Radiotherapy of breast cancer.

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an essential component of the treatment of breast cancer. After conservative surgery for an infiltrating carcinoma, radiotherapy must be systematically performed, regardless of the characteristics of the disease, because it decreases the rate of local recurrence and by this way, specific mortality. A boost dose over the tumour bed is required if the patient is younger than 50 years-old. Partial breast irradiation could be routinely proposed as an alternative to whole breast irradiation, but only in selected and informed patients. For ductal carcinoma in situ, adjuvant radiotherapy must be also systematically performed after lumpectomy. After mastectomy, chest wall irradiation is required for pT3-T4 tumours and if there is an axillary nodal involvement, whatever the number of involved lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy, in case of pN0 disease, chest wall irradiation is recommended if there is a clinically or radiologically T3-T4 or node positive disease before chemotherapy. Axillary irradiation is recommended only if there is no axillary surgical dissection and a positive sentinel lymph node. Supra- and infraclavicular irradiation is advised in case of positive axillary nodes. Internal mammary irradiation must be discussed case by case, according to the benefit/risk ratio (cardiac toxicity). Hypofractionation regimens (42.5Gy in 16 fractions, or 41,6Gy en 13 or 40Gy en 15) are equivalent to conventional irradiation and must prescribe after tumorectomy in selected patients. Delineation of the breast, the chest wall and the nodal areas are based on clinical and radiological evaluations. 3D-conformal irradiation is the recommended technique, intensity-modulated radiotherapy must be proposed only in specific clinical situations. Respiratory gating could be useful to decrease the cardiac dose. Concomitant administration of chemotherapy in unadvised, but hormonal treatment could be start with or after radiotherapy.

Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy vs mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ: French Survey experience.

From March 2003 to April 2004, 77 physicians throughout France prospectively recruited 1289 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients and collected data on diagnosis, patient and tumour characteristics, and treatments. Median age was 56 years (range, 30-84). Ductal carcinoma in situ was diagnosed by mammography in 87.6% of patients. Mastectomy, conservative surgery alone (CS) and CS with radiotherapy (CS+RT) were performed in 30.5, 7.8 and 61.7% of patients, respectively. Thus, 89% of patients treated by CS received adjuvant RT. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and axillary dissection (AD) were performed in 21.3 and 10.4% of patients, respectively. Hormone therapy was administered to 13.4% of the patients (80% tamoxifen). Median tumour size was 14.5 mm (6, 11 and 35 mm for CS, CS+RT and mastectomy, respectively, P<0.0001). Nuclear grade was high in 21% of patients, intermediate in 38.5% and low in 40.5%. Excision was considered complete in 92% (CS) and 88.3% (CS+RT) of patients. Oestrogen receptors were positive in 69.8% of assessed cases (31%). Treatment modalities varied widely according to region: mastectomy rate, 20-37%; adjuvant RT, 84-96%; hormone treatment, 6-34%. Our survey on current DCIS management in France has highlighted correlations between pathological features (tumour size, margin and grade) and treatment options, with several similar variations to those observed in recent UK and US studies.

EUSOMA position regarding breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and the use of textured implants.

During the last two decades the number of breast implants used in aesthetic, oncologic and risk reducing surgery has increased substantially mainly due to the improvement and confirmed safety of these devices. Since identification of the first case of anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with a breast implant (BIA-ALCL) 20 years ago, there has been an increase in the number of reports of this very rare disease, demonstrating a clear association with breast implants. Whilst the majority of cases are localised and cured by implant removal and full capsulectomy, a small percentage require chemotherapy and the mortality rate is very low. The evidence linking BIA-ALCL to implant surface texturing, as the majority of cases were diagnosed in patients with textured implants, has raised concerns about the long term safety of these devices resulting in patient and regulatory authority concerns globally. We hereby present the current published knowledge about the link between BIA-ALCL and implant surface texture and a review of current regulatory and professional body advice across Europe, which may enable a better understanding of this rare disease, how to manage and ultimately prevent it. We conclude by giving EUSOMA recommendation, towards the unnecessary change in attitudes towards implant based surgery, according to the most recent available published evidence as long as patients are properly informed about the risk of BIA-ALCL.

