Inhalation therapy in the next decade: Determinants of adherence to treatment in asthma and COPD.

Proceedings of the European Seminars in Respiratory Medicine course, Inhalation therapy in the next decade: Determinants of adherence to treatment in asthma and COPD, held in Taormina, Italy, on 3-4 March, 2017.

Can Sputum Eosinophilia Be a Constant Feature in Severe Refractory Asthmatics? A 3-Year Longitudinal Study.

In difficult-to-treat asthmatics, uncontrolled despite a high level of therapy and followed for 3 years with a mean number of sputum samples/patient = 10, sputum eosinophilia (≥3%) was observed in 87% of all sputum samples. Persistent sputum eosinophilia is a characteristic of severe uncontrolled asthma.

Neutrophilic Bronchial Inflammation Correlates with Clinical and Functional Findings in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

Background. Neutrophilic bronchial inflammation is a main feature of bronchiectasis, but not much is known about its relationship with other disease features. Aim. To compare airway inflammatory markers with clinical and functional findings in subjects with stable noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB). Methods. 152 NFCB patients (62.6 years; females: 57.2%) underwent clinical and functional cross-sectional evaluation, including microbiologic and inflammatory cell profile in sputum, and exhaled breath condensate malondialdehyde (EBC-MDA). NFCB severity was assessed using BSI and FACED criteria. Results. Sputum neutrophil percentages inversely correlated with FEV1 (P < 0.0001; rho = -0.428), weakly with Leicester Cough Questionnaire score (P = 0.068; rho = -0.58), and directly with duration of the disease (P = 0.004; rho = 0.3) and BSI severity score (P = 0.005; rho = 0.37), but not with FACED. Sputum neutrophilia was higher in colonized subjects, P. aeruginosa colonized subjects showing greater sputum neutrophilia and lower FEV1. Patients with ≥3 exacerbations in the last year showed a significantly greater EBC-MDA than the remaining patients. Conclusions. Sputum neutrophilic inflammation and biomarkers of oxidative stress in EBC can be considered good biomarkers of disease severity in NCFB patients, as confirmed by pulmonary function, disease duration, bacterial colonization, BSI score, and exacerbation rate.

Baseline airway inflammation may be a determinant of the response to ozone exposure in asthmatic patients.

CONTEXT: It is well known that ozone exposure decreases lung function and increases airway neutrophilia, but large variability has been observed among asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVE: To find possible predictors of functional and inflammatory airway response to ozone in asthmatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 120 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, randomly exposed to either air or ozone (0.3 ppm for 2 h) in a challenge chamber. Symptoms and pulmonary function test (PFT) were measured before and immediately after exposure. Six hours after exposure, induced sputum was collected. Patients were evaluated according to their functional (FEV1 responders) or neutrophilic (neutrophil responders) response to ozone. We considered, as possible predictors of response: age, baseline FEV1, previous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), baseline sputum neutrophils, baseline sputum eosinophils, methacholine responsiveness, atopy and smoking habit. RESULTS: FEV1 responders had lower baseline FEV1, and a lower percentage of these had received ICS treatment. Neutrophil responders were younger, with lower baseline sputum inflammation and greater methacholine responsiveness. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patients not previously treated with ICS and patients with lower FEV1 are more prone to functional response to ozone. Lower baseline airway inflammation and greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness may predict neutrophilic airway response to ozone in asthmatic patients. Thus, determinants of functional and inflammatory responses to ozone are different.

