Administration burden associated with recombinant human growth hormone treatment: perspectives of patients and caregivers.

Patients treated with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) for growth hormone disorders follow a challenging treatment schedule. This study assessed patient and caregiver experiences with rhGH therapy treatment regimens. Patients 13 years or older with growth hormone deficiency and caregivers completed Web-based surveys. A total of 61 patients and 239 caregivers participated. Storage of rhGH was considered burdensome by more than a third. More than 51% considered storage "somewhat more" to "much more of a burden" relative to the burden while not traveling. "Away from home or traveling" was the most frequently endorsed reason for missing a dose. rhGH treatment while traveling is challenging because of rhGH storage burden.

Return-to-Function Following Treatment of Dupuytren Contracture With Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Versus Fasciectomy.

Background: Dupuytren contracture (DC) treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has lower associated treatment costs than fasciectomy, but real-world, postprocedure return-to-function data are limited. Methods: This retrospective study used a US claims database and included adults treated for DC with CCH or fasciectomy (first treatment = index date), who had continuous health plan enrollment ≥360 days preindex and ≥90 days postindex (ie, 90-day follow-up). Analgesic use and physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) visits during the follow-up were used as surrogate markers for return-to-function. Results: Overall, 1654 and 2745 patients were included in the CCH and fasciectomy cohorts, respectively. A significantly lower percentage of patients in the CCH versus fasciectomy cohort used opioid analgesics (32.3% vs 82.7%; P < .0001), used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8.6% vs 17.2%; P < .0001), or had ≥1 DC-specific PT or OT visit during follow-up (PT, 38.9% vs 45.3% [P < .0001]; OT, 32.8% vs 38.0% [P = .0006]). The mean number of DC-specific PT and OT visits (PT, 2.5 vs 6.4 [P < .0001]; OT, 1.4 vs 1.9 [P < .0001]) per patient was significantly lower in the CCH versus fasciectomy cohort. Conclusions: This analysis using surrogate markers suggests that CCH treatment may allow earlier return-to-function than fasciectomy in adults treated for DC.

Children's perceptions of influenza illness and preferences for influenza vaccine.

INTRODUCTION: In this qualitative study we explored children's perceptions of influenza, preferences for influenza vaccines, and ability to understand "risk" of vaccine adverse effects and different attributes between injectable and intranasal vaccines. METHOD: In-person, semi-structured interviews were conducted among 28 U.S. children aged 6 through 12 years. RESULTS: Many children understood the concept of influenza illness and believed vaccination was important. Efficacy, adverse effects, and mode of administration affected their preferences for influenza vaccines. Children 8 years of age and older were able to consider multiple attributes when selecting between hypothetical vaccines, and their responses were consistent with their previously stated preferences for individual attributes. Most children would prefer a nasal spray over a shot vaccine when all other vaccine attributes were equal. DISCUSSION: Efficacy, adverse effects, and mode of administration were important factors in children's preferences for influenza vaccine. Children as young as 8 years of age appeared to understand vaccine "risk" and were able to consider multiple attributes simultaneously when choosing between vaccine alternatives.

Parent preferences for pediatric influenza vaccine attributes.

Influenza vaccine is available as an intramuscular injection or an intranasal spray for eligible children. This study was conducted to examine parents' preferences for influenza vaccine attributes and the attributes' relative importance regarding the vaccination of their children. A quantitative Web survey was administered to 500 parents of children aged 2 to 12 years. The survey included general preference questions and conjoint (trade-off) questions. Parents most frequently selected efficacy, risk of temporary side effects, and physician recommendation as important vaccine attributes from a provided list (92%, 75%, and 59%, respectively). For attributes selected as important, parents rated the importance of the attribute; the highest mean importance ratings were given to efficacy, presence of mercury-containing preservative, and physician recommendation.The highest relative importance ratings in the conjoint section were given to efficacy and presence of mercury-containing preservative. Parental education on influenza vaccine efficacy and safety may help to improve pediatric vaccination rates.

Parents' decision-making regarding vaccinating their children against influenza: A web-based survey.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that children between the ages of 6 months and 18 years be vaccinated against influenza annually, vaccination rates remain suboptimal. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to explore factors that influence parents' decisions regarding influenza vaccination for children aged 2 to 12 years, to quantify the relative importance of these factors, to identify an appropriate theoretical model for illustrating the relationships among these factors, and to characterize parents by their likelihood of vaccinating their children against influenza. METHODS: A quantitative Web-based survey was administered to a sample of parents from an online panel representative of the US population. Parents were stratified based on self-reported rates of their personal influenza vaccination (every year, sometimes, or never) and the age of their child (2-4 years or 5-12 years). The results were examined by parents' likelihood of vaccinating their child in the next year (high, medium, or low). Participants were asked to rank their agreement with statements representing various beliefs and perceptions about influenza and influenza vaccine on a scale from 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree. Parents who indicated that they vaccinate their child every year were asked to select the drivers of their decision to vaccinate; parents who indicated that they never vaccinate their child were asked to select the barriers affecting their decision not to vaccinate; and parents who responded that they sometimes vaccinate their child were asked to select both the drivers and barriers affecting their decision. Participants were then asked to rank the importance of each driver or barrier on a scale from 1 = a little important to 5 = extremely important. Mean agreement ratings were calculated for parents' beliefs and perceptions about influenza and influenza vaccine and were compared across likelihood subgroups. Mean importance ratings of the drivers and barriers to vaccination were also calculated and compared across likelihood subgroups. RESULTS: The survey sample consisted of 500 parents; their mean (SD) age was 37.4 (6.82) years, 57.2% were female, and 78.2% were non-Hispanic white. Among those who reported that they vaccinated their child against influenza every year or sometimes, the major drivers of vaccination were prevention of influenza (95.1%), a doctor's recommendation (89.5%), and the desire to reduce influenza symptoms (83.3%). Among those who reported sometimes or never vaccinating their child against influenza, barriers to vaccination were more variable. The most common barriers were low perceived risk of influenza (46.0%), the perception that the vaccine caused influenza (44.0%), and side effects caused by the vaccine (36.6%). Distinct differences were found in beliefs and perceptions of influenza and influenza vaccine according to respondents' likelihood of vaccination. A high likelihood of vaccination was associated with a greater perceived threat of influenza and less concern about the efficacy and safety of the vaccine. Convenience was an important factor among parents with a medium likelihood of vaccination. The Health Belief Model was identified as an appropriate theoretical framework for illustrating the factors influencing parents' decision-making about influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of influenza, reduction of influenza symptoms, and doctor recommendation were the main drivers of parents' decision to vaccinate their child against influenza. Barriers to vaccination were more variable and primarily included the risk of adverse effects and the perceived low risk of influenza. Increasing parents' awareness of the threat of influenza and the efficacy and safety of the vaccine, as well as improving the convenience of getting vaccinated, may help improve rates of pediatric influenza vaccination.