Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(10): 3654-9, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25078917

RESUMO

The identification of mycobacteria outside biocontainment facilities requires that the organisms first be rendered inactive. Exposure to 70% ethanol (EtOH) either before or after mechanical disruption was evaluated in order to establish a safe, effective, and rapid inactivation protocol that is compatible with identification of Mycobacterium and Nocardia species using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). A combination of 5 min of bead beating in 70% EtOH followed by a 10-min room temperature incubation period was found to be rapidly bactericidal and provided high-quality spectra compared to spectra obtained directly from growth on solid media. The age of the culture, the stability of the refrigerated or frozen lysates, and freeze-thaw cycles did not adversely impact the quality of the spectra or the identification obtained.


Assuntos
Desinfecção/métodos , Mycobacterium/química , Mycobacterium/fisiologia , Nocardia/química , Nocardia/fisiologia , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Etanol/toxicidade , Humanos , Fenômenos Mecânicos , Viabilidade Microbiana/efeitos dos fármacos , Mycobacterium/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Mycobacterium/diagnóstico , Nocardia/isolamento & purificação , Nocardiose/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 39(5): e46-8, 2004 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15356801

RESUMO

We identified Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) as the likely etiologic pathogen for chronic diarrhea in 2 patients, 1 of whom was immunocompromised with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and 1 of whom was immunocompetent. Both were treated with antibiotics, and neither developed systemic complications of the infection. These cases suggest that STEC infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic diarrhea.


Assuntos
Diarreia/etiologia , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Toxina Shiga/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Toxina Shiga/metabolismo
3.
J Med Microbiol ; 48(5): 507-510, 1999 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10229549

RESUMO

In a prospective study, the Gen-Probe PACE 2 (GP) assay was compared with Abbott Laboratories' ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. A total of 493 female patients consented to collection of two cervical samples; a first-void urine (FVU) sample was collected also from 446 of the participants. Cervical samples were tested by both GP and LCR; 16 samples (3.1%) tested positive by both methods and no discrepant results were observed. All but one of the FVU samples collected from patients with a positive cervical sample was positive for C. trachomatis by LCR. The stability of FVU samples over time in the LCR test was also evaluated and proved to be significantly longer than the 4 days stated by the manufacturer. While LCR proved to be highly sensitive in detecting chlamydial infection in FVU samples, no difference was noted between LCR and GP in the detection of cervical C. trachomatis infection in this study population.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Colo do Útero/microbiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/urina , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/economia
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 72(1): 8-13, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22015321

RESUMO

Clostridium difficile is the most common and important cause of toxigenic colitis in the health care setting. Laboratory diagnostics have included bacterial culture with further identification of toxigenic stains, or more commonly, direct detection of preformed toxin in stool samples using biological or immunochemistry assays. Recently, molecular amplification assays for the direct detection of toxin-encoding genes have become available commercially. We prospectively evaluated 2 FDA-cleared molecular amplification tests, the Illumigene C. difficile and the ProGastro Cd PCR assay, for the direct detection of toxigenic C. difficile from fecal samples. Of 446 samples tested, 418 produced matching amplification results, 88 positive and 330 negative, and 13 resolved with repeat testing. Toxigenic culture and direct cytotoxin testing were used to resolve the remaining 15 discordant samples. Overall, each assay performed well and correctly identified 97% of positive samples.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Fezes/microbiologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 66(2): 129-34, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20117349

RESUMO

Enzyme immunoassays are currently the most common tests used in the clinical laboratory for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins; however, significant problems with their performance have recently been described. We prospectively reevaluated the Meridian Premier C. difficile toxin A/B assay with direct comparison to a 2-step algorithm that screened for C. difficile common antigen and compared cytotoxin and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as confirmatory procedures. The Premier assay lacked sufficient sensitivity, missing 25% of true-positive samples. PCR was the most sensitive method and the only procedure that allowed same day testing and reporting.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Citotoxinas/toxicidade , Enterotoxinas/análise , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Imunoensaio/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/toxicidade , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Toxinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Toxinas Bacterianas/toxicidade , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Clostridioides difficile/imunologia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Colite/microbiologia , Enterotoxinas/genética , Enterotoxinas/imunologia , Enterotoxinas/toxicidade , Glutamato Desidrogenase/genética , Glutamato Desidrogenase/imunologia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA