Nodal pCR and overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node positive ER+/Her2- breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in node-positive (N+) ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is debated, given low total pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. However, the rate and impact of nodal pCR is unknown. We sought to evaluate nodal pCR rates and the impact on overall survival (OS). Further, we sought to validate the association between nodal pCR with age and Ki67. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for cN + ER+/HER2- BC patients treated with NAC and surgery. Data from 2010 to 2018 were used to evaluate nodal pCR and OS, with multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling for OS, as well as Ki67 for the years 2018-2019. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, we identified 19,611 cN + ER+/HER2- BC patients treated with NAC. While total pCR occurred in only 7.4%, nodal pCR rates were nearly double (14.3%). Nodal pCR (+/- breast pCR) was seen in 21.7% and associated with 5-year OS rate of 86.1% (95% CI: 84.9-87.4%) versus 77.1% (95% CI: 76.3-77.9%) in patients without nodal pCR (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, nodal pCR had better OS (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.63, p < 0.001) across all age groups. Of 2,444 patients with available Ki67, those with age < 50 and Ki67 ≥ 20% had the highest nodal pCR at 31.6%. CONCLUSION: In cN + ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC, nodal pCR is common, associated with age and Ki67, and prognostic for OS. These data strongly suggest that for cN + patients, eradication of nodal disease is critical for OS, and total pCR may not be the optimal measure of NAC benefit.

ASO Author Reflections: Toward Individualized Management of Heterogenous Mixed Invasive Ductolobular Breast Cancers.

Mixed invasive ductolobular breast cancer (MIDLC) is a rare breast cancer with varying lobular and ductal components. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of MIDLC are not well understood due to the rarity of the cancer and the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria and reporting. There is a need for better understanding and individualized management of this heterogeneous spectrum of breast cancers.

Lobular-Like Features and Outcomes of Mixed Invasive Ductolobular Breast Cancer (MIDLC): Insights from 54,403 Stage I-III MIDLC Patients.

BACKGROUND: Mixed invasive ductolobular breast cancer (MIDLC) is a rare histological subtype of breast cancer (BC), with components of both invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and invasive lobular cancer (ILC). Its clinicopathological features and outcomes have not been well characterized. METHOD: The National Cancer Database 2010-2017 was reviewed to identify women with stage I-III BCs. Univariate analysis was performed using Chi-square or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariable analysis with logistic regression to predict surgical decisions. Survival was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 955,828 women with stage I-III BCs (5.7% MIDLC, 10.3% ILC, and 84.0% IDC). MIDLC was more like ILC than IDC in terms of multicentricity (14.2% MIDLC, 13.0% ILC, 10.0% IDC), hormone receptor positivity (96.6% MIDLC, 98.2% ILC, 81.2% IDC), and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; 5.8% MIDLC, 5.2% ILC, 10.8% IDC). 744,607 women underwent upfront surgery. The mastectomy rates were 42.3% for MIDLC, 46.5% for ILC, and 33.3% for IDC (all p < 0.001). With 5.5 years of median follow-up, the adjusted overall survival in the upfront surgery hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) biological subgroup was better in MIDLC (hazard ratio 0.88, p < 0.001) and ILC (hazard ratio 0.91, p < 0.001) than in IDC. Like ILC, MIDLC also had a lower pathological complete response to NAC than IDC (12.3% MIDLC, 7.3% ILC, 28.6% IDC). CONCLUSIONS: MIDLC displays a mixed pattern of characteristics favoring features of ILC compared with IDC, with favorable 5-year overall survival compared with IDC within the HR+/HER2- subtype who underwent upfront surgery.

The Impact of Enhanced Recovery on Long-Term Survival in Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Implementing perioperative interventions such as enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has improved short-term outcomes and minimized length of stay. Preliminary evidence suggests that adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol may also enhance 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in colorectal cancer surgery. This retrospective study presents long-term survival outcomes and disease recurrence from a high-volume, single-center practice. METHODS: All patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma and undergoing elective minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were retrospectively reviewed between February 2005 and April 2018. Relevant data were extracted from Mayo electronic records and securely stored in a database. Short-term morbidity and long-term oncological outcomes were compared between patients enrolled in ERP and those who received non-enhanced care. RESULTS: Overall, 600 rectal cancer patients underwent MIS, of whom 320 (53.3%) were treated according to the ERP and 280 (46.7%) received non-enhanced care. ERP was associated with a decrease in length of stay (3 vs. 5 days; p < 0.001) and less overall complications (34.7 vs. 54.3%; p < 0.001). The ERP group did not show an improvement in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) compared with non-enhanced care on multivariable (non-ERP vs. ERP OS: hazard ratio [HR] 1.268, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.852-1.887; DFS: HR 1.050, 95% CI 0.674-1.635) analysis. CONCLUSION: ERP was found to be associated with a reduction in short-term morbidity, with no impact on long-term oncological outcomes, such as OS, CSS, and DFS.

Early vs conventional onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing curative intent resection.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) impacts patients in their 60s, but its incidence in younger patients is increasing. We hypothesize that younger patients may have worse oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative pancreatic resection for PDAC between January 2011 and December 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) was defined as pancreatic cancer diagnosed in patients ≤50 years. Clinical and survival outcomes were compared between EOPC and Conventional Onset Pancreas Cancer (COPC). RESULTS: A total of 1133 patients were identified, 65 (5.7%) were EOPC. Preoperative patient characteristics including sex, smoking status, alcohol habitus, diabetes mellitus, CA 19-9, and neoadjuvant therapy were similar between EOPC and COPC (p > 0.05). EOPC patients were more likely non-white (p = 0.03), had lower ASA scores (p = 0.02) and larger median tumor size (33 vs 28 mm, p = 0.04), but had similar pathological stages and rate of R0 resections (p > 0.05). Postoperative outcomes were similar (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in overall (HR 0.93, CI 0.64, 1.33; p = 0.68) or recurrence free (HR 1.05, CI 0.75, 1.48; p = 0.77) survival between the EOPC and COPC after adjusting for significant factors. CONCLUSION: Patients with EOPC who underwent surgical resection had similar oncological outcomes compared to patients with COPC.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an endolumenal, organ-sparing therapy for obesity, with wide global adoption. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ESG with lifestyle modifications compared with lifestyle modifications alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomised clinical trial at nine US centres, enrolling individuals aged 21-65 years with class 1 or class 2 obesity and who agreed to comply with lifelong dietary restrictions. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1·5; with stratified permuted blocks) to ESG with lifestyle modifications (ESG group) or lifestyle modifications alone (control group), with potential retightening or crossover to ESG, respectively, at 52 weeks. Lifestyle modifications included a low-calorie diet and physical activity. Participants in the primary ESG group were followed up for 104 weeks. The primary endpoint at 52 weeks was the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL), with excess weight being that over the ideal weight for a BMI of 25 kg/m2. Secondary endpoints included change in metabolic comorbidities between the groups. We used multiple imputed intention-to-treat analyses with mixed-effects models. Our analyses were done on a per-protocol basis and a modified intention-to-treat basis. The safety population was defined as all participants who underwent ESG (both primary and crossover ESG) up to 52 weeks. FINDINGS: Between Dec 20, 2017, and June 14, 2019, 209 participants were randomly assigned to ESG (n=85) or to control (n=124). At 52 weeks, the primary endpoint of mean percentage of EWL was 49·2% (SD 32·0) for the ESG group and 3·2% (18·6) for the control group (p<0·0001). Mean percentage of total bodyweight loss was 13·6% (8·0) for the ESG group and 0·8% (5·0) for the control group (p<0·0001), and 59 (77%) of 77 participants in the ESG group reached 25% or more of EWL at 52 weeks compared with 13 (12%) of 110 in the control group (p<0·0001). At 52 weeks, 41 (80%) of 51 participants in the ESG group had an improvement in one or more metabolic comorbidities, whereas six (12%) worsened, compared with the control group in which 28 (45%) of 62 participants had similar improvement, whereas 31 (50%) worsened. At 104 weeks, 41 (68%) of 60 participants in the ESG group maintained 25% or more of EWL. ESG-related serious adverse events occurred in three (2%) of 131 participants, without mortality or need for intensive care or surgery. INTERPRETATION: ESG is a safe intervention that resulted in significant weight loss, maintained at 104 weeks, with important improvements in metabolic comorbidities. ESG should be considered as a synergistic weight loss intervention for patients with class 1 or class 2 obesity. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03406975. FUNDING: Apollo Endosurgery, Mayo Clinic.

Clinical Behavior, Management, and Treatment Response of Estrogen Receptor Low (1-10%) Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) guide management and impact outcomes of breast cancer (BC). This study compares ER-low (1-10%) with ER-negative (< 1%) and ER-positive (>10%) BC and investigates the significance of PR expression within ER-low disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with HER2-negative invasive BC were identified from the National Cancer Database 2018-2019. Treatment and outcomes were compared using chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 232,762 patients, ER expression was: negative (13.8%), low (2.0%), and > 10% (84.2%). Chemotherapy was given in 83.9% of ER- disease, 82.4% of ER-low/PR- disease, 58.9% of ER-low/PR+ disease, and only in 22.9% of ER+ disease. Within the ER-low subgroup, adjuvant endocrine therapy, recurrence score, and Ki67 varied by PR status (all < 0.01). Patients with ER-low disease selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were younger and had higher T and N category, tumor grade, and Ki67. With NAC, pathological complete response (pCR) rates were similar between ER-low/PR- and ER-low/PR+ (39.5% and 38.1%, respectively, p = 0.67), and were closer to the ER- group (39.7%) than the ER+ group (8.4%). On multivariable analysis, the adjusted effect of ER status (1-10% versus > 10%) on chemotherapy administration was odds ratio (OR) 8.2 (95% CI 7.3-9.2, p < 0.001) for PR-negative, and OR 3.3 (95% CI 7.3-9.2, p < 0.001) for PR-positive. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the tumor features and clinical management of ER-low tumors vary significantly by PR expression. Within ER-low tumors, PR- tumors more closely resemble ER- BC, while PR+ tumors exhibit less aggressive characteristics. In ER-low disease selected for treatment with NAC, response is similar to ER- regardless of PR status.

Accuracy of DOTATATE PET imaging in the preoperative planning of small bowel neuroendocrine tumor resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We assessed the accuracy of preoperative gallium-68 DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in estimating multifocality and nodal metastases of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (sbNETs). METHODS: A multicenter analysis was performed on patients with sbNETs who underwent preoperative DOTATATE PET imaging and surgical resection, with manual palpation of the entire length of the small bowel, between January 2016 and August 2022. Preoperative imaging reports and blinded secondary imaging reviews were compared to the final postoperative pathology reports. Descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: One-hundred and four patients met inclusion criteria. Pathology showed 53 (51%) patients had multifocal sbNETs and 96 (92%) had nodal metastases. The original preoperative DOTATATE PET imaging identified multifocal sbNET in 28 (27%) patients and lymph node (LN) metastases in 80 (77%) patients. Based on original radiology reports, sensitivity for multifocal sbNET identification was 45%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 86%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 62%. For the identification of LN metastases, sensitivity was 82%, specificity was 88%, PPV was 99%, and NPV was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Although DOTATATE PET imaging is specific and relatively accurate, sensitivity and NPV are insufficient to guide surgical planning. Preoperative use should not replace open palpation to identify additional synchronous lesions or to omit regional lymphadenectomy.

Nodal Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Luminal Breast Cancer Vary by Genomic Risk.

BACKGROUND: Although an advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is eradication of axillary disease, nodal pCR rates are much lower for ER+/HER2- breast cancer than other subtypes. We sought to evaluate the association of genomic risk with nodal pCR in ER+/HER2- disease. METHODS: Patients with ER+/HER2- clinically-node-positive (cT0-cT4d/cN1-cN3/cM0) breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery 2010-2018 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Low genomic risk was classified as Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score (RS) 0-25, or Mammaprint 70-gene or RS coded as "Low." High genomic risk included RS >25, or 70-gene or RS coded as "High." Nodal pCR was compared between patients with high versus low genomic risk by using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 15,698 patients, genomic risk was available for 692 of 15,698 (4.4%). High genomic risk was similar between patients aged <50 years versus 50+ (50.8% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.10). Nodal pCR was higher in high genomic risk (25.0%) than low genomic risk (10.4%, p < 0.001). This difference was observed both for patients aged <50 years (29.9% vs. 9.8%) and aged ≥50 years (22.7% vs. 10.8%). On multivariable analysis adjusted for potential confounding variables, including age, grade, and PR status, genomic risk was independently associated with decreased odds of residual nodal disease (odds ratio 0.49, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer treated with NAC, nodal pCR was highest in patients aged <50 years with high genomic risk tumors. In contrast, nodal pCR rates were low in patients with low genomic risk tumors, regardless of age. This information may help when counseling patients regarding axillary management.

Contemporary Axillary Management in cT1-2N0 Breast Cancer with One or Two Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes: Factors Associated with Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Within the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Management of the axilla in patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer with one or two positive (+) sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is often debated, especially in patients undergoing mastectomy. In 2018, the National Cancer Database (NCDB) began collecting the number of +SLNs, enabling identification of patients with one or two +SLNs for the first time. METHODS: From the 2018 NCDB participant user file (PUF), all cT1-2N0M0 patients with one or two +SLNs were identified. The rates of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy were determined, and logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with cALND. RESULTS: Of 10,531 patients with one or two +SLNs, cALND was performed in 807/6498 (12.4%) BCS patients and 1845/4033 (45.7%) mastectomy patients (p < 0.001). Factors associated with cALND in BCS were cT2 versus cT1 (16.0% versus 11.1%, p < 0.001), two versus one positive SLN (20.7% versus 10.8%, p < 0.001), and higher tumor grade (grade 3: 15.4% versus grade 1-2: 11.7%, p = 0.002). Factors associated with cALND among mastectomy were cT2 versus cT1 (48.2% versus 43.7%, p = 0.004), two versus one positive SLN (56.6% versus 42.8%, p < 0.001), younger age (age < 50 years: 49.0%, age 50+ years: 44.1%, p = 0.004), and Hispanic ethnicity (55.7% versus 45.1%, p = 0.001). After adjusting for pN category, adjuvant radiation was significantly less likely after mastectomy if cALND was performed (odds ratio (OR) 0.51, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Omission of cALND with one or two +SLNs in BCS is common. Deescalation of axillary therapy in mastectomy is slower, with a cALND rate of 45.7% in 2018. With the recent updates to the National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) guidelines, we anticipate continued deescalation of axillary therapy in mastectomy patients.

Overuse of Axillary Surgery in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Opportunity for De-escalation.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is noninvasive breast cancer and therefore nodal staging is not routinely recommended. We evaluated the use of and factors associated with axillary surgery in DCIS in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: DCIS cases were identified from the NCDB 2012-2018. Use of axillary surgery was evaluated over time, and factors associated with axillary surgery were assessed for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy groups. RESULTS: We identified 178,762 patients, median age of 60 years. Majority of DCIS (87%) was ER-positive, and 14% low, 43% intermediate, and 44% high grade. Median DCIS size was 1.1 cm. BCS was performed in 72%, whereas 28% had mastectomy. Overall axillary surgery was performed in 38% and was higher in patients undergoing mastectomy compared with patients undergoing BCS (88% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). At axillary surgery, the vast majority (92%) had 1-5 nodes examined, whereas 8% had >5 nodes examined. Over time, axillary surgery decreased in BCS patients (21% in 2012 to 17% in 2018, p < 0.001) but increased slightly in mastectomy patients (86% in 2012 to 90% in 2018, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with axillary surgery were younger patient age, larger tumor size, higher grade, and ER-negative status. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with axillary surgery reflect higher risk disease for upstage to invasive cancer, indicating surgeon judgment. However, despite axillary surgery being overtreatment of DCIS, it is common in mastectomy and is performed for one in five patients undergoing BCS. This provides opportunity for improvement in breast cancer care delivery.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Presentation, and Patient Management.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic caused delays in breast cancer management forcing clinicians to potentially alter treatment recommendations. This study compared breast cancer stage at diagnosis and rates of neoadjuvant therapy among women presenting to our institution before and during COVID-19. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis from March 2020-August 2020 (during-COVID-19) were compared with March 2019-August 2019 (pre-COVID-19). We compared stage at diagnosis, clinical/demographic features, and neoadjuvant therapy use between the time periods. RESULTS: A total of 573 patients included: 376 pre-COVID-19, 197 during-COVID-19. Method of cancer detection was by imaging in 66% versus 63% and by physical findings/symptoms in 34% versus 37% of patients comparing pre-COVID-19 to during-COVID-19, p = 0.47. Overall clinical prognostic stage did not differ significantly (p = 0.39) between the time periods, nor did cM1 disease (2% in each period); 23% pre-COVID-19 and 27% during-COVID-19 presented with cN+ disease (p = 0.38). Neoadjuvant therapy use was significantly higher during-COVID-19 (39%) versus pre-COVID-19 (29%, p = 0.02) driven by increased neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) use (7% to 16%, p = 0.002), whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy use did not change (22% vs. 23%, p = 0.72). In HR+/HER2- disease, NET use increased from 10% pre-COVID-19 to 23% during-COVID-19 (p = 0.001) with a significant increase in stage I patients (7 to 22%, p < 0.001) and nonsignificant increases in stage II (18 to 23%, p = 0.63) and stage III (9 to 29%, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer stage at diagnosis did not differ significantly during-COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19. More patients during-COVID-19 were treated with NET, which was significantly increased in stage I HR+/HER2- disease.

Sexual Well-Being After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Does Preservation of the Nipple Matter?

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed) with and without nipple preservation. METHODS: All female patients undergoing mastectomy between 2011 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were identified and were mailed the BREAST-Q survey. Breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were evaluated and compared by surgery type using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for univariate analysis and linear regression for multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 1547 patients, 771 completed the BREAST-Q survey (response rate 50%). Of these 771 respondents, 237 (31%) did not have reconstruction, 198 (26%) had nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (NSM), and 336 (44%) had skin-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (SSM) ± nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction (via surgery ± tattoo). Patients with breast reconstruction had consistently higher BREAST-Q scores versus those without. Comparing NSM with all SSMs, there was no difference in satisfaction with breasts (mean 71.8 vs. 70.2, p = 0.21) or psychosocial well-being (mean 81.9 vs. 81.3, p = 0.47); however, sexual well-being was significantly higher in the NSM group on univariate (mean 64.5 vs. 58.0, p = 0.002) and multivariable (ß = -4.69, p = 0.03) analysis. Sexual well-being scores were similar for NSM and the SSM subgroups with any type of NAC reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that NSM positively impacts patient sexual well-being after breast reconstruction compared with SSM, particularly SSM without nipple reconstruction or tattoo. SSM with any type of NAC reconstruction achieved similar satisfaction and sexual well-being to those undergoing NSM.

Node Positivity Among Sonographically Suspicious but FNA-Negative Axillary Nodes.

BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of sonographically suspicious axillary lymph nodes is helpful to clinically stage patients and guide consideration of neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. However, data are limited for suspicious nodes that are FNA negative. Our goal is to compare the frequency of node positivity between patients with negative axillary ultrasound (AUSneg) versus suspicious AUS with negative FNA (FNAneg). METHODS: With IRB approval, we identified all clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with invasive breast cancer treated with upfront surgery at our tertiary care center between 2016 and 2021. AUS is routinely performed with FNA of suspicious lymph node(s). We compared clinicopathologic characteristics and nodal positivity rates between AUSneg and FNAneg groups. RESULTS: A total of 1580 cN0 patients with invasive breast cancer were analyzed, including 1240 AUSneg and 340 FNAneg patients. The FNAneg group was younger (median age 59.7 years versus 63.5 years, p < 0.001) and had higher clinical T (cT) category (29.1% versus 21.7% with cT2-cT4 disease, p = 0.005). Final axillary pathologic node positivity did not differ significantly between the AUSneg and FNAneg groups (16.5% versus 19.1%, p = 0.25). Among FNAneg patients, 58/340 (17.1%) had a clip placed, with retrieval confirmed in 28/58 (48.3%). Of the 28 retrieved clipped nodes, 27 were sentinel nodes. Final pathologic nodal status (pN+%) did not differ between patients in whom retrieval of the clipped node was confirmed versus not confirmed (28.6% versus 16.7%, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Both patients with sonographically suspicious node(s) and negative FNA and patients with negative AUS have a similarly low chance of positive nodes. Additionally, routine targeted excision of FNA-negative clipped nodes is not warranted.

Overall survival after surgical staging by lymph node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: a national cancer database study.

OBJECTIVE: Substituting lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging purposes in endometrial cancer has raised concerns about incomplete nodal resection and detrimental oncological outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between the type of lymph node assessment and overall survival in endometrial cancer accounting for node status and histology. METHODS: Women with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymph node assessment from January 2012 to December 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, had previous cancer, and whose follow-up was less than 90 days were excluded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: Of 68 614 patients, 64 796 (94.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy, 1777 (2.6%) underwent sentinel node biopsy only, and 2041 (3.0%) underwent both procedures. On multivariable analysis, neither sentinel lymph node biopsy alone nor sentinel node biopsy followed by lymphadenectomy was associated with significantly different overall survival compared with lymphadenectomy alone (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.17, and HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08, respectively). When stratified by lymph node status, sentinel node biopsy alone or followed by lymphadenectomy was not associated with different overall survival, both in patients with negative (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.24, and HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.27, respectively) or positive (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.52, and HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.04, respectively) lymph nodes. These findings held true when sentinel node biopsy alone and sentinel node biopsy plus lymphadenectomy groups were merged, and on stratification by histotype (type one vs type 2) or inclusion of only complete lymphadenectomy (at least 10 pelvic nodes and at least one para-aortic node removed). In all analyses, age, Charlson-Deyo score, black race, AJCC pathological T stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, brachytherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with overall survival. DISCUSSION: No difference in overall survival was found in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy alone, sentinel node biopsy followed by lymphadenectomy, or lymphadenectomy alone. This observation remained regardless of node status, histotype, and lymphadenectomy extent.

Survival impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIA colon cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Utility of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II cancer remains a matter of debate. Clinical guidelines suggest adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II tumors with high-risk features, in particular T4 tumors. However, limited consensus exists regarding the importance of other high-risk features (lymphovascular or perineural invasion, microsatellite instability). Our study aimed to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIA (T3N0) colon cancer patients. Patients who underwent colectomy for stage IIA colon adenocarcinoma (2010-2015) were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and divided in two groups based on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to compare overall survival between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with specific high-risk features LVI, PNI and MSI was performed. Among 46 688 surgical patients with stage IIA colon adenocarcinoma 5937 (12.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 40 751 (87.3%) were observed. Five-year IPTW-adjusted survival was higher in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (79.7% [95% CI 79.1, 80.2]) compared to the observation group (70.3% [95% CI 69.7, 70.9]). Patients with high-risk pathological features showed an estimated 5-year survival benefit of 11.3% (78.2% [95% CI 77.4, 79.1] vs 66.9% [95% CI 65.9, 67.8]) when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This NCDB analysis revealed a survival benefit for patients with stage IIA colon adenocarcinoma and high-risk features that were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Changes in Management Strategy and Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Extent of Surgery in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

BACKGROUND: Given reports of low response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), we evaluated whether use of alternative strategies such as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is increasing. Additionally, we investigated whether NET is associated with more breast conservation surgery (BCS) and less extensive axillary surgery in those with ILC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried the NCDB from 2010 to 2016 and identified all women with stage I-III hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) ILC who underwent surgery. We used Cochrane-Armitage tests to evaluate trends in utilization of the following treatment strategies: NAC, short-course NET, long-course NET, and primary surgery. We compared rates of BCS and extent of axillary surgery stratified by clinical stage and tumor receptor subtype for each treatment strategy. RESULTS: Among 69,312 cases of HR+/HER2- ILC, NAC use decreased slightly (from 4.7 to 4.2%, p = 0.007), while there was a small but significant increase in long-course NET (from 1.6 to 2.7%, p < 0.001). Long-course NET was significantly associated with increased BCS in patients with cT2-cT4 disease and less extensive axillary surgery in clinically node positive patients with HR+/HER2- tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Primary surgery remains the most common treatment strategy in patients with ILC. However, NAC use decreased slightly over the study period, while the use of long-course NET had a small increase and was associated with more BCS and less extensive axillary surgery.

