Incremental role of glycaemic variability over HbA1c in identifying type 2 diabetic patients with high platelet reactivity undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients with on-treatment high platelet reactivity (HPR) show an increased risk of thrombotic events. Whether measuring glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and/or glycaemic variability (GV) may help identifying diabetic patients at higher risk deserving tailored antiplatelet and/or glucose lowering strategies is unknown. We aimed to investigate the relationship between GV, HbA1c levels and platelet reactivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Platelet reactivity was measured in type 2 DM patients using VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. HPR was defined as P2Y12 Reaction Unit (PRU) > 240. GV was expressed through mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE) and coefficient of variance (CV) by using the iPro™ continuous glucose recorder. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (age 70 ± 9 years, 86% male, mean HbA1c 7.2 ± 1.0%) on clopidogrel therapy were enrolled. HbA1c was independently associated with HPR (OR 7.25, 95% CI 1.55-33.86, p = 0.012). Furthermore, when factored into the model, GV indexes provided independent (OR 1.094, 95% CI 1.007-1.188, p < 0.034) and additional (p < 0.001) diagnostic significance in identifying diabetic patients with HPR. CONCLUSIONS: Glyco-metabolic state significantly correlates with HPR in well-controlled type 2 DM patients on clopidogrel therapy. HbA1c identifies patients at higher thrombotic risk but the highest diagnostic accuracy is achieved by combining GV and HbA1c. Whether individualized antithrombotic and glucose-lowering therapies based on the assessment of these parameters may reduce the incidence of thrombotic events in patients undergoing PCI should be further investigated.

Glycemic variability in the development of cardiovascular complications in diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus represents a major risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease and other vascular complications. Glycated haemoglobin, fructosamine, and fasting blood glucose levels are partial parameters to exhaustively describe patient dysglycemic status. Thus, recently the new concept of glycemic variability has emerged, including information about two major aspects: the magnitude of blood glucose excursions (from nadir to peak, thus lower and higher spikes) and the time intervals in which these fluctuations occur. Despite the lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate definition and tools for its assessment, glycemic variability seems to have more deleterious effects than sustained hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiovascular complications. This manuscript aimed to review the most recent evidence on glycemic variability and its potential use in everyday clinical practice to identify diabetic patients at higher risk of cardiovascular complications and thus needing stricter monitoring and treatment.

Comparison of Lipid-Lowering Medications and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To summarize available evidence regarding lipid-lowering interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: Statins and non-statin therapies that act through upregulation of LDL receptor expression are associated with similar cardiovascular risk reduction per decrease in LDL cholesterol. In subjects with diabetes, with or without established cardiovascular disease, each 39 mg/dl reduction in LDL cholesterol observed with statins is associated with a 21% relative reduction in the risk of major coronary events at 5 years. Statins remain the first-line lipid-lowering agents for the management of dyslipidemia in individuals with diabetes; however, the addition of non-statin therapies to lower LDL cholesterol, such as ezetimibe and PCSK-9 inhibitors, to maximally tolerated statin therapy is recommended in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and baseline LDL cholesterol over 70 mg/dl. Recent data support even lower LDL cholesterol targets (< 55 mg/dl) to further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events especially in subjects with diabetes and documented cardiovascular disease.

Interrupted versus uninterrupted novel oral anticoagulant peri-implantation of cardiac device: A single-center randomized prospective pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients requiring cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation are on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. While continuation of warfarin has been shown to be safe and reduce bleeding complications compared to interruption of warfarin therapy and heparin bridging, it is not known which novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) regimen (interrupted vs uninterrupted) is better in this setting. METHODS: One-hundred and one patients were randomized to receive CIED implantation with either interrupted or uninterrupted/continuous NOAC therapy before surgery. No heparin was used in either treatment arm. The primary end-point was the presence of a clinically significant pocket hematoma after CIED implantation. The secondary end-point was a composite of other major bleeding events, device-related infection, thrombotic events, and device-related admission length postdevice implantation. RESULTS: Both treatment groups were equally balanced for baseline variables and concomitant medications. One clinically significant pocket hematoma occurred in the uninterrupted NOAC group and none in the interrupted group (P  =  0.320). There was no difference in other bleeding complications. No thrombotic events were observed in either of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the paucity of bleeding events, data from this pilot study suggest that uninterrupted NOAC therapy for CIED implantation appears to be as safe as NOAC interruption and does not increase bleeding complications.

Impact of platelet reactivity on 5-year clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a landmark analysis.

We investigated the impact of suboptimal platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We enrolled 500 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured before PCI using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Primary endpoint was the incidence of ischemic or bleeding events at 1 month and 5 years. Patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) showed significantly higher rates of ischemic events both during the 1st month after PCI (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.02-4.06), and beyond 1 month compared with patients without HPR (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.95). Conversely, compared with patients without low platelet reactivity (LPR), patients with LPR presented significantly higher rates of bleeding only during the 1st month (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.68-8.02). In conclusion, pre-procedural HPR is associated with ischemic events even beyond the 1st month after PCI. The association of LPR with bleeding events seems to be confined to the periprocedural period.

Platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome in the elderly: A difficult-to-make diagnosis of intracardiac right-to-left shunt.

Introduction Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome is a combination of positional dyspnoea and hypoxemia; it is caused by several cardiac, pulmonary and hepatic diseases. Case presentation In this study, we describe a 77-year-old female affected by unexplained dizziness and hypoxia that exacerbated in upright position. After diagnosing platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome and excluding all possible causes (liver cirrhosis, acute and chronic pulmonary diseases and arteriovenous malformations), the origin of the syndrome was individuated in the presence of a patent foramen ovale with right-to-left shunt. Endovascular patent foramen ovale closure permitted the resolution of symptoms and disappearance of platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome. Conclusion Although patent foramen ovale may be present since birth without giving clinical signs, it may represent a common enough cause of platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome and other vascular complications in the elderly.

Impact of the high-frequency cutoff of bandpass filtering on ECG quality and clinical interpretation: A comparison between 40Hz and 150Hz cutoff in a surgical preoperative adult outpatient population.

BACKGROUND: In 1990 the American Heart Association (AHA) established a standard 0.05 to 150Hz bandwidth for the routine recording of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). However, subsequent studies have indicated a very high prevalence of deviations from the recommended cutoffs. OBJECTIVE: This prospective observational study investigates the impact of 40Hz compared to 150Hz high-frequency cutoffs on ECG quality and clinical interpretation in a single-center surgical outpatient population. METHODS: 1582 consecutive adult patients underwent two standard 12-lead ECG tracings using different high-frequency cutoffs (40Hz and 150Hz). Two blinded cardiologists randomly reviewed and interpreted the recordings according to pre-defined parameters (PR and ST segment, Q and T wave abnormalities). An arbitrary score, ranging from 1 to 3, was established to evaluate the perceived quality of the recordings and the non-interpretable ECGs were noted. The tracings were then matched to compare interpretations between 40 and 150Hz filters. RESULTS: A 40Hz high-frequency cutoff resulted in an increased rate of optimal quality ECGs compared to the 150Hz cutoff (93.4% vs 54.6%; p<0.001) and a lower rate of non-interpretable traces (0.25% vs 4.80%; p<0.001). Analyzing the morphologic parameters, no significant differences between the filter settings were found, except for a higher incidence of the J-point elevation in the 40Hz high-frequency cutoff (p=0.007) and a higher incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy in the 150Hz high-frequency cutoff (7.4% vs 5.4%, p<0.001). The latter was noted only in ECGs with borderline QRS amplitudes (between 3.3 and 3.7mV; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite current recommendations, the large deviation from standard high-frequency cutoff in clinical practice does not seem to significantly affect ECG clinical interpretation and a 40Hz high-frequency cutoff of the band-pass filtering may be acceptable in a low risk population, allowing for a better quality of tracings.

Statin pretreatment and risk of in-hospital atrial fibrillation among patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a collaborative meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: Statin pretreatment in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is understood to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this is based on observational and limited randomized trial evidence, resulting in uncertainty about any genuine anti-arrhythmic benefits of these agents in this setting. We therefore aimed to quantify precisely the association between statin pretreatment and postoperative AF among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: A detailed search of MEDLINE and PubMed databases (1st January 1996 to 31st July 2012) was conducted, followed by a review of the reference lists of published studies and correspondence with trial investigators to obtain individual-participant data for meta-analysis. Evidence was combined across prospective, randomized clinical trials that compared the risk of postoperative AF among individuals randomized to statin pretreatment or placebo/control medication before elective cardiac surgery. Postoperative AF was defined as episodes of AF lasting ≥5 min. Overall, 1105 participants from 11 trials were included; of them, 552 received statin therapy preoperatively. Postoperative AF occurred in 19% of these participants when compared with 36% of those not treated with statins (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.54, P < 0.00001, using a random-effects model). Atrial fibrillation prevention by statin pretreatment was consistent across different subgroups. CONCLUSION: Short-term statin pretreatment may reduce the risk of postoperative AF among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Platelet function and long-term antiplatelet therapy in women: is there a gender-specificity? A 'state-of-the-art' paper.

