RESUMO
Current practice of sedation and anesthesia for patients undergoing pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory (PCCCL) procedures is known to vary among institutions, a multi-society expert panel with representatives from the Congenital Heart Disease Council of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia and the Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia Society was convened to evaluate the types of sedation and personnel necessary for procedures performed in the PCCCL. The goal of this panel was to provide practitioners and institutions performing these procedures with guidance consistent with national standards and to provide clinicians and institutions with consensus-based recommendations and the supporting references to encourage their application in quality improvement programs. Recommendations can neither encompass all clinical circumstances nor replace the judgment of individual clinicians in the management of each patient. The science of medicine is rooted in evidence, and the art of medicine is based on the application of this evidence to the individual patient. This expert consensus statement has adhered to these principles for optimal management of patients requiring sedation and anesthesia. What follows are recommendations for patient monitoring in the PCCCL regardless of whether minimal or no sedation is being used or general anesthesia is being provided by an anesthesiologist.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/normas , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Sedação Consciente/normas , Cardiopatias Congênitas/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestesiologia/métodos , Anestesiologia/normas , Criança , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Consenso , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico , HumanosRESUMO
Objectives: Limited data on performing bilateral pulmonary artery banding (BPAB) before stage 1 Norwood procedure suggest that some patients may benefit through the postponement of the major cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of BPAB in the surgical management of high-risk patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). Methods: A retrospective review of all high-risk neonates with HLHS who underwent BPAB at our institution was performed. No patients, including those with intact or highly restrictive atrial septum (IAS), were excluded. Results: Between October 2015 and April 2021, 49 neonates with HLHS (including 6 with IAS) underwent BPAB, 40 of whom progressed to the Norwood procedure. Risk factors for not progressing to the Norwood procedure after BPAP include low birth weight (P = .043), the presence of multiple extracardiac anomalies (P = .005), and the presence of genetic disorders (P = .028). Operative mortality was 7.5% (3/40). IAS was associated with operative mortality (P = .022). Conclusions: The strategy of BPAB prestage 1 Norwood procedure was successful in identifying at-risk patients and improving Norwood survival. Although not all patients will need this hybrid approach, a significant number can be expected to benefit from this tactic. These results support the need for a substantial hybrid strategy, in addition to a primary stage 1 Norwood surgical strategy, in the management of HLHS.
RESUMO
Cardiac surgery employing cardiopulmonary bypass exposes infants to a high risk of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of clinical and laboratory variables to predict the development of low cardiac output syndrome, a frequent complication following cardiac surgery in infants. We performed a prospective observational study in the pediatric cardiovascular ICU in an academic children's hospital. Thirty-one patients with congenital heart disease were included. Serum levels of nucleosomes and a panel of 20 cytokines were measured at six time points in the perioperative period. Cardiopulmonary bypass patients were characterized by increased levels of interleukin-10, -6, and -1α upon admission to the ICU compared to non-bypass cardiac patients. Patients developing low cardiac output syndrome endured longer aortic cross-clamp time and required greater inotropic support at 12 h postoperatively compared to bypass patients not developing the condition. Higher preoperative interleukin-10 levels and 24 h postoperative interleukin-8 levels were associated with low cardiac output syndrome. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated a moderate capability of aortic cross-clamp duration to predict low cardiac output syndrome but not IL-8. In conclusion, low cardiac output syndrome was best predicted in our patient population by the surgical metric of aortic cross-clamp duration.