[Efficacy of TS-1 as a Late-Line Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer].

We report 4 female patients with metastatic breast cancer who were administered TS-1 as a late-line treatment and showed favorable outcomes. Their average age was 66.3. The patients, all of whom had undergone prior treatment with both anthracyclines and taxanes, showed intrinsic Luminal A or B subtypes. After administration of TS-1 in the lines of 2 to 9 in metastatic settings, all patients showed a long progression-free survival with a favorable quality of life.

Factors responsible for long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been significantly prolonged over the past decade due to improvement of anti-cancer therapeutics, only a few patients survive for more than 10 years. It has not been determined which patients can have long-term survival with treatment. METHODS: To determine prognostic factors responsible for long-term survival, we retrospectively compared clinicopathologic factors of patients with MBC who survived for 50 months or more after diagnosis with patients who did not. Of 70 patients with MBC who received chemotherapy between November 2005 and September 2011, 23 patients who survived for 50 months or more after diagnosis and 28 patients who died within 50 months after diagnosis were assessed for their clinicopathologic factors and outcomes. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors was significantly higher and the proportion of patients with triple negative tumors (TN) was lower in long-term survivors than in non-long-term survivors (HR+: 87% versus 28.6%, P=0.000037; TN: 13.1% versus 53.6%, P=0.0028). Metastatic site, number of disease sites, prior chemotherapeutic regimens and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status did not differ between the two groups. The proportion of patients who received metronomic regimens was significantly higher in long-term survivors than in non-long-term survivors (65.2% versus 35.7%, P=0.034) when the most effective regimen among regimens that were received in metastatic settings was compared between the two groups. Overall response rate was significantly higher (82.6% versus 17.9%, P<0.00001) and time to treatment failure after receiving the most effective regimen was longer in long-term survivors than in non-long-term survivors (26 versus 5 months, P=0.0001). The number of chemotherapeutic regimens for breast cancer and that for MBC did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with luminal-type MBC who benefit at least once from chemotherapy including metronomic regimens, or patients who continued to receive the most effective regimen for more than two years can be expected to have long-term survival after diagnosis of MBC, regardless of the number of chemotherapeutic regimens they had received.

Indication for skin-sparing mastectomy with or without nipple preservation for primary breast cancer.

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is one of the available operation methods for breast cancer. We discuss here indications for SSM for primary breast cancer. We carried out SSM for 28 patients with breast cancer. Their clinical features were compared with those in patients who underwent breast-conserving treatment (BCT). Fifteen of the 28 patients received SSM according to schedule. The remaining 13 patients who were scheduled to undergo BCT received SSM because of involvement of the surgical margin. Clinical features indicating suitability for SSM included extensive intraductal cancer growth and multicentricity. The length of intraductal cancer growth in these patients was significantly greater than that in 24 patients who received BCT (2.28 versus 0.571 cm; P = 0.000078). Tumor size and tumor-nipple distance were not indicating factors for this treatment. SSM, which is advantageous in terms of aesthetic outcome and oncologic safety, may be widely indicated after careful evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging or pathologic examination.

Indication of metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Clinical outcomes and responsive subtypes.

The survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not improved, despite recent advances in therapeutic strategies. This is mainly due to the fact that cytotoxic agents cannot be administered over a long period, even if they exhibit favorable activity, due to treatment-related side effects or acquisition of tumor resistance to the administered agents. Thus, the development of therapeutic strategies that may be used over a long time period is required to improve survival. We assessed the availability and clinical outcomes of metronomic chemotherapy, which is defined as continuous or frequent treatment with low doses of cytotoxic drugs. A total of 80 patients with MBC received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, and the clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared between 52 patients who received metronomic regimens and 28 patients who received other cytotoxic regimens. As regards clinical outcomes, the median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the metronomic group compared with those in the non-metronomic group (TTF, 15 vs. 4 months, P=0.0001; and OS, 53 vs. 28 months P=0.0012, respectively). In the metronomic group, none of the 18 patients who responded to the regimen had triple-negative (TN) cancer (17 had luminal-type tumors and 1 had a human epidermal factor receptor 2-type tumor). Furthermore, TTF and OS were significantly longer in patients with non-TN cancer compared with those in patients with TN cancer in the metronomic group (TTF, 16 vs. 7 months, P=0.0014; and OS, 108 vs. 20 months, P=0.000007, respectively). The proportion of patients who experienced treatment-related adverse events was significantly lower in the metronomic group compared with that in the non-metronomic group (36.5 vs. 61.5%, respectively; P=0.038). In conclusion, metronomic chemotherapy is a viable option for luminal-type MBC in terms of effectiveness and minimal toxicity, regardless of metastatic sites or prior treatment. However, an alternative treatment is required for TN cancer.

Metronomic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer to prolong time to treatment failure to 12 months or more.

The objective of treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is to control the disease or disease-related symptoms. Prolonged survival has also often been achieved by chemotherapeutic regimens in this setting. Long-term administration of one therapeutic regimen is essential for prolonging survival as well as for maintaining quality of life in these patients. In this study, we focused on time to treatment failure (TTF) as a parameter that predicts patient survival and we retrospectively compared clinical outcomes of patients with MBC who showed TTF of ≥12 months (26 patients) and <12 months (29 patients). The proportion of hormone receptor-positive tumors and the number of prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC were significantly higher and tumor grade was lower in patients with TTF ≥12 months compared to those with TTF <12 months. With regard to clinical outcomes, the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with TTF ≥12 months was significantly higher and median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were longer compared to those with TTF <12 months. Of note, the proportion of patients who received metronomic regimens was significantly higher in patients with TTF ≥12 months compared to those with TTF <12 months (80.8 vs. 24.1%, P=0.00003). To assess the clinical benefit of metronomic regimens, the efficacy in patients receiving metronomic and those receiving non-metronomic regimens was compared. Although there was no difference in ORR between the two groups, median TTP and OS were significantly longer in the metronomic compared to the non-metronomic group (TTP: 30 vs. 4 months, P=0.0017; OS: 68 vs. 28 months, P=0.0005). The results suggested that metronomic chemotherapy is useful for palliative care and also improved clinical outcomes as a regimen for which long-term administration may be expected.

Clinical usefulness of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 extracellular domain as a biomarker for monitoring cancer status and predicting the therapeutic efficacy in breast cancer.

We assessed the clinical usefulness of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 extracellular domain (HER2ECD) as a biomarker for detecting cancer and monitoring disease status and for predicting the efficacy of anticancer treatment in breast cancer. Five-hundred and eighty serum samples from 252 patients with breast cancer were examined for the concentration of HER2ECD to compare with conventional tumor markers (CEA, CA15-3, NCC-ST439 and BCA225). Also, in 19 patients with HER2-overexpressed advanced or recurrent breast cancer who were treated with trastuzumab, clinical outcomes were evaluated retrospectively to determine whether their serum HER2ECD levels predict clinical responses. The proportion of patients with elevated HER2ECD levels was 15.1%, which was compatible with those with elevated conventional marker levels. In patients with HER2-overexpressed breast cancer, the positive rate of HER2ECD was significantly higher (24.1%) than those of conventional markers (7.4-12.9%), suggesting the usefulness of HER2ECD for detecting cancer in this population. HER2-overexpressed patients responding to trastuzumab (12 of 19 patients) showed significantly higher serum HER2ECD level (p = 0.033) and longer time to progression (TTP) (p = 0.039) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.031) than did patients not responding (seven patients). Furthermore, higher response rates were observed in patients with elevated HER2ECD levels than in patients without elevated HER2ECD levels (91.3% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.032), whereas there was no difference in survival between the two groups. The results suggest that HER2ECD is a useful biomarker not only for detecting breast cancer recurrence but also for predicting tumor responses to trastuzumab.