RESUMO
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) occurs less often than other stroke types but affects younger patients, imposing a disproportionately high burden of long-term disability. Although management advances have improved outcomes over time, relatively few aSAH treatments have been tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). One lesson learned from COVID-19 is that trial platforms can facilitate the efficient execution of multicenter RCTs even in complex diseases during challenging conditions. An aSAH trial platform with standardized eligibility criteria, randomization procedures, and end point definitions would enable the study of multiple targeted interventions in a perpetual manner, with treatments entering and leaving the platform based on predefined decision algorithms. An umbrella institutional review board protocol and clinical trial agreement would allow individual arms to be efficiently added as amendments rather than stand-alone protocols. Standardized case report forms using the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke common data elements and general protocol standardization across arms would create synergies for data management and monitoring. A Bayesian analysis framework would emphasize frequent interim looks to enable early termination of trial arms for futility, common controls, borrowing of information across arms, and adaptive designs. A protocol development committee would assist investigators and encourage pragmatic designs to maximize generalizability, reduce site burden, and execute trials efficiently and cost-effectively. Despite decades of steady clinical progress in the management of aSAH, poor patient outcomes remain common, and despite the increasing availability of RCT data in other fields, it remains difficult to perform RCTs to guide more effective care for aSAH. The development of a platform for pragmatic RCTs in aSAH would help close the evidence gap between aSAH and other stroke types and improve outcomes for this important disease with its disproportionate public health burden.
RESUMO
Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) refers to unintended consequences of critical care that manifest as new or worsening impairments in physical functioning, cognitive ability, or mental health. As intensive care unit (ICU) survival continues to improve, PICS is becoming increasingly recognized as a public health problem. Studies that focus on PICS have typically excluded patients with acute brain injuries and chronic neurodegenerative problems. However, patients who require neurocritical care undoubtedly suffer from impairments that overlap substantially with those encompassed by PICS. A major challenge is to distinguish between impairments related to brain injury and those that occur as a consequence of critical care. The general principles for the prevention and management of PICS and multidomain impairments in patients with moderate and severe neurological injuries are similar including the ICU liberation bundle, multidisciplinary team-based care throughout the continuum of care, and increasing awareness regarding the challenges of critical care survivorship among patients, families, and multidisciplinary team members. An extension of this concept, PICS-Family (PICS-F) refers to the mental health consequences of the intensive care experience for families and loved ones of ICU survivors. A dyadic approach to ICU survivorship with an emphasis on recognizing families and caregivers that may be at risk of developing PICS-F after neurocritical care illness can help improve outcomes for ICU survivors. In this review, we will summarize our current understanding of PICS and PICS-F, emerging literature on PICS in severe acute brain injury, strategies for preventing and treating PICS, and share our recommendations for future directions.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Família , Estado TerminalRESUMO
Background: Timely patient and family communication is fundamental to the delivery of patient and family-centered care in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, repetitive, non-urgent communication with patients and designated patient contacts (DPCs) may lead to workflow disruptions, patient safety concerns and burnout. Implementing media-rich, educational content via a web-app could promote a more communication-friendly environment and reduce redundant communication. This may lower workflow disruptions and save time for more meaningful interactions with providers. The goal of this study was to deliver relevant, high-quality content via a web-app, assess time savings, and patient satisfaction with the web-app. Methods: A pre-implementation survey was distributed to Neurosciences intensive care unit (NSICU) staff to assess the burden of repetitive non-urgent communication and perceived duration of disruptions. Patients admitted to the NSICU from September 2022 to February 2023, n = 221 were included in the study. Patients were enrolled in the web-app. Patients and their DPC were granted access. Demographics including patient diagnosis, age, gender, and race were collected, along with data on weekly patient enrollment, number of DPCs granted access, total, frequency, and average view times of each piece of web-app content, and expected time saved due to review of web-app-based content by patient and/or DPCs to reduce repetitive communication by NSICU caregivers. The time saved for each piece of web-app content was calculated after getting feedback from providers (attendings, fellows, advanced practice providers, nurses) for how long it generally took them to convey each piece of information to patients and families. Results: Based on web-app content reviewed by patients and/or DPCs, the estimated average amount of NSICU caregiver time saved over the study period, based on application content views, was 82â min per week, and the cumulative total provider time saved for all content views was 26â h and 53â min. Twenty-one of 59 applications were rated by patients or their DPC and received five-star reviews (out of 5). Conclusion: The implementation of a web-app to facilitate and increase efficiency in communication leads to time savings for NSICU providers and patient/DPC satisfaction with the media-rich educational content.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cerebral edema is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. However, uncertainty remains regarding best monitoring and treatment strategies, which may result in wide practice variations. METHODS: A 20-question digital survey on monitoring and management practices was disseminated between July 2022 and May 2023 to clinicians who manage cerebral edema. The survey was promoted through email, social media, medical conferences, and the Neurocritical Care Society Web site. We used the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression to report factors associated with practice variation, diagnostic monitoring methods, and therapeutic triggers based on practitioner and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: Of 321 participants from 160 institutions in 30 countries, 65% were from university-affiliated centers, 74% were attending physicians, 38% were woman, 38% had neurology training, and 55% were US-based. Eighty-four percent observed practice variations at their institutions, with "provider preference" being cited most (87%). Factors linked to variation included gender, experience, university affiliation, and practicing outside the United States. University affiliates tended to use more tests (median 3.87 vs. 3.43, p = 0.01) to monitor cerebral edema. Regarding management practices, 20% of respondents' preferred timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy was after 48 h, and 37% stated that radiographic findings only would be sufficient to trigger surgery. Fifty percent of respondents reported initiating osmotic therapy based on radiographic indications or prophylactically. There were no significant associations between management strategies and respondent or center characteristics. Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they acquired neuroimaging at intervals of 24 h or less. Within this group, attending physicians were more likely to follow this practice (65.5% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral edema monitoring and management strategies vary. Features associated with practice variations include both practitioner and institutional characteristics. We provide a foundation for understanding practice patterns that is crucial for informing educational initiatives, standardizing guidelines, and conducting future trials.
RESUMO
AIM: The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.
Assuntos
Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/terapia , American Heart Association , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 and systemic critical illness are both associated with neurological complications. We provide an update on the diagnosis and critical care management of adult patients with neurological complications of COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: Large prospective multicentre studies conducted in the adult population over the last 18âmonths improved current knowledge on severe neurological complications of COVID-19. In COVID-19 patients presenting with neurological symptoms, a multimodal diagnostic workup (including CSF analysis, brain MRI, and EEG) may identify different syndromes associated with distinct trajectories and outcomes. Acute encephalopathy, which represents the most common neurological presentation of COVID-19, is associated with hypoxemia, toxic/metabolic derangements, and systemic inflammation. Other less frequent complications include cerebrovascular events, acute inflammatory syndromes, and seizures, which may be linked to more complex pathophysiological processes. Neuroimaging findings include infarction, haemorrhagic stroke, encephalitis, microhaemorrhages and leukoencephalopathy. In the absence of structural brain injury, prolonged unconsciousness is usually fully reversible, warranting a cautious approach for prognostication. Advanced quantitative MRI may provide useful insights into the extent and pathophysiology of the consequences of COVID-19 infection including atrophy and functional imaging changes in the chronic phase. SUMMARY: Our review highlights the importance of a multimodal approach for the accurate diagnosis and management of complications of COVID-19, both at the acute phase and in the long-term.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Encefalite , Adulto , Humanos , Estado Terminal , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome , COVID-19/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Studies examining the risk factors and clinical outcomes of arterial vasospasm secondary to cerebral arteriovenous malformation (cAVM) rupture are scarce in the literature. The authors used a population-based national registry to investigate this largely unexamined clinical entity. METHODS: Admissions for adult patients with cAVM ruptures were identified in the National Inpatient Sample during the period from 2015 to 2019. Complex samples multivariable logistic regression and chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) decision tree analyses were performed to identify significant associations between clinical covariates and the development of vasospasm, and a cAVM-vasospasm predictive model (cAVM-VPM) was generated based on the effect sizes of these parameters. RESULTS: Among 7215 cAVM patients identified, 935 developed vasospasm, corresponding to an incidence rate of 13.0%; 110 of these patients (11.8%) subsequently progressed to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Multivariable adjusted modeling identified the following baseline clinical covariates: decreasing age by decade (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92; p < 0.001), female sex (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.45-1.95; p < 0.001), admission Glasgow Coma Scale score < 9 (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.79; p = 0.045), intraventricular hemorrhage (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.17-2.98; p = 0.009), hypertension (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.50-2.08; p < 0.001), obesity (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84; p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.78; p = 0.043), tobacco smoking (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.78; p < 0.019), and hospitalization events (leukocytosis [aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.32-2.04; p < 