Use of the Xbox Kinect virtual gaming system to improve gait, postural control and cognitive awareness in an individual with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to describe an intervention using the Xbox Kinect virtual gaming system to improve gait, postural control and cognitive awareness in order to reduce falls and improve the quality of life for an individual with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. METHODS: A 65-year-old woman with a five-year history of PSP and frequent falls presented for physical therapy. Her case was complicated by poor ability to visually track objects, axial rigidity, retropulsion, poor postural control with reaching and declines in cognitive awareness. Intervention was provided using the Xbox Kinect for 12 one-hour sessions over six weeks in an outpatient setting. Games were selected to challenge functional motor and cognitive tasks based on patient enjoyment. RESULTS: The Xbox Kinect intervention may have contributed to a decline in falls and maintenance of scores on the BBS, TUG and 10 Meter Walk Tests above fall risk values. A decline in quality of life measures, PDQ-39 and FFABQ, may be attributed to an increase in cognitive awareness of deficits promoted by the intervention structure. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a gaming intervention using the Xbox Kinect is feasible for reducing fall risk, maintaining function and improving cognitive awareness when used in an outpatient setting. Implications for Rehabilitation Progressive Supranuclear Palsy is a rare and rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease wherethere is a lack of long-term rehabilitation options to help slow their rapid progressions. Our case demonstrates the feasibility of an intervention using a virtual gaming system to helpmaintain functional mobility, balance and independence for an individual with PSP. Collaborative interactions between game companies and physical therapists will improve theability of virtual games to address rehabilitation goals within neurodegenerative populations.

Interdisciplinary Parkinson's Disease Deep Brain Stimulation Screening and the Relationship to Unintended Hospitalizations and Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of pre-operative deep brain stimulation (DBS) interdisciplinary assessments on post-operative hospitalizations and quality of life (QoL). BACKGROUND: DBS has been utilized successfully in Parkinson's disease (PD) for the treatment of tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, off time, and motor fluctuations. Although DBS is becoming a more common management approach there are no standardized criteria for selection of DBS candidates, and sparse data exist to guide the use of interdisciplinary evaluations for DBS screening. We reviewed the outcomes of the use of an interdisciplinary model which utilized seven specialties to pre-operatively evaluate potential DBS candidates. METHODS: The University of Florida (UF) INFORM database was queried for PD patients who had DBS implantations performed at UF between January 2011 and February 2013. Records were reviewed to identify unintended hospitalizations, falls, and infections. Minor and major concerns or reservations from each specialty were previously documented and quantified. Clinical outcomes were assessed through the use of the Parkinson disease quality of life questionnaire (PDQ-39), and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Score (UPDRS) Part III. RESULTS: A total of 164 cases were evaluated for possible DBS candidacy. There were 133 subjects who were approved for DBS surgery (81%) following interdisciplinary screening. There were 28 cases (21%) who experienced an unintended hospitalization within the first 12 months following the DBS operation. The patients identified during interdisciplinary evaluation with major or minor concerns from any specialty service had more unintended hospitalizations (93%) when compared to those without concerns (7%). When the preoperative "concern" shifted from "major" to "minor" to "no concerns," the rate of hospitalization decreased from 89% to 33% to 3%. A strong relationship was uncovered between worsened PDQ-39 at 12 months and increased hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Unintended hospitalizations and worsened QOL scores correlated with the number and severity of concerns raised by interdisciplinary DBS evaluations. The data suggest that detailed screenings by interdisciplinary teams may be useful for more than just patient selection. These evaluations may help to stratify risk for post-operative hospitalization and QoL outcomes.

Impact of an Interdisciplinary Deep Brain Stimulation Screening Model on Post-Surgical Complications in Essential Tremor Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of our interdisciplinary screening process on post-operative unintended hospitalizations and quality of life. BACKGROUND: There are currently no standardized criteria for selection of appropriate Deep Brain Stimulation candidates and little hard data exists to support the use of any singular method. METHODS: An Essential Tremor cohort was selected from our institutional Deep Brain Stimulation database. The interdisciplinary model utilized seven specialties who pre-operatively screened all potential Deep Brain Stimulation candidates. Concerns for surgery raised by each specialty were documented and classified as none, minor, or major. Charts were reviewed to identify unintended hospitalizations and quality of life measurements at 1 year post-surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent (44/51) of the potential screened candidates were approved for Deep Brain Stimulation. Eight (18%) patients had an unintended hospitalization during the follow-up period. Patients with minor or major concerns raised by any specialty service had significantly more unintended hospitalizations when compared to patients without concerns (75% vs. 25%, p < 0.005). The rate of hospitalization revealed a direct relationship to the "level of concern"; ranging from 100% if major concerns, 42% if minor concerns, and 7% if no concerns raised, p = 0.001. Quality of life scores significantly worsened in patients with unintended hospitalizations at 6 (p = 0.046) and 12 months (p = 0.027) when compared to baseline scores. No significant differences in tremor scores between unintended and non-unintended hospitalizations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The number and level of concerns raised during interdisciplinary Deep Brain Stimulation screenings were significantly related to unintended hospitalizations and to a reduced quality of life. The interdisciplinary evaluation may help to stratify risk for these complications. However, data should be interpreted with caution due to the limitations of our study. Further prospective comparative and larger studies are required to confirm our results.