Differential effects of selective- and pan-PPAR agonists on experimental steatohepatitis and hepatic macrophages☆.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are essential regulators of whole-body metabolism, but also modulate inflammation in immune cells, notably macrophages. We compared the effects of selective PPAR agonists to those of the pan-PPAR agonist lanifibranor in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and studied isoform-specific effects on hepatic macrophage biology. METHODS: Lanifibranor or selective PPARα (fenofibrate), PPARγ (pioglitazone) and PPARδ (GW501516) agonists were therapeutically administered in choline-deficient, amino acid-defined high-fat diet (CDAA-HFD)- and Western diet (WD)-fed mouse models of NAFLD. Acute liver injury was induced by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). The role of PPARs on macrophage functionality was studied in isolated hepatic macrophages, bone marrow-derived macrophages stimulated with palmitic acid, and circulating monocytes from patients with NAFLD. RESULTS: Lanifibranor improved all histological features of steatohepatitis in CDAA-HFD-fed mice, including liver fibrosis, thereby combining and exceeding specific effects of the single PPAR agonists. Its potent anti-steatotic efficacy was confirmed in a 3D liver biochip model with primary cells. Infiltrating hepatic monocyte-derived macrophages were reduced following PPAR agonist administration, especially with lanifibranor, even after short-term treatment, paralleling improved steatosis and hepatitis. Lanifibranor similarly decreased steatosis, liver injury and monocyte infiltration in the WD model. In the acute CCl4 model, neither single nor pan-PPAR agonists directly affected monocyte recruitment. Hepatic macrophages isolated from WD-fed mice displayed a metabolically activated phenotype. Lanifibranor attenuated the accompanying inflammatory activation in both murine palmitic acid-stimulated bone marrow-derived macrophages, as well as patient-derived circulating monocytes, in a PPARδ-dependent fashion. CONCLUSION: Pan-PPAR agonists combine the beneficial effects of selective PPAR agonists and may counteract inflammation and disease progression more potently. PPARδ agonism and lanifibranor directly modulate macrophage activation, but not infiltration, thereby synergizing with beneficial metabolic effects of PPARα/γ agonists. LAY SUMMARY: Peroxisome proliferated-activated receptors (PPARs) are essential regulators of metabolism and inflammation. We demonstrated that the pan-PPAR agonist lanifibranor ameliorated all aspects of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in independent experimental mouse models. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and fatty acids induce a specific polarization status in macrophages, which was altered by lanifibranor to increase expression of lipid handling genes, thereby decreasing inflammation. PPAR isoforms have differential therapeutic effects on fat-laden hepatocytes, activated hepatic stellate cells and inflammatory macrophages, supporting the clinical development of pan-PPAR agonists.

The new-generation pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist IVA337 protects the liver from metabolic disorders and fibrosis.

IVA337 is a pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with moderate and well-balanced activity on the three PPAR isoforms (α, γ, δ). PPARs are regulators of lipid metabolism, inflammation, insulin resistance, and fibrogenesis. Different single or dual PPAR agonists have been investigated for their therapeutic potential in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a chronic liver condition in which steatosis coexists with necroinflammation, potentially leading to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clinical results have demonstrated variable improvements of histologically assessed hepatic lesions depending on the profile of the tested drug, suggesting that concomitant activation of the three PPAR isoforms would translate into a more substantial therapeutic outcome in patients with NASH. We investigated the effects of IVA337 on several preclinical models reproducing the main metabolic and hepatic features associated with NASH. These models comprised a diet-induced obesity model (high-fat/high-sucrose diet); a methionine- and choline-deficient diet; the foz/foz model; the CCl4-induced liver fibrosis model (prophylactic and therapeutic) and human primary hepatic stellate cells. IVA337 normalized insulin sensitivity while controlling body weight gain, adiposity index, and serum triglyceride increases; it decreased liver steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. IVA337 demonstrated preventive and curative effects on fibrosis in the CCl4 model and inhibited proliferation and activation of human hepatic stellate cells, the key cells driving liver fibrogenesis in NASH. Moreover, IVA337 inhibited the expression of (pro)fibrotic and inflammasome genes while increasing the expression of ß-oxidation-related and fatty acid desaturation-related genes in both the methionine- and choline-deficient diet and the foz/foz model. For all models, IVA337 displayed an antifibrotic efficacy superior to selective PPARα, PPARδ, or PPARγ agonists. Conclusion: The therapeutic potential of IVA337 for the treatment of patients with NASH is supported by our data. (Hepatology Communications 2017;1:524-537).