Standardized low-molecular-weight heparin bridging regimen in outpatients on oral anticoagulants undergoing invasive procedure or surgery: an inception cohort management study.

BACKGROUND: Bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin is usually recommended in patients who must stop oral anticoagulants before surgical or invasive procedures. To date, there is no universally accepted bridging regimen tailored to the patient's thromboembolic risk. This prospective inception cohort management study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an individualized bridging protocol applied to outpatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Oral anticoagulants were stopped 5 days before the procedure. Low-molecular-weight heparin was started 3 to 4 days before surgery and continued for 6 days after surgery at 70 anti-factor Xa U/kg twice daily in high-thromboembolic-risk patients and prophylactic once-daily doses in moderate- to low-risk patients. Oral anticoagulation was resumed the day after the procedure with a boost dose of 50% for 2 days and maintenance doses afterward. The patients were followed up for 30 days. Of the 1262 patients included in the study (only 15% had mechanical valves), 295 (23.4%) were high-thromboembolic-risk patients and 967 (76.6%) were moderate- to low-risk patients. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were 5 thromboembolic events (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.9), all in high-thromboembolic-risk patients. There were 15 major (1.2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.0) and 53 minor (4.2%; 95% confidence interval, 3.2 to 5.5) bleeding episodes. Major bleeding was associated with twice-daily low-molecular-weight heparin administration (high-risk patients) but not with the bleeding risk of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This management bridging protocol, tailored to patients' thromboembolic risk, appears to be feasible, effective, and safe for many patients, but safety in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves has not been conclusively established.

Effectiveness and safety of a management protocol to correct over-anticoagulation with oral vitamin K: a retrospective study of 1,043 cases.

BACKGROUND: Timely reversal of excessive anticoagulation is important in preventing bleeding complications. The use of vitamin K in correcting over-anticoagulation is widely accepted to be superior to discontinuation of therapy but its effectiveness and safety in large scale cohort studies has not been assessed. METHODS: According to our protocol, 2 mg of oral vitamin K in addition to omitting the day's dose of warfarin, were administered to all patients presenting INR levels >or=5.0 and below 10.0; the INR values were checked 20 h after vitamin K administration. The rate of decay of INR, bleeding and thromboembolic complications at presentation and the following 30 days, as well as resistance to warfarin were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 1,611 events, 1,043 (878 patients) met the selection criteria. The median (interquartile range) INR was 6.64 (6.12-7.52) at presentation (day zero) and fell to a median (interquartile range) INR of 2.72 (2.18-3.52, P < 0.0001) after the vitamin K administration (day one) and 90.6% of the INRs were below 4.5. In 98 (9.4%) instances the INR values did not fall below the safe limit of 4.5 and in 173 (17%) instances the INR values were overcorrected to below 2.0. Median INR value on day zero in these two groups was higher (7.3 vs. 6.6, P < 0.0001) and lower (6.5 vs. 6.7, P = 0.049) than that of the remaining cases, respectively. Overcorrection occurred more frequently in women (P = 0.0002). Female gender was an independent factor associated with INR overcorrection (P = 0.001; OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.3). The INRs on day one were inside, above and below the therapeutic range in 44%, 36% and 20% respectively. Warfarin resistance was observed in six cases (0.6%). Major bleeding was reported in one case (1.1 per 100 patient-years), minor bleeding in 14 cases (16.1 per 100 patient-years) and thromboembolic events in six high risk patients (6.9 per 100 patient-years) during the one month period following vitamin K administration. CONCLUSIONS: This adopted protocol for the reversal of excessive anticoagulation in asymptomatic or minor symptom presenting patients is easily applied, effective in lowering the INR and preventing complications. Its use in high risk thromboembolic patients warrants caution.

Lower versus standard intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in elderly warfarin-experienced patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

It has been observed that elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) benefit from standard [an international normalised ratio (INR) goal of 2.0-3.0] oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). The hypothesis that lower-intensity anticoagulation therapy can offset the higher bleeding risk in this population has never been tested in an 'ad hoc' clinical trial. Patients over 75 years of age with NVAF were randomised to receive warfarin to maintain the INR at 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) or at a standard target of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0). There were 135 patients in the low-intensity and 132 in the standard-intensity groups. During a mean follow-up lasting 5.1 years, 59 primary outcome events (thromboembolism and major haemorrhage) were recorded, 24 (3.5 per 100 patient-years) in the low-intensity group and 35 (5.0 per 100 patient-years) in the standard-intensity group (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.1, p=0.1). The reduction in the primary endpoint was mainly due to a diminution in major bleedings (1.9 vs. 3.0 per 100 patient-years; HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.1). The median achieved INR value was 1.86 in the low-intensity and 2.24 in the standard-intensity group (p<0.001). The frequency of INR testing was 26.1 +/- 13.5 vs. 24.3 +/- 11.6 days, p<0.0001). In this exploratory study we observed a low rate of stroke and major bleeding in elderly patients (>75) being managed in an anticoagulation clinic for primary stroke prevention with low-intensity anticoagulation (INR 1.5-2.0). However, further trials are needed to confirm the hypothesis generated by the present study.