Lipohypertrophy Monitoring Study (LIMO): Effect of single use of 4 mm pen needles combined with education on injection site rotation on glycaemic control: Confirmation of an unpleasant truth.

AIMS: To investigate whether single use of 4 mm needles combined with education about injection technique and lipohypertrophy affects HbA1c, hypoglycaemia and glucose variability. METHODS: Insulin-injecting people with diabetes recruited from nine Belgian diabetes centres were prospectively followed for 6 months. They were provided 4 mm pen needles and education concerning injection technique using an online platform (BD and Me™) based on the international Forum for Injection Technique & Therapy Recommendations focused on avoidance of lipohypertrophy zones and reduction of needle reuse. RESULTS: A total of 171 people with diabetes were included of which 146 completed the study. At baseline, lipohypertrophy was present in 63.0% of those who completed the study, with 51.4% injecting in zones of lipohypertrophy, 37.0% incorrectly rotating and 95.9% reusing needles. After the intervention, 7.5% still injected in a lipohypertrophy zone, 4.1% rotated incorrectly and needle reuse decreased to 21.2%. The number of participants with severe hypoglycaemias (from 15.8% to 4.1%, p < 0.001), unexplained hypoglycaemias (from 46.6% to 16.4%, p < 0.001) and high glucose variability (from 64.4% to 29.5%, p < 0.001) was significantly reduced. HbA1c and total daily insulin dose remained stable. CONCLUSION: The combination of 4 mm pen needles and online education on injection techniques significantly reduced the number of people with severe hypoglycaemic episodes, unexplained hypoglycaemia and high glucose variability but did not improve HbA1c control nor lower insulin needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04659330.

Relationship between glycaemic variability and hyperglycaemic clamp-derived functional variables in (impending) type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether measures of glycaemic variability (GV), assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), can complement or replace measures of beta cell function and insulin action in detecting the progression of preclinical disease to type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-two autoantibody-positive (autoAb(+)) first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with type 1 diabetes who were themselves at high 5-year risk (50%) for type 1 diabetes underwent CGM, a hyperglycaemic clamp test and OGTT, and were followed for up to 31 months. Clamp variables were used to estimate beta cell function (first-phase [AUC5-10 min] and second-phase [AUC120-150 min] C-peptide release) combined with insulin resistance (glucose disposal rate; M 120-150 min). Age-matched healthy volunteers (n = 20) and individuals with recent-onset type 1 diabetes (n = 9) served as control groups. RESULTS: In autoAb(+) FDRs, M 120-150 min below the 10th percentile (P10) of controls achieved 86% diagnostic efficiency in discriminating between normoglycaemic FDRs and individuals with (impending) dysglycaemia. M 120-150 min outperformed AUC5-10 min and AUC120-150 min C-peptide below P10 of controls, which were only 59-68% effective. Among GV variables, CGM above the reference range was better at detecting (impending) dysglycaemia than elevated SMBG (77-82% vs 73% efficiency). Combined CGM measures were equally efficient as M 120-150 min (86%). Daytime GV variables were inversely correlated with clamp variables, and more strongly with M 120-150 min than with AUC5-10 min or AUC120-150 min C-peptide. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: CGM-derived GV and the glucose disposal rate, reflecting both insulin secretion and action, outperformed SMBG and first- or second-phase AUC C-peptide in identifying FDRs with (impending) dysglycaemia or diabetes. Our results indicate the feasibility of developing minimally invasive CGM-based criteria for close metabolic monitoring and as outcome measures in trials.

Implementing a Reminder System in the Northern Part of Belgium to Stimulate Postpartum Screening for Glucose Intolerance in Women with Gestational Diabetes: The "Sweet Pregnancy" Project.

AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a gestational diabetes (GDM) recall register on the long-term screening uptake postpartum and to evaluate the prevalence of prediabetes postpartum. METHODS: Evaluation of a GDM recall register implemented in 66 obstetrical centers in the northern part of Belgium from 2009 to 2016. Registrants receive yearly reminders to have a fasting plasma glucose test in primary care to timely detect prediabetes. RESULTS: After 6 years, 7269 women were registered. The yearly response rates varied from 74.4% after the first year to 61.8% after the fifth year. The number of women who reported a screening test varied from 67.4% after the first year to 71.9% after the fifth year. Compared to women who responded at least once to a reminder, women who never responded were more often <30 years (41.4% versus 33.9%, p < 0.001) and were more often obese (29.3% versus 20.8%, p ≤ 0.001). Over a period of 6 years, 7.3% (CI 6.0%-8.8%) developed diabetes and 27.4% (CI 23.9%-31.0%) developed impaired fasting glycaemia. CONCLUSION: We show now the long-term feasibility and efficacy of a GDM recall register to stimulate screening postpartum. One-third of women developed prediabetes within 6 years.

A dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist increases adiponectin and improves plasma lipid profiles in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The objective of these studies was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MK-0767, a prototypical dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist, following administration of single and multiple oral doses in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The first study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, alternating two-panel, rising dose protocol in which single doses of 1-80 mg of MK-0767 were administered. The second study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, staggered incremental dose, parallel-group protocol in which multiple doses of 0.3-25 mg of MK-0767 were administered once daily for 14 days. In both studies at each dose level, six subjects received MK-0767 and two subjects received placebo. RESULTS: Plasma area under the concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration increased with single and multiple doses of MK-0767 over the dose ranges studied. The apparent terminal half-life of MK-0767 averaged approximately 36 hours following single and multiple doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved following approximately 8 days of multiple doses. Compared with placebo, MK-0767 produced dose-dependent reductions in triglycerides (-26 +/- 8% [p = 0.002] and -33 +/- 13% [p = 0.008]) and free fatty acids (-50 +/- 11% [p < 0.001] and -67 +/- 23% [p = 0.008]) following single and multiple doses, respectively. Significant (p < or = 0.050) dose-dependent alterations in adiponectin (332 +/- 36%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-29 +/- 5%), total cholesterol (-19 +/- 3%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-28 +/- 4%), and fasting plasma glucose (-6 +/- 2%; only in the 25 mg group) were observed after multiple doses. CONCLUSIONS: The observed effects of MK-0767 on adiponectin, free fatty acids and lipids, even after single doses, demonstrate that this prototypical dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist has clinically meaningful activity in vivo.

Hyperglycemic clamp and oral glucose tolerance test for 3-year prediction of clinical onset in persistently autoantibody-positive offspring and siblings of type 1 diabetic patients.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: In preparation of future prevention trials, we aimed to identify predictors of 3-year diabetes onset among oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)- and hyperglycemic clamp-derived metabolic markers in persistently islet autoantibody positive (autoAb(+)) offspring and siblings of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). DESIGN: The design is a registry-based study. SETTING: Functional tests were performed in a hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Persistently autoAb(+) first-degree relatives of patients with T1D (n = 81; age 5-39 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed 3-year predictive ability of OGTT- and clamp-derived markers using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Cox regression analysis. Area under the curve of clamp-derived first-phase C-peptide release (AUC(5-10 min); min 5-10) was determined in all relatives and second-phase release (AUC(120-150 min); min 120-150) in those aged 12-39 years (n = 62). RESULTS: Overall, the predictive ability of AUC(5-10 min) was better than that of peak C-peptide, the best predictor among OGTT-derived parameters (ROC-AUC [95%CI]: 0.89 [0.80-0.98] vs 0.81 [0.70-0.93]). Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and AUC(5-10 min) provided the best combination of markers for prediction of diabetes within 3 years; (ROC-AUC [95%CI]: 0.92 [0.84-1.00]). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, AUC(5-10 min)) (P = .001) was the strongest independent predictor and interacted significantly with all tested OGTT-derived parameters. AUC(5-10 min) below percentile 10 of controls was associated with 50-70% progression to T1D regardless of age. Similar results were obtained for AUC(120-150 min). CONCLUSIONS: Clamp-derived first-phase C-peptide release can be used as an efficient and simple screening strategy in persistently autoAb(+) offspring and siblings of T1D patients to predict impending diabetes.

Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes complicated by an episode of severe hypertriglyceridaemia-induced pancreatitis.

A 23-year-old woman with a history of type 2 diabetes and non-compliance presented to the emergency department with abdominal epigastric pain and nausea. Laboratory examination revealed a mild ketoacidosis while an abdominal CT scan performed the following day demonstrated a severe acute pancreatitis of the body and tail (Balthazar grade E) despite normal amylase serum levels on admission. The presence of a lactescent serum was the clue to an extremely high triglyceride level (>10 000 mg/dl) causing the pancreatitis. The hypertriglyceridaemia itself was attributed mainly to the diabetic ketoacidosis. There was no family history of hypertriglyceridaemia. The triad consisting of diabetic ketoacidosis, hypertriglyceridaemia and acute pancreatitis is an unusual presentation of poorly controlled diabetes which can occur in type 1 as well as type 2 diabetic adults and children. Treatment with intravenous insulin and hydration successfully resolved the ketoacidosis and hypertriglyceridaemia and reversed the episode of acute pancreatitis.

Therapy with the hsp60 peptide DiaPep277 in C-peptide positive type 1 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes results from a T-cell mediated autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta-cells. The 60-kDa heat-shock protein (hsp60) is one of the known target self-antigens. An immunogenic peptide from hsp60, p277, arrested beta-cell destruction and maintained insulin production in newly diabetic non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. A randomized, double-blind, phase Ib/II study of peptide treatment was undertaken in recent onset type 1 diabetes patients with remaining insulin production. METHODS: Forty-eight recent onset type 1 diabetes patients were assigned subcutaneous injections of 0.2, 1.0 or 2.5 mg peptide DiaPep277 (n = 12 per dosage) at entry, and 1, 6 and 12 months, or four placebo injections (n = 12). The primary clinical endpoints were safety and efficacy (glucagon-stimulated C-peptide production at 6 and 12 months); secondary endpoints were HbA1c levels and daily insulin dose adjusted for body weight at 2, 6, 12 and 18 months. RESULTS: C-peptide levels decreased over time in all groups except the 2.5 mg-treated. The decrease in C-peptide production was less in treated patients versus placebo, mostly in the 2.5 mg group. HbA1c increased significantly in the 1.0 mg group and in the 2.5 mg group at 2 and 18 months, respectively. No differences were seen in daily insulin doses. One patient was withdrawn from the study possibly owing to a treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple DiaPep277 peptide administration seems safe and may have a beneficial effect on C-peptide levels over time, but this finding is not supported by lower HbA1c levels or daily insulin requirement. Further investigation on a larger scale is warranted.