovine enamel slabs were softened with 0.1 mol/L lactate buffer at pH 4.0 for 14 hrs and subsequently mounted in a mandibular removable Hawley appliance. Control slabs were worn for seven days by eight adult male subjects who brushed their natural dentition daily with a fluoride-free dentifrice. Test slabs were exposed to one 0.55-mg NaF lozenge (0.25 mg F) 4x/day for seven days and the natural dentition brushed with a fluoride-free dentifrice. The efficacy of 0.25-mg F lozenges used 4x/day over that of a 1-mg F lozenge administered 1x/day was established by a pilot study with two subjects. Microhardness testing was performed after intra-oral exposure (IOE) and following immersion in 0.01 mol/L lactate buffer containing Ca and PO4 for 24 hrs at a pH of 4.0. Fluoride uptake was measured on separate control and test slabs after KOH wash and after acid-resistance-testing (ART). Recovery of microhardness following IOE was 40.9% for controls and 53.9% for treated slabs, while control slabs retained 1.3% resistance to ART, compared with 25.6% for test slabs. The F content of the control slabs was significantly less than that of lozenge-treated and lozenge-treated-ART slabs throughout the depth of the lesion. The F content of the lozenge-treated-ART slabs was significantly less than that of the lozenge-treated slabs only at the 0-5-microns depth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In vivo effects of a SnF2 gel on acid-softened enamel.

The purpose of this investigation was to study the intra-oral rehardening of acid-softened enamel and fluoride uptake from SnF2 gel. Bovine enamel slabs were softened with 0.1 mol/L lactate buffer at pH 4.0 for 14 hrs and then mounted in a mandibular removable Hawley appliance. Control slabs were worn for 96 hrs by seven adult males whose teeth were brushed daily with a fluoride-free dentifrice. Test slabs were exposed once/day to 0.4% SnF2 gel. The gel was swabbed onto the slabs for one minute before being replaced in the mouth unrinsed. The natural dentition was brushed 4 X /day with a fluoride-free dentifrice. Microhardness testing was performed after intra-oral exposure (IOE) and after acid-resistance-testing (ART) following immersion in 0.01 mol/L lactate buffer for 24 hrs at pH of 4.0. Fluoride uptake was measured on separate controls, test slabs, and test slabs after ART, with 0.5 mol/L HClO4 etches of from 15 to 60 sec. The F content was measured with a F-ion-specific electrode and the phosphate content by spectrophotometry. Following IOE, microhardness recovery was 35.6% for control and 37.9% for test slabs, and control slabs retained 1.4% resistance to acid, as compared with 18.6% for the test slabs. The F content of control slabs was significantly less than that of SnF2-treated slabs from 5 to 60 micron in depth, and the F content of SnF2-treated slabs after ART was significantly less at depths of from 5 to 35 micron than that of SnF2-treated slabs not exposed to ART. Both control and SnF2 enamel slabs demonstrated rehardening after IOE, but only SnF2-treated enamel retained a significant fraction of that rehardening after ART.

Comparison of the effects of two topical fluoride regimens on demineralized enamel in vivo.

The purpose of this investigation was to study the intra-oral remineralization of acid-softened enamel by a NaF dentifrice compared with that from a combination of topical F agents. Bovine enamel slabs were demineralized with 0.1 mol/L lactic acid at pH 4.0 for 14 hr and then mounted in a removable mandibular appliance. Control slabs were worn for 96 hr by seven adult males who brushed daily with a F-free dentifrice. Test slabs were brushed with a NaF dentifrice 4 x/day or with the same dentifrice 4 x/day and a 0.02% APF mouthrinse and a 0.4% SnF2 gel which were applied once/day for three days. The natural dentition was also brushed with the NaF dentifrice during both test periods. Microhardness testing was performed on sound enamel, and after acid-softening, intra-oral exposure (IOE), and acid resistance testing (ART) in 0.01 mol/L lactic acid at pH 4.0 for 24 hr. Control and test slabs were etched with 0.5 mol/L HC1O4 for from 15 to 60 sec. The F content was measured with a F electrode and PO4 by spectrophotometry. Contact microradiography and image analyses were performed on control and test slabs so that changes in mineral content resulting from treatment could be assessed. Both test groups were significantly harder after both IOE and ART than were controls, but no differences appeared between the effects of the two test groups. The F content of control slabs was significantly less than that of both test groups, and the combination-treated slabs showed greater F than did the dentifrice-treated slabs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Microscopic observations of amalgams carved by different methods and subsequently polished.

Occlusal amalgam restorations placed in extracted deciduous molars were studied using an electron microscope. The fillings were carved only or both carved and burnished, and all were subsequently polished. Observations were made before and after polishing, and the results emphasized the effects of carving, burnishing, and polishing on the surface texture and marginal integrity of amalgam fillings.

Intraoral effects of a fluoride-releasing device on acid-softened enamel.

Among the anticaries benefits of fluorides is the remineralization of incipient carious lesions. There is increasingly convincing evidence that low-potency fluoride agents applied frequently are effective in remineralizing early carious lesions. This study of in vivo remineralization used an intraoral appliance with demineralized enamel slabs mounted in the appliance and an innovative method of fluoride delivery, the fluoride-releasing device, which releases a controlled amount of fluoride (0.3 mg fluoride every 24 hours) on exposure to saliva. After control and treatment periods of 7 and 30 days, the enamel specimens were removed from the appliance and evaluated for microhardness, acid resistance, and fluoride uptake. The treated specimens significantly exceeded the values of their corresponding controls in all parameters measured, indicating that considerable remineralization of the treated enamel had occurred at both 7 and 30 days. Although the longer period of treatment produced greater results, considerable effects were observed after 7 days. This model system provided for an in vivo environment to study the effects of treatment of the FRD and allowed for subsequent recovery of the enamel specimens for evaluation. The results of this study are encouraging with respect to the efficacy of a fluoride-releasing device but indicate that subsequent clinical testing of the effects of FRDs on incipient carious lesions in the natural dentition of human subjects is necessary.