Unveiling exosomes: Cutting-edge isolation techniques and their therapeutic potential.

Exosomes are one type of nanosized membrane vesicles with an endocytic origin. They are secreted by almost all cell types and play diverse functional roles. It is essential for research purposes to differentiate exosomes from microvesicles and isolate them from other components in a fluid sample or cell culture medium. Exosomes are important mediators in cell-cell communication. They deliver their cargos, such as mRNA transcripts, microRNA, lipids, cytosolic and membrane proteins and enzymes, to target cells with or without physical connections between cells. They are highly heterogeneous in size, and their biological functions can vary depending on the cell type, their ability to interact with recipient cells and transport their contents, and the environment in which they are produced. This review summarized the recent progress in exosome isolation and characterization techniques. Moreover, we review the therapeutic approaches, biological functions of exosomes in disease progression, tumour metastasis regulation, immune regulation and some ongoing clinical trials.

Therapeutic potential of Lactobacillus casei and Chlorella vulgaris in high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)-associated kidney damages: a stereological study.

BACKGROUND: The non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is prevalent in as many as 25% of adults who are afflicted with metabolic syndrome. Oxidative stress plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of hepatic and renal injury associated with NAFLD. Therefore, probiotics such as Lactobacillus casei (LBC) and the microalga Chlorella vulgaris (CV) may be beneficial in alleviating kidney injury related to NAFLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This animal study utilized 30 C57BL/6 mice, which were evenly distributed into five groups: the control group, the NAFLD group, the NAFLD + CV group, the NAFLD + LBC group, and the NAFLD + CV + LBC group. A high-fat diet (HFD) was administered to induce NAFLD for six weeks. The treatments with CV and LBC were continued for an additional 35 days. Biochemical parameters, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and the expression of kidney damage marker genes (KIM 1 and NGAL) in serum and kidney tissue were determined, respectively. A stereological analysis was conducted to observe the structural changes in kidney tissues. RESULTS: A liver histopathological examination confirmed the successful induction of NAFLD. Biochemical investigations revealed that the NAFLD group exhibited increased ALT and AST levels, significantly reduced in the therapy groups (p < 0.001). The gene expression levels of KIM-1 and NGAL were elevated in NAFLD but were significantly reduced by CV and LBC therapies (p < 0.001). Stereological examinations revealed reduced kidney size, volume, and tissue composition in the NAFLD group, with significant improvements observed in the treated groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the potential therapeutic efficacy of C. vulgaris and L. casei in mitigating kidney damage caused by NAFLD. These findings provide valuable insights for developing novel treatment approaches for managing NAFLD and its associated complications.

Electron microscopy study of 496 cases of lupus nephritis: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Renal involvement is seen in about 40-82% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Asian patients. The exact diagnosis and classification of lupus nephritis are important for treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the value of electron microscopy (EM) in the diagnosis and classification of lupus nephritis compared with light microscopy. METHOD: In this cross-sectional referral-center 16-year study of lupus nephritis, the final diagnosis was based on the EM study. Primary light microscopy findings were compared with EM diagnosis. Moreover, Immunofluorescence patterns distribution was assessed. RESULTS: From 496 patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis based on EM, 225(45.4%) of patients were categorized in class IV, followed by 98(19.7%), 93(18.8%), 46(9.3%), and 14(2.8%) who were categorized into classes of II, III, V, and VI respectively. Only 1(0.2%) patient belonged to class I, and 19(3.8%) cases were diagnosed with mixed two classes. Using EM was essential for diagnosing 25.6% of cases taking the correct classification by light microscopy into account; however, disregarding correct classification, this could change to a 7.4% contribution rate of EM. The most common cause of misdiagnosis, disregarding incorrect classification, was inadequate or wrong tissue. Positive associations were detected between tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis of both electron and light microscopy with different classes (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While light microscopy is highly accurate for diagnosing lupus nephritis regardless of correct classification, EM contributes substantially to the correct classification of lupus nephritis types.