Cost-effectiveness of spinal muscular atrophy newborn screening based on real-world data in Belgium.

The objective of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of real-world spinal muscular atrophy newborn screening followed by treatment. We modeled the lifetime cost-effectiveness of the spinal muscular atrophy newborn screening followed by treatment (screening) compared to treatment without screening (no screening) from the Belgian healthcare perspective. Real-world data, including quality of life, costs, and motor development data, were collected on 12 patients identified by screening and 43 patients identified by their symptoms. "Screening" was associated with slightly higher healthcare costs (€ 6,858,061 vs. € 6,738,120) but more quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (40.95 vs. 20.34) compared to "no screening", leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of € 5,820 per QALY gained. "Screening" was dominant from a societal perspective (negative incremental costs: € -14,457; incremental QALY = 20.61), when incorporating the burden on caregivers (negative incremental costs = € -74,353; incremental QALY = 27.51), and when the treatment was chosen by the parents (negative incremental costs = € -2,596,748; incremental QALY = 20.61). Spinal muscular atrophy newborn screening coupled with early treatment is thus cost-effective compared with late treatment following clinical diagnosis and is dominant when societal perspective, caregiver burden, and treatment based on parental preference were considered.

Recommendations for the management of myasthenia gravis in Belgium.

International guidelines on the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been published but are not tailored to the Belgian situation. This publication presents recommendations from a group of Belgian MG experts for the practical management of MG in Belgium. It includes recommendations for treatment of adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) or ocular myasthenia gravis (oMG). Depending on the MG-related antibody a treatment sequence is suggested with therapies that can be added on if the treatment goal is not achieved. Selection of treatments was based on the level of evidence of efficacy, registration and reimbursement status in Belgium, common daily practice and the personal views and experiences of the authors. The paper reflects the situation in February 2024. In addition to the treatment considerations, other relevant aspects in the management of MG are addressed, including comorbidities, drugs aggravating disease symptoms, pregnancy, and vaccination. As many new treatments might potentially come to market, a realistic future perspective on the impact of these treatments on clinical practice is given. In conclusion, these recommendations intend to be a guide for neurologists treating patients with MG in Belgium.