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that-compared with men-women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, as well as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of the available data, we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive from observational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles.

Antiplatelet therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome.

Patients with diabetes mellitus have increased atherothrombotic risk and elevated rates of recurrent cardiac events, which may be in part attributable to abnormalities of platelet function resulting in increased platelet reactivity. Despite improved clinical outcomes with an antiplatelet strategy of aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), diabetic patients continue to experience relatively high rates of adverse events during follow-up. Thus, strategies using more potent antiplatelet drugs are warranted in diabetic patients with ACS, especially in the presence of an increased coronary angiographic risk profile. The relative benefit of prasugrel has been described as higher in diabetic vs. nondiabetic patients, without increase in the bleeding risk, whereas a reduction in ischemic events was similar with ticagrelor in patients with and without diabetes. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are indicated in high-risk patients with ACS, but diabetic patients do not benefit from routine administration of such agents.

Thresholds for platelet reactivity to predict clinical events after coronary intervention are different in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have increased baseline platelet reactivity and impaired response to antiplatelet drugs, compared to non-diabetics. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether thresholds for high platelet reactivity (HPR) that predict clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are similar in diabetic compared to non-diabetic patients. A total of 640 (32.6% with DM) consecutive patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing elective PCI were recruited. Platelet reactivity was measured immediately before the procedure with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Primary end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in relation to the presence of DM and to P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) distribution. The optimal cut-off to predict 30-day MACE was a PRU value of >256 in diabetics, and a PRU value of >229 in non-diabetics. Accordingly, we redefined HPR on the basis of these two specific thresholds (HPR-ST), now including 60/209 (29%) diabetic patients with PRU >256, and 130/431 (30%) non-diabetic patients with PRU >229. HPR-ST discriminates significantly (p < 0.001) patients with and without MACE, with a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. The combination of DM and HPR-ST resulted in the highest incidence of MACE (23.3%; p for trend <0.001). At multivariate analysis, HPR-ST was the strongest independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio 4.80, 95% confidence interval 2.58-8.93; p < 0.001). Redefining HPR based on specific thresholds for patients with and without DM significantly improves prediction of MACE post-PCI. Patients with HPR-ST, especially in the presence of DM, are at increased risk for ischemic events and may benefit from more aggressive antiplatelet strategies.

Impact of Endothelial Dysfunction on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Treated With Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating clinical outcomes of patients with or without endothelial disfunction (ED) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) using second generation drug eluting stents (DES) are lacking. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 109 patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES due to stable CAD between December 2014 and September 2016. ED was evaluated evaluating the flow mediated dilation (FMD) at the brachial artery level and defined by an FMD < 7 %. Primary outcome were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), secondary outcomes were target vessel failure (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause death. RESULTS: Five-year follow-up was available in all patients. Median FMD didn't significantly differ between patients who experienced the outcome and those who didn't [no TVR vs. TVR: p = 0.358; no MI vs. MI: p = 0.157; no death vs. death: p = 0.355; no MACE vs. MACE: p = 0.805]. No association between ED and an increased risk for the primary outcome as well as for the secondary ones was evident [MACE: 17.0 % vs. 14.3 %, HR 0.87 (0.33-2.26), log rank p = 0.780; TVR: 9.4 % vs. 5.4 %, HR 0.53 (0.12-2.24), log rank p = 0.384; MI: 3.7 % vs. 8.9 %, HR 2.46 (0.47-12.76), log rank p = 0.265; death: 7.5 % vs. 3.6 %, HR 0.53 (0.09-2.90), log rank p = 0.458]. These findings were confirmed using a lower threshold of FMD to define ED and at one-year landmark analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ED is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events at long-term follow-up in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES.

