Effects of hospital palliative care on health, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality across intensive and non-intensive-care units: A systematic review and metaanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital palliative care has been shown to improve quality of life and optimize hospital utilization for seriously ill patients who need intensive care. The present review examined whether hospital palliative care in intensive care (ICU) and non-ICU settings will influence hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality. METHOD: A systematic search of CINAHL/EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, MEDLINE/Ovid, PubMed, and the Web of Science through 12 October 2016 identified 16 studies that examined the effects of hospital palliative care and reported on hospital length of stay and in-hospital death. Random-effects pooled odds ratios and mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Heterogeneity was measured by the I 2 test. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was utilized to assess the overall quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Of the reviewed 932 articles found in our search, we reviewed the full text of 76 eligible articles and excluded 60 of those, which resulted in a final total of 16 studies for analysis. Five studies were duplicated with regard to outcomes. A total of 18,330 and 9,452 patients were analyzed for hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality from 11 and 10 studies, respectively. Hospital palliative care increased mean hospital length of stay by 0.19 days (pooled mean difference = 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI 95%] = -2.22-2.61 days; p = 0.87; I 2 = 95.88%) and reduced in-hospital mortality by 34% (pooled odds ratio = 0.66; CI 95% = 0.52-0.84; p < 0.01; I 2 = 48.82%). The overall quality of evidence for both hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality was rated as very low and low, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Hospital palliative care was associated with a 34% reduction of in-hospital mortality but had no correlation with hospital length of stay.

A high-value cost conscious approach to minimize heparin induced thrombocytopenia antibody (HITAb) testing using the 4T score.

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication from administration of heparin products. The 4T score is a validated pre-test probability tool to screen for HIT in hospitalized patients. As the negative predictive value (NPV) is very high further testing for HIT in patients with a low score can be avoided. Our objective was to determine trends at our hospital with respect to utilization of HIT antibody (HITAb) testing and evaluate economic burden from unnecessary HIT testing. A retrospective cohort review was performed on patients age 18 and above admitted to a tertiary care center from February 2013 to December 2014 who underwent HITAb testing. Surgical ICU patients were excluded. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk for HIT based on the 4T model. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi square and regression models. Of 150 patients that underwent HITAb testing, 134 met inclusion criteria. 73 were male (54.47 %) and mean age was 55.50 ± 17.27 years. 81 patients had a low 4T score 0-3. Analysis of testing trends showed 60.44 % of patients were tested for HITAb despite being low risk using the 4T model. Only three patients with low 4T score were positive on confirmatory SRA testing (NPV 96.29 % CI 95 = 89.56-99.23 %). Expenditure due to inappropriate testing and treatment was estimated at $103,348.13. The majority of HITAb testing was found unnecessary based on the investigator calculated 4T score. We propose implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) based calculator in order to reduce unneeded tests and reduce use of costlier alternative anticoagulants.

Smoking-associated interstitial lung disease: update and review.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking-associated interstitial lung disease manifests as several heterogeneous disorders involving the airways, pleura, and lung parenchyma with various radiological patterns. The clinical history, radiologic, and pathologic findings are important to distinguish these more uncommon diseases. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for diagnosis and to manage these conditions appropriately. AREAS COVERED: This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of acute eosinophilic pneumonia, e-cigarettes, or vaping associated lung injury, respiratory bronchiolitis interstitial lung disease, desquamative interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and combined pulmonary fibrosis emphysema. EXPERT OPINION: Cigarette smoking is associated with a variety of pathologic conditions that affect the airways and lungs. E-cigarette use and vaping present new challenges to the clinician. Consensus between the clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings is important in identifying and differentiating between the various entities to properly diagnose smoking-related interstitial lung diseases discussed in this review.