The Assisi Think Tank Meeting Survey of post-mastectomy radiation therapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: Suggestions for routine practice.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for local recurrence after mastectomy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) emerged as a grey area during the second "Assisi Think Tank Meeting" (ATTM) on Breast Cancer. AIM: To review practice patterns of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in DCIS, identify risk factors for recurrence and select suitable candidates for PMRT. METHODS: A questionnaire concerning DCIS management, focusing on PMRT, was distributed online via SurveyMonkey. RESULTS: 142 responses were received from 15 countries. The majority worked in academic institutions, had 5-20 years work-experience and irradiated <5 DCIS patients/year. PMRT was more given if: surgical margins <1 mm, high-grade, multicentricity, young age, tumour size >5 cm, skin- or nipple- sparing mastectomy. Moderate hypofractionation was the most common schedule, except after immediate breast reconstruction (57% conventional fractionation). CONCLUSIONS: The present survey highlighted risk factors for PMRT administration, which should be further evaluated.

Concurrent trastuzumab with adjuvant radiotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: acute toxicity analyses from the French multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab (T) combined with chemotherapy has been recently shown to improve outcome in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxic effects of concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and T administration in the adjuvant setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 146 patients with stages II-III HER2-positive BC were recorded. Median age was 46 years. In all, 32 (23%) and 114 (77%) patients received a weekly and a 3-week T schedule, respectively. A median dose of 50 Gy was delivered after surgery. Internal mammary chain (IMC) was irradiated in 103 (71%) patients. RESULTS: Grade >2 dermatitis and esophagitis were noted in 51% and 12%, respectively. According to the Common Toxicity Criteria v3.0 scale and HERA (HERceptin Adjuvant) trial criteria, respectively, 10% and 6% of the patients had a grade >/=2 of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decrease after RT. Multivariate analyses revealed two independent prognostic factors: weekly T administration (for LVEF decrease) and menopausal status (for dermatitis). Higher level of T cumulative dose (>1600 mg) was only borderline of statistical significance for acute esophagitis toxicity. CONCLUSION: We showed that weekly concurrent T and RT are feasible in daily clinical practice with, however, a decrease of LVEF. Cardiac volume sparing and patient selections for IMC irradiation are highly recommended. Longer follow-up is warranted to evaluate late toxic effects.

[Role for aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in menopaused women: facts and questions in 2005]. / Place des inhibiteurs de l'aromatase dans le cancer du sein de la femme ménopausée, en situation adjuvante: les acquis et les incertitudes en 2005.

After a dominant role for more than 30 years, tamoxifen has been progressively replaced by aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer in the menopaused woman. We present here a recall of the mechanisms of action involved together with a review of clinical trials leading to the current situation. Giving trial results in detail, we discuss the current evidence as well as open questions. The populations concerned and trial methodologies are analyzed. Comparative tolerance is detailed. Several questions remain open, either due to the lack of evidence to be obtained from ongoing trials or sufficient follow-up. The evidence presented is commented in light of the American (ASCO) and European (Saint-Gallen) or French (Saint-Paul) guidelines.

[Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBRT): Results and indications]. / Irradiation hypofractionnée du sein : résultats et indications.

Breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery is essential for maximizing local control and overall survival. The increase of breast cancer (BC) incidence, constraints of classical five weeks (w) radiation regimens and scarcity of radiotherapy units have led to test short hypofractionated WBRT schemes. One pilot study and three prospective randomized trials have tested various hypofractionated regimens of WBRT. About 7000 patients were included and follow-up ranged from 5 to 12 years. The conclusion of these trials is similar, showing local control and toxicity equivalent to these of the standard regimens. Three schemes are now clearly validated: 42.5Gy/16fr/3w, 40Gy/15fr/3w, or 42Gy/13fr/5w. However, the majority of included patients had favorable prognostic factors, were treated to the breast only and the boost dose, when indicated, was delivered with a standard fractionation. Therefore, we recommend the regimens preferentially in patients treated to the breast only, and without nodal involvement. These studies did not evaluate the addition of a boost dose with a hypofractionated scheme. If a boost is to be given, a standard fractionation should be used. Particular care should be taken to avoid heterogeneities leading to high fraction doses to organs at risk (lung and heart).

Breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: Impact of boost and tamoxifen on local recurrences.

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ represents 15 to 20% of all breast cancers. Breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation was performed in about 60% of the cases. This study reports local recurrence rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation with or without boost and/or tamoxifen and compares different therapeutic options in two European countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2007, 819 patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ were collected, both in France (266) and Italy (553). Median age was 56. All underwent breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation; 391 (48%) received a boost (55% in France and 45% in Italy, P=0.017) and 173 (22.5%) tamoxifen (4.5% in France and 32% in Italy, P<0.0001). RESULTS: With a 90-month median follow-up, there were 51 local recurrences (6.2%), including 27 invasive (53%). The 5- and 10-year local recurrence rates were 4% and 8.6%. Two patients developed axillary recurrence and 12 (1.5%) metastases (seven after invasive local recurrence); 41 (5%) patients had contralateral breast cancer. In the multivariate analysis, high nuclear grade and lack of tamoxifen are the most powerful predictors of local recurrence, with 2.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.74-3.89, P=0.0012) and 2.85 (95% CI: 1.42-5.72, P=0.04) odds ratio (OR) estimates, respectively. Age, margin status and boost did not influence local recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the ductal carcinoma in situ treatment heterogeneity among countries and the unfavourable prognostic role of nuclear grade. Tamoxifen reduces local recurrence rates and might be considered for some subgroups of patients, but further confirmation is required. The boost usefulness still remains unclear.

[Radiotherapy of breast cancer]. / Radiothérapie du cancer du sein.

In breast cancer, radiotherapy is an essential component of the treatment. After conservative surgery for an infiltrating carcinoma, radiotherapy must be systematically performed, regardless of the characteristics of the disease, because it decreases the rate of local recurrence and by this way, specific mortality. Partial breast irradiation could not be proposed routinely but only in very selected and informed patients. For ductal carcinoma in situ, adjuvant radiotherapy must be also systematically performed after lumpectomy. After mastectomy, chest wall irradiation is required for pT3-T4 tumours and if there is an axillary nodal involvement, whatever the number of involved lymph nodes. After neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy, in case of pN0 disease, chest wall irradiation is recommended if there is a clinically or radiologically T3-T4 or node positive disease before chemotherapy. Axillary irradiation is recommended only if there is no axillary surgical dissection and a positive sentinel lymph node. Supra and infra-clavicular irradiation is advised in case of positive axillary nodes. Internal mammary irradiation must be discussed case by case, according to the benefit/risk ratio (cardiac toxicity). Dose to the chest wall or the breast must be between 45-50Gy with a conventional fractionation. A boost dose over the tumour bed is required if the patient is younger than 60 years old. Hypofractionation (42.5 Gy in 16 fractions, or 41.6 Gy en 13 or 40 Gy en 15) is possible after tumorectomy and if a nodal irradiation is not mandatory. Delineation of the breast, the chest wall and the nodal areas are based on clinical and radiological evaluations. 3D-conformal irradiation is the recommended technique, intensity-modulated radiotherapy must be proposed only in case of specific clinical situations. Respiratory gating could be useful to decrease the cardiac dose. Concomitant administration of chemotherapy in unadvised, but hormonal treatment could be start with radiotherapy.

Impact of screening on clinicopathological features and treatment for invasive breast cancer: results of two national surveys.

PURPOSE: Several studies showed a breast cancer downstaging due to screening. A first national survey was conducted in France in 2001-2002 to evaluate in the current clinical practice the clinicopathological features and treatments of 1049 firstly operated breast cancers. In order to assess the impact of the national screening program implemented in all regions in France in 2004, a new survey was performed in 2007-2008. MATERIAL: The new survey included 1433 firstly operated breast cancers prospectively collected. These new data were compared to the results of the first national survey. RESULTS: According to TN classification, we found in the second survey T0: 27.6%, T1: 48.6%, T2: 21.3%, T3T4: 3.8% and Tx: 0.7%. Infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinomas represented 80% and 13% of tumours. Hormone receptors were positive in 85.3% and Her-2 overexpressed in 12.4% of tumours (83.9% and 20.6% in the first survey); 68.2% and 32% were pN0 and pN1-3. Lumpectomy and mastectomy were performed in 77% and 23% of the cases. Axillary dissection, sentinel node biopsy or both were performed in 42.6%, 41% and 16.4% of the cases, respectively. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and trastuzumab were given to 93%, 51%, 83% and 9.3% of the patients. Compared with the results from the first survey, we found an increase of infraclinical lesions (T0 from 8.4 to 27.6%) and a wide decrease of pN+ rate (from 44% to 32%). The mastectomy rate was constant (23%), as well as radiotherapy use, whereas chemotherapy use decreased from 62.8 to 55.6%. CONCLUSION: A complete national screening coverage clearly provides a favourable modification of breast cancer clinicopathological features. Both locoregional and adjuvant treatments were greatly downscaled.