Transient sputum eosinophilia may occur over time in non-eosinophilic asthma and this is not prevented by salmeterol.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic, steroid-naïve asthmatic patients may have low sputum eosinophil numbers. The aim of the study was to determine whether low sputum eosinophil numbers persisted over time, during treatment with salmeterol monotherapy. METHODS: Forty steroid-naïve, symptomatic asthmatic patients, with sputum eosinophils <3%, were randomized to receive open-label salmeterol (50 µg twice a day, n = 30) or fluticasone (125 µg twice a day, n = 10) and were then assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months. All patients underwent spirometry, a methacholine challenge test and sputum induction at each visit. Symptom scores and peak expiratory flow were recorded throughout the study. Patients were permitted to withdraw from the study at any time, if they experienced exacerbations or deterioration of symptoms. RESULTS: The average sputum eosinophil percentage remained normal (≤1.9%) in both groups over the study period. The eosinophil percentages were ≤1.9% in 65 of the 80 samples obtained from salmeterol-treated patients throughout the study period. Eight patients had an asthma exacerbation or deterioration, during which one developed sputum eosinophilia. Twelve patients, 11 of whom were randomized to salmeterol and one to fluticasone, developed transient sputum eosinophilia at least once during the study. This was not associated with asthma exacerbation (except for one patient). Sputum neutrophil percentage did not change in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Low sputum eosinophil numbers persisted over 6 months in a majority of patients with non-eosinophilic asthma who received salmeterol monotherapy. However, transient sputum eosinophilia occurred in 40% indicating that non-eosinophilic asthma may not be a stable phenotype.

Evaluation of underreporting tuberculosis in Central Italy by means of record linkage.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) surveillance systems have some pitfalls outside of a National Tuberculosis Program and lack of efficient surveillance hampers accurate epidemiological quantification of TB burden.In the present study we assessed the quality of surveillance at the University Hospital in Pisa (UHP), Italy, and TB incidence rates over a ten year period (1999-2008). METHODS: Assessment of underreporting was done by record-linkage from two sources: databases of TB diagnoses performed in the UHP and the Italian Infectious Disease Surveillance (IIDS) system. Two different databases were examined: a) TB diagnoses reported in the Hospital Discharge Records (HDR) from three Units of UHP (Respiratory Pathophysiology, Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases Units) (TB database A); b) TB diagnoses reported in HDR of all Units of UHP plus TB positive cases obtained by the Laboratory Register (LR) of UHP (TB database B). For the TB database A, the accuracy of TB diagnosis in HDR was assessed by direct examination of the Clinical Record Forms of the cases. For the TB database B, clinical and population data were described, as well as the trend of incidence and underreporting over 10 yrs. RESULTS: In the first study 293 patients were found: 80 patients (27%) with a confirmed TB diagnosis were underreported, 39 of them were microbiologically confirmed. Underreporting was related to age (Reported vs Non Reported, mean age: 49.27 ± 20 vs 55 ± 19, p < 0.005 ), diagnosis (smear positive vs negative cases 18.7 vs 81.2%, p = 0.001), microbiological confirmation (49% vs 51%, p < 0.05), X-ray findings (cavitary vs non-cavitary cases: 12.5 vs 87.5%, p = 0.001) but not to nationality.In the second study, 666 patients were found. Mean underreporting rate was 69.4% and decreased over time (68% in 1999, 48% in 2008). Newly diagnosed TB cases were also found to decrease in number whereas immigration rate increased. Underreporting was related to nationality (Immigrants vs Italians: 18% vs 68%, p < 0.001), diagnosis (microbiological confirmation: 25% vs 75%, p < 0.01), kind of hospital regimen (hospitalized patients vs Day Hospital: 70% vs 16%, p < 0.001), and position of TB code in the HDR (TB code in first position vs in the following position: 39,5% vs 45% p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TB is underreported in Pisa, particularly in older patients and those without microbiological confirmation. The TB code in first position of HDR seems fairly accurate in confirming TB diagnosis.

Increase in markers of airway inflammation after ozone exposure can be observed also in stable treated asthmatics with minimal functional response to ozone.

BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between functional and inflammatory airway response to ozone has been reported in normal subjects, but few data are available for stable asthmatics regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Twenty-three well controlled, regularly treated, mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients underwent two sequential randomised exposures to either filtered air or ozone (0.3 ppm for 2 hours) in a challenge chamber. Pulmonary function (PF) was monitored, and patients with FEV1 decrease greater than 10% from pre-challenge value were considered as responders. Immediately after each exposure, exhaled breath condensate (EBC) was collected to measure malondialdehyde (MDA). Six hours after each exposure, PF and EBC collection were repeated, and sputum was induced to measure inflammatory cell counts and soluble mediators (IL-8 and neutrophil elastase). The response to ozone was also evaluated according to the presence of polymorphism in oxidative stress related NQO1 and GSTM1 genes. RESULTS: After ozone exposure, sputum neutrophils significantly increased in responders (n = 8), but not in nonresponders (n = 15). Other markers of neutrophil activation in sputum supernatant and MDA in EBC significantly increased in all patients, but only in nonresponders the increase was significant. In nonresponders, sputum eosinophils also significantly increased after ozone. There was a positive correlation between ozone-induced FEV1 fall and increase in sputum neutrophils. No difference in functional or inflammatory response to ozone was observed between subjects with or without the combination of NQO1wt- GSTM1null genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Markers of neutrophilic inflammation and oxidative stress increase also in asthmatic subjects not responding to ozone. A greater functional response to ozone is associated with greater neutrophil airway recruitment in asthmatic subjects.

Low sputum eosinophils predict the lack of response to beclomethasone in symptomatic asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of low sputum eosinophils in steroid-naïve, symptomatic asthmatic patients is controversial. AIM: To verify whether low sputum eosinophils predict poor response to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Sixty-seven symptomatic asthmatic patients with moderate asthma were examined before and after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate, 500 microg bid. None received corticosteroids in the 3 months preceding the study. At each visit, all patients underwent spirometry, methacholine challenge, and sputum induction. The patients recorded symptom scores and peak expiratory flow (PEF) throughout the study. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had low sputum eosinophils despite being symptomatic. Patients with high (> 3%) sputum eosinophils at baseline showed significant improvement in symptoms, pulmonary function, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness after treatment, whereas patients with low sputum eosinophils showed no significant improvement in most clinical and functional outcomes. Among the baseline indexes examined, sputum eosinophils had the highest negative predictive value but low positive predictive value for the response to treatment. Multiple stepwise regression showed that only baseline FEV(1) and sputum eosinophil percentages significantly correlated with changes in FEV(1) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that, among the indexes examined, low sputum eosinophils are the best predictor for poor corticosteroid effects in asthma.

Asthma Control and Airway Inflammation in Patients with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis that occurs in patients with asthma, nasal disease, blood and tissue eosinophilia, and extrapulmonary manifestations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the clinical, functional, and inflammatory status of upper and lower airways in 37 patients with EGPA, examined 6.4 ± 4.7 years after diagnosis, when they were in partial or complete remission from systemic involvement while on treatment with low-dose oral corticosteroids as maintenance therapy. METHODS: All patients performed spirometry and were assessed for bronchial hyperreactivity, sputum eosinophilia, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide; asthma control was evaluated according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines and the Asthma Control Test. Markers of systemic disease were compared with the data available at diagnosis. Nasal involvement was evaluated by using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, nasal endoscopy, and nasal cytology. The impact on the quality of life was evaluated by using generic (36-item short form health survey) and organ-specific questionnaires. RESULTS: At the time of the study visit, almost all patients were receiving low-dose oral corticosteroids and immunomodulating drugs, but only 50% were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Although low systemic disease activity was documented in the large majority of patients, poorly controlled asthma and rhinosinusitis with eosinophilic airway inflammation were demonstrated in almost all patients. A significant correlation was found between sputum and blood eosinophilia and between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and asthma control. The 36-item short form health survey questionnaire results significantly correlated with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test but not with the Asthma Control Test. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic treatment controls systemic involvement in EGPA, but not asthma and nasal diseases, which negatively affects patients' quality of life.

Sputum eosinophilia is a determinant of FEV1 decline in occupational asthma: results of an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential determinants of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decline in workers with occupational asthma (OA) still exposed to the causative agent. We hypothesised that sputum eosinophilia might be a predictor of poor asthma outcome after diagnosis. SETTING, DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a specialistic clinical centre of the University Hospital of Pisa, we studied 39 participants (28 M, 11 F) diagnosed as having OA, routinely followed up between 1990 and 2009. They were a subgroup of 94 participants diagnosed as affected by OA in that period: 9 had been removed from work at the diagnosis, 21 were excluded for having ceased occupational exposure after few months from diagnosis, and 25 were lost at the follow-up or had no acceptable sputum measurements at the diagnosis. Estimates of the decline in FEV1 were obtained by means of simple regression analysis during the period of occupational exposure after diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to analyse the effects of factors (baseline FEV1 and sputum inflammatory cells, duration and type of exposure) that may potentially influence FEV1 decline. RESULTS: At follow-up (5.7+3.7 years), most participants were still symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) treatment and had their occupational exposure reduced. Participants with higher sputum eosinophils (>3%) at baseline had a significantly greater decline of FEV1 (-52.5 vs -18.6 mL/year, p=0.012). Logistic regression showed that persistent exposure and sputum eosinophilia were significantly associated with a greater decline in FEV1 (OR 11.5, 95% CI 1.8 to 71.4, p=0.009 and OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 41.7, p= 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sputum eosinophilia at diagnosis, together with the persistence of occupational exposure during follow-up, may contribute to a greater decline in FEV1 in patients with OA still at work. Further long-term studies are required as to whether intensive ICS treatment may be beneficial for patients with OA and increase ad eosinophilic inflammation.

Efficacy of anticholinergic drugs in asthma.

Although bronchial hyperresponsiveness to cholinergic agents is a main feature of asthma, the role of anticholinergic drugs in chronic asthma management has been largely underestimated. Several single-dose studies comparing acute bronchodilation induced by ipratropium bromide with salbutamol have shown that salbutamol was more effective than ipratropium in asthma treatment. Recently, tiotropium has been studied in asthma, when added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in unselected moderate asthmatics or in patients with uncontrolled asthma, or patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and history of asthma. Later, studies on patients with Arg/Arg ß(2)-receptor polymorphism demonstrated a similar efficacy of tiotropium in comparison with salmeterol when both were added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Further long-term studies are currently in progress, for the evaluation of the efficacy of tiotropium on clinical asthma control, and on the rate and severity of asthma exacerbations, as well as the potential modification of inflammatory mechanisms and varying efficacy in specific asthma phenotypes (such as smoking asthmatics).

Effects of oral prednisone on sputum eosinophils and cytokines in patients with severe refractory asthma.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma occurs in a heterogeneous group of patients in whom symptoms and airway inflammation persist despite maximal antiasthma treatment. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether a short-term course of oral steroids would modify sputum inflammatory cytokine and sputum eosinophil concentrations and whether this effect is related to the presence of sputum eosinophilia. METHODS: In 59 patients with severe refractory asthma, we measured pulmonary function and inflammatory markers in hypertonic saline-induced sputum before and after 2 weeks of treatment with 0.5 mg/kg of oral prednisone (n = 39) or placebo (n = 20) daily. Selected sputum portions were assayed for total and differential cell counts and supernatant interleukin (IL) 5 and IL-8 concentrations. RESULTS: At baseline, no statistical differences were found among placebo- and prednisone-treated patients in terms of sputum inflammatory cell percentages and IL-5 and IL-8 concentrations. After treatment, forced expiratory volume in 1 second significantly increased and sputum eosinophil percentages and IL-5 and IL-8 concentrations significantly decreased in the prednisone group, whereas no changes were observed in the placebo group. The positive effect of prednisone treatment was observed only in patients with baseline sputum eosinophilia, whereas in noneosinophilic patients with severe asthma prednisone induced only a significant decrease of sputum IL-8. CONCLUSIONS: Additional high-dose oral corticosteroids improve pulmonary function and reduce not only sputum eosinophil but also sputum proinflammatory cytokine concentrations in patients with severe refractory asthma.

Magnitude of late asthmatic response to allergen in relation to baseline and allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia in mild asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Late asthmatic response (LAR) to allergen challenge is a validated method for studying the pathogenesis of and new treatments for asthma in the laboratory. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the magnitude of allergen-induced LAR and clinical and biological determinants, including sputum and blood eosinophil percentages and eosinophil cationic protein concentrations. METHODS: Thirty-eight untreated mild asthmatic patients (mean age, 21.2 years) were selected for the presence of allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) and LAR. Each patient measured methacholine responsiveness (provocation dose that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% [PD20FEV1]) at baseline, differential blood cell counts and eosinophil cationic protein levels in blood and induced sputum, and serum neutrophil chemotactic activity at baseline and 24 hours after allergen challenge. RESULTS: A correlation was found between LAR (as area under the curve [AUC]) and sputum eosinophil percentages at baseline (r = 0.51; P = .001) and 24 hours after allergen challenge (r = 0.44; P < .007). Furthermore, we found significant correlations between AUC LAR and AUC EAR, baseline methacholine PD20FEV1, baseline blood eosinophil percentages, and baseline serum neutrophil chemotactic activity. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the stronger determinants of AUC LAR were baseline sputum eosinophilia and AUC EAR. CONCLUSION: Baseline sputum eosinophilia and functional findings are determinants of the magnitude of allergen-induced LAR.

Prednisone blunts airway neutrophilic inflammatory response due to ozone exposure in asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: The effect of corticosteroids on the ozone (O3)-induced airway inflammation is still debated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to confirm the effect of a short-term treatment with oral glucocorticosteroids on O3-induced airway inflammation, detected by induced sputum analysis, and on functional response in glucocorticosteroid-naive subjects. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled study using oral prednisone (25 mg o.d. for 4 days) was carried out. Nine mild persistent asthmatics were exposed for 2 h, on separatedays, to 0.27 ppm O3 and to air in random order, after 4 days of treatment with prednisone (25 mg o.d.) and after 4 days of placebo.Before and after exposure, pulmonary function test was measured; 6 h afterexposure, sputum induction was done. RESULTS: Oral glucorticosteroids did not prevent pulmonary function decrement due to O3. After placebo, the percentage of neutrophils in induced sputum was significantly higher after O3 than after air [52.1 (15.7-77.3) vs. 17.8 (1.7-58.4), p=0.02, O3 vs. air]. This difference was lost after 4 days of treatment with prednisone [35.2% (10-96.2) vs. 30.9% (6.1-75.6), n.s., O3 vs. air]. Neutrophil elastase in sputum supernatant increased after O3 exposure in the sample obtained after placebo, but not after prednisone treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that glucocorticosteroids reduce inflammatory airway response, but do not prevent the airway functional impairment after O3 exposure.

Profiles of proinflammatory cytokines in sputum from different groups of severe asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma represents a heterogeneous group of patients whose characteristics of airway inflammation are poorly known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sputum cytokine profiles of different phenotypes of severe asthma. METHODS: Severe asthmatic patients (n = 45) were divided into 3 groups: frequent exacerbations, persistent bronchoconstriction, and both features. Two other groups (9 patients with untreated mild asthma and 10 control subjects) were also studied. Selected sputum portions were assayed for differential cell count, supernatant interleukin 5 (IL-5), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-8, and eosinophil cationic protein. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 severe asthma groups in terms of sputum inflammatory cell percentages, IL-8 levels, and eosinophil cationic protein levels, although IL-8 levels tended to be higher in patients with persistent bronchoconstriction. Sputum concentrations of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and IL-5 were significantly higher in patients with frequent exacerbations compared with the other 2 groups. Levels of IL-5 and IL-8 were higher in severe asthmatic patients compared with mild asthmatic patients and controls, whereas sputum eosinophil percentages were intermediate between those of mild asthmatic patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Proeosinophilic cytokine levels are increased in severe asthmatic patients with frequent exacerbations but not in severe asthmatic patients with persistent bronchoconstriction, suggesting that different cytokine profiles could be associated with different phenotypes of severe asthma.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate is effective as well as oral prednisone in reducing sputum eosinophilia during exacerbations of asthma which do not require hospitalization.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether fluticasone propionate (FP) is effective as well as prednisone (P) in reducing sputum eosinophilia and in improving airway obstruction due to asthma exacerbations not requiring hospitalization. We measured, in a parallel-group, double-blind double-dummy, randomized study, sputum and blood inflammatory cell counts and soluble mediators in 37 asthmatic subjects during a spontaneous exacerbation of asthma (Visit 1) and after a 2 week (Visit 2) treatment with inhaled FP (1000microg bid) (Group A, n=18) or a reducing course of oral P (Group B, n=19). Asthma exacerbation was accompanied by sputum eosinophilia (eosinophils >2%) in almost all patients (95%). FP improved FEV(1) (from 53.9%+/-16.8 at Visit 1 to 76.4%+/-21.2 at Visit 2, p=0.0001) and reduced the percentage of sputum eosinophils (from 38%[0-78] to 3%[1-31, p=0.0008) as well as oral P (FEV(1): from 51.5%+/-14.4 to 83.6%+/-21.1, p=0.0001; sputum eosinophils: from 52%[1-96] to 11%[0-64], p=0.0003). At Visit 2, sputum eosinophils were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B. P but not FP induced significant decrease in blood and sputum ECP. Oxygen saturation, PEF variability, symptom score and use of rescue medication similarly improved in both groups. We conclude that FP is effective at least as well as P in reducing sputum eosinophilia and in improving airway obstruction due to asthma exacerbation. However, the cost/effectiveness ratio of this option should be further evaluated.

