Functional Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty Using a Novel Three-Dimensional Virtual Mesh Imaging System With Fluoroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Optimal position of total hip arthroplasty (THA) components is critical for joint mechanics and stability. Acetabular component positioning during supine surgery in direct anterior approach (DAA) THA may be different in the standing position postoperatively, which traditional fluoroscopy is unable to predict. A novel 3-dimensional (3D) image analysis technology (IAT) that uses artificial intelligence to measure the tilt and rotation of the pelvis has enabled prediction of component positioning from supine to standing. The purpose of this study was to compare intraoperative fluoroscopy, non-3D-IAT, and 3D-IAT with postoperative standing radiographs to assess the accuracy of component positioning. METHODS: From 2022 to 2023, 30 consecutive patients (86.6% women, mean age 59 [range, 55 to 67]) undergoing primary DAA THA with the use of the 3D-IAT were identified. A separate cohort of 148 patients from 2020 to 2021 (85% women, mean age 65 [range, 55 to 69]) who underwent DAA THA with non-3D-IAT was used for comparison. Leg length discrepancy (LLD), cup anteversion, and inclination were manually measured on intraoperative fluoroscopic images and digitally measured using IAT. Follow-up evaluation occurred at 1 month with standing pelvis radiographs measured using Ein Bild Röntgen Analyze-Cup software. Measurements were compared via Wilcoxon signed rank tests where P ≤ .05 indicates significantly different measurements. RESULTS: Median LLD, inclination, and anteversion measurements via non-3D-IAT and fluoroscopy were significantly different compared to postoperative standing radiographs (P < .001). The 3D-IAT more accurately predicted LLD, abduction, and anteversion, with values not significantly different from postoperative standing measurements (P = .23, P = .93, and P = .36, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the 3D-IAT during DAA THA allowed for the more accurate prediction of acetabular component position in the standing position postoperatively.

High Rate of Unplanned Reoperation for Interprosthetic Femur Fractures After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Interprosthetic femur fractures (IPFFs) are a rare, but devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty. There is limited evidence to help guide their management. The purpose of this study was to describe the features, treatment, and outcomes of surgically managed IPFFs. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 75 patients who had 76 IPFFs. The mean age at the time of IPFF was 75 years (range, 29 to 94), and 78% were women. The mean body mass index was 30 (range, 19 to 51), and the mean follow-up was 3 years (range, 0 to 14). There were 16 Vancouver B1 fractures, 28 Vancouver B2 fractures, 2 Vancouver B3 fractures, and 30 Vancouver C fractures. All B1 fractures underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). All Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures underwent revision arthroplasty, including 1 proximal femur replacement and 1 total femur replacement. Vancouver C fractures were treated with ORIF (n = 20), distal femoral replacement (n = 9), and in 1 case, total femur replacement (n = 1). Kaplan-Meier survivorship was used to calculate 2-year survival free from all-cause reoperation and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). RESULTS: The 2-year survivorship-free rate from reoperation was 71%. There were 18 reoperations following initial surgical management of the IPFF, including 9 for infection, 3 for refracture, 3 for nonunion, 2 for hardware failure, and 1 for instability. An initial IPFF involving a stemmed femoral total knee arthroplasty component was associated with increased risk for reoperation (P = .007) and PJI (P = .044). There was no difference in survivorship free of reoperation between IPFFs managed with ORIF or revision arthroplasty (P = .72). CONCLUSIONS: An IPFF is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty with high reoperation rates, most commonly secondary to PJI. Those IPFFs that occurred between 2 stemmed components were at the highest risk for reoperation.

A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. METHODS: A consecutive series of 113 patients (72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 ± 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. RESULTS: There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 ± 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 ± 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P > .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 ± 26.6 versus 46.7 ± 2 6.4 mm, P = .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 ± 3.5 versus 2.4 ± 3.2 mm, P = .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs.

Initial Outcomes of Single versus Multiple-Plug Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Although several prior studies have described the outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for single osteochondral lesions, there is a paucity of comparative data on outcomes of single versus multiple OCA transplants. We aimed to describe the initial outcomes of single-plug versus multiple-plug knee OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients undergoing single-plug and multiple-plug OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data of patients undergoing OCA transplantation for large (>2 cm2) osteochondral defects of the knee. Thirty patients who underwent multiple-plug (2 + ) OCA transplants (either single surface using the snowman technique or multi-surface) were 1:1 age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) matched with 30 patients who underwent single-plug OCA transplants. PROMs, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores, were obtained both preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Failure was defined as a revision OCA or conversion to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The cohort comprised 30 females (31 affected left knees), with an average age of 37 ± 10.3 years and median follow-up of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 1.7-2.5 years). There was a significant increase in PROMs from the preoperative to the postoperative period for the entire cohort and the single-plug versus multiple-plug subgroups (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROM (p > 0.05). There were two failures, both in the single-plug group, with a mean time to failure of 3.5 years. There was no difference in the initial outcomes between patients undergoing single-plug versus multiple-plug OCA transplant at the short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level IV, case series.