Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 15: 559-571, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37489131

RESUMO

Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate health-care resources utilization, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with the treatment with CNIC-Polypill as secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to other treatments, in clinical practice in Spain. Patients and Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed using medical records (economic results [healthcare perspective], NEPTUNO-study; BIG-PAC-database) of patients who initiated secondary prevention between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed up to 2 years (maximum). Four cohorts were balanced with a propensity-score-matching (PSM): 1) CNIC-Polypill (aspirin+atorvastatin+ramipril), 2) Monocomponents (same separate drugs), 3) Equipotent (equipotent drugs) and 4) Other therapies ([OT], other cardiovascular drugs). Incidence of cardiovascular events, health-care resources utilization and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (2020 Euros) were compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per cardiovascular event avoided were estimated. Results: After PSM, 1614 patients were recruited in each study cohort. The accumulated incidence of cardiovascular events during the 24-month follow-up was lower in the CNIC-Polypill cohort vs the other cohorts (19.8% vs Monocomponents: 23.3%, Equipotent: 25.5% and OT: 26.8%; p<0.01). During the follow-up period, the CNIC-Polypill cohort also reduced the health-care resources utilization per patient compared to the other cohorts, particularly primary care visits (16.6 vs Monocomponents: 18.7, Equipotent: 18.9 and OT: 21.0; p<0.001) and hospitalization days (2.3 vs Monocomponents: 3.4, Equipotent: 3.7 and OT: 4.0; p<0.001). The treatment cost in the CNIC-Polypill cohort was lower than that in the other cohorts (€4668 vs Monocomponents: €5587; Equipotent: €5682 and OT: €6016; p<0.001) (Difference: -€919, -€1014 and -€1348, respectively). Due to the reduction of cardiovascular events and costs, the CNIC-Polypill is a dominant alternative compared to the other treatments. Conclusion: CNIC-Polypill reduces recurrent major cardiovascular events and costs, being a cost-saving strategy as secondary prevention of ASCVD.

2.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 74(6): 518-525, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32807709

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) are a set of interventions to improve the prognosis of cardiovascular disease by influencing patients' physical, mental, and social conditions. However, there are no studies evaluating the optimal duration of these programs. We aimed to compare the results of a standard vs a brief intensive CRP in patients after ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome through the Más por Menos study (More Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Less Time). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, open, evaluator-blind for end-point, and multicenter trial (PROBE design), patients were randomly allocated to either standard 8-week CRP or intensive 2-week CRP with booster sessions. A final visit was performed 12 months later, after completion of the program. We assessed adherence to the Mediterranean diet, psychological status, smoking, drug therapy, functional capacity, quality of life, cardiometabolic and anthropometric parameters, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients (mean age, 57.8±10.0 years; 87.3% men) were finally assessed (intensive: n=262; standard: n=235). Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. At 12 months, the results of treadmill ergometry improved by ≥ 1 MET in ≥ 93% of the patients. In addition, adherence to the Mediterranean diet and quality of life were significantly improved by CRP, with no significant differences between the groups. The occurrence of cardiovascular events was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive CRP could be as effective as standard CRP in achieving adherence to recommended secondary prevention measures after acute coronary syndrome and could be an alternative for some patients and centers. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02619422).


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Reabilitação Cardíaca , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
3.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 952021 Mar 16.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724261

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: During the state of alarm and once the confinement decreed by the COVID-19 pandemic ended, a cross-sectorial study was carried out in Spain between May 4th and 22nd, 2020 by volunteers who completed a self-administered online survey. The objective of this study was to know how the confinement period affected the consumption of tobacco and other related products in the adult Spanish population. METHODS: The survey consisted of 18 questions concerning sociodemographic characteristics, the consumption of tobacco and other related products, exposure to secondhand smoke and perception of COVID-19 risk associated with consumption. Questions about tobacco and other related products were posed in order to compare consumption prior to and during confinement. The survey was completed by 17,017 people. The analysis of association of variables was carried out with T-student. Variable frequency analysis was performed with χ2. RESULTS: There was a reduction in the prevalence of daily tobacco smoking and no changes were observed in the products consumed in either period (6.73%). The prevalence of exposure to secondhand smoke at home during confinement among non-smokers decreased (61.83%). Most of survey respondents reported that tobacco and e-cigarette consumption increased the risk of contracting COVID-19 and suffering severe complications (39.09% and 31.80% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain, the tobacco consumption decreased. Also, secondhand smoke exposition reduces in Spain during this period.


