Case report & review: Bilateral NIFTP harboring concomitant HRAS and KRAS mutation: Report of an unusual case and literature review.

Diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease are affected by the wide range of thyroid cancer subtypes and their varying degrees of aggressiveness. To better describe the indolent nature of thyroid neoplasms previously classified as noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (NI-FVPTC), the Endocrine Pathology Society working group has recently coined the term "noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features" (NIFTP). The purpose of this nomenclature change is to avoid patients the distress of cancer diagnosis and to decrease the overtreatment of thyroid nodules with a RAS-LIKE molecular profile similar to follicular adenoma. Consequently, the reclassification has a significant impact on thyroid nodule clinical care as well as histopathologic and cytopathologic diagnosis. This paper will focus on a unique case of Bilateral NIFTP harboring concomitant HRAS and KRAS mutation; we will also review the background, molecular features, and clinical implications of NIFTP as well as the factors behind the nomenclature update. It also seemed helpful to emphasize the impact of NIFTP on clinical practice to avoid overtreating nodules that could be safely managed with lobectomy alone. Actually, despite the diagnosis is postsurgery, a comprehensive preoperative evaluation may raise a suspicion of NIFTP and suggest a more careful plan for treatment. Here, we present a unique case of bilateral NIFTP after total thyroidectomy; subsequent molecular analysis revealed that the patient's right nodule harbored an isolated p.(Q61K) HRAS mutation, while the left a p.(Q61K) KRAS mutation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of this nature. The existence of simultaneous mutations highlights the occurrence of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) also in the context of FVPTC, which requires comprehensive investigation. The available information shows that NIFTP, identified in accordance with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, exhibits a very latent clinical behavior even in the face of conservative lobectomy, lacking of radioactive iodine therapy. However, it cannot be regarded as a benign lesion because there is a small but significant incidence of adverse events, such as lymph nodes and distant metastases. Currently, NIFTP can only be suspected before surgery: several efforts could be explored to identify key molecular, cytological, and ultrasonographic traits that may be helpful in raising the possibility of NIFTP in the preoperative context. Additionally, our discovery of simultaneous mutations within the same lesion strengthens the evidence of ITH even in FVPTC. Although the extent and biological impact of this phenomenon in NIFTP are still debated, a deeper understanding is essential to ensure appropriate clinical management.

Clinical characteristics and molecular aspects of low-grade serous ovarian and peritoneal cancer: a multicenter, observational, retrospective analysis of MITO Group (MITO 22).

BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous ovarian and peritoneal cancer (LGSC) is a rare disease and few data on the clinical and genomic landscape have been published. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with LGSC between 1996 and 2019 was conducted in MITO centers. Objective Response Rate (ORR) to treatments, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Additionally, the tumor molecular profile of 56 patients was evaluated using the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) FoundationOne CDX (Foundation Medicine®). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients with complete clinical data and pathologically confirmed diagnosis of LGSC were identified. ORR to first and subsequent therapies were 23.7% and 33.7%, respectively. PFS was 43.9 months (95% CI:32.4-53.1) and OS was 105.4 months (95% CI: 82.7-not reached). The most common gene alterations were: KRAS (n = 12, 21%), CDKN2A/B (n = 11, 20%), NRAS (n = 8, 14%), FANCA (n = 8, 14%), NF1 (n = 7, 13%) and BRAF (n = 6, 11%). Unexpectedly, pathogenetic BRCA1 (n = 2, 4%), BRCA2 (n = 1, 2%) and PALB2 (n = 1, 2%) mutations were found. CONCLUSIONS: MITO 22 suggests that LGSC is an heterogenous disease for both its clinical behavior in response to standard therapies and its molecular alterations. Future prospective studies should test treatments according to biological and molecular tumor's characteristics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered under NCT02408536 on ClinicalTrials.gov .

Biological and clinical impact of membrane EGFR expression in a subgroup of OC patients from the phase IV ovarian cancer MITO-16A/MANGO-OV2A trial.

BACKGROUND: Validated prognostic biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy using the anti-VEGF antibody Bevacizumab in ovarian cancer (OC) patients are still an unmet clinical need. The EGFR can contribute to cancer-associated biological mechanisms in OC cells including angiogenesis, but its targeting gave disappointing results with less than 10% of OC patients treated with anti-EGFR compounds showing a positive response, likely due to a non adequate selection and stratification of EGFR-expressing OC patients. METHODS: EGFR membrane expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 310 OC patients from the MITO-16A/MANGO-OV2A trial, designed to identify prognostic biomarkers of survival in patients treated with first line standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Statistical analyses assessed the association between EGFR and clinical prognostic factors and survival outcomes. A single sample Gene Set Enrichment-like and Ingenuity Pathway Analyses were applied to the gene expression profile of 195 OC samples from the same cohort. In an OC in vitro model, biological experiments were performed to assess specific EGFR activation. RESULTS: Based on EGFR-membrane expression, three OC subgroups of patients were identified being the subgroup with strong and homogeneous EGFR membrane localization, indicative of possible EGFR out/in signalling activation, an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival of patients treated with an anti-angiogenic agent. This OC subgroup resulted statistically enriched of tumors of histotypes different than high grade serous lacking angiogenic molecular characteristics. At molecular level, among the EGFR-related molecular traits identified to be activated only in this patients' subgroup the crosstalk between EGFR with other RTKs also emerged. In vitro, we also showed a functional cross-talk between EGFR and AXL RTK; upon AXL silencing, the cells resulted more sensitive to EGFR targeting with erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Strong and homogeneous cell membrane localization of EGFR, associated with specific transcriptional traits, can be considered a prognostic biomarker in OC patients and could be useful for a better OC patients' stratification and the identification of alternative therapeutic target/s in a personalized therapeutic approach.

Evaluation of Angiogenesis-Related Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers of Bevacizumab Treated Ovarian Cancer Patients: Results from the Phase IV MITO16A/ManGO OV-2 Translational Study.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a rare, highly lethal disease. In a subset of high grade EOC patients, maintenance therapy with the antiangiogenic drug Bevacizumab (BEV) is a valuable option. To date, no validated predictive or prognostic biomarkers exist for selecting EOC patients that might benefit from BEV treatment. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR evaluated the expression of seven angiogenesis-related proteins and of a twelve microRNAs angio-signature in EOC patients, treated in first line with chemotherapy plus BEV (MITO16A/ManGO OV-2 phase IV trial). Centralized statistical analyses assessed the associations between each biomarker, clinical prognostic factors and survival outcomes. RESULTS: High miR-484 expression was associated with longer progression-free and overall survival. Notably, the combined expression of miR-484 and its target VEGFB identified a subset of patients that might mostly benefit from BEV treatment. No other significant correlations were found between the other analyzed biomarkers and patients' survival. The application of a shrinkage procedure to adjust for over-fitting hazard ratio estimates reduced the association significance. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of angiogenesis related biomarkers in EOC patients homogenously treated with BEV in first line provides novel insight in their prognostic value and suggests that some of them might merit to be tested as predictive markers of drug activity in dedicated randomized trials.