[Male breast cancer: prognostic factors, diagnosis and treatment: a multi-institutional survey of 95 cases]. / Le cancer du sein chez l'homme: approche épidémiologique, diagnostique, et thérapeutique: étude multicentrique rétrospective à propos de 95 cas.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment for male breast cancer is not known because male breast cancer is a rare disease. It represents as little as 0.6% of all breast cancers and less than 1% of human cancers. The aim was to analyze the clinical, histological and therapeutic characteristics of 95 men cared for breast cancer between 2000 and 2010 in four hospitals, and determine predictors of poor prognosis to improve care of male breast cancer. METHODS: This study is a multi-institutional survey, retrospective, involving four French institutions: Cancer Institute of the West (ICO), Reunion Island South hospital group, the hospital group of Dax, and the Bergonié Institute. All carcinomas in situ or invasive breast occurred in male patients were included. An analysis of clinical, histological and therapeutic features was performed. Statistical analysis of our study focused on the overall survival of patients and specific method of Kaplan-Meier, enabling search for predictors of poor prognosis. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 years. Thirty-seven percent of patients were overweight or obese. It was in 88% of cases of palpable tumor whose average size was 26.29mm. Ninety patients, none had a lesion palpable T0, 44% T1 tumors, 38% T2 tumors, 3% had a T3 tumors, and finally 10% T4 tumors. The histological type was the most common invasive ductal carcinoma (87%). He found a similar proportion of patients with or without lymph node involvement. N+ patients, capsular rupture was observed in 29% of cases. Receptor positivity was found, estrogen in 95% of cases and progesterone in 83% of cases. Additional irradiation was performed in 75% of patients and chemotherapy in 37% of patients. Overall survival was 79.2% at five years and 70.8% at ten years. Age, tumor size and histological capsular rupture are factors that significantly influence the overall survival and specific. CONCLUSION: Male breast cancer is a different pathology of breast cancer in women. The majority of recommendations suggest treating men who are diagnosed with breast cancer, using the guidelines applied to postmenopausal women treatments. There is no study based on male population that has evaluated these treatment modalities in terms of impact on survival. The diagnosis is usually made at later stages, and tumor size is often greater. Histological characteristics also differ. However, the treatment is almost identical.

'Dosimetric breast size': a new and useful parameter for the prediction of local recurrence after breast conservative treatment.

To evaluate the risk of local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer, we measured the distance between each entry point of the irradiation on the surface of the breast in line with the axis of the external and internal tangential fields (dosimetric breast size). 652 breast cancer patients were retrospectively analysed, with a median age of 51 years and a median follow-up of 99 months (range 84-192). There were 50 local recurrences, 44 isolated and 6 associated with nodal recurrence or metastases. The global rates of local recurrences at 5 and 10 years were 5.3% and 9%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Following a Cox's multivariate analysis, the only significant and independent parameters related to local recurrence were quality of excision, age at diagnosis and dosimetric breast size. For a small dosimetric breast size (< or = 10 cm), the rate of local recurrence was 14.1 compared with 11.8 for medium dosimetric breast size (> 10 cm-< or = 12 cm) and 5.2 for large dosimetric breast size (> 12 cm). If the analysis was restricted to only those with complete excision, then the relative risk for a patient with a small dosimetric breast size was three times that for a large breast size.

