Reassessment of Iron Biomarkers for Prediction of Dialysis Iron Overload: An MRI Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Iron overload among hemodialysis patients was previously considered rare but is now an increasingly recognized clinical situation. We analyzed correlations between iron biomarkers and the liver iron concentration (LIC) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and examined their diagnostic accuracy for iron overload. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study from 31 January 2005 to 31 August 2013 in the dialysis centre of a French community-based private hospital. A cohort of 212 hemodialysis patients free of overt inflammation or malnutrition, were treated for anemia with parenteral iron-sucrose and an erythropoesis-stimulating agent, in keeping with current clinical guidelines. Blinded measurements of hepatic iron stores were performed by T1 and T2* contrast MRI, and relationships were analysed using Spearman's coefficient, logistic regression and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Among the biological markers, only serum ferritin showed a strong correlation with LIC (rho= 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.61, p< 0.0001, Spearman test). In logistic analysis, only serum ferritin correctly classified the overall cohort into patients with normal liver iron stores (LIC ≤ 50 µmol/g) and those with elevated liver iron stores (LIC > 50 µmol/g) (odds ratio 1.007; 95% CI: 1.004-1.010). Serum ferritin was the iron biomarker with the best discriminatory capacity in ROC curves analysis (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.767; 95% CI: 0.698-0.835). The optimal serum ferritin cutoffs were 160 µg/L for LIC > 50 µmol/g (mild iron overload) and 290 µg/L for LIC > 200 µmol/g (severe iron overload). CONCLUSIONS: For clinical purposes, serum ferritin correctly reflects liver iron stores, as assessed by MRI, in hemodialysis patients without overt inflammation or malnutrition. These results strongly suggest that current ferritin target values should be lowered to avoid iron overload. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry 80100088.

Maximal standard dose of parenteral iron for hemodialysis patients: an MRI-based decision tree learning analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Iron overload used to be considered rare among hemodialysis patients after the advent of erythropoesis-stimulating agents, but recent MRI studies have challenged this view. The aim of this study, based on decision-tree learning and on MRI determination of hepatic iron content, was to identify a noxious pattern of parenteral iron administration in hemodialysis patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study from 31 January 2005 to 31 August 2013 in the dialysis centre of a French community-based private hospital. A cohort of 199 fit hemodialysis patients free of overt inflammation and malnutrition were treated for anemia with parenteral iron-sucrose and an erythropoesis-stimulating agent (darbepoetin), in keeping with current clinical guidelines. Patients had blinded measurements of hepatic iron stores by means of T1 and T2* contrast MRI, without gadolinium, together with CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) analysis. RESULTS: The CHAID algorithm first split the patients according to their monthly infused iron dose, with a single cutoff of 250 mg/month. In the node comprising the 88 hemodialysis patients who received more than 250 mg/month of IV iron, 78 patients had iron overload on MRI (88.6%, 95% CI: 80% to 93%). The odds ratio for hepatic iron overload on MRI was 3.9 (95% CI: 1.81 to 8.4) with >250 mg/month of IV iron as compared to <250 mg/month. Age, gender (female sex) and the hepcidin level also influenced liver iron content on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The standard maximal amount of iron infused per month should be lowered to 250 mg in order to lessen the risk of dialysis iron overload and to allow safer use of parenteral iron products.

Hemodialysis-associated hemosiderosis in the era of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a MRI study.

BACKGROUND: Most dialysis patients receiving erythropoesis-stimulating agents (ESA) also receive parenteral iron supplementation. There are few data on the risk of hemosiderosis in this setting. METHODS: We prospectively measured liver iron concentration by means of T1 and T2* contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without gadolinium, in a cohort of 119 fit hemodialysis patients receiving both parenteral iron and ESA, in keeping with current guidelines. RESULTS: Mild to severe hepatic iron overload was observed in 100 patients (84%; confidence interval, [CI] 76%-90%), of whom 36% (CI, 27%-46%) had severe hepatic iron overload (liver iron concentration >201 µmol/g of dry weight). In the cross-sectional study, infused iron, hepcidin, and C-reactive protein values correlated with hepatic iron stores in both univariate analysis (P<.05, Spearman test) and binary logistic regression (P <.05). In 11 patients who were monitored closely during parenteral iron therapy, the iron dose infused per month correlated strongly with both the overall increase and the monthly increase in liver iron concentration (respectively, rho=0.66, P=.0306 and rho=0.85, P=0.0015, Spearman test). In the 33 patients with iron overload, iron stores fell significantly after iron withdrawal or after a major reduction in the iron dose (first MRI: 220 µmol/g (range: 60-340); last MRI: 50 µmol/g (range: 5-210); P <.0001, Wilcoxon's paired test). CONCLUSIONS: Most hemodialysis patients receiving ESA and intravenous iron supplementation have hepatic iron overload on MRI. These findings call for a revision of guidelines on iron therapy in this setting, especially regarding the amount of iron infused and noninvasive methods for monitoring iron stores.

Percutaneous acetic acid injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: using CT fluoroscopy to evaluate distribution of acetic acid mixed with an iodinated contrast agent.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the distribution of acetic acid mixed with iodinated contrast agent during percutaneous acetic acid injection on CT fluoroscopy for hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Monitoring acetic acid distribution on CT fluoroscopy can detect extratumoral diffusion and may optimize the distribution of acetic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma.