Effects of valsartan, benazepril and their combination in overt nephropathy of type 2 diabetes: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS: To evaluate whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) combination therapy is more nephroprotective than ACE inhibitor or ARB monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, open, blind-endpoint phase III trial sponsored by the Italian Drug Agency, 103 consenting patients with type 2 diabetes, aged >40 years, with serum creatinine levels 159 to 309 µmol/L, spot morning urinary albumin-creatinine ratio > 1000 mg/g (or > 500 mg/g in those on ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy at inclusion) were stratified by centre and randomized to 4.5-year treatment with valsartan 320 mg/d (n = 36), benazepril 20 mg/d (n = 34) or halved doses of both medications (n = 33). The primary endpoint was end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Modified intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: Recruitment took place between June 2007 and February 2013 at 10 centres in Italy and one in Slovenia. A total of 77 participants completed the study and 26 were prematurely withdrawn. During a median (interquartile range) of 41 (18-54) months, 12 participants on benazepril (35.3%) and nine on combination therapy (27.3%) progressed to ESRD, versus five on valsartan (13.9%). Differences between benazepril (hazard ratio [HR] 3.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-10.30; P = 0.018) or combination therapy (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.07-10.0; P = 0.038) and valsartan were significant, even after adjustment for age, gender and baseline serum creatinine, systolic blood pressure and 24-hour proteinuria (HR 5.16, 95% CI 1.50-17.75, P = 0.009 and HR 4.75, 95% CI 1.01-22.39, P = 0.049, respectively). Adverse events were distributed similarly among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In people with type 2 diabetes with nephropathy, valsartan (320 mg/d) safely postponed ESRD more effectively than benazepril (20 mg/d) or than halved doses of both medications.

Phosphate levels in patients treated with low-flux haemodialysis, pre-dilution haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration: post hoc analysis of a multicentre, randomized and controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether convective therapies allow better control of serum phosphate (P) is still undefined, and no data are available concerning on-line haemofiltration (HF). The objectives of the study are to evaluate the effect of convective treatments (CTs) on P levels in comparison with low-flux haemodialysis (HD) and to evaluate the correlates of serum phosphate in a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: This analysis was performed in the database of a multicentre, open label and randomized controlled study in which 146 chronic HD patients from 27 Italian centres were randomly assigned to HD (70 patients) or CTs: on-line pre-dilution HF (36 patients) or on-line pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (40 patients). RESULTS: CTs did not affect P (P = 0.526), calcium (Ca) (P = 0.849) and parathyroid hormone levels (P = 0.622). P levels were associated with the use of phosphate binders including aluminium-based phosphate binders (P < 0.001) and sevelamer (P < 0.001), pre-dialysis bicarbonate levels (P < 0.001) and pre-dialysis blood K levels (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis (generalized linear model), serum P was again largely unassociated with CTs (P = 0.631). Notably, participating centres were by far the strongest independent correlate of serum P, explaining 45.3% of the variance of serum P over the trial and this association was confirmed at multivariate analysis. Bicarbonate (P < 0.001) and, to a weaker extent, serum K (P = 0.032) were independently related to serum P. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with low-flux HD, CTs did not significantly affect serum P levels. Participating centres were the main source of P variability during the trial followed by treatment with phosphate binders, serum bicarbonate and, to a weak extent, serum potassium levels (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT011583309).

Predictors of haemoglobin levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients treated with low-flux haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration: results of a multicentre randomized and controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of haemoglobin (Hb) levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in dialysis patients have not yet been clearly defined. Some mainly uncontrolled studies suggest that online haemodiafiltration (HDF) may have a beneficial effect on Hb, whereas no data are available concerning online haemofiltration (HF). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of convective treatments (CTs) on Hb levels and ESA resistance in comparison with low-flux haemodialysis (HD) and to evaluate the predictors of these outcomes. METHODS: Primary multivariate analysis was made of a pre-specified secondary outcome of a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled study in which 146 chronic HD patients from 27 Italian centres were randomly assigned to HD (70 patients) or CTs: online pre-dilution HF (36 patients) or online pre-dilution HDF (40 patients). RESULTS: CTs did not affect Hb levels (P = 0.596) or ESA resistance (P = 0.984). Hb correlated with polycystic kidney disease (P = 0.001), C-reactive protein (P = 0.025), ferritin (P = 0.018), ESA dose (P < 0.001) and total cholesterol (P = 0.021). The participating centres were the main source of Hb variability (partial eta(2) 0.313, P < 0.001). ESA resistance directly correlated with serum ferritin (P = 0.030) and beta2 microglobulin (P = 0.065); participating centres were again a major source of variance (partial eta(2) 0.367, P < 0.001). Transferrin saturation did not predict either outcome variables (P = 0.277 and P = 0.170). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with low-flux HD, CTs did not significantly improve Hb levels or ESA resistance. The main sources of variability were participating centres, ESA dose and the underlying disease.

[Evolution and physical principles of convection-based dialysis treatment]. / Storia e principi biofisici generali delle tecniche convettive.

In the late 1960s, ultrafiltration was first used in clinical settings to increase, by convection, the clearance of toxic solutes in patients undergoing dialysis. Unfortunately, the efficiency of convection-based dialysis treatment, or hemofiltration (HF), was limited by the relatively low ultrafiltration coefficient of the dialyzers available at the time. Thus, the exchanged volume was low, and the corresponding clearance of low-molecular-weight solutes was insufficient with respect to the current target value of Kt/V urea. This was probably the cause of the failed improvement in the clinical and metabolic status of patients compared with standard dialysis treatment. In 1977, favorable results of the combination of diffusion and convection demonstrated the potential advantage of hemodiafiltration (HDF) over HF in terms of dialysis clearance. HDF was in fact the only means to obtain significant clearance of high-molecular-weight solutes while maintaining adequate urea clearance, whereas the increase in mean hematocrit in the erythropoietin era limited the exchanged volume in HF, in spite of the improved water permeability of the dialysis membranes. Mixed diffusive and convective clearance is less than the sum of the two parts because of reciprocal interference. Diffusive clearance mainly depends on the membrane permeability and the solute concentration gradient. New, highly permeable dialysis membranes can reach significant clearance of high-molecular-weight solutes such as Beta2 microglobulin (B2m) simply by diffusion, although in clinical settings there is also considerable ''hidden'' convection due to backfiltration. However, convection remains the best way to remove high-molecular-weight solutes, also for this kind of membrane. The ultrafiltration rate and the sieving coefficient account for the amount of convective clearance, as described in detail in the text. To define the treatment dose, the equation of Waniewsky allows the theoretical calculation of the urea clearance in HDF, both in postdilution and predilution mode. Unfortunately, no such equation is available for B2m. With a new mathematical model, well fitting with preliminary measured data although not fully validated, we calculated the relationship between urea and B2m clearance in predilution versus postdilution HDF, also considering the impact of variables such as blood and ultrafiltration flow. In particular, the predilution mode may decrease the urea clearance in comparison to hemodialysis with the same membrane and blood flow. This also applies to B2m clearance in predilution vs postdilution HDF, in spite of a marked increase in the ultrafiltration rate, at least in the more common clinical settings. In conclusion, good knowledge of the physics of solute transport is mandatory for appropriate prescription of HDF, in order to maximize both low- and high-molecular-weight solute clearance.

Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD.

Symptomatic intradialytic hypotension is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD). The application of convective therapies to the outpatient setting may improve outcomes, including intradialytic hypotension. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study, we randomly assigned 146 long-term dialysis patients to HD (n = 70), online predilution hemofiltration (HF; n = 36), or online predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF; n = 40). The primary end point was the frequency of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension (ISH). Compared with the run-in period, the frequency of sessions with ISH during the evaluation period increased for HD (7.1 to 7.9%) and decreased for both HF (9.8 to 8.0%) and HDF (10.6 to 5.2%) (P < 0.001). Mean predialysis systolic BP increased by 4.2 mmHg among those who were assigned to HDF compared with decreases of 0.6 and 1.8 mmHg among those who were assigned to HD and HF, respectively (P = 0.038). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated significant risk reductions in ISH for both HF (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.92) and HDF (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.63). There was a trend toward higher dropout for those who were assigned to HF (P = 0.107). In conclusion, compared with conventional HD, convective therapies (HDF and HF) reduce ISH in long-term dialysis patients.

Ramipril and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: The ARCADIA Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. We evaluated the cardioprotective effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this phase 3, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, parallel, multicenter trial, we recruited patients on maintenance hemodialysis with hypertension and/or left ventricular hypertrophy from 28 Italian centers. Between July 2009 and February 2014, 140 participants were randomized to ramipril (1.25-10 mg/d) and 129 participants were allocated to non-RAS inhibition therapy, both titrated up to the maximally tolerated dose to achieve predefined target BP values. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included the single components of the primary end point, new-onset or recurrence of atrial fibrillation, hospitalizations for symptomatic fluid overload, thrombosis or stenosis of the arteriovenous fistula, and changes in cardiac mass index. All outcomes were evaluated up to 42 months after randomization. RESULTS: At comparable BP control, 23 participants on ramipril (16%) and 24 on non-RAS inhibitor therapy (19%) reached the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.64; P=0.80). Ramipril reduced cardiac mass index at 1 year of follow-up (between-group difference in change from baseline: -16.3 g/m2; 95% confidence interval, -29.4 to -3.1), but did not significantly affect the other secondary outcomes. Hypotensive episodes were more frequent in participants allocated to ramipril than controls (41% versus 12%). Twenty participants on ramipril and nine controls developed cancer, including six gastrointestinal malignancies on ramipril (four were fatal), compared with none in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Ramipril did not reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ARCADIA, NCT00985322 and European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database number 2008-003529-17.

A simple approach for assessing equilibrated Kt/V beta 2-M on a routine basis.

BACKGROUND: Large observational studies have shown a reduction in morbidity and mortality in patients on high-flux haemodialysis (HD) or convective techniques, compared with low-flux HD. An index to evaluate treatment efficiency in middle molecule (MM) removal would be recommended. Since beta-2-microglobulin (beta2-M) is a recognized MM marker, we evaluated an easy approach for Kt/V(beta2-M) assessment on a routine basis, avoiding other complex methods. METHODS: An equation that estimates single-pool (sp) Kt/V(beta2-M) was derived from Leypoldt's formula, which calculates beta2-M dialyser clearance (K(beta2-M)) from the post/pre-dialysis beta2-M concentration (C(t)/C(0)) ratio and the weight loss/end-dialysis weight (Delta W/W) ratio. Our equation, spKt/V(beta2-M) = 6.12 Delta W/W [1 - ln(C(t)/C(0))/ln(1 + 6.12 Delta W/W)], was derived by assuming urea distribution volume (V(u)) as 49% of W and beta2-M volume (V(beta2-M)) as V(u)/3, in agreement with the average patient values in the HEMO Study. The spKt/V(beta2-M) values calculated with our equation (F) in 129 patients on 407 sessions of different high-flux treatments were compared with those calculated with the method applied in the HEMO Study (HM). Equilibrated beta2-M concentration (C(eq)) of the same sessions was also estimated with the equation for C(eq) by Tattersall, and equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V(beta2-M)) was calculated by introducing Tattersall's equation into our simplified spKt/V(beta2-M) formula. RESULTS: Mean results of our spKt/V(beta2-M) equation (F) were very close to those of the HM method (1.48 +/- 0.38 vs 1.47 +/- 0.37). The difference was less than +/-0.1 in 95% of cases. A mean end-session beta2-M rebound of 44 +/- 14% was predicted, which caused a mean reduction in actual Kt/V(beta2-M) of ~27% (eKt/V(beta2-M) = 1.08 +/- 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The method proposed to estimate spKt/V(beta2-M) and eKt/V(beta2-M) could become a simple tool to monitor the efficiency of high-flux HD and convective techniques and to evaluate the adequacy of treatments in terms of MM removal. Moreover, it might help to better understand the effects of different dialysis schedules. Validation on a larger dialysis population is required.

The PIRP project (Prevenzione Insufficienza Renale Progressiva): how to integrate hospital and community maintenance treatment for chronic kidney disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a global health burden with great economic impact on healthcare and therefore it requires appropriate interventions by Health Care Systems. The PIRP (Prevenzione Insufficienza Renale Progressiva) project is endorsed and funded by the Emilia-Romagna Regional Health Board and involves all the Nephrology Units of the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). The project has a predominantly clinical purpose and is expected to bring about a continuous quality improvement in the treatment of patients with CKD. Its aims are to intercept patients in an early phase of CKD, to delay their illness progression and to prevent cardiovascular complications. An integrated care pathway involving nephrologists, general practitioners (GPs) and other specialists has been created to identify patients to whom ambulatory care targeted on effective, efficient pharmaceutical and dietary treatment as well as on lifestyle modifications is subsequently provided. With the cooperation of GPs, in its 13 years of activity the project identified and followed up more than 25,000 CKD patients, who attended the Nephrology units with more than 100,000 visits. The effects of a closer and joint monitoring of CKD patients by GPs and nephrologists can be quantified by the reduction of the mean annual GFR decline (average annual CKD-EPI change: - 0.34 ml/min), and by the decrease in the overall incidence of patients who annually started dialysis in the Emilia-Romagna Region, that dropped from 218.6 (× million) in 2006 to 197.5 (× million) in 2016, corresponding to about 100 cases.

Urea in exhaled breath condensate of uraemics and patients with chronic airway diseases.

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is composed mainly by water and also contains non-volatile mediators, which are expired in small droplets of airway fluid. Urea has been proposed as a normalization factor for EBC non-volatile biomarkers. Aim of this study was to assess volatility and diffusivity of urea ex vivo and to measure its EBC concentrations in different clinical conditions. Volatility was assessed quantifying EBC concentrations collected at 4 different temperatures, whereas diffusivity was tested by measuring urea concentrations in both plasma and EBC from uraemic patients on intermittent haemodialysis. Urea was also measured in EBC from patients with chronic airway diseases, i.e., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and cystic fibrosis. The concentration of urea but not its absolute amount in EBC increased with condensation temperature. Haemodialysis influenced EBC and plasma urea concentrations in a similar way. The concentrations of urea in chronic airway diseases did not significantly differ from those of controls. Urea is a non-volatile molecule ex vivo and EBC urea depends on its concentrations in plasma. Urea concentrations in EBC are unaffected by three chronic airway diseases. We suggest that there is no need to normalize non-volatile biomarkers in EBC for urea concentrations to account for inter-individual variability. However, in repeated measurements within the same individual, the use of urea either as a normalizing factor or as covariate variable could be proposed to control intra-individual variability.

[Challenges and results of the PIRP project (Prevenzione della Insufficienza Renale Progressiva) of the Emilia-Romagna Region].

The PIRP project was conceived in 2004; with the aim to face the increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with the aging and increased survival of the population. The first phase of the project consisted of training primary care physicians to identify people at risk of CKD and to implement intervention strategies that proved to be effective in preventing CKD it or delaying its progression once it is established. In the second phase of the project, dedicated ambulatories were opened in the nephrology units of Emilia-Romagna hospitals to provide an in-depth assessment and personalized care to CKD patients, following them up until renal failure or death or referring them back to general practitioners, according to the study protocol. A web-based registry was implemented to collect demographic and clinical data on PIRP patients. As of 30 June 2018, the registry included 26.211 CKD patients, with a median follow-up of 24.5 months. Over the 14 years of the PIRP the mean age of incident patients increased from 71.0 years to 74.2 years and the mean eGFR increased from 30.56 to 36.52 mL/min/1.73 m ², proving that the project was successful in recruiting older patients with a better renal function. At 5 years, the percentage of patients still active in the project was =45%.The implementation of the project has seen a reduction in the number of patients arriving every year to the dialysis treatment in E-R (about 100 units less from 2006 to 2016). The PIRP cohort is the largest in Italy and in Europe, which makes it ideal for research based on international comparisons and as a model for national registries.

Iron-replete hemodialysis patients do not require higher EPO dosages when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration: results of the Italian Study on Erythropoietin Converting (ISEC).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported significant increases in epoetin dosages when converting hemodialysis patients from subcutaneous (SC) to intravenous (IV) administration. More recent studies that corrected for iron deficiency found a much lower, if any, increase in epoetin dosage and/or decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) level after conversion from SC to IV epoetin administration. Therefore, the matter is still open for debate. METHODS: This multicenter observational study evaluated stable hemodialysis patients without iron deficiency who had a stable SC epoetin dosage and Hb level of 10 g/dL or greater (> or =100 g/L) at the time of study enrollment. Data for epoetin dosage, anemia, and inflammatory markers were collected retrospectively during the last 6 months of SC epoetin treatment and prospectively for 6 months after conversion to IV administration. The primary efficacy assessment was difference in Hb levels and epoetin dosages between patients administered epoetin SC and IV. Changes in values for iron stores, C-reactive protein, intact parathyroid hormone, and albumin were monitored as control parameters. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 262 hemodialysis patients from 6 Italian centers. Overall, mean Hb levels were similar with SC and IV epoetin administration (11.49 g/dL [114.9 g/L] and 11.44 g/dL [114.4 g/L]). Mean epoetin dosages also were similar with SC and IV administration (7,185 and 7,270 IU/wk). In patients requiring epoetin dosages of 12,000 IU/wk or greater at study entry, mean dosages tended to decrease after conversion to IV administration. There were no significant changes in control parameters. CONCLUSION: Conversion from SC to IV epoetin administration did not result in changes in Hb levels or epoetin dosage requirements in iron-replete hemodialysis patients.

Clinical effects of online dialysate and infusion fluids.

Online hemodiafiltration appears to be the most effective technique of renal replacement therapy in many respects. Removal of small and high-molecular weight substances is enhanced. Modern technology ensures a safe, online production of reinfusion fluids. Nonetheless, stringent maintenance rules are required for the production of sterile and nonpyrogenic-dialysate solutions. In this review, we will critically review the state of the art of the clinical effects derived from the use of ultrapure dialysate and the online production of dialysate fluids in high-flux hemodiafiltration.

Urinary soluble CD14 mediates human proximal tubular epithelial cell injury induced by LPS.

Renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTEC) are target for LPS during sepsis and renal infections. In the present study, we evaluated whether stimulation of human PTEC by LPS is modulated through the soluble or the membrane form of the LPS receptor CD14. We found that PTEC lacked expression of the membrane form of CD14 and did not release soluble CD14 (sCD14). sCD14 was detected in the urine of normal subjects and it was increased in patients with renal sepsis or with proteinuria. In the presence of sCD14 and LPS binding protein (LBP), PTEC were 10 to 100-fold more sensitive to LPS activation, resulting in cytokine production (IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-alpha) and NO release. We found that sCD14 purified from urine was biologically active on PTEC. Moreover, the presence of sCD14 and LBP was required for cytotoxicity induced by low concentrations of LPS (1-10 ng/ml) in PTEC. Cell death showed the characteristics of both necrosis and apoptosis, as demonstrated by LDH release and by TUNEL and acridine orange staining and caspase-3 activation. Whereas the LPS alone was sufficient to induce necrosis, sCD14 and LBP were required for apoptosis. Our results suggest that sCD14 excreted in urine may participate with endotoxin in the activation and injury of renal proximal tubules. In particular, sCD14 may contribute to the tubulo-interstitial injury in clinical settings characterised by proteinuria and enhanced susceptibility to infections such as in diabetes.

Effects of add-on fluvastatin therapy in patients with chronic proteinuric nephropathy on dual renin-angiotensin system blockade: the ESPLANADE trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This open, prospective, randomized trial aimed to assess the effects of statins in chronic kidney disease patients on optimized antiproteinuric treatment with combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: After 1-month benazepril therapy followed by 1-month benazepril-valsartan combined therapy (run-in), 186 consenting patients with residual proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h were randomized to 6-month benazepril-valsartan therapy alone or combined with fluvastatin. Between-groups changes in proteinuria (primary outcome), serum lipids, and GFR were compared by ANCOVA. Analyses were blinded and by intention to treat. RESULTS: During the run-in, proteinuria decreased more on benazepril-valsartan than on benazepril alone. Proteinuria reduction correlated with concomitant reduction in total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A levels. After randomization, median proteinuria similarly decreased from 1.2 (0.6 to 2.2) to 1.1 (0.5 to 1.7) g/24 h on fluvastatin and from 1.5 (0.8 to 2.7) to 1.0 (0.5 to 2.4) g/24 h on benazapril-valsartan therapy alone. Fluvastatin further reduced total and LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B versus benazepril-valsartan alone, but did not affect serum triglycerides and GFR. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic kidney disease patients with residual proteinuria despite combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blockade therapy, add-on fluvastatin does not affect urinary proteins, but further reduces serum lipids and is safe. Whether combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blockade, and statin therapy may improve cardiovascular outcomes in this high-risk population is worth investigating.

Burnout in health care providers of dialysis service in Northern Italy--a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available regarding the prevalence of burnout among dialysis health care workers. Aims of the present study were to assess and compare burnout levels in a sample of nurses and physicians working in dialysis units, and to investigate their relationships with quality of life, in a cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: A total of 344 workers from 10 dialysis centres in Northern Italy completed a battery of questionnaires including the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the MOS-36 Item Short Form Health Survey [SF36: physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores] and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ30). Data on social and demographic characteristics and working conditions were also collected. General Estimating Equations models were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Overall, burnout scores were lower than the Italian normative sample, with no significant differences between physicians and nurses. However, 30% of nurses had high emotional exhaustion vs 18% of physicians (adjusted OR 2.38, P = 0.003). Emotional exhaustion was also predicted by number of worked hours and months worked in dialysis in the previous 2 years. Depersonalisation was predicted by male gender and bad relationship with coworkers. Having no children and having a permanent hospital position predicted low personal accomplishment. PCS was lower in nurses (50.0 vs 53.3, P < 0.001), while no significant difference was found for MCS and GHQ30. Lower PCS was associated with emotional exhaustion (P = 0.007) and GHQ30 > 5 with depersonalization (P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Although burnout is not a general problem in dialysis health care providers, a subgroup of them may be identified, who would benefit from supportive measures to prevent this condition. Nurses appeared more burned-out in the emotional exhaustion scale than physicians.

Organic contamination in dialysis water: trichloroethylene as a model compound.

BACKGROUND: Routine water monitoring in a haemodialysis centre revealed high trichloroethylene (TCE) concentrations. The aim of this study is to describe the measures adopted after organic contamination of dialysis water in order to avoid the possibility of patient exposure. We also carried out in vitro experiments to evaluate the accumulation of TCE in various devices normally used in a dialysis water treatment system (DWTS). METHODS: In vivo and in vitro blood and water TCE levels were determined by means of solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography/mass spectrometer. RESULTS: High TCE concentrations were found throughout the DWTS; acceptably low levels were obtained only by replacing the activated charcoal, ionic-exchange resins, microfilters and PVC pipes. The adsorption and realising capacities of these devices were tested in vitro, and the elimination curves made it possible to calculate the total percentage of the previously absorbed TCE mass released into the water. Evidence of exposure was confirmed by the relatively high TCE levels in the patient blood samples taken 30 days after the last exposure even if the subjects were asymptomatic. In vivo experiments showed that the blood gain of TCE through the low flux membrane during the course of dialysis was about 77+/-10.4% of the amount carried by dialysis fluid as calculated on the basis of its partition coefficient value (K(b/w) 3.75). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, when present in dialysis water, the lipophilic TCE contaminant can accumulate in various devices, thus transforming them into possible sources of exposure. This highlights the importance of periodically monitoring dialysis water for organic substances that have a great affinity to the blood compartment, in order to prevent occasional or chronic patient exposure.

Comparison of 3 automated assays for C-reactive protein in end-stage renal disease: clinical and epidemiological implications.

Chronic inflammation has been repeatedly reported in individuals undergoing hemodialysis. C-reactive protein (CRP) is considered a marker of chronic inflammation, as well as a mediator of the atherosclerotic process. Clinical and epidemiologic studies are based on plasma values obtained with the use of various automated methods. Our aim was to test 3 commercially available methods and compare the values obtained with the use of these tests in a population of individuals undergoing hemodialysis. We compared the following methods: immunoturbidimetry (AU2700 biochemistry analyzer; Olympus, Rungis, France) laser nephelometry (Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany), and nephelometry (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, Calif. The 3 methods were used in 3 different centers: Montpellier, France; and Pisa and Turin, Italy, respectively. We prepared samples for the estimation of imprecision values (ie, coefficient of variation [CV]) from the plasma of normal patients by adding purified C-reactive protein at concentrations ranging from 2.6 to 180 mg/L for intraassay variation and concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150, and 180 mg/L for interassay variation. Intraassay imprecision was determined with the use of 10 replicate analyses on the same sample of the same day. We assessed interassay imprecision using the same sample, divided into aliquots and measured on 5 consecutive days. Agreement between methods was assessed on predialysis serum samples collected from patients with stable chronic kidney disease who were undergoing long-term hemodialysis at the 3 different centers (Montpellier,192; Pisa, 56; Turin,98). Serum was separated from the red cells and stored in 3 aliquots at -70 degrees C until it could be analyzed. Samples were thawed only once, circulated among the 3 centers, and each tested with all 3 of the methods. The Beckman method yielded the most precise results, with intraassay CVs ranging from 1 to 2 and interassay CVs ranging from 1 to 4. The Behring method was the least precise, with intraassay and interassay CVs ranging from 12 to 15 and 7 to 16, respectively. The results of the Olympus method fell between those of the other 2 methods. Agreement between the results of the Olympus and Behring methods was satisfactorily. The Beckman and Olympus methods yielded, on average, similar results over the entire range of CRP values. We detected significant disagreement between the Beckman method and the other 2 methods, obtaining results 10 to 100 times lower with the Beckman method. This became evident in terms of kappa-statistics. Our findings emphasize the need for careful assessment of the methods used to detect CRP in serum samples. Failure to do so may ultimately have a negative impact on the real relevance of CRP as a marker and on the role of chronic implication particularly in epidemiologic studies.