Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aust Health Rev ; 29(2): 240-6, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15865576

RESUMO

Medical practitioners with varying levels of experience may make medical decisions in hospitals. Little is known about who is responsible for these decisions. We determined transfusion appropriateness during an audit of blood transfusion, before developing practice improvement strategies, by concurrent medical record review. The prescriber could be determined in 78% of transfusion episodes: most were specialist staff. Registrars and after-hours staff prescribed significantly fewer inappropriate transfusions. The findings have significant implications in understanding clinical decision making in the hospital setting and for the targeting of quality improvement strategies in particular.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Território da Capital Australiana , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , New South Wales
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA