Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 76(2): 133-7, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23537789

RESUMO

In this study, the performance of 10 serological assays for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection was evaluated. A total of 145 sera from 120 patients were tested. They were obtained from patients who were serologically positive for M. pneumoniae infection as well as from patients who were infected with micro-organisms that may cause interstitial pneumonia. The following assays were utilized: SeroMP IgM and IgG, SeroMP recombinant IgM, IgA and IgG, Liaison M. pneumoniae IgM and IgG and M. pneumoniae IgM, IgA and IgG ELISA Medac. The SeroMP Recombinant and Liaison assays both showed low IgM specificity, and crossreactivity was mainly observed in groups of patients with acute cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infections. For IgA, the Medac assay was less specific than the SeroMP Recombinant assay. Discrepancies between the four tests were observed in IgG analyses, and due to the lack of a gold standard, 22 results were removed prior to determining the sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the overall performance of IgG assays may be overstated; nevertheless, the SeroMP assay demonstrated a lack of sensitivity. The seroprevalence of IgG appears to be very low, raising concerns regarding whether the serological techniques can detect IgG levels over time. Serology remains a biological tool of choice for diagnosing M. pneumoniae infection, but improvement and standardization of the assays are needed, particularly for the determination of IgG.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Citomegalovirus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Masculino , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/sangue , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Adulto Jovem
2.
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol ; 64(3): 352-63, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22141752

RESUMO

To develop a specific line blot (LB) for supporting ELISA-based serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, individual native/recombinant H. pylori antigens were evaluated with respect to their reactivity with both serum IgG and IgA from 156 dyspeptic screening patients (67% H. pylori positive). Of 13 antigens, HP0175, p17, and p19 revealed highest positive likelihood ratios for H. pylori-specific IgG (> 5.0) and were selected as LB substrates, in addition to the established virulence markers VacA and CagA. For validation, the LB was compared to a commercial whole-cell-lysate-based ELISA by parallel (re-)analysis of 156 screening sera, 22 sera from diabetes mellitus patients and 15 sera from follow-up patients after H. pylori eradication. In screening patients, the combined use of IgG ELISA and LB revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 94%, 81%, and 90%, respectively, whereas IgG ELISA alone exhibited a low specificity of 75%. In diabetic and follow-up patients, IgA ELISA exhibited high accuracy of 89% and 93%, respectively, whereas IgG detection was unreliable (accuracy < 80%). In conclusion, using HP0175, p17, p19, CagA, and VacA as LB substrates significantly improves the specificity of anti-H. pylori IgG analysis, providing a reliable tool for (1) confirmation/refutation of ELISA-based screening results and (2) assessment of the CagA/VacA status.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/química , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Antígenos de Bactérias/sangue , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/sangue , Infecções por Helicobacter/imunologia , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Humanos , Immunoblotting/métodos , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Imunoglobulina A/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Virulência/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 73(3): 246-51, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22560168

RESUMO

The performance of 4 screening tests and 10 blot assays for the serologic diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis in a Belgian population was evaluated. A total of 196 sera were tested: 36 Lyme borreliosis at different stages of the disease, 50 healthy blood donors, and 110 representing various clinical circumstances. The DiaSorin Liaison and Euroimmun Anti-Borrelia screening tests were evaluated. The tested blot assays were Virotech Borrelia LINE tests WE222, WE225, and WE224, as well as Mikrogen recomLine Borrelia and Viramed ViraStripe. The specificity of IgG was acceptable for the different assays. For IgM, DiaSorin Liaison Borrelia IgM Quant, Mikrogen recomLine, and Viramed ViraStripe lacked specificity. Interestingly, a higher rate of falsely reactive samples was observed in the group of patients suffering from malaria. Serological diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis remains challenging; assays should be evaluated in the population where they are intended to be used.


Assuntos
Borrelia burgdorferi/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Doença de Lyme/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Bélgica , Borrelia burgdorferi/genética , Borrelia burgdorferi/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Testes Sorológicos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA