Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 29(1): 59-103, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26598385

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens is a laboratory practice that supports strategies for rapid transition to direct targeted therapy by providing for timely and effective patient care. In fact, the more rapidly that appropriate antimicrobials are prescribed, the lower the mortality for patients with sepsis. Rapid identification methods may have multiple positive impacts on patient outcomes, including reductions in mortality, morbidity, hospital lengths of stay, and antibiotic use. In addition, the strategy can reduce the cost of care for patients with BSIs. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of three rapid diagnostic practices in decreasing the time to targeted therapy for hospitalized patients with BSIs. The review was performed by applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Initiative (LMBP) systematic review methods for quality improvement (QI) practices and translating the results into evidence-based guidance (R. H. Christenson et al., Clin Chem 57:816-825, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.157131). SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies with measurable outcomes. A search of three electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL), databases containing "gray" literature (unpublished academic, government, or industry evidence not governed by commercial publishing) (CIHI, NIHR, SIGN, and other databases), and the Cochrane database for English-language articles published between 1990 and 2011 was conducted in July 2011. DATES OF SEARCH: The dates of our search were from 1990 to July 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Animal studies and non-English publications were excluded. The search contained the following medical subject headings: bacteremia; bloodstream infection; time factors; health care costs; length of stay; morbidity; mortality; antimicrobial therapy; rapid molecular techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR); in situ hybridization, fluorescence; treatment outcome; drug therapy; patient care team; pharmacy service, hospital; hospital information systems; Gram stain; pharmacy service; and spectrometry, mass, matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization. Phenotypic as well as the following key words were searched: targeted therapy; rapid identification; rapid; Gram positive; Gram negative; reduce(ed); cost(s); pneumoslide; PBP2; tube coagulase; matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight; MALDI TOF; blood culture; EMR; electronic reporting; call to provider; collaboration; pharmacy; laboratory; bacteria; yeast; ICU; and others. In addition to the electronic search being performed, a request for unpublished quality improvement data was made to the clinical laboratory community. MAIN RESULTS: Rapid molecular testing with direct communication significantly improves timeliness compared to standard testing. Rapid phenotypic techniques with direct communication likely improve the timeliness of targeted therapy. Studies show a significant and homogeneous reduction in mortality associated with rapid molecular testing combined with direct communication. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No recommendation is made for or against the use of the three assessed practices of this review due to insufficient evidence. The overall strength of evidence is suggestive; the data suggest that each of these three practices has the potential to improve the time required to initiate targeted therapy and possibly improve other patient outcomes, such as mortality. The meta-analysis results suggest that the implementation of any of the three practices may be more effective at increasing timeliness to targeted therapy than routine microbiology techniques for identification of the microorganisms causing BSIs. Based on the included studies, results for all three practices appear applicable across multiple microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), Candida species, and Enterococcus species.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Clin Chem ; 57(6): 816-25, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21515742

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop methods for systematically reviewing evidence for identifying effective laboratory medicine (LM) practices associated with improved healthcare quality outcomes. RELEVANCE: Although many evidence-evaluation systems have been developed, none are designed to include and rate healthcare quality improvement studies to identify evidence-based practices that improve patient safety and LM quality. METHODS: Validated evidence-based medicine methods established by governmental agencies, the Guide to Community Preventive Services, and others were adapted for the LM field. Key methods modifications included (a) inclusion of quality improvement study designs; (b) mechanisms for inclusion of unpublished evidence, (c) combining of individual ratings of study quality, effect size, and relevance of outcome measures to evaluate consistency of practice evidence; and (d) deriving an overall strength rating to support evidence-based best practice recommendations. The methods follow the process steps of: ask; acquire; appraise; analyze; apply; and assess. Expert panels used the systematic evidence review results on practice effectiveness for improving healthcare quality outcomes consistent with the Institute of Medicine's healthcare quality aims (safe, timely, effective, equitable, efficient, and patient-centered). CONCLUSIONS: Adapting and developing methods from validated systems and applying them to systematically review and evaluate practices in LM by using published and unpublished studies is feasible. With these methods, evidence from quality improvement studies can be systematically synthesized and summarized to identify effective LM practices. Practical and scientifically validated demonstration of a positive impact on outcomes ensures that practitioners, policy makers, and decision makers at all levels have the evidence needed for improving healthcare quality and public health.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências
3.
J Prim Prev ; 30(2): 89-107, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19291403

RESUMO

The Institute of Medicine distinguishes between programs based on who is targeted: the entire population (universal), those at risk (selective), or persons exhibiting the early stages of use or related problem behavior (indicated). Evaluations suggest that although universal programs can be effective in reducing and preventing substance use, selective and indicated programs are both more effective and have greater cost-benefit ratios. This paper tests these assumptions by comparing the impact of these program types in reducing and preventing substance use at the individual level (i.e., those exposed to intervention services) and in the population (i.e., those exposed and not exposed to intervention services). A meta-analysis was performed on 43 studies of 25 programs to examine program comparability across IOM categories. When examining unadjusted effect sizes at the individual level, universal programs were modestly more successful in reducing tobacco use, but selective and indicated programs were modestly more successful in reducing alcohol and marijuana use. When adjusted to the population level, the average effect sizes for selective and indicated programs were reduced by approximately half. At the population level, universal programs were more successful in reducing tobacco and marijuana use and selective and indicated programs were more successful in reducing alcohol use. Editors' Strategic Implications: the authors' focus on the public health value of a prevention strategy is compelling and provides a model for analyses of other strategies and content areas.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Abuso de Maconha/prevenção & controle , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin Biochem ; 71: 1-13, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31278895

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of antifibrinolytics tranexamic acid (TA), ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA), and aprotinin to decrease overuse of red blood cell transfusions in adult surgical and non-surgical patients. METHODS: This review followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Laboratory Medicine Best Practice (LMBP™) Systematic Review (A-6) method. Eligible studies were assessed for evidence of effectiveness of TA or EACA in reducing the number of patients transfused or the number of whole blood transfusions. RESULTS: Seventy-two articles met LMBP™ inclusion criteria. Fifty-six studies assessed Topical, Intra-articular Injection, or Intravenous TA, 4 studied EACA, and 12 studied the effectiveness of aprotinin. The overall strength of the body of evidence of effectiveness for each of these practices was rated as high. CONCLUSION: LMBP™ recommends the use of topical, intra-articular injection, or intravenous tranexamic acid and the use of ε-aminocaproic acid for reducing overuse of red blood cell transfusion.


Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Laboratórios , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos
5.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 152(5): 544-557, 2019 10 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31305890

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Assess support for the effectiveness of two separate practices, restrictive transfusion strategy and computerized physician order entry/clinical decision support (CPOE/CDS) tools, in decreasing RBC transfusions in adult surgical and nonsurgical patients. METHODS: Following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Laboratory Medicine Best Practice (LMBP) Systematic Review (A-6) method, studies were assessed for quality and evidence of effectiveness in reducing the percentage of patients transfused and/or units of blood transfused. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies on restrictive transfusion practice and seven studies on CPOE/CDS practice met LMBP inclusion criteria. The overall strength of the body of evidence of effectiveness for restrictive transfusion strategy and CPOE/CDS was rated as high. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these procedures, adherence to an institutional restrictive transfusion strategy and use of CPOE/CDS tools for hemoglobin alerts or reminders of the institution's restrictive transfusion policies are effective in reducing RBC transfusion overuse.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde
6.
Eval Health Prof ; 41(2): 321-345, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29577743

RESUMO

The logic, theory, and practice of large-scale evaluation were once limited to large federal initiatives. However, with the advent of regularly collected performance measures and the often multisite implementation of quality improvement efforts, there is an opportunity to adopt large-scale evaluation methods in local and regional evaluation efforts. While ineffective programs show little variation in their ineffectiveness, effective programs generally show a range of effects. A central task of large-scale evaluation is to describe and ascribe why the same program, implemented in multiple settings, produces different effects. By its attention to variation attributable to setting, activities, outputs, and by participants and documenting the conditions in which programs achieve greater and lesser success, large-scale evaluation supports the needs of decision-makers when choosing to implement an evidence-based program. In addition to knowing a program is effective, decision-makers want to know whether it is appropriate for their situation and what facilitates or impedes effective implementation and bears on the program's ultimate effectiveness. This article presents the different methods and approaches appropriate for effectively and efficiently constructing and executing a large-scale evaluation that will provide decision-makers the evidence they need for evidence-informed adoption of effective programs.


Assuntos
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Ciência da Implementação , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Teorema de Bayes , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , Modelos Estatísticos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
7.
Crime Justice ; 47(1): 255-364, 2018 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30310248

RESUMO

Violent crime is a major cause of social instability, injury, and death in low- and middle-income countries. Longitudinal studies in high-income countries have provided important evidence on developmental precursors of violence and other antisocial behaviors. However, there may be unique influences or different risk factor effects in other social settings. Extensive searches in seven languages and screening of over 60,000 references identified 39 longitudinal studies of antisocial behavior in low- and middle-income countries. Many risk factors have roughly the same average effects as when studied in high-income countries. Stability of aggression over a 3-year period is almost identical across low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Dimensions of comorbid psychopathology such as low self-control, hyperactivity, and sensation seeking are associated with antisocial behavior in low- and middle-income countries, but some early physical health factors have consistently weak or null effects.

8.
J Appl Lab Med ; 1(2): 214-229, 2016 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27840858

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the incremental utility of nontraditional lipid biomarkers [e.g., apolipoprotein (apo) B, apo A-I, and non-HDL-C] in improving cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction when added to a conventional model of traditional risk factors (e.g., total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, sex, age, smoking status, and blood pressure). Here we present a systematic review that was conducted to assess the use of nontraditional lipid biomarkers including apo B, apo A-I, apo B/A-I ratio, and non-HDL-C in improving CVD risk prediction after controlling for the traditional risk factors in populations at risk for cardiovascular events. CONTENT: This systematic review used the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP™) A-6 methods. A total of 9 relevant studies published before and including July 2015 comprised the evidence base for this review. Results from this systematic review indicated that after the adjustment for standard nonlipid and lipid CVD risk factors, nontraditional apolipoprotein biomarkers apo B (overall effect = relative risk: 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.40; 4 studies) and apo B/apo A-I ratio (overall effect = relative risk: 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.38; 7 studies) resulted in significant improvement in long-term CVD risk assessment. SUMMARY: Available evidence showed that nontraditional lipid biomarkers apo B and apo B/apo I ratio can improve the risk prediction for cardiovascular events after controlling for the traditional risk factors for the populations at risk. However, because of insufficient evidence, no conclusions could be made for the effectiveness of apo A-I and non-HDL-C lipid markers to predict the CVD events, indicating a need for more research in this field.

9.
J Consult Clin Psychol ; 71(1): 136-49, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12602434

RESUMO

Research on the effectiveness of school-based programs for preventing or reducing aggressive behavior was synthesized with a meta-analysis. Changes in aggressive behavior between pretest and posttest were analyzed for developmental patterns and characteristics associated with differential effects. Control groups showed little change in aggressive behavior, but there were significant reductions among intervention groups. Most studies were conducted on demonstration programs; the few studies of routine practice programs showed much smaller effects. Among demonstration programs, positive outcomes were associated with a variety of study, subject, and intervention characteristics. Most notably, higher risk youth showed greater reductions in aggressive behavior, poorly implemented programs produced smaller effects, and different types of programs were generally similar in their effectiveness, other things equal.


Assuntos
Agressão/psicologia , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/normas , Transtornos do Comportamento Social/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Psicológicos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Transtornos do Comportamento Social/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Comportamento Social/epidemiologia
10.
Addict Behav ; 27(2): 193-206, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11817762

RESUMO

The present study uses data from a meta-analytic archive of prospective longitudinal studies (N= 3206) to examine the association between negative affect, emotionality, and unconventionality on the use, misuse, and abuse of marijuana. For each of the three constructs, variables were divided into two categories--a "trait," which refers to a personality characteristic or attitudes and beliefs, and a "behavior," which refers to something that a subject does. A total of 63 reports from 40 studies provided effect sizes on the bivariate relationship of one or more of these six categories with current or later marijuana use, misuse, or abuse. Pooling partially redundant estimates for independence reduced the dataset from 358 estimates to 93 aggregated effect sizes for the cross-sectional data included in the archive, and from 478 estimates to 73 aggregated effect sizes for the longitudinal data. The effect sizes obtained from the longitudinal data were modest, none above 0.20. Indeed, only those for unconventionality-trait and emotionality-trait and marijuana use were of sufficient magnitude and reliably to warrant attention. Of the behavioral constructs assessed using the cross-sectional data, only unconventionality was associated with marijuana use and misuse. The emotionality-behavior construct and both unconventionality constructs were most strongly associated with marijuana abuse. The conceptual and methodological limitations of the study along with the implications of its findings for prevention are briefly discussed.


Assuntos
Comportamento Aditivo/psicologia , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais
11.
Eval Health Prof ; 37(2): 258-82, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23132815

RESUMO

We propose a method for creating groups against which outcomes of local pretest-posttest evaluations of evidence-based programs can be judged. This involves assessing pretest markers for new and previously conducted evaluations to identify groups that have high pretest similarity. A database of 802 prior local evaluations provided six summary measures for analysis. The proximity of all groups using these variables is calculated as standardized proximities having values between 0 and 1. Five methods for creating standardized proximities are demonstrated. The approach allows proximity limits to be adjusted to find sufficient numbers of synthetic comparators. Several index cases are examined to assess the numbers of groups available to serve as comparators. Results show that most local evaluations would have sufficient numbers of comparators available for estimating program effects. This method holds promise as a tool for local evaluations to estimate relative effectiveness.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Criança , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/normas
12.
Eval Program Plann ; 35(2): 293-302, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22104743

RESUMO

The Safe Schools/Healthy Students (SS/HS) Initiative has awarded over $2 billion in grants to more than 350 school districts in partnership with local mental health, law enforcement, and juvenile justice agencies. To estimate the impact of grantee characteristics, grant operations, and near-term outcomes in reducing violence and substance use, promoting mental health, and enhancing school safety, logged odds ratios (LORs) were calculated contrasting Year 3 with Baseline performance from grantee-provided data on seven outcome measures. After comparing grantee performance across outcomes and outcomes across grantees, the LORs were entered as dependent variables in a series of meta-regressions in which grantee characteristics, grant operations, and near-term outcomes were tested after controlling for pre-grant characteristics. Findings indicate that the SS/HS Initiative significantly improved most outcomes, that within-grantee performance varied greatly by outcome, and that random-effects meta-regression appreciably decreased the variance available for modeling. The approach demonstrates that the SS/HS Initiative is effective and that locally collected performance data can be used to estimate grantee success in improving youth outcomes.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Instituições Acadêmicas/organização & administração , Estudantes/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Violência/prevenção & controle , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Financiamento Governamental , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Delinquência Juvenil/prevenção & controle , Aplicação da Lei , Saúde Mental , Metanálise como Assunto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/economia , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/normas , Instituições Acadêmicas/economia , Instituições Acadêmicas/normas
13.
Clin Biochem ; 45(13-14): 999-1011, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22709932

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This article is a systematic review of the effectiveness of three practices for reducing blood culture contamination rates: venipuncture, phlebotomy teams, and prepackaged preparation/collection (prep) kits. DESIGN AND METHODS: The CDC-funded Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Initiative systematic review methods for quality improvement practices were used. RESULTS: Studies included as evidence were: 9 venipuncture (vs. versus intravenous catheter), 5 phlebotomy team; and 7 prep kit. All studies for venipuncture and phlebotomy teams favored these practices, with meta-analysis mean odds ratios for venipuncture of 2.69 and phlebotomy teams of 2.58. For prep kits 6 studies' effect sizes were not statistically significantly different from no effect (meta-analysis mean odds ratio 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Venipuncture and the use of phlebotomy teams are effective practices for reducing blood culture contamination rates in diverse hospital settings and are recommended as evidence-based "best practices" with high overall strength of evidence and substantial effect size ratings. No recommendation is made for or against prep kits based on uncertain improvement.


Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Sangue/microbiologia , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Flebotomia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Técnicas de Cultura de Células/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/normas , Estados Unidos
14.
Clin Biochem ; 45(13-14): 1012-32, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22968086

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To complete a systematic review of emergency department (ED) practices for reducing hemolysis in blood samples sent to the clinical laboratory for testing. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies met the review inclusion criteria (12 published and 4 unpublished). All 11 studies comparing new straight needle venipuncture with IV starts found a reduction in hemolysis rates, [average risk ratio of 0.16 (95% CI=0.11-0.24)]. Four studies on the effect of venipuncture location showed reduced hemolysis rates for the antecubital site [average risk ratio of 0.45 (95% CI=0.35-0.57]. CONCLUSIONS: Use of new straight needle venipuncture instead of IV starts is effective at reducing hemolysis rates in EDs, and is recommended as an evidence-based best practice. The overall strength of evidence rating is high and the effect size is substantial. Unpublished studies made an important contribution to the body of evidence. When IV starts must be used, observed rates of hemolysis may be substantially reduced by placing the IV at the antecubital site.


Assuntos
Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/normas , Hemólise , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Catéteres/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Pessoal de Laboratório Médico/normas , Razão de Chances , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Seringas/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Clin Biochem ; 45(13-14): 979-87, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22750773

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the evidence available in support of automated notification methods and call centers and to acknowledge other considerations in making evidence-based recommendations for best practices in improving the timeliness and accuracy of critical value reporting. DESIGN AND METHODS: This review followed the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) review methods (Christenson, et al. 2011). A broad literature search and call for unpublished submissions returned 196 bibliographic records which were screened for eligibility. 41 studies were retrieved. Of these, 4 contained credible evidence for the timeliness and accuracy of automatic notification systems and 5 provided credible evidence for call centers for communicating critical value information in in-patient care settings. RESULTS: Studies reporting improvement from implementing automated notification findings report mean differences and were standardized using the standard difference in means (d=0.42; 95% CI=0.2-0.62) while studies reporting improvement from implementing call centers generally reported criterion referenced findings and were standardized using odds ratios (OR=22.1; 95% CI=17.1-28.6). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence, although suggestive, is not sufficient to make an LMBP recommendation for or against using automated notification systems as a best practice to improve the timeliness of critical value reporting in an in-patient care setting. Call centers, however, are effective in improving the timeliness of critical value reporting in an in-patient care setting, and meet LMBP criteria to be recommended as an "evidence-based best practice."


Assuntos
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Sistemas de Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Laboratórios/normas , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
16.
Clin Biochem ; 45(13-14): 988-98, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22750145

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This is the first systematic review of the effectiveness of barcoding practices for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors. DESIGN AND METHODS: The CDC-funded Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Initiative systematic review methods for quality improvement practices were used. RESULTS: A total of 17 observational studies reporting on barcoding systems are included in the body of evidence; 10 for patient specimens and 7 for point-of-care testing. All 17 studies favored barcoding, with meta-analysis mean odds ratios for barcoding systems of 4.39 (95% CI: 3.05-6.32) and for point-of-care testing of 5.93 (95% CI: 5.28-6.67). CONCLUSIONS: Barcoding is effective for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors in diverse hospital settings and is recommended as an evidence-based "best practice." The overall strength of evidence rating is high and the effect size rating is substantial. Unpublished studies made an important contribution comprising almost half of the body of evidence.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Processamento Eletrônico de Dados/métodos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Estados Unidos
18.
J Prim Prev ; 28(5): 421-47, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17990119

RESUMO

In a period of increased accountability and reduced prevention resources, the effective targeting of those limited resources is critical. One way in which limited resources are focused is to identify and provide services to those most at risk for later substance use. Risk status, or propensity, is typically estimated from correlational evidence. Using meta-analytic techniques this paper examines the evidence that 29 of the 35 constructs specified by the CTC risk and protective factor model are related to alcohol, tobacco, or marijuana use. While these factors are generally demonstrated to be predictive of substance use, the strength of relation is modest. Ten factors show a significantly different strength of relation with tobacco than with alcohol and marijuana. Given the correlations observed and the rate of substance use in the population, providing only selective intervention services likely ignores the majority of those who will later use substances. Although selection improves the percentage of those receiving services who are likely to benefit from services, the evidence summarized in this study suggests selective interventions will omit many of those who will likely use substances. Given typical base and selection rates, smaller program effects on universal populations may keep a greater number of youth from becoming alcohol, tobacco, or marijuana involved. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: The data make a strong and provocative argument for primary prevention of youth substance abuse that should be heard by policymakers and service providers involved in strategic planning and appropriate deployment of resources.


Assuntos
Seleção de Pacientes , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Medicina Preventiva , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Alcoolismo/prevenção & controle , Criança , Participação da Comunidade , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Tamanho da Amostra , Fumar , Estatística como Assunto , Nicotiana
19.
Health Educ Res ; 22(3): 351-60, 2007 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16963725

RESUMO

We conducted an analysis of programs listed on the National Registry of Effective Programs and Practices as of 2003. This analysis focused on programs that addressed substance abuse prevention from among those on the effective or model program lists and that had manuals. A total of 48 programs met these inclusion criteria. We coded program manuals for content that was covered based on how much time was devoted to changing targeted mediating variables. The value of this approach is that program content can be judged using an impartial standard that can be applied to a wide range of intervention approaches. On average, programs addressed eight of 23 possible content areas. Our analyses suggested there were seven distinguishable approaches that have been used in substance abuse prevention programs. These include (i) changing access within the environment, (ii) promoting the development of personal and social skills, (iii) promoting positive affiliation, (iv) addressing social influences, (v) providing social support and helping participants develop goals and alternatives, (vi) developing positive schools and (vii) enhancing motivation to avoid substance use. We propose that the field use such analyses as the basis of future theory development.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Manuais como Assunto , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/classificação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Psicológicos , Motivação , Desenvolvimento da Personalidade , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Meio Social , Apoio Social , Estados Unidos , United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
20.
J Prim Prev ; 26(4): 321-43, 2005 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15995802

RESUMO

In a 46-site, 5-year high-risk youth substance abuse prevention evaluation, effect sizes were adjusted using a meta-analytic regression technique to project potential effectiveness under more optimal research and implementation conditions. Adjusting effect size estimates to control for the impact of comparison group prevention exposure, service intensity, and coherent program implementation raised the mean effectiveness estimate from near zero (.02, SD = .21) to .24 (SD = .18). This finding suggests that adolescent prevention programs can have significant positive effects under optimal, yet obtainable conditions. EDITORS' STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: The authors present a meta-analytic technique that promises to be an important tool for understanding what works in multi-site community-based prevention settings. Researchers will find this to be a creative approach to model the "noise'' in implementation that may often overshadow the potential impact of prevention programs.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde do Adolescente , Planejamento em Saúde Comunitária , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Prevenção Primária , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Humanos , Desenvolvimento de Programas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA