Different clinical outcomes between cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation and non-inflammatory form.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-ri) is a rare manifestation related to CAA, thought to be more severe. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of CAA-ri and non-inflammatory CAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with CAA-ri from 13 French centers. We constituted a sex- and age-matched control cohort with non-inflammatory CAA and similar disease duration. Survival, autonomy and cognitive evolution were compared after logistic regression. Cerebral microbleeds (CMB), intracerebral hemorrhage, cortical superficial siderosis and hippocampal atrophy were analyzed as well as CSF biomarker profile and APOE genotype when available. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Data from 48 CAA-ri patients including 28 already reported and 20 new patients were analyzed. Over a mean of 3.1 years, 11 patients died (22.9%) and 18 (37.5%) relapsed. CAA-ri patients were more frequently institutionalized than non-inflammatory CAA patients (30% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001); mortality rates remained similar. MMSE and modified Rankin scale scores showed greater severity in CAA-ri at last follow-up. MRI showed a higher number of CMB at baseline and last follow-up in CAA-ri (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). CSF showed lower baseline levels of Aß42 in CAA-ri than non-inflammatory CAA (373.3 pg/ml vs 490.8 pg/ml, p = 0.05). CAA-ri patients more likely carried at least one APOE ε4 allele (76% vs 37.5%, adjusted p = 0.05) particularly as homozygous status (56% vs 6.2%, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: CAA-ri appears to be more severe than non-inflammatory CAA with a significant loss of autonomy and global higher amyloid burden, shown by more CMB and a distinct CSF profile. This burden may be partially promoted by ε4 allele.

Diagnosis and Prediction of Relapses in Susac Syndrome: A New Use for MR Postcontrast FLAIR Leptomeningeal Enhancement.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal enhancement can be found in a variety of neurologic diseases such as Susac Syndrome. Our aim was to assess its prevalence and significance of leptomeningeal enhancement in Susac syndrome using 3T postcontrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2017, nine consecutive patients with Susac syndrome and a control group of 73 patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome were included. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical and ophthalmologic data independently reviewed MRIs and assessed leptomeningeal enhancement and parenchymal abnormalities. Follow-up MRIs (5.9 MRIs is the mean number per patient over a median period of 46 months) of patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed and compared with clinical and retinal fluorescein angiographic data evaluated by an independent ophthalmologist. Fisher tests were used to compare the 2 groups, and mixed-effects logistic models were used for analysis of clinical and imaging follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome. RESULTS: Patients with Susac syndrome were significantly more likely to present with leptomeningeal enhancement: 5/9 (56%) versus 6/73 (8%) in the control group (P = .002). They had a significantly higher leptomeningeal enhancement burden with ≥3 lesions in 5/9 patients versus 0/73 (P < .001). Regions of leptomeningeal enhancement were significantly more likely to be located in the posterior fossa: 5/9 versus 0/73 (P < .001). Interobserver agreement for leptomeningeal enhancement was good (κ = 0.79). There was a significant association between clinical relapses and increase of both leptomeningeal enhancement and parenchymal lesion load: OR = 6.15 (P = .01) and OR = 5 (P = .02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Leptomeningeal enhancement occurs frequently in Susac syndrome and could be helpful for diagnosis and in predicting clinical relapse.