0.001], hyponatremia [aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.39-1.98; p < 0.001], and acute hypotension [aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.11; p < 0.001]) independently associated with the development of vasospasm. Intraparenchymal and subarachnoid hemorrhage were not associated with the development of vasospasm following multivariable adjustment. Among significant associations, a CHAID decision tree algorithm identified age 50-59 years (parent node), hyponatremia, and leukocytosis as important determinants of vasospasm development. The cAVM-VPM achieved an area under the curve of 0.65 (sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.53). Progression to DCI, but not vasospasm alone, was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.29-4.31; p = 0.016) and lower likelihood of routine discharge (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.96; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale assessment of vasospasm in cAVM identifies common clinical risk factors and establishes progression to DCI as a predictor of poor neurological outcomes.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , Hiponatremia , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano , Adulto , Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Infarto Cerebral/complicações , Infarto Cerebral/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Hiponatremia/complicações , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/complicações , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas/epidemiologia , Leucocitose/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruptura , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano/complicações , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We present a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evacuation to identify variables that were associated with long-term outcome. METHODS: Minimally invasive endoscopic ICH evacuation was performed on patients with supratentorial ICH who fit prespecified clinical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors previously demonstrated to impact functional outcome in ICH were included in a univariate analysis to identify factors associated with favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-3) at 6 months. Factors associated with a favorable outcome in the univariate analysis (P≤0.20) were included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis with the same dependent variable. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent MIS endoscopic ICH evacuation within 72 hours of ictus. In a multivariate analysis, factors associated with good long-term functional outcome included time to evacuation (per hour; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.98], P=0.004), age (per decade, odds ratio [OR], 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.77], P=0.005), presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (OR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.04-0.47], P=0.002), and lobar location (OR, 18.5 [95% CI, 4.5-103], P=0.0005). Early evacuation was not associated with an increased risk of rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Young age, lack of intraventricular hemorrhage, lobar location, and time to evacuation were independently associated with good long-term functional outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic ICH evacuation. The OR for time to evacuation suggests that for each additional hour, there was a 5% reduction in the odds of achieving a favorable outcome.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral/cirurgia , Hematoma/cirurgia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicações , Craniotomia/métodos , Hematoma/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Razão de ChancesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Determine the characteristics of postintensive care syndrome in the cognitive, physical, and psychiatric domains in coronavirus disease 2019 ICU survivors. DESIGN: Single-center descriptive cohort study from April 21, to July 7, 2020. SETTING: Critical care recovery clinic at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. PATIENTS: Adults who had critical illness due to coronavirus disease 2019 requiring an ICU stay of 7 days or more and who agreed to a telehealth follow-up in the critical care recovery clinic 1-month post hospital discharge. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical and psychiatric domains were collected electronically, a cognitive test was performed by a clinician, and clinical data were obtained through electronic medical records. Outcome measures assessed postintensive care syndrome symptoms in the physical (Modified Rankin Scale, Dalhousie Clinical Frailty Scale, Neuro-Quality of Life Upper Extremity and Lower Extremity Function, Neuro-Quality of Life Fatigue), psychiatric (Insomnia Severity Scale; Patient Health Questionnaire-9; and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition), and cognitive (Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment) domains. The 3-Level Version of Euro-QoL-5D was used to assess the physical and psychiatric domains. A diagnosis of postintensive care syndrome was made in cases with evidence of impairment in at least one postintensive care syndrome domain. We included 45 patients with a mean (sd) age of 54 (13) years, and 73% were male. Ninety-one percent of coronavirus disease 2019 ICU survivors fit diagnostic criteria for postintensive care syndrome. 86.7 % had impairments in the physical domain, 22 (48%) reported impairments in the psychiatric domain, and four (8%) had impairments on cognitive screening. We found that 58% had some degree of mobility impairment. In the psychiatric domain, 38% exhibited at least mild depression, and 18 % moderate to severe depression. Eighteen percent presented Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, scores suggestive of posttraumatic stress syndrome diagnosis. In the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment, 9% had impaired cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of critical illness related to coronavirus disease 2019 are at high risk of developing postintensive care syndrome. These findings highlight the importance of planning for appropriate post-ICU care to diagnose and treat this population.
Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Estado Terminal , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/terapia , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Sobreviventes/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Triage of patients with emergent large vessel occlusion stroke to primary stroke centers followed by transfer to comprehensive stroke centers leads to increased time to endovascular therapy. A Mobile Interventional Stroke Team (MIST) provides an alternative model by transferring a MIST to a Thrombectomy Capable Stroke Center (TSC) to perform endovascular therapy. Our aim is to determine whether the MIST model is more time-efficient and leads to improved clinical outcomes compared with standard drip-and-ship (DS) and mothership models. METHODS: This is a prospective observational cohort study with 3-month follow-up between June 2016 and December 2018 at a multicenter health system, consisting of one comprehensive stroke center, 4 TSCs, and several primary stroke centers. A total of 228 of 373 patients received endovascular therapy via 1 of 4 models: mothership with patient presentation to a comprehensive stroke center, DS with patient transfer from primary stroke center or TSC to comprehensive stroke center, MIST with patient presentation to TSC and MIST transfer, or a combination of DS with patient transfer from primary stroke center to TSC and MIST. The prespecified primary end point was initial door-to-recanalization time and secondary end points measured additional time intervals and clinical outcomes at discharge and 3 months. RESULTS: MIST had a faster mean initial door-to-recanalization time than DS by 83 minutes (P<0.01). MIST and mothership had similar median door-to-recanalization times of 192 minutes and 179 minutes, respectively (P=0.83). A greater proportion had a complete recovery (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 0 or 1) at discharge in MIST compared with DS (37.9% versus 16.7%; P<0.01). MIST had 52.8% of patients with modified Rankin Scale of ≤2 at 3 months compared with 38.9% in DS (P=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: MIST led to significantly faster initial door-to-recanalization times compared with DS, which was comparable to mothership. This decrease in time has translated into improved short-term outcomes and a trend towards improved long-term outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03048292.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Unidades Móveis de Saúde/organização & administração , Transferência de Pacientes/organização & administração , Trombectomia/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Trombose das Artérias Carótidas/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Infarto da Artéria Cerebral Média/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Young patients with malignant cerebral edema have been shown to benefit from early decompressive hemicraniectomy. The impact of concomitant infection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and how this should weigh in on the decision for surgery is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all COVID-19-positive patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit for malignant edema monitoring. Patients with >50% of middle cerebral artery involvement on computed tomography imaging were considered at risk for malignant edema. RESULTS: Seven patients were admitted for monitoring of whom 4 died. Cause of death was related to COVID-19 complications, and these were either seen both very early and several days into the intensive care unit course after the typical window of malignant cerebral swelling. Three cases underwent surgery, and 1 patient died postoperatively from cardiac failure. A good outcome was attained in the other 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-positive patients with large hemispheric stroke can have a good outcome with decompressive hemicraniectomy. A positive test for COVID-19 should not be used in isolation to exclude patients from a potentially lifesaving procedure.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Isquemia Encefálica/cirurgia , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Craniectomia Descompressiva/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/cirurgia , Adulto , Edema Encefálico/complicações , Edema Encefálico/cirurgia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19 , Causas de Morte , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Cuidados Críticos , Craniectomia Descompressiva/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical features and outcomes of Black/African American (AA) and Latino Hispanic patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalized in an inter-city hospital in the state of New Jersey. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of AA and Latino Hispanic patients with COVID-19 admitted to a 665-bed quaternary care, teaching hospital located in Newark, New Jersey. The study included patients who had completed hospitalization between March 10, 2020, and April 10, 2020. We reviewed demographics, socioeconomic variables and incidence of in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Logistic regression was used to identify predictor of in-hospital death. RESULTS: Out of 416 patients, 251 (60%) had completed hospitalization as of April 10, 2020. The incidence of In-hospital mortality was 38.6% (n = 97). Most common symptoms at initial presentation were dyspnea 39% (n = 162) followed by cough 38%(n = 156) and fever 34% (n = 143). Patients were in the highest quartile for population's density, number of housing units and disproportionately fell into the lowest median income quartile for the state of New Jersey. The incidence of septic shock, acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring hemodialysis and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) was 24% (n = 59), 21% (n = 52), 33% (n = 82) respectively. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were older age, lower serum Hemoglobin < 10 mg/dl, elevated serum Ferritin and Creatinine phosphokinase levels > 1200 U/L and > 1000 U/L. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from an inter-city hospital's experience with COVID-19 among underserved minority populations showed that, more than one of every three patients were at risk for in-hospital death or morbidity. Older age and elevated inflammatory markers at presentation were associated with in-hospital death.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Coronavirus/etnologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Minoritários/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/etnologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Idoso , COVID-19 , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/etnologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objectives: Standard management strategies for lowering intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury has been well-studied, but the use of lesser known interventions for ICP in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains elusive. Searches were performed in PubMed and EBSCO Host to identify best available evidence for evaluation and management of medically refractory ICP in SAH. The role of standard management strategies such as head elevation, hyperventilation, mannitol and hypertonic saline as well as lesser known management such as sodium bicarbonate, indomethacin, tromethamine, decompressive craniectomy, decompressive laparotomy, hypothermia, and barbiturate coma are reviewed. We also included dose concentrations, dose frequency, infusion volume, and infusion rate for these lesser known strategies. Nonetheless, there is still a gap in the evidence to recommend optimal dosing, timing and its role in the improvement of outcomes but early diagnosis and appropriate management reduce adverse outcomes.
Assuntos
Craniectomia Descompressiva/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Hipertensão Intracraniana/terapia , Solução Salina Hipertônica/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/terapia , Barbitúricos/administração & dosagem , Coma/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Hipertensão Intracraniana/etiologia , Hipertensão Intracraniana/fisiopatologia , Pressão Intracraniana , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
Background and Purpose- Although obesity is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke, studies have shown evidence of an obesity paradox-a protective effect of obesity in patients who already have these disease states. Data on the obesity paradox in intracerebral hemorrhage is limited. Methods- Clinical data for adult intracerebral hemorrhage patients were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2014. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association of body habitus with in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, tracheostomy or gastrostomy placement, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Results- There were 99 212 patients who were eligible. Patients with both obesity (OR=0.69; 95% CI=0.62-0.76; P<0.001) and morbid obesity (OR=0.85; 95% CI=0.74-0.97; P=0.02) were associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality. Morbid obesity was significantly associated with increased odds of a tracheostomy or gastrostomy placement (OR=1.42; 1.20-1.69; P<0.001) and decreased odds of a routine discharge disposition (OR=0.84; 0.74-0.97; P=0.014). Conclusions- Obesity and morbid obesity appear to protect against mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Cerebral/complicações , Obesidade/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hemorragia Cerebral/mortalidade , Feminino , Gastrostomia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Proteção , Traqueostomia , Derivação Ventriculoperitoneal , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has emerged as the standard of care for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) acute ischemic stroke. An increasing number of patients with suspected ELVO are being transferred to stroke centers with interventional capacity. Not all such inter-hospital transfers result in EVT. AIM: To identify the major causes for not performing EVT following transfer. METHODS: An analysis of 222 consecutive patients with suspected ELVO transferred for potential EVT between January 2015 and -December 2017 within a New York City health system was performed. About 