RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional-flow cardiac MR (4DF-MR) offers advantages in primary mitral regurgitation. The relationship between 4DF-MR-derived mitral regurgitant volume (MR-Rvol) and the post-operative left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling has not yet been established. PURPOSE: To ascertain if the 4DF-MR-derived MR-Rvol correlates with the LV reverse remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, single-center, two arm, interventional vs. nonintervention observational study. POPULATION: Forty-four patients (male N = 30; median age 68 [59-75]) with at least moderate primary mitral regurgitation; either awaiting mitral valve surgery (repair [MVr], replacement [MVR]) or undergoing "watchful waiting" (WW). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 5 T/Balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence/Phase contrast imaging/Multishot echo-planar imaging pulse sequence (five shots). ASSESSMENT: Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), phase-contrast MR (PMRI), 4DF-MR and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at baseline, and a follow-up PMRI and 6MWT at 6 months. MR-Rvol was quantified by PMRI, 4DF-MR, and TTE by one observer. The pre-operative MR-Rvol was correlated with the post-operative decrease in the LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi). STATISTICAL TESTS: Included Student t-test/Mann-Whitney test/Fisher's exact test, Bland-Altman plots, linear regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: While Bland-Altman plots demonstrated similar bias between all the modalities, the limits of agreement were narrower between 4DF-MR and PMRI (bias 15; limits of agreement -36 mL to 65 mL), than between 4DF-MR and TTE (bias -8; limits of agreement -106 mL to 90 mL) and PMRI and TTE (bias -23; limits of agreement -105 mL to 59 mL). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between the MR-Rvol and the post-operative decrease in the LVEDVi, when the MR-Rvol was quantified by PMRI and 4DF-MR, but not by TTE (P = 0.73). 4DF-MR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance for reduction in the post-operative LVEDVi with the largest area under the curve (4DF-MR 0.83; vs. PMRI 0.78; and TTE 0.51; P = 0.89). DATA CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential clinical utility of 4DF-MR in the assessment of primary mitral regurgitation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Exercise imaging using current modalities can be challenging. This was patient focused study to establish the feasibility and reproducibility of exercise-cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (EX-CMR) acquired during continuous in-scanner exercise in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: This was a prospective, feasibility study. Biventricular volumes/function, aortic flow volume, MR volume (MR-Rvol) and regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) were assessed at rest and during low- (Low-EX) and moderate-intensity exercise (Mod-EX) in asymptomatic patients with primary MR. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients completed EX-CMR without complications. Whilst there were no significant changes in the left ventricular (LV) volumes, there was a significant increase in the LVEF (rest 63 ± 5% vs. Mod-EX 68 ± 6%;p = 0.01). There was a significant reduction in the right ventricular (RV) end-systolic volume (rest 68 ml(60-75) vs. Mod-EX 46 ml(39-59);p < 0.001) and a significant increase in the RV ejection fraction (rest 55 ± 5% vs. Mod-EX 65 ± 8%;p < 0.001). Whilst overall, there were no significant group changes in the MR-Rvol and MR-RF, individual responses were variable, with MR-Rvol increasing by ≥ 15 ml in 4(16%) patients and decreasing by ≥ 15 ml in 9(36%) of patients. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of LV volumes and aortic flow measurements were excellent, including at Mod-EX. CONCLUSION: EX-CMR is feasible and reproducible in patients with primary MR. During exercise, there is an increase in the LV and RV ejection fraction, reduction in the RV end-systolic volume and a variable response of MR-Rvol and MR-RF. Understanding the individual variability in MR-Rvol and MR-RF during physiological exercise may be clinically important.