Biomarkers of severity and threshold of allergic reactions during oral peanut challenges.

BACKGROUND: Oral food challenge (OFC) is the criterion standard to assess peanut allergy (PA), but it involves a risk of allergic reactions of unpredictable severity. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify biomarkers for risk of severe reactions or low dose threshold during OFC to peanut. METHODS: We assessed Learning Early about Peanut Allergy study, Persistance of Oral Tolerance to Peanut study, and Peanut Allergy Sensitization study participants by administering the basophil activation test (BAT) and the skin prick test (SPT) and measuring the levels of peanut-specific IgE, Arachis hypogaea 2-specific IgE, and peanut-specific IgG4, and we analyzed the utility of the different biomarkers in relation to PA status, severity, and threshold dose of allergic reactions to peanut during OFC. RESULTS: When a previously defined optimal cutoff was used, the BAT diagnosed PA with 98% specificity and 75% sensitivity. The BAT identified severe reactions with 97% specificity and 100% sensitivity. The SPT, level of Arachis hypogaea 2-specific IgE, level of peanut-specific IgE, and IgG4/IgE ratio also had 100% sensitivity but slightly lower specificity (92%, 93%, 90%, and 88%, respectively) to predict severity. Participants with lower thresholds of reactivity had higher basophil activation to peanut in vitro. The SPT and the BAT were the best individual predictors of threshold. Multivariate models were superior to individual biomarkers and were used to generate nomograms to calculate the probability of serious adverse events during OFC for individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT diagnosed PA with high specificity and identified severe reactors and low threshold with high specificity and high sensitivity. The BAT was the best biomarker for severity, surpassed only by the SPT in predicting threshold. Nomograms can help estimate the likelihood of severe reactions and reactions to a low dose of allergen in individual patients with PA.

Role of IL-35 in sublingual allergen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Grass pollen-specific immunotherapy involves immunomodulation of allergen-specific TH2 responses and induction of IL-10+ and/or TGF-ß+CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (induced Treg cells). IL-35+CD4+CD25+ forkhead box protein 3-negative T (IL-35-inducible regulatory T [iTR35]) cells have been reported as a novel subset of induced Treg cells with modulatory characteristics. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate mechanisms underlying the induction and maintenance of immunologic tolerance induced by IL-35 and iTR35 cells. METHODS: The biological effects of IL-35 were assessed on group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s); dendritic cells primed with thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-25, and IL-33; and B and TH2 cells by using flow cytometry and quantitative RT-PCR. Grass pollen-driven TH2 cell proliferation and cytokine production were measured by using tritiated thymidine and Luminex MagPix, respectively. iTR35 cells were quantified in patients with grass pollen allergy (seasonal allergic rhinitis [SAR] group, n = 16), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-treated patients (SLIT group, n = 16), and nonatopic control subjects (NACs; NAC group, n = 16). RESULTS: The SAR group had increased proportions of ILC2s (P = .002) and IL-5+ cells (P = .042), IL-13+ cells (P = .042), and IL-5+IL-13+ ILC2s (P = .003) compared with NACs. IL-35 inhibited IL-5 and IL-13 production by ILC2s in the presence of IL-25 or IL-33 (P = .031) and allergen-driven TH2 cytokines by effector T cells. IL-35 inhibited CD40 ligand-, IL-4-, and IL-21-mediated IgE production by B cells (P = .015), allergen-driven T-cell proliferation (P = .001), and TH2 cytokine production mediated by primed dendritic cells. iTR35 cells suppressed TH2 cell proliferation and cytokine production. In addition, allergen-driven IL-35 levels and iTR35 cell counts were increased in patients receiving SLIT (all, P < .001) and NACs (all, P < .001) compared with patients with SAR. CONCLUSION: IL-35 and iTR35 cells are potential novel immune regulators induced by SLIT. The clinical relevance of SLIT can be underscored by restoration of protective iTR35 cells.

Nasal allergen-neutralizing IgG4 antibodies block IgE-mediated responses: Novel biomarker of subcutaneous grass pollen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is associated with induction of serum IgG4-associated inhibitory antibodies that prevent IgE-facilitated allergen binding to B cells. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether SCIT induces nasal allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies with inhibitory activity that correlates closely with clinical response. METHODS: In a cross-sectional controlled study, nasal fluid and sera were collected during the grass pollen season from 10 SCIT-treated patients, 13 untreated allergic patients (with seasonal allergic rhinitis [SAR]), and 12 nonatopic control subjects. Nasal and serum IgE and IgG4 levels to Phleum pratense components were measured by using the Immuno Solid Allergen Chip microarray. Inhibitory activity was measured by IgE-facilitated allergen binding assay. IL-10+ regulatory B cells were quantified in peripheral blood by using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Nasal and serum Phl p 1- and Phl p 5-specific IgE levels were increased in patients with SAR compared to nonatopic control subjects (all, P < .001) and SCIT-treated patients (nasal, P < .001; serum Phl p 5, P = .073). Nasal IgG4 levels were increased in the SCIT group compared to those in the SAR group (P < .001) during the pollen season compared to out of season. IgG-associated inhibitory activity in nasal fluid and serum was significantly increased in the SCIT group compared to that in the SAR (both, P < .01). The magnitude of the inhibitory activity was 93% (P < .001) in nasal fluid compared to 66% (P < .001) in serum and was reversed after depletion of IgG. Both nasal fluid (r = -0.69, P = .0005) and serum (r = -0.552, P = .0095) blocking activity correlated with global symptom improvement. IL-10+ regulatory B cells were increased in season compared to out of season in the SCIT group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: For the first time, we show that nasal IgG4-associated inhibitory activity correlates closely with the clinical response to allergen immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.

IgG4 inhibits peanut-induced basophil and mast cell activation in peanut-tolerant children sensitized to peanut major allergens.

BACKGROUND: Most children with detectable peanut-specific IgE (P-sIgE) are not allergic to peanut. We addressed 2 non-mutually exclusive hypotheses for the discrepancy between allergy and sensitization: (1) differences in P-sIgE levels between children with peanut allergy (PA) and peanut-sensitized but tolerant (PS) children and (2) the presence of an IgE inhibitor, such as peanut-specific IgG4 (P-sIgG4), in PS patients. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-eight children (108 patients with PA, 77 PS patients, and 43 nonsensitized nonallergic subjects) were studied. Levels of specific IgE and IgG4 to peanut and its components were determined. IgE-stripped basophils or a mast cell line were used in passive sensitization activation and inhibition assays. Plasma of PS subjects and patients submitted to peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) were depleted of IgG4 and retested in inhibition assays. RESULTS: Basophils and mast cells sensitized with plasma from patients with PA but not PS patients showed dose-dependent activation in response to peanut. Levels of sIgE to peanut and its components could only partially explain differences in clinical reactivity between patients with PA and PS patients. P-sIgG4 levels (P = .023) and P-sIgG4/P-sIgE (P < .001), Ara h 1-sIgG4/Ara h 1-sIgE (P = .050), Ara h 2-sIgG4/Ara h 2-sIgE (P = .004), and Ara h 3-sIgG4/Ara h 3-sIgE (P = .016) ratios were greater in PS children compared with those in children with PA. Peanut-induced activation was inhibited in the presence of plasma from PS children with detectable P-sIgG4 levels and POIT but not from nonsensitized nonallergic children. Depletion of IgG4 from plasma of children with PS (and POIT) sensitized to Ara h 1 to Ara h 3 partially restored peanut-induced mast cell activation (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in sIgE levels and allergen specificity could not justify the clinical phenotype in all children with PA and PS children. Blocking IgG4 antibodies provide an additional explanation for the absence of clinical reactivity in PS patients sensitized to major peanut allergens.

Basophil Activation Test Reduces Oral Food Challenges to Nuts and Sesame.

BACKGROUND: Nut allergic patients are often IgE sensitized to other nuts/seeds and need multiple oral food challenges (OFCs) before the safe nuts can be introduced in the diet. However, OFCs are time-consuming and risky procedures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) to predict the allergic status and reduce the need for an OFC in children with 1 or more nut or seed allergies. METHODS: Participants in the Pronuts study recruited at the Geneva and the London centers were tested on the BAT to hazelnut, cashew nut, sesame, almond, and peanut, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 6, using FlowCAST, a commercially available BAT kit, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: The BAT to hazelnut, cashew nut, sesame, almond, and peanut discriminated between allergic and nonallergic children, to the respective nut or seed. The optimal allergen concentration and their optimal, positive, and negative cutoffs were identified for the BAT and the other tests, for each nut and seed. Using the BAT as a second step in the diagnostic process, after equivocal skin prick test and IgE to extracts and components, reduced the number of total OFCs by 5% to 15% and positive OFCs by 33% to 75% (except for hazelnut) with 0% false-negatives and a diagnostic accuracy of 96% to 100%. CONCLUSION: The BAT proved to be a useful diagnostic tool, used in a stepwise approach, to predict the allergic status and reduce the number of OFCs in the Pronuts study participants with at least 1 nut allergy willing to consume selected nuts.