Choice of surgery in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a long-term comparative study.

PURPOSE: Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare sinonasal malignancy. Curative treatment requires multidisciplinary approach, with surgical options consist of the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) and external surgery (EXTS). Here, we provide the post-operative and survival results from a single-center long-term follow-up. METHODS: We report long-term follow-up of 92 ITAC cases treated between 1998 and 2018, treated with EEA (n = 40) or EXTS (n = 52). Survival estimates, post-operative complications and duration of hospitalization were compared between surgical modalities. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar. A higher number of T4b tumors (16%), and subsequently more tumoral invasion (39%), was present in patients undergoing EXTS compared to EEA (3% and 18%, respectively). No difference in Barnes histology subtypes was noticed. Patients undergoing EEA had a shorter post-operative hospitalization stay versus EXTS (4 versus 7 days). Use of EEA was associated to improved disease-specific survival (DSS; 11.4 versus 4.4 years; HREEA = 0.53), especially for patients with T3-4a tumors (11.4 versus 3.0 years; HREEA = 0.41). Patients with T3-4 stage, tumoral invasion, positive surgical margins, mucinous or mixed histology, and prolonged post-operative hospital stay showed poor local relapse-free, disease-free, overall, and DSS. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up in locally advanced ITAC demonstrates that resection by EEA is correlated with improved DSS compared to EXTS, especially for T3-4 tumors. No significant differences between both treatment modalities was observed regarding per- and post-operative complications, although hospitalization in patients undergoing EEA was shorter than for patients treated with EXTS. These results confirm that EEA should remain the preferred surgical procedure in operable cases of sinonasal ITAC.

The Therapeutic Landscape of Salivary Gland Malignancies-Where Are We Now?

Salivary gland malignancies (SGMs) account for less than 5% of new diagnoses in head and neck tumors. If feasible, surgery is the preferred treatment modality. Nevertheless, some malignancies have a tendency of recurrence, with possible distant metastasis. Alternative treatment strategies, such as primary radiation or chemotherapeutics, often present low response rates. As a result, there is an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. Nowadays, target-based therapies (e.g., small inhibitors and immunotherapy) are used by the medical oncologist for possible treatment of advanced SGMs. Based on recent published trials, some novel treatments may provide additional disease control for some patients. However, sample sizes are small, the general findings are unsatisfactory, and a lot of uncertainties remain to be elucidated. Nevertheless, research shows that patients do not benefit from blind administration of systemic treatments and therefore a more personalized approach is highly needed. The aim of this review paper is to summarize the most recent advances in the biological understanding and molecular pathways of salivary gland cancers, the association of these pathways with the current treatments used and their implications for more personalized targeted-based therapies.

Clinical significance of overall assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in oropharyngeal cancer: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The overall assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining has been recently studied in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of Scopus, Ovid Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to retrieve studies assessing TILs in HE-stained sections of OPSCC. We used fixed-effect models and random-effect models to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: Eleven studies were identified that had analyzed the prognostic significance of TILs in OPSCC using HE-stained specimens. Our meta-analyses showed that a high infiltration of TILs was significantly associated with improved DFS (HR 0.39, 95%CI 0.24-0.65, P = 0.0003), OS (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.29-0.50, P < 0.0001), and DSS (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.19-0.53, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Findings of our meta-analysis support a growing body of evidence indicating that assessment of TILs in OPSCC using HE-stained sections has reliable prognostic value. The clinical significance of such assessment of TILs has been reported repeatedly in many studies on OPSCC. The assessment is cost-effective, feasible, easy to transfer from lab to clinic, and therefore can be incorporated in daily practice.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Head and Neck Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has received global attention as a promising prognostic cancer biomarker that can aid in clinical decision making. Proof of their significance was first shown in breast cancer, where TILs are now recommended in the classification of breast tumors. Emerging evidence indicates that the significance of TILs extends to other cancer types, including head and neck cancer. In the era of immunotherapy as a treatment choice for head and neck cancer, assessment of TILs and immune checkpoints is of high clinical relevance. The availability of the standardized method from the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group (IIBWG) is an important cornerstone toward standardized assessment. The aim of the current article is to summarize the accumulated evidence and to establish a clear premise for future research toward the implementation of TILs in the personalized management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Concordance, Correlation, and Clinical Impact of Standardized PD-L1 and TIL Scoring in SCCHN.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been thoroughly researched in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). To address the impact of intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity in these biomarkers, we explored the concordance of PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and stromal TILs in different paired tissue sample types, while evaluating their internal relationship and prognostic impact. METHODS: A total of 165 tissue blocks from 80 SCCHN patients were reviewed for TILs and PD-L1 CPS. Concordance between paired tissue samples was evaluated, and their association with several clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was determined. RESULTS: Biopsies and paired resection material were severely discordant in 39% and 34% of samples for CPS and TIL count, respectively, of which CPS was underscored in 27% of biopsies. In paired primary tumor-metastatic lesions, the disagreement was lower for CPS (19%) but not for TIL count (44%). PD-L1 CPS was correlated with prolonged OS when calculated from tissue acquirement, while extended OS and DFS were observed for high TIL density. CONCLUSION: Intertumoral and, especially, intratumoral heterogeneity were confounding factors when determining PD-L1 CPS and TIL count on paired tissue samples, indicating the increasing necessity of assessing both biomarkers on representative tissue material. Although TILs hold valuable prognostic information in SCCHN, the robustness of PD-L1 as a biomarker in SCCHN remains ambiguous.

Immuno-Oncological Biomarkers for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: Current State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

The era of immune checkpoint inhibitors has altered the therapeutic landscape in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). Our knowledge about the tumor microenvironment has fueled the research in SCCHN, leading to several well-known and less-known prognostic and predictive biomarkers. The clinical staging, p16/HPV status, and PD-L1 expression are currently the main tools for assessing the patients' diagnosis and prognosis. However, several novel biomarkers have been thoroughly investigated, some reaching actual significant clinical contributions. The untangling of the immune infiltrate with the subtyping of tissue-associated tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and circulating blood-based biomarkers are an interesting avenue to be further explored and prospectively assessed. Although PD-L1 expression remains the most important response predictor for immune checkpoint inhibitors, several flaws impede proper assessment such as technical issues, different scoring protocol, and intra-, inter-, and temporal heterogeneity. In addition, the construction of an immune-related gene panel has been proposed as a prognostic and predictive stratification but lacks consensus. Recently, the role of microbioma have also been explored regarding its systemic and antitumor immunity. This review gives a comprehensive overview of the aforementioned topics in SCCHN. To this end, the integration of these clinically advantageous biomarkers via construction of an immunogram or nomogram could be an invaluable tool for SCCHN in future prospects.

Managing viral hepatitis in cancer patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: should we take the risk?

More patients with chronic hepatitis B and C infection are being exposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the safety and efficacy of ICIs in patients with chronic viral hepatitis are still poorly described. To explore this interaction, we identified eight studies of cancer patients with viral hepatitis treated with one or more ICIs, formally assessed tumor responses and safety by grading liver dysfunction. ICIs appear to be relatively safe in HBV/HCV-infected patients, and hepatitis related to viral reactivation is rare. In some patients, viral load regressed during ICI treatment, so immune checkpoints may play a role in viral clearance. HBV/HCV do not appear to be a contraindication to ICIs, although careful clinical and biochemical follow-up is recommended and, whenever necessary, antiviral therapy commenced.

Verrucous hyperplasia and verrucous carcinoma in head and neck: use and benefit of methotrexate.

Background and aim: Verrucous hyperplasia (VH) and verrucous carcinoma (VC) of the head and neck are two (pre)malignant entities that are slowly progressive with low tendency to metastasize. However, they can reduce the patient's Quality of Life (QoL) and may even transform into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). As they are typically approached by surgical resection, some patients do not qualify for surgery. Methotrexate may be a systemic alternative but the response is mostly not durable. This case report tries to illustrate the potential role of methotrexate in VH/VC of the head and neck.Method: We describe four cases of patients with VH or VC of the head and neck who received methotrexate (40-60 mg/m2) in a weekly or two-weekly interval.Results: Two patients received methotrexate in a neoadjuvant setting. The first patient achieved a macroscopical complete response after 16 cycles and remained in remission after surgery. The second patient suffered from residual disease after 26 cycles and refused radical surgery.Two other patients refused surgery at the time of diagnosis and were proposed methotrexate as a salvage treatment. The first patient had an ongoing response on methotrexate after >60 cycles. The second patient achieved macroscopical complete remission after 28 cycles of methotrexate but suffered relapse by developing an oropharyngeal SCC in the same region.Conclusion: When surgery is not desirable in VH and/or VC, patients can be treated with methotrexate which has a reasonable effect and seems to be well tolerated. Nevertheless, surgery should be the preferred strategy to achieve complete remission.

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in oropharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic value and evaluation of a standardised method.

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been described as a biomarker for the host immune response against the tumour with prognostic properties. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group (IBWG) proposed a standardised method for quantifying TILs in solid tumours to improve consistent and reproducible scoring. In this study, the methodology was tested in a retrospective population of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). TIL quantification was performed on 92 OPSCC samples (2004-2013) by four independent observers as described by the IBWG. Interobserver variability was assessed and results were correlated with clinicopathological variables and survival. TIL evaluation turned out to be challenging in OPSCC due to heterogeneity of TILs distribution, presence of pre-existing lymphoid tissue, surface ulceration or erosion and insufficient amount of intertumoural stroma in biopsies. Nonetheless, interobserver variability proved to be good to excellent. High stromal TILs (TILstr) and intratumoural TILs (TILtum) were both correlated to favourable overall survival and multivariate analysis showed TILstr to be the sole independent prognostic factor in OPSCC. The IBWG-proposed TIL quantification method is feasible and reproducible in OPSCC and provides valuable prognostic information regarding clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival. The use of this standardised methodology may facilitate implementation of TILs scoring as a prognostic biomarker in OPSCC.

An open-label, nonrandomized, phase Ib feasibility study of cusatuzumab in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

CD70 is expressed in up to 80% of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases. Cusatuzumab is a humanized anti-CD70 monoclonal antibody, with dual action mechanisms: induction of cytotoxicity against CD70+ tumor cells and reduction in CD70-CD27 signaling mediated immune evasion. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamic profile, and preliminary activity of cusatuzumab in advanced NPC. Eleven patients were enrolled: one patient was assigned to arm A (adjuvant cusatuzumab monotherapy after curative chemoradiation), nine patients to arm B (cusatuzumab monotherapy; noncurative setting), and one patient to arm C (cusatuzumab + chemotherapy; noncurative setting); irrespective of tumoral CD70 expression. Both patients in arms A and C completed the study. All patients in arm B discontinued at an early stage. Five patients experienced grade greater than or equal to 3 nondrug related treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly fatigue and pneumonia (18%). An infusion-related reaction was observed in two of 11 patients. Laboratory results showed no trend over time. Seven patients were eligible for response evaluation. No objective response to cusatuzumab was observed with stable disease being the best response. The current study indicates that the safety profile of cusatuzumab (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) is manageable in patients with advanced NPC, which is consistent with known safety profile. Limited activity of cusatuzumab in advanced NPC was observed. Combination therapies of cusatuzumab and other types of therapy should be explored for the improvement of activity in NPC and other CD70-expressing malignancies.

Targeting FGFR in bladder cancer: ready for clinical practice?

Objective: To give a brief literature overview of current knowledge regarding FGFR inhibition in bladder cancer.Background: The deeper molecular understanding of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) has reshaped the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of this malignancy. Rapid technological development, including the frequent use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical practice, has boosted identification and development of potential biomarkers and targeted therapies. Genetic aberrations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-pathway may drive tumorigenesis and are considered as attractive drug targets in advanced and/or metastatic UC. Several clinical trials have been performed or are ongoing to assess the safety and efficacy of (non-)selective FGFR inhibitors in patients with advanced or metatastic UC.Results: While non-selective FGFR inhibitors have shown limited clinical response with unacceptable toxicity, selective 'pan'-FGFR inhibitors had favourable response rates with manageable toxicity. To predict response, patients were screened for FGFR aberrations using NGS after DNA/RNA extraction of UC tissue specimen or collection of ctDNA or cfDNA.Conclusion: Early clinical trials have shown promising results for targeting FGFR in advanced or metastatic UC, though these findings need to be validated in phase III trials. It seems that FGFR aberrations can be detected in ctDNA and cfDNA as efficiently as in tumour tissue, showing their potential as predictive, non-invasive liquid biomarkers.

To treat or not to treat? Managing comorbidities in cancer patients under immune checkpoint inhibition.

Objectives: Assessing the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in risky cancer patient subgroups: pre-existing organ failure, elderly, presence of auto-immune disease, transplanted patients and brain metastasis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Google scholar databases were searched for English articles published prior to February 2019. Search terms used were organ failure, dialysis, elderly, organ transplant, liver disease, auto-immune disease, immunosuppression, and brain metastasis. Results: Our literature data indicate that immune checkpoint inhibition in the majority of these subpopulations can be administered safely without any loss of efficacy. These data are mostly based on case-reports as only a minority of high-risk patients were included in (the earliest) clinical trials. Validation of these results is necessary on a larger scale. Conclusion: Future trials should not automatically exclude aforementioned patient groups but alter the study design and make their inclusion possible, since more data are needed to answer several remaining questions in these populations. Especially since ICI appears to be safe to administer in these patients.