Radical surgery and conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

70 cases of strictly intraductal breast carcinoma were treated from January 1975 to December 1987. 34 patients underwent radical modified mastectomy, and 36 patients had local excision (2), lumpectomy (26) or quadrantectomy (8), with a complementary irradiation in 34/36 cases (with boost in 32). The main histological subtype is comedocarcinoma (25/70). One local relapse (3%) is noted in radical surgery group at 55 months. 3 local relapses (9%) are noted in conservative treatment group, respectively at 27, 48 and 52 months. The obvious factor influencing the local recurrence is the inefficient surgical excision. Since breast screening programs may lead to early duct carcinoma in situ identification, our results suggest that appropriate conservative surgery associated to radiation therapy could be an adequate alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of this in situ lesion.

Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases.

From 1960 to 1986, 397 cases of non-metastatic male breast cancer (MBC) treated in 14 French regional cancer centres were reviewed. The median age was 64 years (range 25-93). TNM classification (UICC, 1978) showed seven T0, 79 T1, 162 T2, 31 T3, 74 T4 and 44 unclassified tumours (Tx). Clinical positive lymph nodes were found in 31% of the patients. 24 patients received radiotherapy only, and 373 underwent surgery, 247 of these with postoperative irradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy were used in 71 and 68 patients, respectively. There were 382 infiltrating carcinomas and 15 pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Lymph node involvement was found in 56% of infiltrating carcinoma. The oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors were positive in 79% and 77%, respectively, of examined cases. Isolated local and regional recurrence were observed in 8.8% and 4.5% of cases, respectively and 40% of patients developed metastases. The crude survival rates by Kaplan-Meier method were 65% and 38% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and the disease-specific survival rates (without death due to intercurrent disease or second cancer) was 74% at 5 years and 51% at 10 years. The disease-specific survival rate for pN- and pN+ groups were 77% and 39% at 10 years. The prognostic factors were clinical size (T) and histological axillary status (pN-/pN+). The relative risk of death for pN- was 1.0, 2.0 and 3.2 in the T0-T1, T2 and T3-T4 groups, respectively. For pN+, these relative risks increased 1.9, 3.9 and 6.0 in the same groups. The optimal treatment include modified radical mastectomy and irradiation for cases with risk factors of local relapse (nodal invasion, large tumour with cutaneous or muscular involvement). Locoregional failure had unfavourable prognosis. First-line adjuvant treatment seems to be tamoxifen, due to the very high rate of positive hormonal receptors and the old age of the patients, which contraindicate chemotherapy in many cases. The prognosis of patients with breast cancer is the same in male and female patients when disease-specific survival rate, tumour size and axillary involvement are compared.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast results of conservative and radical treatments in 716 patients.

Until now, less than 5% of the patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been enrolled in clinical trials. Consequently, we have analysed the results of "current practice" among 716 women treated in eight French Cancer Centres from 1985 to 1992: 441 cases (61.6%) corresponded to impalpable lesions, 92 had a clinical size of less than or equal to 2 cm and 70 from 2 to 5 cm; in 113 cases, the size was unspecified. Median age was 53.2 years (range: 21-87 years). 145 patients underwent mastectomy (RS) and 571 conservative surgery (CS) without (136) or with (435) radiotherapy (CS+RT). The mean histological tumour sizes in these three groups were 25.6, 8.2, 14.8 mm, respectively (P<0.0001). After a 91-month median follow-up, local recurrence (LR) rates were 2.1, 30.1 and 13.8% in the RS, CS and CS +RT groups, respectively (P=0.001); LR were invasive in 59 and 60% in the CS and CS+RT groups, respectively. In these groups, the 8-year LR rates were 31.3 and 13.9%, respectively (P=0.0001). Nodal recurrence occurred in 3.7 and 1.8% in the CS and CS+RT groups. Metastases rates were 1.4, 4.4 and 1.4% in the RS, CS and CS+RT groups. Among the 60 cases of invasive LR, in CS and CS+RT groups 19% developed metastases. After multivariate analysis, we did not identify any significant LR risk factor in the CS group, whereas young age (<40 years) and incomplete excision were significant in the CS+RT group (P=0.012 and P=0.02, respectively).

Breast cancer in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease: clinical and pathological analysis of 76 cases in 63 patients.

