RESUMO
The EAACI Guidelines on the impact of short-term exposure to outdoor pollutants on asthma-related outcomes provide recommendations for prevention, patient care and mitigation in a framework supporting rational decisions for healthcare professionals and patients to individualize and improve asthma management and for policymakers and regulators as an evidence-informed reference to help setting legally binding standards and goals for outdoor air quality at international, national and local levels. The Guideline was developed using the GRADE approach and evaluated outdoor pollutants referenced in the current Air Quality Guideline of the World Health Organization as single or mixed pollutants and outdoor pesticides. Short-term exposure to all pollutants evaluated increases the risk of asthma-related adverse outcomes, especially hospital admissions and emergency department visits (moderate certainty of evidence at specific lag days). There is limited evidence for the impact of traffic-related air pollution and outdoor pesticides exposure as well as for the interventions to reduce emissions. Due to the quality of evidence, conditional recommendations were formulated for all pollutants and for the interventions reducing outdoor air pollution. Asthma management counselled by the current EAACI guidelines can improve asthma-related outcomes but global measures for clean air are needed to achieve significant impact.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Asma , Exposição Ambiental , Asma/etiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Systematic review using GRADE of the impact of exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs), cleaning agents, mould/damp, pesticides on the risk of (i) new-onset asthma (incidence) and (ii) adverse asthma-related outcomes (impact). MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for indoor pollutant exposure studies reporting on new-onset asthma and critical and important asthma-related outcomes. Ninety four studies were included: 11 for VOCs (7 for incidenceand 4 for impact), 25 for cleaning agents (7 for incidenceand 8 for impact), 48 for damp/mould (26 for incidence and 22 for impact) and 10 for pesticides (8 for incidence and 2 for impact). Exposure to damp/mould increases the risk of new-onset wheeze (moderate certainty evidence). Exposure to cleaning agents may be associated with a higher risk of new-onset asthma and with asthma severity (low level of certainty). Exposure to pesticides and VOCs may increase the risk of new-onset asthma (very low certainty evidence). The impact on asthma-related outcomes of all major indoor pollutants is uncertain. As the level of certainty is low or very low for most of the available evidence on the impact of indoor pollutants on asthma-related outcomes more rigorous research in the field is warranted.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados , Asma , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis , Humanos , Asma/etiologia , Asma/epidemiologia , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Incidência , Praguicidas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
To inform the clinical practice guidelines' recommendations developed by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology systematic reviews (SR) assessed using GRADE on the impact of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and active smoking on the risk of new-onset asthma/recurrent wheezing (RW)/low lung function (LF), and on asthma-related outcomes. Only longitudinal studies were included, almost all on combustion cigarettes, only one assessing e-cigarettes and LF. According to the first SR (67 studies), prenatal ETS increases the risk of RW (moderate certainty evidence) and may increase the risk of new-onset asthma and of low LF (low certainty evidence). Postnatal ETS increases the risk of new-onset asthma and of RW (moderate certainty evidence) and may impact LF (low certainty evidence). Combined in utero and postnatal ETS may increase the risk of new-onset asthma (low certainty evidence) and increases the risk of RW (moderate certainty evidence). According to the second SR (24 studies), ETS increases the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and impairs asthma control and LF (moderate certainty evidence). According to the third SR (25 studies), active smoking increases the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and of suboptimal asthma control (moderate certainty evidence) and may impact asthma-related quality-of-life and LF (low certainty evidence).
RESUMO
Air pollution is one of the biggest environmental threats for asthma. Its impact is augmented by climate change. To inform the recommendations of the EAACI Guidelines on the environmental science for allergic diseases and asthma, a systematic review (SR) evaluated the impact on asthma-related outcomes of short-term exposure to outdoor air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, O3, and CO), heavy traffic, outdoor pesticides, and extreme temperatures. Additionally, the SR evaluated the impact of the efficacy of interventions reducing outdoor pollutants. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E tools and the certainty of the evidence by using GRADE. Short-term exposure to PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 probably increases the risk of asthma-related hospital admissions (HA) and emergency department (ED) visits (moderate certainty evidence). Exposure to heavy traffic may increase HA and deteriorate asthma control (low certainty evidence). Interventions reducing outdoor pollutants may reduce asthma exacerbations (low to very low certainty evidence). Exposure to fumigants may increase the risk of new-onset asthma in agricultural workers, while exposure to 1,3-dichloropropene may increase the risk of asthma-related ED visits (low certainty evidence). Heatwaves and cold spells may increase the risk of asthma-related ED visits and HA and asthma mortality (low certainty evidence).
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Asma , Exposição Ambiental , Humanos , Asma/etiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Asma/epidemiologia , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To define the cost-effectiveness and health resource use of mepolizumab in a cohort of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in real-life conditions in Spain. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients included were diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma and treated with mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneous (SC) 4-weekly for 12 months. Outcomes evaluated: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), number of exacerbations, disease control with the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and direct and indirect cost per patient. RESULTS: 12 months after mepolizumab initiation, a significant decrease in exacerbations was shown, from a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 3.1 (2.6) to 0.7 (1.5), an increase from 4.9 (0.4) to 6.1 (0.5) in AQLQ, and from 14.9 (5.7) to 21.5 (3.9) in ACT scores. The number of cortico-dependent patients significantly decreased from 53.3% to 13.3% during this period. There was a significant decrease of 94% in the cost of hospitalization, from a mean (SD) of 4063.9 (5423.9) pretreatment to 238.6 (1306.9) post-treatment (p = 0.0003). Total costs decreased significantly from a median of 2,423.1 (1,512.8; 9,320.9) pretreatment to 1,177.5 (965.0; 1,737.8) post-treatment if mepolizumab was excluded. ICER per exacerbation avoided was 3606.9, per 3-point ACT score increase 3934.8, and per 0.5-point AQLQ score increase 3606.9. CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab improves control of asthma and quality of life in patients with severe diseases in a cost-effectiveness range. The number of exacerbations decreased, and there was a clear reduction in primary care visits and hospitalizations. Further economic analyses of biological therapies for asthma are required.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Eosinofilia Pulmonar , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 are considered key drivers of type 2 inflammatory diseases. Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4 and IL-13, thus inhibiting signaling of both cytokines. CASE STUDY: We report a case of a patient with uncontrolled severe asthma and other T2 inflammatory diseases (atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and eosinophilic esophagitis) treated with dupilumab. RESULTS: After one year of treatment, dupilumab improved asthma control together with lung function parameters and airway inflammation. Additionally, a positive impact on quality of life (QoL), evaluated by validated questionnaires, across all the diseases was observed. CONCLUSION: In this case report, a positive and objectively measurable of global improvement on QoL across all four T2 comorbidities was observed after treatment with dupilumab, demonstrating the important role of IL-4 and IL-13 and the existence of a unifying pathological mechanism in T2 diseases.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Asma , Dermatite Atópica , Esofagite Eosinofílica , Pólipos Nasais , Qualidade de Vida , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Pólipos Nasais/imunologia , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica , Masculino , Interleucina-13/antagonistas & inibidores , Interleucina-13/imunologia , Multimorbidade , Interleucina-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Interleucina-4/imunologia , Adulto , Feminino , RinossinusiteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of asthma in adults >65 years old is approximately 12-14%, and 10% have severe asthma. A higher mortality rate is observed in subjects with asthma >65 years old and especially >80 years old. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of at least three doses of benralizumab in a subgroup of elderly subjects (>65 years old) with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma in real-life conditions. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study (AUTOBENRA study) conducted in 9 hospitals that included 72 patients aged >18 years old with uncontrolled severe asthma based on the Spanish Asthma Guidelines who were treated with at least three doses of benralizumab, self-administered at home since before April 30, 2021. The recruitment period ended on October 1, 2021. Written consent was obtained before the study commencement. In this subanalysis, we compared the results between patients >65 years old and patients <65 years old. RESULTS: A total of 72 subjects with severe asthma were screened, and 54 were included (MD: 57.3 ± 10 years old). There were 12 subjects aged >65 years old [MD: 69.8 ± 4.3 years old (minimum: 65 years old; maximum: 83 years old)]. Subjects >65 years old experienced statistically significant improvement in lung function, ACT and mini-AQLQ with benralizumab. Additionally, 9 patients (75%) experienced no asthma exacerbation (p = 0.0047), half (3/6) were able to stop OCS (p = 0.08), and no adverse effects with benralizumab were reported during the 20 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged >65 years old, benralizumab was an effective and safe therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma in our study, with no significant differences from the younger subgroup. This is especially important since they are a group with numerous comorbidities, medications and worse quality of life.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Eosinofilia Pulmonar , Humanos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/induzido quimicamente , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Eosinofilia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Progressão da Doença , EosinófilosRESUMO
Limited number of studies have focused on the impact of pollen exposure on asthma. As a part of the EAACI Guidelines on Environment Science, this first systematic review on the relationship of pollen exposure to asthma exacerbations aimed to bridge this knowledge gap in view of implementing recommendations of prevention. We searched electronic iPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using a set of MeSH terms and related synonyms and identified 73 eligible studies that were included for systemic review. When possible, meta-analyses were conducted. Overall meta-analysis suggests that outdoor pollen exposure may have an effect on asthma exacerbation, but caution is needed due to the low number of studies and their heterogeneity. The strongest associations were found between asthma attacks, asthma-related ED admissions or hospitalizations, and an increase in grass pollen concentration in the previous 2-day overall in children aged less than 18 years of age. Tree pollen may increase asthma-related ED visits or admissions lagged up to 7-day overall in individuals younger than 18 years. Rare data show that among subjects under 18 years of age, an exposure to grass pollen lagged up to 3 days may lower lung function. Further research considering effect modifiers of pollen sensitization, hay fever, asthma, air pollution, green spaces, and pre-existing medications is urgently warranted to better evaluate the impacts of pollen on asthma exacerbation. Preventive measures in relation to pollen exposure should be integrated in asthma control as pollen increase continues due to climate change.
Assuntos
Poluição do Ar , Asma , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Recém-Nascido , Alérgenos/análise , Pólen , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of many diseases. In this regard, omalizumab (OMA), an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is the recommended therapeutic option for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to second-generation H1-antihistamines. Several studies confirm the efficacy and safety of the drug. However, the literature focusing on the elderly population is scarce, as this age group is often excluded from clinical trials. Therefore, the pharmacological treatment of CSU in elderly patients is a challenge that is increased by their comorbidities and consequent polypharmacy. OBJECTIVES: We describe the real-life safety profile of OMA in elderly patients (≥70 years) with CSU and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). We aimed to provide data for daily clinical practice in this vulnerable patient group. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of the records of patients with CSU/CIndU from May 2003 to December 2019 in the Hospital Universitario La Paz. We describe qualitative and quantitative data according to measures of central tendency. Comparisons between qualitative and quantitative data were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher's test for qualitative variables. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-nine patients were included, divided into two groups (<70 vs. ≥70 years). The overall rate of adverse events (AEs) was 48%, mainly mild. No association between age and AE was found (p = 0.789). No serious AE such as anaphylaxis was detected. CSU predominated in both groups. CIndU was less prevalent in the elderly (p = 0.017). There was no association between age and the other variables. Although the frequency of neoplasms was slightly higher in the elderly with OMA, we found no difference compared to the incidence of neoplasms in the general population. Therefore, our data suggest that OMA may be a safe treatment in elderly people with CSU/CIndU for prolonged periods of treatment, although further studies with larger samples are needed to corroborate our observations.
Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Neoplasias , Urticária , Humanos , Idoso , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Urticária Crônica Induzida , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pru p 7 has been reported as a major allergen in peach allergy, associated with severe clinical symptoms and related to IgE sensitisation to cypress pollen. The main objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the frequency of sensitisation to Pru p 7 and its clinical relevance amongst pediatric patients with peach allergy in Madrid (Spain). METHODS: Patients with a history of IgE-mediated symptoms (oral allergy syndrome, urticaria/angioedema, rhinoconjunctivitis/asthma, gastrointestinal symptoms, or anaphylaxis) occurring within 2 h after peach intake or contact were prospectively recruited from February 2020 to September 2021. Skin tests, sIgE by ImmunoCAP® (Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4, Pru p 7, and Cupressus arizonica) and oral food challenge (OFC) were performed. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (PI-4513). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included (53.3% male); median age, 10 (IQR 6.0-14.75) years. Seventy-four (80.4%) patients had a reaction after ingestion of fresh peach (25.0% from peel, 23.9% from pulp, and 44.6% from both). Fifteen (16.3%) patients were sensitised to Pru p 7. Upper airway symptoms, anaphylaxis, and grade 2 reactions were statistically more frequent in patients sensitised to Pru p 7. Seven (7.9%) patients presented with exercise as a cofactor, four of whom were sensitised to Pru p 7 (p = .001). Patients sensitised to Pru p 7 were significantly more likely to have a positive OFC result than patients who were not (p = .008). Four patients who reacted to peach at OFC were sensitised to Pru p 7. Specific IgE against Cupressus arizonica pollen was positive in 25 (62.5%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pru p 7 sensitisation was observed in 16.3% of our population and was related to severe reactions, upper airway symptoms, anaphylaxis, and the presence of an eliciting cofactor.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Prunus persica , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Feminino , Alérgenos , Prunus persica/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Antígenos de Plantas , Proteínas de Plantas , Imunoglobulina ERESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe asthma treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) added to inhaled corticosteroids and a long-acting ß2-agonist (ICS-LABA) may result in more treatment burden and increased adverse effects. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This ambispective multicenter observational study aimed at describing the clinical burden in patients with severe asthma on stable high-dose ICS-LABA who received OCS during ≥6 months (maintenance group) or ≥2 cycles in the previous 12 months (bursts group). Data collection comprised a retrospective 12-month baseline period and 2 follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were evaluable (30 on maintenance, 59 on bursts). At baseline, mean (SD) daily prednisone equivalent exposure in the total population was 24.6 (14.7) mg: 13.8 (9.4) mg on maintenance and 29.9 (14.3) mg on bursts. During the 6-month follow-up period, mean (SD) daily dose in the total cohort was 22.5 (18.8) mg: 17.2 (18.6) mg on maintenance and 28.4 (20.6) mg on bursts. The overall annual severe exacerbations rate during the 12-month baseline period was 2.05 per patient-year and 1.5 per patient-year over the 6-month follow-up, and frequency of hospitalizations and emergency department visits were similar on both maintenance and bursts use. CONCLUSIONS: Results show a suboptimal control of severe asthma despite such high doses of OCS and persistence of disease burden regardless of the prescribing pattern in maintenance or bursts. There is therapeutic inertia to continue using OCS despite the increased risk of adverse effects and the availability of biologics.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, cases have been reported in which unexpected systemic hypersensitivity reactions occurred in patients dialyzed with polysulfone- or polyethersulfone-biocompatible membranes in the absence of other risk factors. The pathomechanisms involved in these reactions are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To characterize hypersensitivity reactions to polysulfone hemodialysis using clinical and laboratory data and to identify biomarkers suitable for endotype identification and diagnosis. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 29 patients with suspected hypersensitivity reactions to polysulfone hemodialysis membranes. Clinical laboratory parameters such as tryptase, blood cell counts, and complement levels were recorded. Acute samples were obtained from 18 cases for the ex vivo assessment of basophil activation by flow cytometry analysis of CD63, CD203, and FcεRI cell membrane expression. Serum cytokines and anaphylatoxin concentrations were evaluated in 16 cases by Luminex and cytometric bead array analysis. RESULTS: Tryptase was elevated during the acute reaction in 4 cases. Evidence of basophil activation was obtained in 10 patients. Complement activation was found in only 2 cases. However, C5a serum levels tended to increase during the acute reaction in those patients with hypoxemia. Significantly higher serum levels of interleukin-6 were observed during the acute reactions to polysulfone hemodialysis (P = .0103). CONCLUSION: Based on biomarker analysis, various endotypes were identified, including type I-like (with the involvement of mast cells or basophils), complement, and cytokine (interleukin-6) release-related reactions, with some patients showing mixed reactions. Further research is needed to unravel the exact mechanisms involved in the activation of these cellular and molecular pathways.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade , Membranas Artificiais , Basófilos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Interleucina-6 , Polímeros , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Sulfonas , Triptases/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of biological therapy for severe T2 asthma (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and reslizumab) under real-life conditions in elderly patients older than 70 years. METHODS: Retrospective data collection including clinical characteristics, comorbidities, treatment, disease control and adverse events (AE) of all patients with severe asthma on biological therapy older than 70 years seen in the Severe Asthma Unit of our hospital. RESULTS: Of 147 patients with severe asthma being treated with biologics, 21 patients older than 70 years were included. The median age of these patients was 76.3 years (range 71-86) and the majority were women (n = 18, 85.7%). There were 9 patients (42.9%) who experienced an AE related to biological treatment. Four (44.4%) were in treatment with omalizumab, two (22.2%) with mepolizumab, two patients (22.2%) with reslizumab and one (11.1%) with benralizumab. The median FEV1 (%) was 66%. These patients had a considerably higher body mass index (BMI). No significant differences were found for any other variable. Most of the AE reported were considered mild with the exception of one case of systemic AE (anaphylaxis) associated with omalizumab. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the prescription of biological therapy in elderly patients with severe asthma seems to be safe. More evidence is needed in this particular population.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Produtos Biológicos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Asma/terapia , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Terapia Biológica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic cough (CC) represents a significant health burden. This study assessed the prevalence of CC (defined as per international guidelines as cough duration >8 weeks) in Spanish adults and compared characteristics between CC and non-CC cohorts. METHODS: CC cohorts were compiled using data from adult respondents to the 2020 Spanish cross-sectional online National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Using propensity scores, respondents experiencing CC during their lifetime and the previous 12 months were matched 3:1 to respondents without CC and their health characteristics were compared. The number of Spanish adults affected with CC was estimated using weighted CC prevalence. RESULTS: CC during their lifetime or the previous 12 months was experienced by 579 (8.2%) and 389 (5.5%) of 7074 NHWS respondents, of whom 233 (38.5%) and 171 (44.0%), respectively, had physician-diagnosed CC. Based on weighted prevalence rates, lifetime and 12-month CC were estimated to affect ≈3.3 million and ≈2.2 million Spanish adults, respectively. Relative to the non-CC cohort, the 12-month CC cohort consistently demonstrated poorer health status, poorer mental health, greater healthcare utilization, and lower productivity at work and home. CONCLUSION: This study contributes novel data regarding the prevalence of CC in Spain, suggests that CC is underdiagnosed, and reflects that CC and related comorbidities inflict a significant health burden in the affected population.
Assuntos
Tosse , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Tosse/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Prevalência , Espanha/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To collect perspectives and explore consensus for expert recommendations related to asthma control and the use of telemedicine among professionals who manage patients with asthma. DESIGN: A Delphi-like questionnaire was designed to analyse the level of agreement about several recommendations formulated by an expert scientific committee about asthma control and the use of telemedicine with this purpose. A dedicated scientific committee validated the questionnaire, which included questions about the participants' profile and the use of technological tools at a personal level or in clinical practice. The experts expressed their agreement with a Likert-scale of 9 values: 1-3 was considered no agreement, 4-6 neutral, and 7-9 agreement. A rate ≥70% with the same answer was considered consensus. SITE: The questionnaire was programmed and distributed as an internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: A pre-selected sample of 75 experts with experience in telemedicine (pulmonology, allergology, family medicine, nursing and community pharmacy) responded to a Delphi-like questionnaire composed by six questions and 52 items. INTERVENTIONS: Consultation was performed in two consecutive waves: the first wave was carried out from 12th of July to 8th of September of 2021; the second wave, from 25th of October to 12th of November of 2021. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Three questions about asthma control (actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma at every visit, current problems that affect asthma control, and potential solutions to offset such problems), and three questions about the impact of telemedicine in asthma control (potential benefits of telemedicine, and potential reticence about telemedicine among both patients and healthcare professionals) were included. RESULTS: From the 52 items inquired, 35 were agreed by consensus. The actions for achieving or maintaining control of asthma, the problems that affect asthma control, and their potential solutions were agreed by consensus. The potential benefits of telemedicine were validated by consensus. None of the potential reservations of patients about telemedicine were validated, while five out of 14 potential reservations of healthcare professionals were agreed by consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The COMETA consensus provides a current picture of the main problems for achieving asthma control, the benefits and the reservations about the use of telemedicine in the Spanish setting, and offers solutions. A wide interest in implementing telemedicine has been observed, although current limitations need to be overcome.
Assuntos
Asma , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Consenso , Asma/prevenção & controle , Asma/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Prova PericialRESUMO
The Global Initiative for Asthma Report updated in 2019 stated that potential benefits of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), compared to pharmacological and avoidance options, must be weighed against the risk of adverse effects and the inconvenience and cost of the prolonged course of therapy in asthma. Thus, with the aim of clarifying some aspects with regard to the possible use of AIT in allergic asthma treatment armamentarium, a group of expert allergists from the Spanish Allergy and Clinical Immunology Scientific Society (SEAIC), particularly from the Immunotherapy and Asthma Interest Groups developed a frequently asked questions in clinical practice. This document updates relevant topics on the use of AIT in asthma and could facilitate physician clinical decisions and improve health outcomes for individual patients.
Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma/imunologia , Asma/terapia , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Fatores Etários , Especificidade de Anticorpos/imunologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Prognóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the recent findings of the last 2 years on the epidemiology and phenotypes of occupational asthma, as well as new developments in its diagnosis and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from nine longitudinal studies showed a population attributable fraction for the occupational contribution to incident asthma of 16%. The main phenotypes of occupational asthma are: occupational asthma caused by high-molecular-weight (HMW) or low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents, irritant-induced asthma and occupational asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap. Among the variety of causative agents of occupational asthma, food-derived components are increasingly being reported, accounting for up to 25% cases of occupational asthma and/or occupational rhinitis. Recently, a specific inhalation challenge (SIC)-independent model has been developed to calculate the probability of occupational asthma diagnosis in workers exposed to HMW agents. In this model, work-specific sensitization, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, inhaled corticosteroid use, rhinoconjunctivitis and age 40 years or less were the most relevant predictive factors. Specific IgE measurements showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.71 in the diagnosis of occupational asthma for HMW agents, while a lower sensitivity (0.28) and a higher specificity (0.89) was shown for LMW agents. Cessation of exposure to workplace sensitizers is the cornerstone of management of work-related conditions. SUMMARY: An early and precise diagnosis of occupational asthma is crucial, allowing appropriate management and implementation of preventive strategies.
Assuntos
Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Hiper-Reatividade Brônquica/diagnóstico , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Asma Ocupacional/fisiopatologia , Hiper-Reatividade Brônquica/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Testes de Função Respiratória , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to understand the perception of family physicians, pulmonologists, and allergists with respect to diagnostic tests performed on patients with chronic cough and treatments prescribed to patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. We also assessed how these health professionals perceived the effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed by the scientific societies SEPAR, SEAIC, SEMERGEN, semFYC, and SEMG. Respondents were asked how often they perform diagnostic tests and prescribe treatments (responses from 1 = never to 10 = always) and how they perceived the effectiveness of the drugs used (from 1 = not at all to 10 = very effective). The correlation between perceived effectiveness and frequency of prescription was analyzed. RESULTS: The respondents comprised 620 family physicians, 92 pulmonologists, and 62 allergists. The most frequently performed diagnostic tests were chest x-ray and, among pulmonologists and allergists, simple spirometry and bronchodilator tests. The most frequently prescribed drugs were bronchodilators (percentages scoring 8-10 for each specialty: 43.2%, 42.4%, and 56.5%; p = 0.127), inhaled corticosteroids (36.9%, 55.4%, and 54.8%; p < 0.001), and antitussives (family physicians, 33.4%). Regarding perceived effectiveness, only bronchodilators, inhaled or oral corticosteroids, and opioids obtained a median effectiveness score > 5 (between 6 and 7). Correlation coefficients (ρ2) suggested that approximately 45% of prescription was related to perceived effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Although chronic cough is a common problem, diagnosis and treatment differ among specialists. The perceived effectiveness of drugs is generally low.
Assuntos
Asma , Tosse , Tosse/diagnóstico , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Percepção , Padrões de Prática Médica , Pneumologistas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to recognize the multifactorial cause of asthma, from the influence of mother until adulthood, highlight the main characteristics of the disease at different ages and summarize the evidence of potential prevention strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: To date, regarding the prenatal period, the presence of specific genes, maternal asthma, drugs, and tobacco exposure are the most relevant predisposing features for an asthmatic offspring. For newborns, preterm, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and low birth weight has been associated with low lung function. Among young children, atopic dermatitis, lower respiratory tract infections, and increased levels of total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and allergen-specific IgE are important determinants.Breastfeeding has been demonstrated being protective for the onset of asthma. Allergen immunotherapy has also been shown to have significant preventive effect decreasing asthma development. Inhaled corticosteroids use in early childhood prevents exacerbations but does not alter the natural history of asthma. Other interventions, such as the use of palivizumab, probiotics, vitamin D supplementation, and fish consumption presented controversial results. SUMMARY: A good knowledge of risk factors for asthma development, from prenatal period to adulthood, may lead to efficacious preventive strategies. Further data of long-term follow-up in population-based studies according to different phenotypes are needed.
Assuntos
Asma , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Causalidade , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The "united airway disease" concept is based on the bidirectional interaction between asthma and rhinitis. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between upper airway diseases and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), as well as their association with the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and atopy in patients with persistent symptoms suggestive of asthma requiring methacholine challenge testing (MCT) to confirm asthma diagnosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective study was carried out in adult patients with persistent asthma-like symptoms and negative bronchodilator testing. FeNO and MCT were performed in all patients. Asthma was confirmed based on the presence of suggestive symptoms and MCT results. Associated upper airway diseases included allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). RESULTS: The study included 575 patients; asthma was confirmed in 32.3%, and FeNO values ≥ 50 ppb were found in 27% of the patients. Elevated FeNO was significantly associated to AERD. The prevalence of atopy in asthma patients was 86.6%. Atopy was present in 90.4% of patients with asthma and FeNO levels ≥ 50 ppb. A significant association was found between AERD, asthma, and FeNO ≥ 50 ppb. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma but negative bronchodilator testing are commonly seen in usual practice. In this population, the association of high FeNO levels and BHR to atopy, as well as to AERD, suggests the presence eosinophilic inflammation in both the upper and lower airways and supports the "one airway" hypothesis.