Transition of care for pediatric and adult patients with venous thromboembolism: A National Quality Improvement Project from the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN).

BACKGROUND: Transition of care (TOC) for management of anticoagulation from inpatient to outpatient setting for patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses serious safety concerns. We implemented a national quality improvement educational initiative to address this issue. METHODS: Pediatric and adult patients admitted for their first VTE were prospectively enrolled at 16 centers from January 2016 to December 2018. Patient demographics, VTE diagnosis, risk factors, and treatment characteristics were collected. There were two phases: pre-intervention (PI) and quality intervention (QI). The PI phase assessed the quality and patient understanding and satisfaction of anticoagulation instructions given at hospital discharge and adherence to these instructions via a patient and/or caregiver feedback questionnaire (PFQ) and a patient knowledge questionnaire (PKQ) at 30 days. The QI phase provided patient and/or caregiver enhanced education regarding anticoagulation therapy and VTE at hospital discharge using a comprehensive discharge instruction module and a phone call follow-up at one week. Patient and/or caregiver knowledge at 7 and 30 days was assessed with the same PFQ and PKQ and compared to the PI baseline measures. RESULTS: Of the 409 study patients, 210 (51%) were adults, 218 (53%) females, and 316 (77%) White. Deep vein thrombosis (62.8%) and pulmonary embolism (47.9%) were the most common VTE in children and adults, respectively. Day 30 PFQ scores were significantly higher in the QI phase compared to the PI phase by 11% (p < 0.01). Day 30 PKQ demonstrated enhanced teaching (93.7% vs. 83.5%, p-value 0.004) and disease recognition (89.6% vs. 84.6% p = 0.03) in the QI phase than the PI phase. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive VTE discharge instructions followed by a 1-week post-discharge phone call strengthen patient and caregiver knowledge, satisfaction of education given and care provided, and disease recognition.

Clinical adherence to thrombophilia screening guidelines at a major tertiary care hospital.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Thrombophilia screening has significantly increased but has limited clinical utility. We evaluated the positive rate of thrombophilia screening and adherence to published guidelines. Both the positive rate for thrombophilia screening and the adherence to guidelines were low. Guidance implementation is essential to improve current thrombophilia screening practice. SUMMARY: Background Thrombophilia screening is widely performed but provides limited clinical utility in managing patients predisposed to venous thromboembolism. Although guidelines to limit testing have been published, adherence to those guidelines in the outpatient clinical setting has not been assessed. Objective To evaluate outpatient thrombophilia screening practices at a tertiary academic medical center. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical records and a computational analysis of thrombophilia tests collected during a 3-year period (August 2010 to June 2013) at a large teaching hospital. Our primary outcome measures were positive diagnostic yield for thrombophilia and clinician adherence to published thrombophilia screening guidelines in the outpatient setting. Results and Conclusions We found a positive diagnostic yield of 13.8% (95% confidence interval 12.3% to 15.3%) for outpatient thrombophilia screening at our institution. Of the screening tests requiring a second confirmatory assay for definitive diagnosis, only 12% (95% confidence interval 10.3% to 13.7%) were appropriately obtained. We also observed that 73% of patients in our electronic medical record review were inappropriately tested based on existing screening guideline criteria. When parsed by specialty, we identified that hematologists had a higher adherence rate to guideline criteria than do physicians from other specialties. Our study confirms low adherence to thrombophilia screening guidelines across disciplines and indicates the need for continued clinician education.

Bleeding and thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with cancer.

Alterations in hemostasis are common in patients with cancer admitted to the ICU. Depending on the underlying disease and specific hemostatic abnormality, the patient with cancer may develop bleeding, thrombosis, or both, such as DIC. Bleeding complications usually result from abnormalities in platelets or deficiency of coagulation factors and require specific blood or coagulation factor replacement. Similarly, critically ill patients with cancer are predisposed to thrombotic complications such as DVT, PE, and central vein thrombosis, the last as a result of the widespread use of long-term indwelling catheter devices. Advances in diagnostic imaging and the availability of newer and more potent anticoagulant agents have facilitated the care of these patients greatly. Ultimately, it is hoped that a thorough understanding of the various disturbances in hemostasis, innovative treatment approaches, and implementation of preventive strategies in patients with cancer will lead to decreased morbidity and improved survival rates of critically ill patients with cancer in the ICU.