In a retrospective multicentric analysis, 63 women treated between 1941 to 1988 for Hodgkin's disease (HD) subsequently developed 76 breast cancers (BC). The median age at diagnosis of HD was 26 years (range 7-67), and 22 women (35%) were 20 years old or less. Exclusive radiotherapy (RT) was used in 36 women (57%) and combined modalities with chemotherapy (CT) in 25 (39%). Breast cancer occurred after a median interval of 16 years (range 2-40) and the median age at diagnosis of the first BC was 42 years (range 25-73). TNM classification (UICC, 1978) showed 10 T0 (non-palpable lesions) (13%), 20 T1 (26%), 22 T2 (29%), 8 T3 (11%), 7 T4 (9%) and 9 Tx (12%), giving altogether a total of 76 tumours, including, respectively, 5 and 8 bilateral synchronous and metachronous lesions. Among the 68 tumours initially discovered, 53 ductal infiltrating, one lobular infiltrating and two medullary carcinomas were found. Moreover, two fibrosarcomas and 10 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were also found. Among 50 axillary dissections for invasive carcinomas, histological involvement was found in 31 cases (62%). 45 tumours were treated by mastectomy, without (n = 35) or with (n = 10) RT. 27 tumours had lumpectomy, without (n = 7) or with RT (n = 20). 2 others received RT only, and one only CT. 7 patients (11%) developed isolated local recurrence. 20 patients (32%) developed metastases and all died; 38 are in complete remission, whereas 5 died of intercurrent disease. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate by the Kaplan-Meier method was 61%. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate for pN0, pN1-3 and pN > or = 3 groups were 91%, 66% and 0%, respectively (P < 0.0001) and 100%, 88%, 64% and 23% for the T0, T1, T2 and T3T4 groups, respectively. These secondary BCs seem to be of two types: a large number of aggressive tumours with a very unfavourable prognosis (especially in the case of pN > 3 and/or T3T4); and many tumours with a 'slow development' such as DCIS and microinvasive lesions, especially in patients treated exclusively by RT. Moreover, a very unusual rate of bilateral tumours (21%) was observed. These secondary BC could be 'in field', in 'border of field' or 'out of field'. However, a complete analysis of doses delivered by supradiaphragmatic irradiation was often very difficult, due to large variations in several parameters. We conclude that young women and girls treated for HD should be carefully monitored by clinical examination, mammography and ultrasonography.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast. Analysis of 31 cases.

From 1970 to 1992, 31 pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the male breast treated in 19 French Regional Cancer Centres were reviewed. They represent 5% of all breast cancers treated in men in the same period. The median age was 58 years, but 6 patients were younger than 40 years. TNM classification (UICC, 1978) showed 12 T0 (discovered only by bloody nipple discharge), 10 T1, 5 T2 and four unclassified tumours (Tx). 11 patients (35.5%) had clinical gynecomastia, and three (10%) had a family history of breast cancer. 6 patients underwent lumpectomy, and 25 mastectomy. Axillary dissection was performed in 19 cases. 6 cases received postoperative irradiation. 15 out of 31 lesions were of the papillary subtype, pure or associated with a cribriform component. The size of the 12 measured lesions varied from 3 to 45 mm. All lymph nodes sampled were negative. With a median follow-up of 83 months, 4 patients (13%) presented a local relapse (LR), respectively, at 12, 27, 36 and 55 months. 3 of these patients had been initially treated by lumpectomy. In one case LR was still in situ, but already infiltrating in the 3 others. Radical salvage surgery was performed in 3 cases, but one patient developed metastases and died 30 months later. The last patient was treated by multiple local excisions and tamoxifen. One 43-year-old patient developed a contralateral DCIS and three others developed a metachronous cancer. The aetiology and risk factors of male breast cancer remain unknown. Gynecomastia, which implies an imbalance between androgen and oestrogen, may be a predisposing factor. As in women, DCIS in the male breast has a good prognosis. Total mastectomy without axillary dissection is the basic treatment. Frequently, the first symptom is a bloody nipple discharge. The age of occurrence is younger than for infiltrating carcinoma, suggesting that DCIS is the first step in the development of breast cancer.

