Integrating health and environmental impact analysis.

Scientific investigations have progressively refined our understanding of the influence of the environment on human health, and the many adverse impacts that human activities exert on the environment, from the local to the planetary level. Nonetheless, throughout the modern public health era, health has been pursued as though our lives and lifestyles are disconnected from ecosystems and their component organisms. The inadequacy of the societal and public health response to obesity, health inequities, and especially global environmental and climate change now calls for an ecological approach which addresses human activity in all its social, economic and cultural complexity. The new approach must be integral to, and interactive, with the natural environment. We see the continuing failure to truly integrate human health and environmental impact analysis as deeply damaging, and we propose a new conceptual model, the ecosystems-enriched Drivers, Pressures, State, Exposure, Effects, Actions or 'eDPSEEA' model, to address this shortcoming. The model recognizes convergence between the concept of ecosystems services which provides a human health and well-being slant to the value of ecosystems while equally emphasizing the health of the environment, and the growing calls for 'ecological public health' as a response to global environmental concerns now suffusing the discourse in public health. More revolution than evolution, ecological public health will demand new perspectives regarding the interconnections among society, the economy, the environment and our health and well-being. Success must be built on collaborations between the disparate scientific communities of the environmental sciences and public health as well as interactions with social scientists, economists and the legal profession. It will require outreach to political and other stakeholders including a currently largely disengaged general public. The need for an effective and robust science-policy interface has never been more pressing. Conceptual models can facilitate this by providing theoretical frameworks and supporting stakeholder engagement process simplifications for inherently complex situations involving environment and human health and well-being. They can be tools to think with, to engage, to communicate and to help navigate in a sea of complexity. We believe models such as eDPSEEA can help frame many of the issues which have become the challenges of the new public health era and can provide the essential platforms necessary for progress.

Influence of nutrient application rate on growth and rooting potential of the West African hardwood Triplochiton scleroxylon.

Effects of stock plant nutrition on growth and subsequent rooting of leafy stem cuttings of the commercially important west African tree Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. were investigated to identify the primary morphological variables influencing adventitious root formation. Potted plants were watered as required with one of four balanced nutrient solutions (0, 15, 63 or 125 mg N l(-1)). Increasing the nutrient supply to stock plants increased growth rate and rate of adventitious root production of subsequently harvested cuttings, but an optimum nutrient regime was not identified. Rooting percentage increased from 27% in cuttings harvested from stock plants receiving a low nutrient supply to 64% for cuttings harvested from stock plants receiving eight times the amount of nutrients extractable from plants under typical field conditions in West Africa. The ability of a cutting to retain its leaf during propagation and the length of the cutting were the primary measured characteristics associated with rooting and accounted for 43% of the variance fitted in the model. The length of the new shoot, total leaf area and within-shoot position (node position) were also significantly associated with rooting. After these characteristics were fitted to the model, the genetic origin (clone) was not statistically significant. We conclude that genetic variation in rooting potential is mediated through variations in morphological and physiological traits, rather than through genetic variation in cell differentiation or related aspects of root initiation.