Leptin as predictor of cardiovascular events and high platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leptin is a hormone involved in the regulation of food intake. Previous studies suggested an interplay between leptin, platelet aggregation, and cardiovascular outcome but this issue was not investigated in vivo in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We designed a study to evaluate the possible relation between leptin, cardiovascular outcome, and platelet reactivity (PR) in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: 155 PCI patients had preprocedural measurements of PR and leptin plasma levels. The latter were assessed by ELISA. Hyperleptinemia was defined as leptin levels ≥14 ng/ml. PR was evaluated by the VerifyNowP2Y12 assay and expressed as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). Patients were divided into three groups based on PR values and defined as low (LPR), normal (NPR), and high (HPR). Patients were followed for up 8 years. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Major Acute Cardiac Events (MACE) at long-term follow-up according to leptin groups. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of leptin levels according to PR groups and the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) according to leptin groups. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up was completed in 140 patients. Patients with hyperleptinemia experienced a higher MACE rate than the normoleptinemic group (HR 2.3; CI 95% 1.14-4.6, P = 0.02). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for Body Mass Index, hypertension, and gender. Leptin levels were significantly different among groups of PR (P = 0.047). Leptin levels were higher in the HPR group (12.61 ± 16.58 ng/ml) compared to the LPR group (7.83 ± 8.87 ng/ml, P = 0.044) and NPR group (7.04 ± 7.03 ng/ml, P = 0.01). The rate of PMI was higher in hyperleptinemia patients (15.1% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that high leptin levels are associated with a worse clinical outcome in patients undergoing PCI and with HPR. Further studies are needed to define better the pathophysiological pathways underlying this association.

Clinical benefit of statin pretreatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a collaborative patient-level meta-analysis of 13 randomized studies.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that statin pretreatment reduces cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, most data were observational, and single randomized trials included limited numbers of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a collaborative meta-analysis using individual patient data from 13 randomized studies in which 3341 patients received either high-dose statin (n=1692) or no statin/low-dose statin (n=1649) before percutaneous coronary intervention, with all patients receiving statin therapy after intervention. Occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction, defined as postintervention creatine kinase-MB increase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization) was evaluated. Incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction was 7.0% in the high-dose statin versus 11.9% in the control group, which corresponds to a 44% risk reduction in the active-treatment arm (odds ratio by fixed-effects model 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.71, P<0.00001). The rate of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days was significantly lower in the high-dose statin group (7.4% versus 12.6%, a 44% risk reduction; P<0.00001), and 1-month major adverse cardiac events, excluding periprocedural events, were also reduced (0.6% versus 1.4%; P=0.05). The benefit of high-dose statins was realized irrespective of clinical presentation (P for interaction=0.43) and was maintained across various subgroups but appeared greater in the subgroup with elevated baseline C-reactive protein levels (n=734; 68% risk reduction for periprocedural myocardial infarction versus 31% in those 1861 patients with normal CRP; P for quantitative interaction=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose statin pretreatment leads to a significant reduction in periprocedural myocardial infarction and 30-day adverse events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This strategy should be considered in all patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention.

Prognostic role of preprocedural glucose levels on short- and long-term outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the prognostic role of preprocedural blood glucose levels (BGLs) on short- and long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, with or without pre-existing diabetes mellitus, are associated with adverse outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Moreover, neointimal hyperplasia after coronary stent implantation is increased in presence of suboptimal glycemic control. METHODS: Preprocedural BGLs were prospectively measured in 572 patients and predefined groups were considered: hypoglycemia ≤ 80 mg/dl; euglycemia 81-109 mg/dl; mild hyperglycemia 110-125 mg/dl; hyperglycemia ≥ 126 mg/dl. Primary end point was represented by the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) and secondary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at follow-up. RESULTS: Hypoglycemia was associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural MI (51% vs 30%, 29%, and 37% in euglycemia, mild hyperglycemia and hyperglycemia groups, respectively; P for trend 0.025). After a mean follow-up of 15 ± 8 months, the occurrence of MACE was 38% in the hypoglycemia group, 12% in the euglycemia group, 14% in the mild hyperglycemia and 22% in the hyperglycemia group (P < 0.001). The incidence of in-stent restenosis and target vessel revascularization was also higher in patients with abnormal pre-procedural BGLs (P for trend 0.007 and <0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed hypoglycemia as a predictor of early and long-term unfavorable cardiac prognosis (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.09-5.81, P = 0.029 for peri-procedural MI; OR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.26-6.69, P = 0.012 for MACE occurrence). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant association between preprocedural BGLs and adverse short-and long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective PCI. Thus, a careful glycemic monitoring should be recommended in all patients undergoing coronary stenting, irrespective of the diabetic status.

Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in complex higher-risk patients.

AIMS: To investigate the levels of platelet reactivity and the impact of high platelet reactivity (HPR) on long-term clinical outcomes of complex higher-risk and indicated patients (CHIP) with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We enrolled 500 patients undergoing elective PCI for stable CAD and treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients were divided into four groups based on the presence of CHIP features and HPR. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) at 5 years. RESULTS: The prevalence of HPR was significantly greater in the CHIP population rather than non-CHIP patients (39.9% vs 29.8%, P = 0.021). Patients with both CHIP features and HPR showed the highest estimates of MACE (22.1%, log-rank P = 0.047). At Cox proportional hazard analysis, the combination of CHIP features and HPR was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.30-5.05, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Among patients with stable CAD undergoing elective PCI and treated with aspirin and clopidogrel, the combination of CHIP features and HPR identifies a cohort of patients with the highest risk of MACE at 5 years, who might benefit from more potent antiplatelet strategies.

Clopidogrel reloading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic clopidogrel therapy: results of the ARMYDA-4 RELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial.

AIMS: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of clopidogrel reloading in patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred and three patients on >10 days clopidogrel therapy (41% with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, ACS) randomly received 600 mg clopidogrel loading 4-8 h before PCI (n = 252) or placebo (n = 251). Primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In the overall population primary endpoint occurred in 6.7% of patients in the reload vs. 8.8% in the placebo arm [odds ratios (OR) 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.37-1.52; P = 0.50]. In stable angina patients, 1-month MACE were not significantly different (7.0 vs. 3.9%; OR 1.84, 0.60-5.88; P = 0.36), whereas ACS patients had significant clinical benefit with reloading (6.4 vs. 16.3%; OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.32-0.90, P = 0.033 at multivariable analysis; interaction test: P = 0.01). There was no excess bleeding in the reload arm (6% in both groups). CONCLUSION: ARMYDA-4 RELOAD reveals no overall benefit from reloading patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy prior to PCI; the benefit observed in ACS patients is a hypothesis-generating finding that needs to be confirmed by larger studies.

Diagnosis, treatment and predictors of prognosis of myocarditis. A narrative review.

Although it has been recognized for almost two centuries, myocarditis is still a challenging diagnosis due to the wide heterogeneity of its clinical manifestations and evolution. Moreover, the diagnostic gold standard, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), is infrequently used, making hard to determine the exact incidence of myocarditis. Clinical presentation includes a wide range of symptoms, ranging from asymptomatic or subclinical disease with mild dyspnea and chest pain to sudden death, due to cardiogenic shock or malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Equally, the evolution of myocarditis largely varies: albeit short-term prognosis is usually good, with complete or partial recovery, dilated cardiomyopathy with chronic heart failure is the major long-term consequence of myocarditis, developing often several years after the acute onset. This narrative review aims to summarize the current knowledge about myocarditis, with a particular attention to predictors of short- and long-term prognosis, in order to provide a rational and practical approach to the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of suspected myocarditis.

REabsorbable vs. DUrable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in All-Comer PatiEnts: the REDUCE registry.

BACKGROUND: While the superiority of reabsorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents (RP-DES) over bare-metal stents and first-generation durable-polymer (DP)-DES has been largely established, their advantage compared with new-generation DP-DES is still controversial. This study aimed was to compare clinical outcomes of all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new generation DP-DES or RP-DES implantation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 679 consecutive patients treated with PCI with RP-DES or DP-DES. The primary endpoint was the 1-year incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and definite stent thrombosis were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 439 (64.6%) received RP-DES and 240 (36.4%) received DP-DES. No significant difference in the incidence of MACE (5.9 vs. 4.9%; hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-2.49; P = 0.569), death (1.8 vs. 1.7%; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.33-3.64; P = 0.882), MI (2.3 vs. 2.1%; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.36-3.08; P = 0.927), TVR (2.3 vs. 1.3%; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.47-6.20; P = 0.418), TLR (1.4 vs. 0.4%; hazard ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 0.37-25.40; P = 0.301), and definite stent thrombosis (0.5 vs. 0.4%; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.10-12.10; P = 0.942) was observed between RP-DES and DP-DES patients at 1-year follow-up. These results were confirmed in a propensity score-matched cohort (n = 134 per group). CONCLUSION: In our registry including a real-world population of all-comer patients undergoing PCI, RP-DES, or durable polymer-DES showed similar efficacy and safety at a 1-year follow-up.