RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children diagnosed with cancer often develop significant physical treatment-related side effects. This study evaluated the feasibility of a targeted, proactive, individualised physiotherapy intervention programme for children with a recent cancer diagnosis. PROCEDURE: This feasibility study was a single-group mixed methods study, consisting of pre- and post-intervention assessment, followed by a survey and interviews of parents. Participants were children and adolescents with a new cancer diagnosis. The physiotherapy model of care consisted of education, surveillance, standardised assessment, individually tailored exercise and a fitness tracker. RESULTS: All participants (n = 14) completed over 75% of the supervised exercise sessions. No safety or adverse events occurred. Over the 8-week intervention period, an average of 7.5 supervised sessions were completed per participant. The overall experience provided by the physiotherapist service was rated as excellent by 86% (n = 12) and very good by 14% (n = 2) of parents. All parents surveyed (n = 14) rated the level of support provided by the physiotherapy service as excellent, and all participants completed the standardised assessments pre- and post-exercise intervention. There was a significant improvement in 6MWD from 240 m (SD 193 m) compared to 355 m (SD 115 m) (p = .015), as well as improvements in the Physical Function domain (p = .013) and combined Psychosocial and Physical Function domains (p = .030). CONCLUSIONS: A prospective structured and targeted physiotherapy model of care appears feasible for use with children and families in the acute phase of cancer treatment. The regular screening was acceptable and may have helped build a strong rapport between the physiotherapist and the families.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To explore influences on the capability, opportunity and motivation of physiotherapists integrating new evidence into routine care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed-methods study utilising the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour model. Metropolitan inpatient rehabilitation physiotherapists participated by integrating the Balance Intensity Scale into routine care for 6 weeks. Evidence integration was supported by a tailored theory-informed approach. Participants completed pre- and post-evidence integration surveys and a post-evidence integration focus group. RESULTS: Pre- and post-surveys were completed by 24 and 12 participants, respectively. One focus group (n = 7) was conducted. Framework analysis identified themes in Capability (n = 4), Opportunity (n = 4) and Motivation (n = 5) domains influencing behaviour when implementing new evidence. The evidence integration process enhanced participants' Knowledge (p = 0.04), Skills (p = 0.003) and Belief in capabilities (p = 0.03) when prescribing and measuring balance exercises. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified perceived barriers and enablers to evidence integration of a new outcome measure into routine care. It highlights strategies that may support physiotherapy teams in incorporating new evidence into routine care. These strategies include education on the evidence being implemented, physical resources, change champions to facilitate social support, management endorsement, and recognition of the time and effort required for evidence integration in the short term.
When integrating new evidence into routine physiotherapy care in rehabilitation settings, the theoretical domains framework can provide a suitable framework to identify potential barriers and enablers of evidence integration at a local level, to guide the tailoring of support strategies.Rehabilitation physiotherapists can integrate the Balance Intensity Scale into balance exercise prescription as part of routine care.Targeted education provides support to change practice and implement evidence-informed care.Clinical change champions and sharing the effort to change as a team are pivotal in fostering the adoption of new evidence, such as the Balance Intensity Scale, into practice.