Volatile Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Delirium in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of anesthesia regimens on postoperative delirium after on-pump cardiac valve surgery is yet undetermined. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of volatile anesthesia compared with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the occurrence of delirium after on-pump cardiac valve surgery. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a university academic hospital in China, from February 2019 to January 2021. Patients scheduled for on-pump cardiac valve surgery or combined valve with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries were randomly assigned to receive anesthesia maintenance with either a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) or propofol-based TIVA. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium during the first 7 days after surgery, assessed using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (ICU). The secondary outcomes included duration of delirium, subtypes of delirium, 30-day mortality, pain score, major morbidity (including cerebral infarction, respiratory failure, and pneumonia), duration of mechanical ventilation, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome variable was by Pearson's χ 2 test. RESULTS: Among the 684 patients analyzed (mean age, 53.8 years; 381 [55.7%] women), 676 were assessed for the primary outcome. Postoperative delirium occurred in 63 of 337 (18.7%) patients receiving volatile anesthesia versus 76 of 339 (22.4%) patients receiving propofol-based TIVA (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-1.16; P = .231). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing on-pump cardiac valve surgery, anesthesia maintenance with a volatile agent did not result in significantly fewer occurrences of postoperative delirium than propofol-based TIVA.

Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of volatile anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Single-center tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-four patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive anesthesia maintenance with a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) or propofol-based TIVA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days. The PPCs occurred in 118 of 262 patients (45.0%) in the volatile anesthesia group compared with 105 of 262 patients (40.1%) in the propofol-based intravenous anesthesia group (relative risk: 1.17 [95% CI 0.96-1.42], p = 0.123). There were no significant differences in the severity of PPCs within 7 days postoperatively, the occurrence and severity grade of PPCs within 30 days, the incidence of hypoxia, and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, general anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic compared with propofol-based TIVA had not reduced pulmonary complications within the first 7 days after surgery.

The Effect of Propofol Versus Volatile Anesthetics on Persistent Pain After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Sternal incisions can generate persistent and intense post-sternotomy pain. Propofol has been shown to improve postoperative analgesia, but the preventive effect on persistent pain after cardiac surgery is unknown. The hypothesis of the present study was that intraoperative propofol-based anesthesia compared with volatile anesthesia could reduce the risk of chronic pain after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A single-center, two-arm, patient-and-evaluator-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A single major urban teaching and university hospital. PATIENTS: Five-hundred adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy randomly were assigned. With six withdrawals from the study and five from surgery, 244 in the total intravenous anesthesia group and 245 in the volatile group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomly were assigned to receive either propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia or volatile anesthesia during surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were the incidence of pain at three, six, and 12 months after surgery defined as pain score >0 on the numeric rating scale. The secondary outcomes included acute pain, opioid use during the first 72 hours after surgery, and quality of life. The use of propofol did not significantly affect chronic pain at three months (55.4% v 52.9%, difference 2.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.6 to 11.6; p = 0.656), six months (35.5% v 37.5%, difference -2.0%, 95% CI -10.9 to 6.9; p = 0.657), or 12 months (18.2% v 20.7%, difference -2.5%, 95% CI -9.8 to 4.8; p = 0.495) compared with volatile anesthetics. Furthermore, there were no differences in acute pain score; morphine-equivalent consumption during the first 72 hours; and quality of life at three, six, and 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative administration of propofol did not reduce persistent pain after cardiac surgery compared with volatile anesthetics.