RESUMO
The shortage of donors in cardiac transplantation may be alleviated by the use of allografts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. We have previously shown that hearts exposed to 30 min warm ischemic time and then flushed with Celsior supplemented with agents that activate ischemic postconditioning pathways, show complete recovery on a blood-perfused ex vivo working heart apparatus. In this study, these findings were assessed in a porcine orthotopic heart transplant model. DCD hearts were preserved with either normothermic ex vivo perfusion (NEVP) using a clinically approved device, or with standard cold storage (CS) for 4 h. Orthotopic transplantation into recipient animals was subsequently undertaken. Five of six hearts preserved with NEVP demonstrated favorable lactate profiles during NEVP and all five could be weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass posttransplant, compared with 0 of 3 hearts preserved with CS (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). In conclusion, DCD hearts flushed with supplemented Celsior solution and preserved with NEVP display viability before and after transplantation. Viability studies of human DCD hearts using NEVP are warranted.
Assuntos
Temperatura Corporal , Morte , Transplante de Coração , Coração/fisiologia , Preservação de Órgãos/métodos , Perfusão/métodos , Sobrevivência de Tecidos/fisiologia , Animais , Temperatura Baixa , Dissacarídeos , Eletrólitos , Glutamatos , Glutationa , Histidina , Manitol , Modelos Animais , Soluções para Preservação de Órgãos , Sus scrofa , Doadores de Tecidos , Isquemia QuenteRESUMO
In a cross-sectional analytic study, we examined the differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors, including coagulation factors and platelet aggregation, among males from southern European countries and those of Anglo-Celtic descent who had widely different CHD standardized mortality ratios. The participants included 169 men aged 40 to 49 years, 27% of whom were born in southern European countries. The subjects had no history of heart disease and no other clinical conditions, or were not taking medications known to affect hemostasis. Data obtained included their medical history and CHD-related risk behaviors, blood pressure, height, weight, abdominal and pelvic circumference, and coagulation, fibrinolysis, platelet activity, lipids, and lipoproteins profiles. There were significant differences between the two groups in the prevalence of a positive family history, mean apolipoprotein A1 levels, and platelet aggregation responses to ADP. Other established risk factors, including coagulation factor levels, were not significantly different.
Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Agregação Plaquetária , Difosfato de Adenosina/farmacologia , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Coagulação Sanguínea , Colágeno/farmacologia , Doença das Coronárias/sangue , Doença das Coronárias/etnologia , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente)/etnologia , Humanos , Lipídeos/sangue , Lipoproteínas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Risco , Reino Unido/etnologiaRESUMO
This report details extensive studies investigating an improved screening procedure for the laboratory confirmation of clinically suspected von Willebrand's disease (vWD). Over the past two years, over 400 plasma samples, comprising samples derived from both normal individuals (n = 112) and from patients undergoing investigation on clinical grounds, underwent analysis in this screening procedure, comprising three distinct assays: a standard ELISA assay for von Willebrand Factor (vWF) antigen levels (vWF:Ag), a standard ristocetin cofactor (R Cof) assay, and a functional collagen based ELISA assay for vWF ('CBA'). Normal individual plasma samples yielded normal reference values (mean +/- 2SD) approximating 50-200% (vWF:Ag, R Cof) or 50-250% (CBA). In order to permit comparative analysis, and based upon derived assay values, and subsequent multimer analysis, patient samples were either deemed to derive from persons unlikely to suffer vWD ('non-vWD' patient group) or those potentially suffering vWD. The latter group was further separated into subgroups based upon the likelihood, and probable subtype of vWD. In conjunction with the vWF:Ag assay, the CBA provides the basis by which an effective predictor system (likelihood and probable subtype of vWD) can be offered on the basis of preliminary screening procedures. To date, there has been no overlap in vWF:Ag to CBA ratios (vWF:CBA) between patients yielding Type II vWD like multimer patterns and those yielding Type I vWD, or normal, multimer patterns. Thus, high vWF:CBA (i.e. > or = 3.0) would suggest a Type II, or pseudo, -vWD like defect, whereas low vWF:CBA (< or = 2.5) would likely derive from either normal individuals, or persons suffering from Type I vWD.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)