Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems.

BACKGROUND: EOSedge™* (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) is an X-ray imaging system using automatic exposure control (AEC) with tube current modulation, in order to optimize dose deposition in patients. PURPOSE: This study aims at characterizing EOSedge organ dose deposition in comparison to a digital radiography (DR) system and the previous EOS system (EOS-1st generation), in relation to their respective image quality levels. METHOD: Organ doses were measured in an anthropomorphic female adult phantom and a 5-year-old pediatric phantom using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters, which were carefully calibrated within the studied energy range. Organ doses were recorded on the EOSedge and the Fuji Visionary DRF (Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc, Lexington, MA). The resulting effective doses were compared to the EOS-1st-generation values present in the literature. Image quality assessment was carried out on end-user images. Quantitative image quality metrics were computed for all tested modalities on a quality assurance phantom. Qualitative assessment of EOSedge image quality was based on anthropomorphic phantom acquisitions against the EOS-1st-generation system, and on clinical images against the tested DR system. RESULTS: For a full-spine exam, and on the female adult phantom (respectively, the pediatric phantom), an effective dose of 92 µSv (respectively, 32 µSv) was obtained on EOSedge, and 572 µSv (respectively, 179 µSv) on the DR system; these values were compared to effective dose values of 290 µSv (respectively, 200 µSv) from the literature on EOS-1st generation, leading to an effective dose reduction factor of 6 with respect to the DR system, and of 3-6 with respect to EOS-1st generation. EOSedge provides the best compromise between contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and dose, with more consistent CNR values than the other tested modalities, in a range of attenuation from 10 to 40 cm of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Within this range, EOSedge is also comparable to DR for 10 and 20 cm of PMMA, and better than DR for 30 and 40 cm of PMMA, both in terms of spatial resolution and low-contrast detection. The anatomical landmarks of interest in the follow-up of spinal deformities can be detected in all tested modalities. CONCLUSION: Results showed that EOSedge provides significant dose reduction factors for full spine imaging in both adults and children compared to the other tested modalities, without compromising image quality. We believe that this work could help raise awareness on the capabilities of modern X-ray systems, when equipped with appropriate AEC strategies, to perform ultra-low-dose, long-axis images.

Virtual Scoliosis Surgery Using a 3D-Printed Model Based on Biplanar Radiographs.

The aim of this paper is to describe a protocol that simulates the spinal surgery undergone by adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by using a 3D-printed spine model. Patients with AIS underwent pre- and postoperative bi-planar low-dose X-rays from which a numerical 3D model of their spine was generated. The preoperative numerical spine model was subsequently 3D printed to virtually reproduce the spine surgery. Special consideration was given to the printing materials for the 3D-printed elements in order to reflect the radiopaque and mechanical properties of typical bones most accurately. Two patients with AIS were recruited and operated. During the virtual surgery, both pre- and postoperative images of the 3D-printed spine model were acquired. The proposed 3D-printing workflow used to create a realistic 3D-printed spine suitable for virtual surgery appears to be feasible and reliable. This method could be used for virtual-reality scoliosis surgery training incorporating 3D-printed models, and to test surgical instruments and implants.