OBJETIVO: Durante el estado de alarma y una vez finalizado el confinamiento decretado por la pandemia por COVID-19, en España se realizó, entre el 4 y el 22 de mayo de 2020, un estudio transversal en voluntarios aplicando una encuesta autocumplimentada online. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer cómo afectó el periodo de confinamiento al consumo de tabaco y relacionados en la población adulta española. METODOS: El cuestionario constaba de 18 preguntas e incluía características sociodemográficas, el consumo de tabaco y otros productos relacionados, exposición al humo ambiental de tabaco y percepción del riesgo de enfermedad por COVID-19 asociada a su consumo. La encuesta fue completada por 17.017 personas. El análisis de la asociación entre variables cuantitativas, fue realizado mediante el test de la T de Student y el de frecuencias de las variables categóricas mediante el test de χ2. RESULTADOS: Se observó reducción en la prevalencia de fumadores diarios de tabaco (6,73%) y no se observaron cambios en los productos consumidos. La prevalencia de exposición al humo ambiental en casa durante el confinamiento entre personas no fumadoras disminuyó (61,83%). Los encuestados declararon que el consumo de tabaco y de cigarrillos electrónicos aumentaba el riesgo de contraer la enfermedad del COVID-19 y sufrir complicaciones (39,09% y 31,80% respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: Durante el periodo de confinamiento en España debido al COVID-19, se produjo una reducción en el consumo de tabaco y similares. Además de observó una reducción a la exposición al humo ambiental.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Mídias Sociais , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Estudos Transversais , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Prevalência , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Produtos do Tabaco , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 73(4): 313-323, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31672562

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperkalemia is a growing concern in the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction because it limits the use of effective drugs. We report estimates of the magnitude of this problem in routine clinical practice in Spain, as well as changes in potassium levels during follow-up and associated factors. METHODS: This study included patients with acute (n=881) or chronic (n=3587) heart failure recruited in 28 Spanish hospitals of the European heart failure registry of the European Society of Cardiology and followed up for 1 year. Various outcomes were analyzed, including changes in serum potassium levels and their impact on treatment. RESULTS: Hyperkalemia (K+> 5.4 mEq/L) was identified in 4.3% (95%CI, 3.7%-5.0%) and 8.2% (6.5%-10.2%) of patients with chronic and acute heart failure, respectively, and was responsible for 28.9% of all cases of contraindication to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use and for 10.8% of all cases of failure to reach the target dose. Serum potassium levels were not recorded in 291 (10.8%) of the 2693 chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. During follow-up, potassium levels increased in 179 of 1431 patients (12.5%, 95%CI, 10.8%-14.3%). This increase was directly related to age, diabetes, and history of stroke and was inversely related to history of hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the magnitude of the problem of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure in everyday clinical practice and the need to improve monitoring of this factor in these patients due to its interference with the possibility of receiving optimal treatment.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperpotassemia/etiologia , Potássio/sangue , Sistema de Registros , Espironolactona/uso terapêutico , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hiperpotassemia/sangue , Hiperpotassemia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 110(4): 234-241, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28082243

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current guideline recommendations encourage culprit vessel only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. However, recent studies have shown a better clinical outcome in patients who receive multivessel PCI. AIM: To measure and compare clinical outcomes between partial revascularization (PR) versus complete revascularization (CR) in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who underwent a cardiac rehabilitation programme. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 282 patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who received PR or CR and were subsequently enrolled in a cardiac rehabilitation programme between July 2006 and November 2013 at La Paz University Hospital. The incidences of cardiovascular events, new PCI, hospital admissions for cardiovascular reasons and mortality were compared between the PR and CR groups. RESULTS: Overall, 143 patients received PR and 139 received CR. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, except for mean age (59.3 vs. 56.7 years; P=0.02), diabetes mellitus prevalence (34.3% vs. 20.1%; P=0.01) and number of arteries with stenosis (2.6 vs. 2.3; P=0.001). During the mean follow-up of 48.0±25.9 months, a cardiovascular event occurred in 23 (16.1%) PR patients and 20 (14.4%) CR patients, with no statistically significant differences in the early (hazard ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.19-1.89) or late (hazard ratio: 1.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-3.14) follow-up periods. Cox regression, adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus and number of affected coronary vessels, showed no difference in new cardiovascular event risk. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistical differences in clinical outcomes between PR and CR among patients who received cardiac rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Idoso , Reabilitação Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Reabilitação Cardíaca/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Estenose Coronária/complicações , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 70(6): 474-486, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28330818

RESUMO

Improvements in early detection and treatment have markedly reduced cancer-related mortality. However survival not only depends on effectively cure cancer, but prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer-related complications is also needed. Cardiovascular toxicity is a widespread problem across many classes of therapeutic schemes, however scientific evidence in the management of cardiovascular complications of onco-hematological patients is scarce, as these patients have been systematically excluded from clinical trials and current recommendations are based on expert consensus. Multidisciplinary teams are mandatory to decrease morbidity and mortality from both cardiotoxicity and cancer itself. An excessive concern for the occurrence of cardiovascular toxicity, can avoid potentially curative therapies, while underestimating this risk, increases long-term mortality of cancer survivors. The objective of this consensus document, developed in collaboration of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology and the Spanish Society of Hematology, is to update the necessary concepts and expertise on cardio-onco-hematology that enable its application in daily clinical practice and to promote the development of local multidisciplinary teams, to improve the cardiovascular health of patients with cancer.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Consenso , Hematologia/normas , Oncologia/normas , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária/normas , Humanos
7.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 56(3): 230-5, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12622952

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Primary pulmonary hypertension and its associated forms is a progressive and often fatal disease, the course of which has been favourably modified by prostacyclin therapy in the last decade. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analize retrospectively the efficacy of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (synthetic prostacyclin) therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension, and to compare it with conventional therapy (anticoagulants, digoxin and diuretics). METHODS: Between 1990-2000, 31 patients with severe precapillary pulmonary hypertension in functional class III or IV went on continuous intravenous epoprostenol therapy, administered by a portable infusion pump through a Hickman catheter. We compared their survival with a group of 16 patients treated with conventional therapy alone. RESULTS: Time of follow-up was 33.25 months in the prostacyclin group and 20 months in the conventional group. The one- three- and five- year survival rates were 86%, 50% and 38% respectively for patients treated with epoprostenol compared with 40%, 40% and 8% survival rates at idetical periods for patients treated conventionally (p = 0,02). Functional class and the mean distance walked in the 6 minutes test were improved in patients treated with prostacyclin (p < 0,01). Serious complications attributable to the delivery system included 3 deaths, mainly due to infection. CONCLUSION: Continuous intravenous epoprostenol therapy improves survival and exercise capacity in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension despite potentially serious complications attributable to the delivery system.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Epoprostenol/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Prostaglandinas A/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 140(6): 272.e1-272.e12, 2013 Mar 16.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23246167

RESUMO

Tobacco use presents an odd confluence of circumstances: it is a significant and high threat to health, and there is a lack of motivation among health workers to act accordingly. Yet we have effective interventions. It is really hard to identify any other determinant of health presenting this mixture of lethality, prevalence, and lack of care, despite having effective treatments readily available. On the other hand, smoking cessation interventions are considered as the gold standard of preventive interventions, far above other preventive measures commonly used. This has prompted the National Committee for Smoking Prevention to develop a consensus document for the Clinical Care of Smoking Cessation in Spain. The purpose of this technical and scientific document is to agree on a basic proposal of quality of care to tackle smokers to quit. This document would serve as a guideline in the clinical practice in our country. The aims of this agreement are to review the effectiveness of the existing therapies for smoking cessation, to synthesize their available evidence, and to set the basic minimum standards of care in the clinical practice of patients who smoke. The consensus sets the strategies, and the evidences that support them, in order to assist both the smokers who want to quit, and the smokers who do not, setting out the steps to intervene in the most adequate.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Benzazepinas/uso terapêutico , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Aconselhamento , Humanos , Motivação , Agonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapêutico , Cooperação do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Comunicação Persuasiva , Quinoxalinas/uso terapêutico , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/psicologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Tabagismo/psicologia , Tabagismo/terapia , Vareniclina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA