Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824050

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This is the first interventional study to assess the impact of childhood maltreatment (CM) on psychological treatment outcomes in patients with late-life depression (LLD). METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial with 251 participants aged ≥60 years with moderate to severe depression. Participants were randomly assigned to cognitive behavioral therapy for late life depression (LLD-CBT) or to a supportive intervention (SUI). Treatment outcomes were measured by changes in the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat sample (n = 229), both LLD-CBT (n = 115) and SUI (n = 114) significantly reduced depressive symptoms in patients with CM, with large effects at post-treatment (d = 0.95 [95% CI: 0.65 to 1.25] in LLD-CBT; d = 0.82 [95% CI: 0.52 to 1.12] in SUI). A significant treatment group*CM interaction (F(1,201.31) = 4.71; p = .031) indicated greater depressive symptom reduction in LLD-CBT compared to SUI at week 5 and post-treatment for patients without CM, but not at 6-month follow-up. Across both treatments, higher severity of the CM subtype 'physical neglect' was associated with a smaller depressive symptom reduction (F(1,207.16) = 5.37; p = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Specific and non-specific psychotherapy effectively reduced depressive symptoms in older individuals with depression and early trauma. For patients without early trauma, LLD-CBT may be preferable over SUI. Considering early trauma subtypes may contribute to develop personalized treatment approaches.

2.
Psychother Psychosom ; 92(3): 180-192, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004508

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Different psychotherapeutic interventions for late-life depression (LLD) have been proposed, but their evaluation in large, multicenter trials is rare. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the efficacy of a specific cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for LLD (LLD-CBT) in comparison with a supportive unspecific intervention (SUI), both administered in a specialist psychiatric outpatient setting. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, parallel group trial, we recruited participants (≥60 years) with moderate to severe depression at 7 trial sites in Germany. Participants were randomly assigned to the LLD-CBT or SUI group. The primary outcome was depression severity at the end of treatment measured by change on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Secondary outcomes included change in observer-rated depression, anxiety, sleep ratings, and quality of life throughout the treatment phase and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Between October 1, 2018, and November 11, 2020, we randomly assigned 251 patients to either LLD-CBT (n = 126) or SUI (n = 125), of whom 229 provided primary-outcome data. There was no significant between-group difference in the change in GDS scores at the end of treatment (estimated marginal mean difference: -1.01 [95% CI: -2.88 to 0.86]; p = 0.287). Secondary analyses showed significant improvements in several outcomes after 8 weeks and at follow-up in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LLD-specific CBT and a supportive unspecific treatment both provide clinical benefit in patients with moderate to severe LLD without evidence for superiority of LLD-CBT.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Transtorno Depressivo , Humanos , Idoso , Depressão/terapia , Depressão/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 19(1): 423, 2019 12 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31881995

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Late-life depression (LLD) is one of the most prevalent mental disorders in old age. It is associated with various adverse outcomes and frequent use of health care services thereby remaining a serious public health concern. Compared with depression in early adulthood, most treatment options of LLD are less effective. Psychotherapy may be particularly beneficial for LLD due to specific psychological conditions in old age and a low risk of side effects. Although cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is highly established and effective in depression in young and mid-life there is only a limited number of small studies on CBT in LLD. An LLD-specific CBT has not yet been compared to an active, but unspecific supportive psychological intervention in a multicentre trial. METHODS: Here we present the design of the CBTlate trial, which is a multicentre, randomized, observer-blinded, active-controlled, parallel group trial. CBTlate aims at including 248 patients with LLD of both genders at 7 sites in Germany. The purpose of the study is to test the hypothesis that a 15-session individually-delivered CBT specific for LLD is of superior efficacy in reducing symptoms of depression in comparison with a supportive unspecific intervention (SUI) of the same quantity. The intervention includes 8 weeks of individual treatment sessions twice per week and a follow-up period of 6 months after randomization. The primary end point is the severity of depression at the end of treatment measured by the self-rated 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Secondary endpoints include depressive symptoms at week 5 and at follow-up (6 months after randomization). Additional secondary endpoints include the change of depressive symptoms assessed with a clinician-rating-scale and a patient reported outcome instrument for major depressive disorder, anxiety symptoms, sleep, cognition, quality of life, and overall health status from baseline to end-of treatment and to end of follow-up. Add-on protocols include MRI and the collection of blood samples. DISCUSSION: This study is the first multicentre trial of a specific CBT intervention for LLD compared to an unspecific supportive psychological intervention administered in a specialist setting. It has important implications for developing and implementing efficient psychotherapeutic strategies for LLD and may be a significant step to broaden treatment options for people suffering from LLD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03735576, registered on 24 October 2018); DRKS (DRKS00013769, registered on 28 June 2018).


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Depressão/terapia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiedade/terapia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Depressão/sangue , Depressão/patologia , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Transtornos de Início Tardio/terapia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroimagem , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ; 86(4): 242-255, 2018 04.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29689582

RESUMO

Late-life depression is a frequent and severe mental disorder. It is characterized by alterations in mood as well as cognitive deficits and somatic symptoms. LLD is associated with various adverse outcomes, such as reduced quality of life, negative impact on physical comorbidities, functional impairments, increased suicide and non-suicide mortality. Moreover, LLD serves as a risk factor for developing all-cause dementia, including Alzheimer´s disease. It leads to a frequent use of health care services and remains a serious public health concern. Unfortunately, LLD is often misinterpreted as a physiological aging process and thus remains underdiagnosed and undertreated for years. With a view towards the demographic change LLD is one of the major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of the aging society. Nevertheless, psychotherapy, pharmacological interventions as well as ECT are effective treatment options. The goal of any treatment for LLD is to ensure full remission, functional recovery and social reintegration.


Assuntos
Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais/psicologia , Idoso/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
5.
J Affect Disord ; 359: 342-349, 2024 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Late-life depression (LLD) is highly prevalent, especially in people aged 80 years and older. We aimed to investigate predictors and their influence on depressive symptoms in LLD. METHODS: We analysed data from the NRW80+ study, a population-based cross-sectional study of individuals aged 80 years and older. Data from n = 926 cognitively unimpaired participants were included. We reduced 95 variables to 21 predictors of depressive symptoms by using a two-step cluster analysis (TSCA), which were assigned to one of four factors (function, values and lifestyle, autonomy and contentment, biological-somatic) according to a principal component analysis. A second TSCA with complete data sets (n = 879) was used to define clusters of participants. Using weighted mean composite scores (CS) for each factor group, binary logistic regression analyses were performed to predict depressive symptoms for each cluster and the total population. RESULTS: The second TSCA yielded two clusters (cluster 1 (n = 688), cluster 2 (n = 191)). The proportion of participants with depressive symptoms was significantly higher in cluster 2 compared to cluster 1 (39 % vs. 15 %; OR = 3.6; 95 % CI 2.5-5.1; p < .001). Participants in cluster 2 were significantly older (mean age 88 vs. 85 years; p < .001), with a higher proportion of women (56 % vs. 46 %; OR = 1.5; 95 % CI 1.1-2.0; p = .016), had a higher BMI (p = .017), lower financial resources (OR = 2.3; 95 % CI 1.6-3.5; p < .001), lower educational level (OR = 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2-2.5; p = .002), higher proportion of single, separated or widowed participants (OR = 1.9; 95 % CI 1.3-2.6; p < .001) and a smaller mean social network (p = .044) compared to cluster 1. Binary logistic regression analyses showed that the weighted mean CS including the autonomy and contentment predictors explained the largest proportion of variance (22.8 %) for depressive symptoms in the total population (Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.228, p < .001) and in both clusters (cluster 1: Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.171, p < .001; cluster 2: Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.213, p < .001), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The main limitations are the restriction to cognitively unimpaired individuals and the use of a self-rated questionnaire to assess depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological factors such as autonomy and contentment are critical for the occurrence of depressive symptoms at higher age, independent of the functional and somatic status and may serve as specific targets for psychotherapy.


Assuntos
Depressão , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Estilo de Vida , Autonomia Pessoal , Fatores de Risco
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e245841, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619842

RESUMO

Importance: Physical diseases co-occur with late-life depression (LLD). The influence of physical diseases and the subjective perception of physical health (PPH) on treatment outcome in LLD, however, is not well understood. Objective: To assess the association of physical diseases and PPH with the outcomes of 2 different types of psychotherapy in LLD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc secondary analysis of a multicenter, observer-blinded, controlled, parallel-group randomized clinical trial assessed participants 60 years or older with moderate to severe depression recruited at 7 psychiatric-psychotherapeutic outpatient trial sites in Germany from October 1, 2018, to November 11, 2020. Data analysis was performed from April 1 to October 31, 2023. Interventions: Patients received LLD-specific cognitive behavioral therapy (LLD-CBT) or supportive unspecific intervention (SUI). Main Outcomes and Measures: Depression severity, response, and remission were measured during treatment and at 6-month follow-up by the change in the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score. Physical health and PPH were assessed by the number of physical diseases, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version physical health subscale. Results: A total of 251 patients were randomized to LLD-CBT (n = 126) or SUI (n = 125), of whom 229 (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [7.1] years; 151 [66%] female) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Patients with low and moderate PPH at baseline had significantly less reduction in the GDS score across both treatment groups than patients with high PPH (estimated marginal mean difference [EMMD], 2.67; 95% CI, 0.37-4.97; P = .02 for low PPH and EMMD, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.22-3.42; P = .03 for moderate vs high PPH). Higher PPH at baseline was associated with higher likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06; P = .009) and remission at the end of treatment (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P = .002) and response (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P < .001) and remission at follow-up (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10; P < .001) across both treatment groups. However, a significant interaction of PPH with treatment group was observed with low PPH at baseline being associated with significantly larger reduction in GDS scores in SUI compared with LLD-CBT at the end of treatment (EMMD, -6.48; 95% CI, -11.31 to -1.64; P = .009) and follow-up (EMMD, -6.49; 95% CI, -11.51 to -1.47; P = .01). In contrast, patients with high PPH at baseline had a significantly greater reduction in GDS scores in LLD-CBT compared with SUI at all time points (week 5: EMMD, -4.08; 95% CI, -6.49 to -1.67; P = .001; end-of-treatment: EMMD, -3.67; 95% CI, -6.72 to -0.61; P = .02; and follow-up: EMMD, -3.57; 95% CI, -6.63 to -0.51; P = .02). The number of physical diseases or CCI at baseline did not have an effect on the change in GDS score, response, or remission, neither across both groups nor within either group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, subjective PPH was associated with treatment outcome, response, and remission in psychotherapy of LLD. Patients with LLD responded differently to LLD-CBT and SUI, depending on their baseline PPH score. Treatment approaches for patients with LLD should address PPH in personalized interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735576; Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien Identifier: DRKS00013769.


Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Depressão , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Psicoterapia , Análise de Dados
7.
Transl Psychiatry ; 10(1): 160, 2020 05 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32433512

RESUMO

It is broadly acknowledged that the onset of dementia in Alzheimer's disease (AD) may be modifiable by the management of risk factors. While several recent guidelines and multidomain intervention trials on prevention of cognitive decline address lifestyle factors and risk diseases, such as hypertension and diabetes, a special reference to the established risk factor of depression or depressive symptoms is systematically lacking. In this article we review epidemiological studies and biological mechanisms linking depression with AD and cognitive decline. We also emphasize the effects of antidepressive treatment on AD pathology including the molecular effects of antidepressants on neurogenesis, amyloid burden, tau pathology, and inflammation. We advocate moving depression and depressive symptoms into the focus of prevention of cognitive decline and dementia. We constitute that early treatment of depressive symptoms may impact on the disease course of AD and affect the risk of developing dementia and we propose the need for clinical trials.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Doença de Alzheimer/prevenção & controle , Disfunção Cognitiva/prevenção & controle , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA