Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(11): 2293-2294, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31512186

Assuntos
Pesquisa , Humanos , Incerteza
2.
Acad Med ; 2024 Sep 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39265093

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Peer support is beneficial to physicians in distress, but few institutions have created formal programs that train residents and fellows to effectively support their peers. Existing curricula also do not address the differential experience of residents from historically excluded groups, who are more likely to experience distressing mistreatment and discrimination in the clinical learning environment. The Graduate Medical Education (GME) Peer Support Ambassador (PSA) Program aimed to address this gap by: (1) offering peer support skills and trauma-informed care training to a diverse cohort of resident leaders representing a range of specialties, (2) deploying these leaders to support their peers, and (3) facilitating opportunities for participants to train other residents in these skills. In the PSA program's inaugural year, 10 residents were trained in fundamentals of peer support, trauma-informed care, and the restorative mindset. The training increased participants' confidence and skills in these areas, increased their understanding of when to refer a co-resident for additional levels of support, and their awareness of resources for mental health care and addressing mistreatment and discrimination. Beyond the skills training, the program broadened participants' perspectives about other residents' experiences and helped them feel more connected to residents in other specialties. Opportunities to improve the PSA program include creating more opportunities for program participants to connect between sessions and after the training, publicizing the program more effectively to residents experiencing distress, and training a larger number of residents in peer support skills.

3.
Ann Surg Open ; 3(3): e187, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37601153

RESUMO

Objectives: We explored differences by race/ethnicity in regard to several factors that reflect or impact wellbeing. Background: Physician wellbeing has critical ramifications for the US healthcare system, affecting clinical outcomes, patient experience, and healthcare economics. Within surgery, literature examining the association between race/ethnicity and wellbeing has been limited and inconclusive. Methods: Residents at 16 academic General Surgery training programs completed an online questionnaire. Racial/ethnic identity, gender identity, post-graduate year (PGY) level, and gap years were self-reported. Differences by race/ethnicity in flourishing (global wellbeing) as well as factors reflecting resilience (mindfulness, personal accomplishment, workplace support, workplace control) and risk (depression, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, stress, anxiety, workplace demand) were assessed. Results: Of 300 respondents (response rate 34%), 179 (60%) were non-male, 123 (41%) were residents of color (ROC), and 53 (18%) were from racial/ethnic groups that are underrepresented in medicine (UIM). Relative to White residents, ROC have significantly lower flourishing and higher anxiety, and these remain significant when adjusting for gender, PGY level, and gap years. Relative to residents overrepresented in medicine (OIM), UIM residents have significantly lower emotional exhaustion and depersonalization after adjusting for gender, PGY level and gap years. Conclusions: Disparities in resident wellbeing based on race/ethnicity and UIM/OIM status exist. However, the experience of ROC is not homogeneous. As part of the transformative process to address systemic racism, eliminate disparities in surgical training, and reconceptualize wellbeing as a fundamental asset for optimal surgeon performance, further understanding the specific contributors and detractors of wellbeing among different individuals and groups is critical.

4.
J Med Educ Curric Dev ; 8: 23821205211000352, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33796793

RESUMO

PROBLEM: Medical students often feel unprepared to care for patients whose cultural backgrounds differ from their own. Programs in medical schools have begun to address health: inequities; however, interventions vary in intensity, effectiveness, and student experience. INTERVENTION: The authors describe an intensive 2-day diversity, equity, and inclusion curriculum for medical students in their orientation week prior to starting formal classes. Rather than using solely a knowledge-based "cultural competence" or a reflective "cultural humility" approach, an experiential curriculum was employed that links directly to fundamental communication skills vital to interactions with patients and teams, and critically important to addressing interpersonal disparities. Specifically, personal narratives were incorporated to promote individuation and decrease implicit bias, relationship-centered skills practice to improve communication across differences, and mindfulness skills to help respond to bias when it occurs. Brief didactics highlighting student and faculty narratives of difference were followed by small group sessions run by faculty trained to facilitate sessions on equity and inclusion. CONTEXT: Orientation week for matriculating first-year students at a US medical school. IMPACT: Matriculating students highly regarded an innovative 2-day diversity, equity, and inclusion orientation curriculum that emphasized significant relationship-building with peers, in addition to core concepts and skills in diversity, equity, and inclusion. LESSONS LEARNED: This orientation represented an important primer to concepts, skills, and literature that reinforce the necessity of training in diversity, equity, and inclusion. The design team found that intensive faculty development and incorporating diversity concepts into fundamental communication skills training were necessary to perpetuate this learning. Two areas of further work emerged: (1) the emphasis on addressing racism and racial equity as paradigmatic belies further essential understanding of intersectionality, and (2) uncomfortable conversations about privilege and marginalization arose, requiring expert facilitation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA