Effectiveness of the quadrivalent high-dose influenza vaccine for prevention of cardiovascular and respiratory events in people aged 65 years and above: Rationale and design of a real-world pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Influenza has been an acknowledged cause of respiratory disease for decades. However, considerable related, and often unappreciated, disease burden stems from cardiovascular complications, exacerbations of underlying medical conditions and secondary respiratory complications, with the highest burden in the elderly. This novel study combines the gold standard method of a randomized controlled trial with real-world data collection through national registries, to assess the relative effectiveness of high-dose (QIV-HD) vs standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-SD) in preventing cardio-respiratory hospitalizations in a large cohort of adults aged ≥65 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: This trial (NCT04137887) is a Phase III/IV, modified double-blinded, randomized, registry-based trial, conducted by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). Participants (n>120 000) are being enrolled over multiple influenza seasons and randomized (1:1) to receive QIV-HD or QIV-SD. Participant follow-up is based on data collection up to 11 months post-vaccination using Finnish national health registries. The primary objective is to demonstrate the relative superior effectiveness of QIV-HD over QIV-SD in preventing cardio-respiratory hospitalizations up to 6 months post-vaccination. Safety will be assessed using automated online tools throughout the study, with causality assessed using statistical and probabilistic methods; serious adverse reactions and adverse events of special interest will be investigated individually. CONCLUSION: This large, real-world, randomized study will provide valuable insight into the contribution of influenza in causing severe cardio-respiratory events, and the role of vaccination with QIV-HD in reducing these outcomes compared to the current standard of care. FUNDING: Sanofi Pasteur.

High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine for Prevention of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Hospitalizations in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) versus standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-SD) in preventing respiratory or cardiovascular hospitalizations in older adults. METHODS: FinFluHD was a phase 3b/4 modified double-blind, randomized pragmatic trial. Enrolment of 121,000 adults ≥65 years was planned over three influenza seasons (October to December 2019-2021). Participants received a single injection of QIV-HD or QIV-SD. The primary endpoint was first occurrence of an unscheduled acute respiratory or cardiovascular hospitalization (ICD-10 primary discharge J/I codes), from ≥14 days post-vaccination until May 31. The study was terminated after one season due to COVID-19; follow-up data for 2019-2020 are presented. RESULTS: 33,093 participants were vaccinated (QIV-HD, n = 16,549; QIV-SD, n = 16,544); 529 respiratory or cardiovascular hospitalizations (QIV-HD, n = 257; QIV-SD, n = 272) were recorded. The rVE of QIV-HD versus QIV-SD to prevent respiratory/cardiovascular hospitalizations was 5.5% (95% CI, -12.4 to 20.7). When prevention of respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations were considered separately, rVE estimates of QIV-HD versus QIV-SD were 5.4% (95% CI, -28.0 to 30.1) and 7.1% (95% CI, -15.0 to 25.0), respectively. Serious adverse reactions were <0.01% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite insufficient statistical power due to the impact of COVID-19, rVE point estimates demonstrated a trend toward a benefit of QIV-HD over QIV-SD. QIV-HD was associated with lower respiratory or cardiovascular hospitalization rates than QIV-SD, with a comparable safety profile. Adequately powered studies conducted over multiple influenza seasons are needed to determine statistical significance of QIV-HD compared with QIV-SD against preventing respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04137887.

Superior immunogenicity of high-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine versus Standard-Dose vaccine in Japanese Adults ≥ 60 years of age: Results from a phase III, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: A high-dose, split-virion inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4-HD; Sanofi) is being used for the prevention of influenza in multiple countries. This study examined the immunogenicity and safety of the IIV4-HD vaccine administered intramuscularly (IM) compared with a locally licensed standard-dose influenza vaccine (IIV4-SD) administered subcutaneously (SC) in Japan. METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center study in older adults ≥ 60 years of age conducted during the Northern Hemisphere (NH) influenza season of 2020-21 in Japan. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single IM injection of IIV4-HD or SC injection of IIV4-SD. Hemagglutination inhibition antibody and seroconversion rates were measured at baseline and day 28. Solicited reactions were collected for up to 7 days after vaccination, unsolicited adverse events up to 28 days after vaccination, and serious adverse events throughout the study. RESULTS: The study included 2100 adults ≥ 60 years of age. IIV4-HD given IM induced superior immune responses versus IIV4-SD given SC as assessed by geometric mean titers for all four influenza strains. Superior seroconversion rates were also observed for IIV4-HD compared to IIV4-SD for all influenza strains. The safety profiles of IIV4-HD and IIV4-SD were similar. IIV4-HD was well tolerated in participants, with no safety concerns identified. CONCLUSIONS: IIV4-HD provided superior immunogenicity versus IIV4-SD and was well tolerated in participants ≥ 60 years of age in Japan. With superior immunogenicity based on the multiple randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence of trivalent high-dose formulation, IIV4-HD is expected to be the first differentiated influenza vaccine in Japan that offer a greater protection against influenza and its complications in adults 60 years of age and older. STUDY REGISTRATION: NCT04498832 (clinicaltrials.gov); U1111-1225-1085 (who.int).

Antibody-mediated NK cell activation as a correlate of immunity against influenza infection.

Antibodies play a critical role in protection against influenza; yet titers and viral neutralization represent incomplete correlates of immunity. Instead, the ability of antibodies to leverage the antiviral power of the innate immune system has been implicated in protection from and clearance of influenza infection. Here, post-hoc analysis of the humoral immune response to influenza is comprehensively profiled in a cohort of vaccinated older adults (65 + ) monitored for influenza infection during the 2012/2013 season in the United States (NCT: 01427309). While robust humoral immune responses arose against the vaccine and circulating strains, influenza-specific antibody effector profiles differed in individuals that later became infected with influenza, who are deficient in NK cell activating antibodies to both hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, compared to individuals who remained uninfected. Furthermore, NK cell activation was strongly associated with the NK cell senescence marker CD57, arguing for the need for selective induction of influenza-specific afucosylated NK activating antibodies in older adults to achieve protection. High dose vaccination, currently used for older adults, was insufficient to generate this NK cell-activating humoral response. Next generation vaccines able to selectively bolster NK cell activating antibodies may be required to achieve protection in the setting of progressively senescent NK cells.

Immunological non-inferiority and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine versus two trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in China: Results from two studies.

WHO UNIVERSAL TRIAL NUMBERS (UTNS): U1111-1174-4615 and U1111-1174-4698. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT04210349 and NCT03430089.

Immunogenicity and safety of a multi-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in individuals aged 6 months to 17 years: a randomized phase III trial.

Annual vaccination is the most effective way to prevent seasonal influenza. Influenza vaccines in multi-dose vial (MDV) formats can facilitate timely vaccination of large populations by reducing per-dose costs and cold storage requirements compared to single-dose pre-filled syringe (PFS) formats. MDV vaccines require thiomersal or another preservative to prevent microbial contamination. We conducted a randomized, open-label trial in 302 healthy subjects aged 6 months to 17 years to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) in a thiomersal-containing MDV format compared to the licensed thiomersal-free PFS format. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the MDV (n = 153) or PFS (n = 149) format. Post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition titers for all four vaccine strains were ≥4.9-fold higher than baseline titers with no difference in magnitude between the MDV and PFS groups. Seroconversion rates per strain were also comparable between the two groups. There were no differences in reactogenicity or safety between the two vaccine formats. These results showed that the MDV format of QIV was as safe and immunogenic as the PFS format in infants, children, and adolescents. These findings support the use of MDV QIV as a resource-saving alternative for seasonal influenza vaccination.

Impact of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine on influenza-associated complications and health care use in children aged 6 to 35 months: Analysis of data from a phase III trial in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

BACKGROUND: A multi-season phase III trial conducted in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres demonstrated the efficacy of a quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in children 6-35 months of age. METHODS: Data collected during the phase III trial were analysed to examine the vaccine efficacy (VE) of IIV4 in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza in age subgroups and to determine the relative risk for IIV4 vs. placebo for severe outcomes, healthcare use, and parental absenteeism from work associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza. RESULTS: VE (95% confidence interval [CI]) to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza due to any A or B strain was 54.76% (40.24-66.03%) for participants aged 6-23 months and 46.91% (23.57-63.53%) for participants aged 24-35 months. VE (95% CI) to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza due to vaccine-similar strains was 74.51% (53.55-86.91%) for participants aged 6-23 months and 59.78% (19.11-81.25%) for participants aged 24-35 months. Compared to placebo, IIV4 reduced the risk (95% CI) by 31.28% (8.96-89.34%) for acute otitis media, 21.76% (6.46-58.51%) for acute lower respiratory infection, 40.80% (29.62-55.59%) for healthcare medical visits, 29.71% (11.66-67.23%) for parent absenteeism from work, and 39.20% (26.89-56.24%) for antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: In children aged 6-35 months, vaccination with IIV4 reduces severe outcomes of influenza as well as the associated burden for their parents and the healthcare system. In addition, vaccination with IIV4 is effective at preventing against influenza in children aged 6-23 and 24-35 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT no. 2013-001231-51.

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6-35 months: A multi-season randomised placebo-controlled trial in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres.

BACKGROUND: A quadrivalent split-virion inactivated influenza vaccine (VaxigripTetra™, Sanofi Pasteur; IIV4) containing two A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and B strains from both lineages (Victoria and Yamagata) was approved in Europe in 2016 for individuals aged ≥ 3 years. This study examined the efficacy and safety of IIV4 in children aged 6-35 months. METHODS: This was a phase III randomised controlled trial conducted in Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Europe during the Northern Hemisphere 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 and Southern Hemisphere 2014 and 2015 influenza seasons. Healthy children aged 6-35 months not previously vaccinated against influenza were randomised to receive two full doses 28 days apart of IIV4, placebo, the licensed trivalent split-virion inactivated vaccine (IIV3), an investigational IIV3 containing a B strain from the alternate lineage. The primary objective was to demonstrate efficacy against influenza illness caused by any strain or vaccine-similar strains. RESULTS: The study enrolled 5806 participants. Efficacy, assessed in 4980 participants completing the study according to protocol, was demonstrated for IIV4. Vaccine efficacy was 50.98% (97% CI, 37.36-61.86%) against influenza caused by any A or B type and 68.40% (97% CI, 47.07-81.92%) against influenza caused by vaccine-like strains. Safety profiles were similar for IIV4, placebo, and the IIV3s, although injection-site reactions were slightly more frequent for IIV4 than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: IIV4 was safe and effective for protecting children aged 6-35 months against influenza illness caused by vaccine-similar or any circulating strains. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT no. 2013-001231-51.

Quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (VaxigripTetra™).

INTRODUCTION: VaxigripTetra™ (IIV4; Sanofi Pasteur) is a quadrivalent split-virion influenza vaccine approved in Europe in 2016 for individuals ≥ 3 years of age. IIV4 builds on the well-established record of the trivalent split-virion influenza vaccine (Vaxigrip®). Areas covered: This literature review summarizes the rationale for developing quadrivalent influenza vaccines and discusses the phase III clinical trial results supporting the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of IIV4. Expert commentary: IIV4 is immunogenic and well tolerated. Adding a second B strain to the trivalent split-virion influenza vaccine provides a superior immune response for the additional strain but does not reduce the immune response for the three other strains or negatively affect the safety profile. By offering broader protection against co-circulating influenza B lineages, IIV4 has the potential to further reduce influenza-related morbidity and mortality beyond that achieved with trivalent vaccines.

Safety and immunogenicity of two subunit influenza vaccines in healthy children, adults and the elderly: a randomized controlled trial in China.

The burden of influenza is well known in the elderly and at-risk patients, but also in children. Especially in those under 5 years old, influenza may cause severe morbidity and mortality. Influenza infections and complications can be reduced by vaccination. In a randomized, endpoint-blinded, parallel group trial the immunogenicity and safety was studied of two trivalent inactivated surface antigen (subunit) influenza vaccines Influvac and Agrippal in healthy children as well as in adults and the elderly. An open safety part in 30 children aged 3-12 years and 30 adults aged 18-60 years vaccinated with Influvac was followed by an endpoint-blind, parallel group part in 300 healthy children aged 3-12 years, 300 healthy adults aged 18-59 years, and 240 healthy elderly persons aged 60 years or over, in which subjects were randomized 2:1 to vaccination with either Influvac or Agrippal. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was the geometric mean titer (GMT) 4 weeks after vaccination. Both Influvac and Agrippal induced high anti-hemagglutinin antibody titers in the children and in the adult and elderly subjects. Seroprotection rates were >85% and seroconversion rates >70% for both vaccines in all three age groups for all three-virus strains. The GMT ratios after vaccination indicated that the immunogenicity of Influvac was at least comparable with that of Agrippal in all three age groups. Both vaccines were well tolerated and safe. In this trial, Influvac and Agrippal were immunogenic, safe and well tolerated in healthy children as well as in adults and elderly people.

Antibody induction by virosomal, MF59-adjuvanted, or conventional influenza vaccines in the elderly.

In a randomized, observer-blind, three-arm, parallel group, multi-centre trial including 386 elderly subjects in four countries, the immunogenicity and safety was studied of three different trivalent inactivated surface antigen (subunit) influenza vaccine types: a conventional subunit influenza vaccine (SIV, brand: Influvac and two newer vaccines: a MF59-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine (adSIV, brand: Fluad and a virosomal subunit influenza vaccine (vSIV, brand: Invivac. All vaccines were trivalent containing 15 microg hemagglutinin of each virus strain as recommended by the World Health Organization for the 2004-2005 season. The study was designed to demonstrate the serological non-inferiority of vSIV to both adSIV and SIV in elderly persons. The secondary objective was to investigate whether vSIV is superior to adSIV with respect to local reactogenicity. For all three vaccine strains, the post-vaccination geometric mean titres were comparable between SIV and adSIV and between vSIV and SIV. Seroprotection rates (i.e. percentages of subjects with a post-vaccination titre >or=40) varied between 84.1-100% indicating that the three vaccines all induced a strong antibody response. Local and systemic reactions were more frequently associated with adSIV (46 and 32%, respectively) than with vSIV or SIV ( approximately 20%). Vaccinations caused only little inconvenience as measured by questionnaire. In general, all vaccines were safe and well tolerated. In this trial, virosomal vaccine had similar immunogenicity to MF59-adjuvanted and conventional subunit vaccine and was considerably less reactogenic than the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine in the elderly.

The European CHMP criteria for influenza vaccine immunogenicity cannot be improved by the use of confidence intervals.

In a well-know CHMP Note for Guidance criteria are given for evaluation the results of annual-update studies. Now and then it sometimes is suggested that these criteria can be improved by the use of confidence intervals. Here it is argued that this is based on a misinterpretation of what confidence intervals are. These intervals require that subjects are chosen at random from a population. In influenza studies this is never the case.

On the bias in HI titers and how to reduce it.

HI titers measure anti-HA antibody concentrations in sera. By the way they are defined standard titers underestimate the true amounts of antibody. A new definition is proposed, the mid-value definition. Under mild conditions mid-value titers are on average closer to the true value than standard titers.