Impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients for radiation therapy.

UNLABELLED: Whole-body PET with (18)F-FDG has proven to be a very effective imaging modality for staging of malignant tumors. This study was performed to evaluate the impact of (18)F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients for radiation therapy. METHODS: The treatment records of 202 consecutive patients (98 male, 104 female; mean age, 56.9 y; age range, 8-91 y) with different malignant tumors were reviewed. Radiation therapy was intended for all patients. The diagnoses were head and neck tumors (n = 55), gynecologic tumors (n = 28), breast cancer (n = 28), lung cancer (n = 26), malignant lymphomas (n = 24), tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (n = 18), and others (n = 23). Whole-body PET was performed before radiation therapy. The alteration of PET on each patient's staging and management decisions for radiation therapy were determined. RESULTS: For 55 of 202 patients (27%), PET results changed the patients' management in radiation therapy. In 18 cases (9%), PET resulted in a cancellation of radiation therapy because of the detection of previously unknown distant metastases (8 patients), additional lymph node metastases (9 patients), residual tumor (6 patients), or the exclusion of active disease (2 patients). In 6 patients, >1 incremental reason was found for cancellation. In 21 PET examinations (10%), PET results changed the intention of radiation treatment (curative or palliative). The radiation dose was changed in 25 cases (12%). A change of radiation volume was necessary in 12 patients (6%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that (18)F-FDG PET has a major impact on the management of patients for radiation therapy, influencing both the stage and the management in 27% of patients.

Application of oral contrast media in coregistered positron emission tomography-CT.

OBJECTIVE: Coregistration of positron emission tomography (PET) and CT images results in significantly improved localization of abnormal FDG uptake compared with PET images alone. For delineation of intestinal structures, application of oral contrast media is a standard procedure in CT. The influence of oral contrast agents in PET imaging using CT data for attenuation correction was evaluated in a comparative study on an in-line PET-CT system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients referred for PET-CT were evaluated in two groups. One group of 30 patients received oral Gastrografin 45 min before data acquisition. The second group received no contrast medium. PET images were reconstructed, using CT data for attenuation correction. Image analysis was performed by two reviewers in consensus, using a 4-point scale comparing FDG-uptake in the gastrointestinal tract in PET images of both groups. Furthermore, correlation of FDG uptake and localization of contrast media in the intestinal tract in CT images were determined. RESULTS: No significant difference in FDG uptake in PET images in all regions of the gastrointestinal tract except the ascending colon was seen in both groups. No correlation was found in the location of increased FDG uptake and contrast media in the CT images. CONCLUSION: An oral contrast agent can be used for coregistered PET-CT without the introduction of artifacts in PET.