Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs correlates with the risk of venous thromboembolism in knee osteoarthritis patients: a UK population-based case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine whether the current users of specific NSAIDs have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among knee OA patients. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study using The Health Improvement Network, a database of patient records from general practices in the UK. For every VTE case, we identified five controls matched on age, sex and calendar year of study enrolment. We used conditional logistic regression to assess the association between current use of specific NSAIDs and risk of VTE relative to remote NSAID users. RESULTS: Among knee OA patients with at least one NSAID prescription, we identified 4020 incident cases of VTE and 20 059 matched controls. Adjusted odd ratios (ORs) relative to the remote users were 1.38 (95% CI: 1.32, 1.44) for recent users and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.49) for current users. Among the current NSAID users, the risk of VTE was increased with diclofenac [OR 1.63 (95% CI: 1.53, 1.74)], ibuprofen [OR = 1.49 (95% CI: 1.38, 1.62)], meloxicam [OR = 1.29 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.50)] and coxibs [celecoxib, OR = 1.30 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.51); rofecoxib, OR = 1.44 (95% CI: 1.18, 1.76)]; naproxen did not increase VTE risk [OR = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.12)]. CONCLUSION: Compared with the remote users of NSAIDs, the risk of VTE increased for current users of diclofenac, ibuprofen, meloxicam, and coxibs, but not for naproxen, in the knee OA population. Clinicians should consider the risk profile for specific NSAIDs when recommending their use.

Impact of pretransplant rifaximin therapy on early post-liver transplant infections.

Bacterial and fungal infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). The role of intestinal decontamination in the prevention of post-LT infections is controversial. Rifaximin is widely used for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. The effect of rifaximin on post-LT infections is unknown. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of rifaximin therapy in the pretransplant period on early bacterial infections (EBIs) and fungal infections within the first 30 days after LT. All adult patients who underwent LT at our institution (January 2009 to July 2011) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving antibiotics other than pretransplant protocol antibiotics were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of rifaximin therapy for at least 2 days before LT. Infections were defined by the isolation of any bacterial or fungal organisms within 30 days of LT. Multivariate regression analysis, Student t tests, and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to compare the 2 groups. Two hundred sixty-eight patients were included, and 71 of these patients (26.5%) were on rifaximin at the time of LT. The 2 groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, race, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. There were no significant differences in the rates of EBIs (30% for the non-rifaximin group and 25% for the rifaximin group, P = 0.48) or fungal infections between the 2 groups. There was no increase in antimicrobial resistance among the infecting organisms. There was no difference in survival between the rifaximin and non-rifaximin groups (98% versus 97%, P = 0.36). In conclusion, the use of rifaximin in the pre-LT period was not associated with an increased risk of bacterial or fungal infections in the early post-LT period.

Sociocultural and Economic Disparities in Physical Therapy Utilization Among Insured Older Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine influences of sociocultural and economic determinants on physical therapy (PT) utilization for older adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In these annual cross-sectional analyses between 2012 and 2016, we accessed Medicare enrollment data and fee-for-service claims. The cohort included Medicare beneficiaries with RA based on 3 diagnosis codes or 2 codes plus a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug medication claim. We defined race and ethnicity and dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage (proxy for income) using enrollment data. Adults with a Current Procedural Terminology code for PT evaluation were classified as utilizing PT services. Associations between race and ethnicity and dual coverage and PT utilization were estimated with logistic regression analyses. Potential interactions between race and ethnicity status and dual coverage were tested using interaction terms. RESULTS: Of 106,470 adults with RA (75.1% female; aged 75.8 [SD 7.3] years; 83.9% identified as non-Hispanic White, 8.8% as non-Hispanic Black, 7.2% as Hispanic), 9.6-12.5% used PT in a given year. Non-Hispanic Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82) and Hispanic (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98) individuals had lower odds of PT utilization than non-Hispanic White individuals. Adults with dual coverage (lower income) had lower odds of utilization than adults with Medicare only (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.43-0.46). There were no significant interactions between race and ethnicity status and dual coverage on utilization. CONCLUSION: We found sociocultural and economic disparities in PT utilization in older adults with RA. We must identify and address the underlying factors that influence these disparities in order to mitigate them.

Medicare expenditures for conventional and biologic disease modifying agents commonly used for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Biologic disease modifying agents (bDMARDs) are an integral part of rheumatoid arthritis treatment guidelines but are associated with significant cost in the US. We present the trends in total spending and unit cost of conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) as compared to bDMARDs in Medicare program. METHODS: We used the Medicare drug spending data for the year 2012-2017 covering all part B (fee-for-service) and part D drugs. Total spending was calculated by summing spending across various drug formulations and unit drug cost by dividing total spending by number of doses dispensed. We present the 6-year trends in total spending, total beneficiary count and unit costs of each of the commonly used cDMARDs and bDMARDs. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2017, the total spending on the cDMARDs increased 5-folds from $98 million to $579 million; this was fraction of total spending on bDMARDs which increased from $4.3 to $10.0 billion. This increase was driven largely by unit costs of drug rather than number of beneficiaries. There was a 6-fold increase in the unit cost of generic hydroxychloroquine followed by methotrexate and leflunomide. Amongst bDMARDs, adalimumab and etanercept unit cost increased by 2-folds. The increase was less pronounced for office-administered products. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several generic cDMARDs over decades, there were steep increases in the unit cost of these agents to "keep pace" with the increases in bDMARDs. As the number of elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients increases, policy interventions might be required to reduce the spending on both biologics and conventional DMARDs.

Prescription Opioid Use Among Patients With Acute Gout Discharged From the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: Acute gout is among the most painful inflammatory arthritides and a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits. Prescription opioids are the leading contributor to the ongoing opioid epidemic; EDs are often the source of the index prescription. Our aim was to assess the burden of opioid use and factors associated with its use among gout patients discharged from the ED. METHODS: In the electronic health records system of Lifespan Healthcare System (currently contains 2.2 million records), adult gout patients discharged from the ED or hospital were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision diagnostic codes. The study period was March 2015 to September 2017, and only patients with a primary diagnosis of gout were included. If a patient was seen multiple times, only the first encounter was included. For these patients, we estimated the frequency, dose, and duration of opioids prescribed. Using multivariable logistic regression, we ascertained the factors associated with increased odds of opioid prescription at discharge among patients with acute gout. RESULTS: Of the 456 patients, 129 (28.3%) received opioids at discharge (~80% were new patients). The average dose of prescription was mean ± SD 37.9 ± 17.2 mg of morphine equivalent for a median duration of 8 days (interquartile range 5-14). We noted that patients with polyarticular gout attack and diabetes mellitus and those taking opioids prior to admission had higher odds of receiving opioids at discharge. CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of effective treatments, opioids are commonly used for the management of acute gout. This study highlights an opportunity to curb the opioid epidemic among gout patients.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Pregnancy: A Brief Review.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic multisystemic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects young women of childbearing age group. There is a complex immunologic interplay during pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. The pregnancy has direct impact on the disease where an increased rate of flares is noted, and lupus leads to increased risk of hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, preterm birth as well as miscarriages, particularly those with antiphospholipid antibodies. Neonates born to patients with lupus are at increased risk of neonatal lupus as well as heart block if born to patients with positive SSA/SSB. Despite the increased risk of morbidity, recent data suggest improved outcomes in pregnant patients with lupus. A multidisciplinary approach with careful monitoring of pregnancy and lupus could reduce adverse outcomes in these patients. This requires careful pregnancy planning, defining the clinical and serologic involvement of lupus, careful monitoring the patient for adverse pregnancy outcome as well as lupus flares and comprehensive understanding of the drugs that can be safely used in pregnancy. Fetuses should be carefully monitored for heart and neonates for neonatal lupus. Hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine and corticosteroids can be used during pregnancy and may reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. Similarly, appropriate therapy needs to be instituted for hypertensive diseases in pregnancy. Anticoagulant therapy may be necessary for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of biological agents in the older rheumatoid arthritis patients compared to Young: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Biologic anti-rheumatic drugs are used with less frequency among older patients compared to young patients. This population is less represented in studies performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this drugs. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of biological agents between the older RA patients compared to young. METHODS: A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in major indexing databases using key terms for RA and each biological agent. The review process was completed by 2 investigators. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of at least 6-month duration conducted in adult RA patients were included. Outcomes of interest were clinical efficacy and safety. Effect-estimates were pooled using random-effects modeling if 4 or more studies used the same scale and time-frame for measuring outcomes. RESULTS: 24 studies (16 focusing on anti-TNF agents) representing 63,705 patients (24% were older) were included. Older RA patients had worse baseline RA disease activity, longer disease duration at the time of enrollment in the trial (14.4 ±â€¯3.6 vs. 10.9 ±â€¯3.6 years; p < 0.001) and higher steroid use (73.2 vs. 64.7%, p < 0.001) than younger. 5 out of 6 studies assessing anti-TNF agents showed worse efficacy outcomes in older patients. The pooled OR of infection and ADRs with anti-TNF agents in older compared to young RA patients was OR 1.59 (95% CI: 1.45-1.76) and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.23-1.61) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients had worse safety and efficacy with biological agents but also had worse baseline disease activity. There was significant heterogeneity in reporting outcomes and very limited studies in biological agents other than anti-TNF drugs.

Quantifying harmful effects of psoriatic diseases on quality of life: Cardio-metabolic outcomes in psoriatic arthritis study (COMPASS).

OBJECTIVE: Up to 30% of patients with psoriasis suffer from concurrent psoriatic arthritis, and both the diseases have worse quality-of-life outcomes compared to the general population. There is limited literature comparing quality-of-life outcomes between these diseases. We seek to compare quality-of-life outcomes between both these groups. METHODS: The current study is a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of 252 patients with psoriatic diseases, who were recruited from 2 tertiary-care centers. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic and validated quality-of-life data using short form-12 (SF 12), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the quality-of-life outcomes. RESULTS: We included 107 (42.5%) psoriatic arthritis and 145 (57.5%) psoriasis patients in the cohort. The groups had comparable gender distribution and co-morbid diseases prevalence, but arthritis patients were older and received biologics/DMARDs more frequently than psoriasis patients. The physical indices (identified by HAQ and SF 12 PCS) were worse for psoriatic arthritis, whereas the mental/psychometric indices (identified by DLQI and SF 12 MCS) were comparable between both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite aggressive therapy, physical quality of life was worse in psoriatic arthritis patients compared to psoriasis patients. The mental quality-of-life indices were comparable in both the groups and were still below the population norm. These results suggest need for screening for psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis to reduce the burden of physical quality of life and screening for early signs of psychiatric illnesses in both these disease populations.