Induced sputum is a reproducible method to assess airway inflammation in asthma.

To evaluate the reproducibility of induced sputum analysis, and to estimate the sample size required to obtained reliable results, sputum was induced by hypertonic saline inhalation in 29 asthmatic subjects on two different days. The whole sample method was used for analysis, and inflammatory cells were counted on cytospin slides. Reproducibility, expressed by intra-class correlation coefficients, was good for macrophages (+0.80), neutrophils (+0.85), and eosinophils (+0.87), but not for lymphocytes (+0.15). Detectable differences were 5.5% for macrophages, 0.6% for lymphocytes, 5.2% for neutrophils, and 3.0% for eosinophils. We conclude that analysis of induced sputum is a reproducible method to study airway inflammation in asthma. Sample sizes greater than ours give little improvement in the detectable difference of eosinophil percentages.

Analysis of sputum cell counts during spontaneous moderate exacerbations of asthma in comparison to the stable phase.

BACKGROUND: Acute airway inflammation is considered to characterize asthma exacerbations, but its specific cellular pattern has not yet been completely evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of sputum eosinophilia during acute asthma exacerbations of moderate severity, compared with a stable phase of the disease, and to assess the concordance between changes in pulmonary function and sputum eosinophilia in the period between exacerbation and post exacerbation. METHODS: We compared sputum and blood inflammatory cell counts in 29 asthmatic subjects during a spontaneous moderate exacerbation of asthma (visit 1) with sputum and blood cell counts measured 4 weeks after the resolution of asthma exacerbation (visit 2). At visit 1, all subjects required an appropriate 1 week treatment with oral corticosteroids. RESULTS: At visit 1, all subjects were able to collect spontaneous sputum, whereas at visit 2 sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 3, 4, and 5%, 10 minutes each) with beta2-agonist pretreatment. Asthma exacerbation was accompanied by a significant increase in sputum eosinophil percentages compared with levels after exacerbation [25% (1-78) versus 4% (0-23), p<0.05). Only four subjects showed low sputum eosinophil percentages during exacerbation, and these showed no differences in main clinical findings with respect to subjects with sputum eosinophilia. At visit 2, the stability of asthma was assessed on the basis of PEF, FEV1, symptoms, and use of rescue beta2-agonist. Asthma was defined as stable in 21 out of 29 subjects. Sputum eosinophil percentages fell significantly between visit 1 and visit 2 in both stable and unstable patients, but at visit 2 sputum eosinophil percentages were still high in subjects with unstable asthma. In patients who proved to be stable at visit 2, there was a significant correlation between the changes recorded in sputum eosinophil percentages and in FEV1 between the two visits (rho: 0.723, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sputum cosinophil but not neutrophil percentages increase in most asthmatic subjects during moderate exacerbation of asthma. Changes in the degree of airway eosinophilic inflammation are related to changes in the severity of airway obstruction during asthma exacerbation.