Use of the Twelve-Gene Recurrence Score for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Its Influence on Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation and Hormonal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Tumor genomic prognostic assays estimate 10-year local recurrence risk in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and can guide treatment decisions. This study aimed to evaluate which DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) underwent DCIS score genomic testing and the influence of the results on adjuvant treatment recommendations. METHODS: The study identified patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who had DCIS treated with BCS from 2010 to 2016. RESULTS: Of 141,047 patients, 4255 (3%) had a DCIS score assessed, 0.3% in 2010 increasing to 5.8% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The patients most likely to undergo DCIS score assessment had more favorable tumor features in the multivariable analysis. The DCIS score result was documented for 91.4% of the tested patients (n = 3888): 70.5% of the low-risk, 14.9% of the intermediate-risk, and 14.6% of the high-risk patients. The patients with low-risk scores were less likely to have radiation than those with intermediate- or high-risk scores among the patients with either ER + (35.0% vs 71.0% or 81.1%) or ER- disease (48.1% vs 77.0% or 85.5%) (each p ≤ 0.001). The patients who had ER + disease with high- and intermediate-risk scores were most commonly treated with both radiation and hormone therapy (HT) (57.1% and 52.2%), whereas the most common treatment for those with a low-risk DCIS score was HT alone without radiation (37.1%). Comparison of genomic testing with clinicopathologic features showed an independent influence of genomic testing on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the DCIS score increased over time, predominantly for favorable DCIS. Patients with a low-risk score were significantly less likely to receive radiation, supporting an impact of the DCIS score on treatment de-escalation.

Sentinel Lymph Node Removal After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Negative Patients: When to Stop?

BACKGROUND: The maximum number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) to be resected to accurately stage the axilla in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for the treatment of clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer has not been determined. We sought to determine the sequence of removal of the positive SLNs in this patient population. METHODS: All patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with cN0 invasive breast cancer who received NAC and underwent SLN surgery at Mayo Clinic Rochester between September 2008 and September 2018 were identified. Univariate analysis was performed to compare factors associated with positive nodes and where the first positive node was in the sequence of removal of the SLNs. RESULTS: We identified 446 cancers among 440 patients with a median age of 51 (IQR: 43, 61) years. At surgery, 381 (85.4%) cancers were pathologically node (ypN) negative and 65 (14.6%) were pN + . The number of nodes removed was similar for both patients with ypN0 and ypN + disease, with a median number of SLNs removed of 2.0 (IQR: 2.0, 3.0). Of all patients with a positive node, the first positive node was most commonly the 1st node removed (75.4%), and was identified by the 3rd SLN removed in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Among cN0 patients treated with NAC, if a positive SLN is present, it is most commonly identified as the 1st sentinel node removed by the surgeon, and was identified by the 3rd sentinel node in our series. This suggests that once 3 SLNs have been resected, removal of additional sentinel lymph nodes does not add diagnostic value.

Burden and causes of readmissions following initial discharge after aortic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Aortic syndromes, including aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH), and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU), carry significant morbidity and mortality; few data exist regarding burden and causes of related rehospitalizations following initial discharge. METHODS: The study was conducted using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. All adult residents (age ≥18 years) with an incident diagnosis of AD, IMH, and PAU (1995-2015) were identified from the Rochester Epidemiology Project using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes and Hospital Adaptation of the International Classification of Diseases, second edition, codes. Assessment of any-cause (aortic and cardiovascular), aorta-related, or cardiovascular-related readmissions was determined following date of hospital discharge or diagnosis date (ie, the index event). RESULTS: A total of 117 patients of 130 cases of AD, IMH, and PAU included in the initial study population survived the index event and were evaluated. The median age of diagnosis was 74 years, and 70 (60%) were male. A total of 79 patients (68%) experienced at least one readmission. The median time to first any-cause, cardiovascular, and aortic readmission was 143, 861, and 171 days, respectively. The cumulative incidence of any-cause readmissions at 2, 4, and 10 years was 45%, 55%, and 69%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular readmissions at 2, 4, and 10 years was 15%, 20%, and 28%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of aortic readmissions at 2, 4, and 10 years was 38%, 46%, and 59%, respectively. Overall survival for the entire cohort at 2, 4, and 10 years was 84%, 75%, and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions following initial discharge after diagnosis of aortic syndrome are common and not different across specific disease types. Whereas aorta-related rehospitalizations occur in more than half of patients but tend to be earlier, cardiovascular-related rehospitalizations tend to happen later in about one-third of patients. This may suggest the need for early follow-up focused on aortic complications, whereas later follow-up should address cardiovascular events.