36% (80/222) were deemed EVT ineligible and compared to an EVT cohort. RESULTS: Major causes for not performing EVT were established infarct (34%), no or recanalized ELVO (31%), and mild or clinically improved symptoms (21%). In the established infarct subgroup, 28% (7/27) arrived at a stroke center with interventional capacity within 5 h of last known well, compared to 61% (83/142) in the EVT cohort (p = 0.003). In the no or recanalized ELVO subgroup, 40% (10/25) received computed tomographic angiography at the primary stroke center (PSC), compared to 73% (104/142) in the EVT cohort (p = 0.001). Among patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, 6% (6/104) improved from a NIHSS of ≥6 to <6 following transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Established infarct, no or recanalized ELVO, and mild or clinically improved symptoms were the major causes for not performing EVT for patients transferred for ELVO management. These may be addressed by decreasing stroke onset to treatment times and timely ELVO detection at the PSC and/or pre-hospital triage.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Definição da Elegibilidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Hospitais Urbanos , Transferência de Pacientes , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologiaAssuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Adulto , COVID-19 , Complicações do Diabetes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE Patients who have experienced subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) often receive care in the setting of the ICU. However, SAH patients may not all require extended ICU admission. The authors established a protocol on January 1, 2015, to transfer select, low-risk patients to a step-down unit (SDU) to streamline care for SAH patients. This study describes the results of the implemented protocol. METHODS In this retrospective chart review, patients presenting with SAH between January 2011 and September 2016 were reviewed for inclusion. The control group consisted of patients admitted prior to establishment of the SDU transfer protocol, while the intervention group consisted of patients admitted afterward. RESULTS Of the patients in the intervention group, 79.2% (57/72) were transferred to the SDU during their admission. Of these transferred patients, 29.8% (17/57) required return to the neurosurgical ICU (NSICU). There were no instances of morbidity or mortality directly related to care in the SDU. Patients in the intervention group had a mean reduced NSICU length of stay, by 1.95 days, which trended toward significance, and a longer average hospitalization, by 2.7 days, which also trended toward significance. In-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission rate were not statistically different between the groups. In addition, early transfer timing prior to 7 days was associated with neither a higher return rate to the NSICU nor higher 90-day readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, the authors demonstrated that the transfer protocol was safe, feasible, and effective in reducing the ICU length of stay and was independent of transfer timing. Confirmation of these results is needed in a large, multicenter study.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas/cirurgia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Lesões Encefálicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/mortalidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), brain injury visible within 48 h of onset may impact on admission neurological disability and 3-month functional outcome. With volumetric MRI, we measured the volume of brain injury visible after SAH, and assessed the association with admission clinical grade and 3-month functional outcome. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted in the Neurocritical Care Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA. On brain MRI acquired within 48 h of SAH-onset and before aneurysm-securing (n = 27), two blinded readers measured DWI and FLAIR-lesion volumes using semi-automated, computer segmentation software. RESULTS: Compared to post-resuscitation Hunt-Hess grade 1-3 (70 %), high-grade patients (30 %) had higher lesion volumes on DWI (34 ml [IQR: 0-64] vs. 2 ml [IQR: 0.5-7], P = 0.02) and on FLAIR (81 ml [IQR: 24-127] vs. 3 ml [IQR: 0-27], P = 0.02). On DWI, each 10 ml increase in lesion volume was associated with a 101 %-increase in the odds of presenting with 1 grade more in the Hunt-Hess scale (aOR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.10-3.68, P = 0.02), but was not significantly associated with 3-month outcome. On FLAIR, each 10 ml increase in lesion volume was associated with 34 % higher odds of a 1-point increase on the Hunt-Hess scale (aOR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.06-1.68, P = 0.01) and 139 % higher odds of a 1-point increase on the 3-month mRS (aOR 2.39, 95 % CI 1.13-5.07, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The volume of brain injury visible on DWI and FLAIR within 48 h after SAH is proportional to neurological impairment on admission. Moreover, FLAIR-imaging implicates chronic brain injury-predating SAH-as potentially relevant cause of poor functional outcome.