Therapy and survival in male breast carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 50 cases.

The relationship between therapy and overall survival was retrospectively investigated in 50 patients with primary male breast carcinoma. Forty-five had radical or modified radical mastectomy and 5 simple mastectomy. Thirty-five received adjuvant post-operative therapy, including radiation, hormone and chemotherapy, given separately or in combination. The mean follow-up period was 67 (range, 1-230) months. The median survival was 33 months for patients receiving surgery alone and 86 months for those who also had adjuvant therapy (p=0.003). No difference in survival was found between simple or radical/modified radical mastectomy, nor among the various types of adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy was most effective in large size, node positive and poorly differentiated tumors, and retained independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis. With the limitation due to the small number of cases, our data suggest that adjuvant therapy may improve survival in males with cancer of the breast.

Pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide administered according to three different schedules in metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

Ifosfamide is a leading drug in soft tissue sarcoma therapy. Recently high dose therapy (>9 g/m2) has been introduced in different schemes to obtain a higher response rate. All these higher doses can be administered following two different schedules: continuous infusion 24 hours a day for 4-5 days or bolus administration for 5 consecutive days. In this study we compare the differences in the pharmacokinetic profile between the two schedules. In both schemes we saw a very important autoinduction phenomenon, with a corresponding half-life decrease and total body clearance increase during the days of therapy. The clearances were not directly correlated with the administered dose. We can conclude that ifosfamide continuous infusion therapy is equivalent to fractionated administration, at least from a pharmacokinetic point of view. Short-term infusion is subjectively better tolerated and is therefore preferred.

Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) in daily practice: results of a survey in two Italian regions, Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most important health problems in Western countries: it is the fourth cancer in terms of incidence and the second cause of cancer death. Surgery is the main therapeutic choice and there is broad consensus on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) after resection. Unfortunately, 50% of the patients will relapse and die of the disease. Palliative CT based on 5-fluorouracil (5FU) may induce a 9-48% response rate with a median survival of 11.5 months. At present there is no gold standard for CT In advanced CRC and the situation has become more complicated since the advent of new drugs (Raltitrexed, Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin). The aim of this study was the identification of the different approaches to treatment of advanced CRC among the clinicians (oncologists, radiologists, internal medicine specialists, surgeons) who practice CT. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Forty-six clinicians from two Italian Regions (Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta) were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: 5FU modulated with Lederfolin according to the classic Machover scheme is the main option in daily practice. More sophisticated therapies are reserved to patients with a good performance status (PS) and are prescribed only in the larger centers. The planned therapies usually consist of six courses. Restaging may be performed after three or six courses. A marked difference has been recorded in the evaluation of a situation of no change (NC): 25.5% of the clinicians evaluate stable disease as a positive result. In the event of disease progression or relapse, 35% of the clinicians do not prescribe second-line CT. In case of further treatment, the options are totally subjective. CONCLUSIONS: A national survey on this issue is necessary under the auspices of AIOM (Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica) and involving oncologists, epidemiologists and statisticians, in order to define the reasons for variations in therapy in advanced CRC and determine the differences between clinicians of different age, specialization and location. This survey could lead to a definition of guidelines for the treatment of advanced CRC.

Two episodes of ifosfamide-related neurotoxicity in the same patient following different schedules and doses of the drug. A case report.

We report the first case of recurrent ifosfamide-related neurotoxicity in the same patient following two distinct administrations of the drug at different doses and schedules and with a long interval between the two episodes. Remarkably, the first event was characterized by confusion and hallucinations, while the second, 29 months later, was characterized by partial and generalized seizures. Between the two episodes the patient had received high-dose cyclophosphamide, an oxazophoshorine agent closely related to ifosfamide, without any neurological side effects. We briefly discuss the diagnosis and management of ifosfamide-related encephalopathy.

Androgen receptor expression in male breast carcinoma: lack of clinicopathological association.

Androgen receptor (AR) expression was retrospectively analysed in 47 primary male breast carcinomas (MBCs) using a monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. AR immunopositivity was detected in 16 out of 47 (34%) cases. No association was found with patient age, tumour stage, progesterone receptor (PGR) or p53 protein expression. Well-differentiated MBCs tended to be AR positive more often than poorly differentiated ones (P = 0.08). A negative association was found between ARs and cell proliferative activity: MIB-1 scores were higher (25.4%) in AR-negative than in AR-positive cases (21.11%; P = 0.04). A strong positive association (P = 0.0001) was found between ARs and oestrogen receptors (ERs). In univariate analysis, ARs (as well as ERs and PGRs) were not correlated with overall survival; tumour histological grade (P = 0.02), size (P = 0.01), p53 expression (P = 0.0008) and MIB-1 scores (P = 0.0003) had strong prognostic value. In multivariate survival analysis, only p53 expression (P = 0.002) and histological grade (P = 0.02) retained independent prognostic significance. In conclusion, the lack of association between AR and most clinicopathological features and survival, together with the absence of prognostic value for ER/PGR status, suggest that MBCs are biologically different from female breast carcinomas and make it questionable to use antihormonal therapy for patients with MBC.