Cytosponge-TFF3 Testing can Detect Precancerous Mucosal Changes of the Stomach.

Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and gastric atrophy (GA) are associated with increased risk of gastric cancer and are indications for endoscopic surveillance when affecting the proximal stomach.1 Endoscopic screening is not cost-effective in areas with low-moderate incidence of gastric cancer2; noninvasive methods to detect GIM/GA are currently lacking.3.

Accuracy, safety, and tolerability of tissue collection by Cytosponge vs endoscopy for evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) requires repeated endoscopic collection of mucosal samples to assess disease activity and response to therapy. An easier and less expensive means of monitoring of EoE is required. We compared the accuracy, safety, and tolerability of sample collection via Cytosponge (an ingestible gelatin capsule comprising compressed mesh attached to a string) with those of endoscopy for assessment of EoE. METHODS: Esophageal tissues were collected from 20 patients with EoE (all with dysphagia, 15 with stricture, 13 with active EoE) via Cytosponge and then by endoscopy. Number of eosinophils/high-power field and levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin were determined; hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed. We compared the adequacy, diagnostic accuracy, safety, and patient preference for sample collection via Cytosponge vs endoscopy procedures. RESULTS: All 20 samples collected by Cytosponge were adequate for analysis. By using a cutoff value of 15 eosinophils/high power field, analysis of samples collected by Cytosponge identified 11 of the 13 individuals with active EoE (83%); additional features such as abscesses were also identified. Numbers of eosinophils in samples collected by Cytosponge correlated with those in samples collected by endoscopy (r = 0.50, P = .025). Analysis of tissues collected by Cytosponge identified 4 of the 7 patients without active EoE (57% specificity), as well as 3 cases of active EoE not identified by analysis of endoscopy samples. Including information on level of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin did not increase the accuracy of diagnosis. No complications occurred during the Cytosponge procedure, which was preferred by all patients, compared with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In a feasibility study, the Cytosponge is a safe and well-tolerated method for collecting near mucosal specimens. Analysis of numbers of eosinophils/high-power field identified patients with active EoE with 83% sensitivity. Larger studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of this method of esophageal tissue collection. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01585103.

Prospective cohort study assessing outcomes of patients from families fulfilling criteria for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer undergoing endoscopic surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic total gastrectomy is performed in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) patients carrying the CDH1 mutation because endoscopic surveillance often fails to detect microscopic disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the natural history and outcomes of patients with HDGC undergoing endoscopy. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort observational study. SETTINGS: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients fulfilling criteria for HDGC who opted to undergo endoscopy. INTERVENTION: Research surveillance program using high-resolution white-light endoscopy with autofluorescence and narrow-band imaging combined with targeted and multiple random biopsies assessed by an expert histopathologist for the presence of signet ring cell carcinoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the endoscopic yield of microscopic signet ring cell carcinoma according to patient mutation status and subsequent decision to undergo surgery. The secondary endpoint was the additional yield of targeted biopsies compared with random biopsies. RESULTS: Between September 2007 and March 2013, 29 patients from 17 families underwent 70 surveillance endoscopies. Signet ring cell carcinoma foci were identified in 14 of 22 (63.6%) patients with confirmed CDH1 germline mutations and 2 of 7 (28.6%) with no pathogenic mutation identified. Eleven of 16 (9 CDH1-positive) patients proceeded to gastrectomy in a median 5.7 months. Five patients delayed surgery. In 1 patient, advanced gastric cancer developed 40.2 months after the first endoscopic findings. LIMITATIONS: No control group. CONCLUSIONS: Careful white-light examination with targeted and random biopsies combined with detailed histopathology can identify early lesions and help to inform decision making with regard to gastrectomy. Autofluorescence and narrow-band imaging are of limited utility. Delaying gastrectomy in individuals with signet ring cell carcinoma foci carries a high risk and has to be weighed carefully.

Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy and acceptability to patients of non-endoscopic screening for Barrett's oesophagus, using an ingestible oesophageal sampling device (Cytosponge) coupled with immunocytochemisty for trefoil factor 3. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 12 UK general practices, with gastroscopies carried out in one hospital endoscopy unit. PARTICIPANTS: 504 of 2696 eligible patients (18.7%) aged 50 to 70 years with a previous prescription for an acid suppressant (H(2) receptor antagonist or proton pump inhibitor) for more than three months in the past five years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity estimates for detecting Barrett's oesophagus compared with gastroscopy as the ideal method, and patient anxiety (short form Spielberger state trait anxiety inventory, impact of events scale) and acceptability (visual analogue scale) of the test. RESULTS: 501 of 504 (99%) participants (median age 62, male to female ratio 1:1.2) successfully swallowed the Cytosponge. No serious adverse events occurred. In total, 3.0% (15/501) had an endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus (≥1 cm circumferential length, median circumferential and maximal length of 2 cm and 5 cm, respectively) with intestinal metaplasia. Compared with gastroscopy the sensitivity and specificity of the test was 73.3% (95% confidence interval 44.9% to 92.2%) and 93.8% (91.3% to 95.8%) for 1 cm or more circumferential length and 90.0% (55.5% to 99.7%) and 93.5% (90.9% to 95.5%) for clinically relevant segments of 2 cm or more. Most participants (355/496, 82%, 95% confidence interval 78.9% to 85.1%) reported low levels of anxiety before the test, and scores remained within normal limits at follow-up. Less than 4.5% (2.8% to 6.1%) of participants reported psychological distress a week after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the Cytosponge test was promising and the procedure was well tolerated. These data bring screening for Barrett's oesophagus into the realm of possibility. Further evaluation is recommended.

Bone structure and remodelling in stroke patients: early effects of zoledronate.

INTRODUCTION: We have reported that after an acute stroke, intravenous zoledronate prevented bone loss in the hemiplegic hip. Participants from the trial also volunteered for trans-iliac bone biopsy, to assess the early effects of stroke and zoledronate on iliac bone remodelling. METHODS: Patients with acute stroke were randomly assigned to a single intravenous dose of zoledronate 4 mg or placebo within 5 weeks of stroke. Biopsies from 14 patients (3 female, 11 male, mean age 71+/-11) were suitable for analysis. These were taken at mean 10 weeks (+/-2) post-stroke, and included 5 patients who had received zoledronate. Histomorphometry was performed on undecalcified sections using light and fluorescence microscopy. Static and dynamic indices of remodelling were compared to a local reference range from healthy controls. Osteoclasts and their precursors were identified on frozen sections using tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the proximal femora was performed at baseline and 6 months later. RESULTS: The eroded surface in cancellous bone (ES/BS) was significantly higher in stroke patients than controls (5.7% vs. ref 1.6%, p<0.0001). Although ES/BS did not differ between zoledronate and placebo-treated groups, there were significantly fewer osteoclasts and their precursors in zoledronate-treated individuals (p=0.023). Bone formation indices (osteoid surface, OS/BS and mineralising surface, MS/BS) were significantly lower in stroke patients than controls and although OS/BS was higher in the zoledronate group than the placebo group (p=0.033), MS/BS was not different (p=0.924). There were no differences between hemiplegic and unaffected sides for any histomorphometric parameter despite asymmetric reductions in hip bone mineral density (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Stroke patients had higher resorption indices and lower bone forming surfaces than controls, consistent with uncoupling of bone remodelling. These findings are preliminary and a larger study is required to evaluate the contributions of gender, age and hemiplegic status to the remodelling imbalance. Zoledronate therapy was associated with a reduction in osteoclastic cell numbers consistent with its known mode of action in bone.