Nine breast angiosarcomas after conservative treatment for breast carcinoma: a survey from French comprehensive Cancer Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a survey of the angiosarcomas developing after breast conservation for carcinoma in the French Cancer Centers, to study the evolution of these cases in detail, and to review literature in an attempt to propose an optimal treatment scheme. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven of the 20 French Cancer Centers agreed to research and retrospectively analyze all angiosarcomas discovered in patients previously treated by conservative treatment. The majority of the patients were node negative, T1N0M0. The mean age of the patients at the time of primary breast cancer treatment was 62.5 years, and 69 years at the diagnosis of the angiosarcoma. RESULTS: During the last two decades, nearly 20,000 patients have been treated conservatively in these 11 centers, and only 9 cases of angiosarcoma were found. The median latency period between the treatment of the breast carcinoma and the diagnosis of the breast angiosarcoma was approximately 74 months, with a range of 57-108 months. Mastectomy was performed as the main treatment of this angiosarcoma. All recurrences after mastectomy for the angiosarcoma appeared within 16 months after the mastectomy. A median time of recurrence was found to be 7.5 months, regardless of the treatment. The angiosarcomas appeared to be very aggressive, and chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and sometimes hyperthermia could only palliate the condition for a short time. After the diagnosis of angiosarcoma, the median survival was 15.5 months, showing a particularly poor prognosis. Only 1 patient of 9 is alive without progressive disease at 32 months after salvage mastectomy for the recurrence of the angiosarcoma. Precise data obtained from 11 centers show that, of 18115 breast carcinomas treated conservatively, only 9 breast angiosarcomas are reported, which represents a prevalence of 5 cases of angiosarcoma per 10,000, which is the same prevalence for primary breast angiosarcomas occurring in healthy breasts. CONCLUSION: Angiosarcoma developing after breast conserving therapy for carcinoma is a rare event, and induction of it by treatment is controversial. However, early diagnosis is essential and it appears that radical mastectomy gives the highest chance of cure and the best long-term survival.

Anal margin carcinoma: 21 cases treated at the Institut Curie by exclusive conservative radiotherapy.

Between 1962 and 1980, 21 patients with anal margin carcinoma were treated with exclusive radiotherapy. They were divided into 4 T1, 7 T2, 8 T3 and 2 T4 cases; only 3 cases presented with an N1 lymph node involvement (1 T2 and 2 T3). The tumor dose was 65 Gy in 22 fractions and 55 days; the inguinal dose was 50 Gy in 15 sessions and 50 days for prophylactic irradiation performed in 9/18 N0 patients, and 65 Gy with a limited 15 Gy boost for the 3 N1 cases. The results are: for T1, 4 patients alive and well out of 4; for T2, 3 out of 7; for T3, 2 out of 8; for T4, 2 out of 2. The overall survival was 11 out of 21 after 5 years. Severe complications occurred in 2 patients out of 21. Sphincter preservation was obtained in 9 patients out of 10 cured cases.

Results of postoperative radiation therapy in medullary carcinoma of the thyroid: a retrospective study by the French Federation of Cancer Institutes--the Radiotherapy Cooperative Group.

Between 1971 and 1989, 59 patients received external radiation therapy with a curative intent. There were 25 females and 34 males, ranging in age from 19 to 87. No patients had distant metastasis at the onset of treatment. The majority of patients had a total thyroidectomy (55/59), generally combined with neck dissection. Residual tumour was left in 11 cases, and 44 patients had positive cervical nodes. Using megavoltage radiotherapy, the whole neck and the upper mediastinum area were most often irradiated through a large anterior Y-shaped field without laryngeal shielding. The mean dose to the tumoral bed was 54 Gy. Dysphagia was observed in 32 patients (11, 17 and 5 scores were grade 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Dyspnea occurred in five cases and in two of these cases, it was considered to be severe. Local recurrences were noted in 18 (30%) patients, most of them occurring within the fields of irradiation. Parameters such as age, sex, total dose, irradiated volumes or cervical node enlargement did not modify the local control rate. The same conclusions can be drawn for distant failures. Thirty five patients are still alive and among them, 24 have no evidence of disease. The average length of survival is 70.5 months and is shortened by the occurrence of distant failures except in patients with bone metastases.