Consequences of mesial temporal sparing temporal lobe surgery in medically refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: We compared long-term seizure outcome, neuropsychological outcome, and occupational outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) with and without sparing of mesial structures to determine whether mesial sparing temporal lobectomy prevents memory decline and thus disability, with acceptable seizure outcome. METHODS: We studied patients (n = 21) and controls (n = 21) with no evidence of mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) on MRI who had surgery to treat drug-resistant epilepsy. Demographic and pre- and postsurgical clinical characteristics were compared. Patients had neuropsychological assessment before and after surgery. Neuropsychological analyses were limited to patients with left-sided surgery and available data (n = 14 in each group) as they were at risk of verbal memory impairment. The California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II) (sum of trials 1-5, delayed free recall) and the Logical Memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale III or IV (WMS-III or WMS-IV) (learning and delayed recall of prose passages) were used to assess verbal episodic learning and memory. Seizure and occupational outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The chance of attaining seizure freedom was similar in the two groups, so sparing mesial temporal structures did not lessen the chance of stopping seizures. Sparing mesial temporal structures mitigated the extent of postoperative verbal memory impairment, though some of these individuals suffered decline as a consequence of surgery. Occupational outcome was similar in both groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Mesial temporal sparing resections provide a similar seizure outcome as ATL, while producing a better memory outcome. Anterior temporal lobectomy including mesial structure resection did not increase the risk of postoperative disability.

Clinicopathologic features and pathogenesis of melanocytic colonization in atypical meningioma.

Only two prior cases of benign dendritic melanocytes colonizing a meningioma have been reported. We add a third case, describe clinicopathologic features shared by the three, and elucidate the risk factors for this very rare phenomenon. A 29 year-old Hispanic woman presented with headache and hydrocephalus. MRI showed a lobulated enhancing pineal region mass measuring 41 mm in greatest dimension. Subtotal resection of the mass demonstrated an atypical meningioma, WHO grade II, and the patient subsequently underwent radiotherapy. She presented 4 years later with diplopia, and MRI showed an enhancing extra-axial mass measuring 47 mm in greatest dimension and centered on the tentorial incisura. Subtotal resection showed a brain-invasive atypical meningioma with melanocytic colonization. The previous two cases in the literature were atypical meningiomas, one of which was also brain invasive. Atypical meningiomas may be at particular risk for melanocytic colonization as they upregulate molecules known to be chemoattractants for melanocytes. We detected c-Kit expression in a minority of the melanocytes as well as stem cell factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in the meningioma cells, suggesting that mechanisms implicated in normal melanocyte migration may be involved. In some cases, brain invasion with disruption of the leptomeningeal barrier may also facilitate migration from the subarachnoid space into the tumor. Whether there is low-level proliferation of the dendritic melanocytes is unclear. Given that all three patients were non-Caucasian, meningiomas in persons and/or brain regions with increased dendritic melanocytes may predispose to colonization. The age range spanned from 6 years old to 70 years old. All three patients were female. The role of gender and estrogen in the pathogenesis of this entity remains to be clarified. Whether melanocytic colonization may also occur in the more common Grade I meningiomas awaits identification of additional cases.