Unplanned Surgery in Dually Eligible Beneficiaries for Conditions that Should Be Treated Electively.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of unplanned surgery among dually eligible beneficiaries for surgical conditions that should be treated electively. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Access-sensitive surgical conditions (e.g. abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy for colon cancer, ventral hernia repair) are ideally treated with elective surgery, but when left untreated have a natural history leading to unplanned surgery. Dually eligible beneficiaries may face systematic barriers to access surgical care. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study of all beneficiaries who were eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, and underwent surgery for an access-sensitive surgical condition between 2016-2020. We compared the rate of unplanned surgery as well as 30-day mortality, complications and readmissions for dually eligible versus non-dually eligible beneficiaries. Sex, age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, teaching status, nursing ratio, hospital region and bed size and surgery year were included in the risk-adjustment model. RESULTS: Out of 853,500 beneficiaries, 118,812 were dually eligible with an average age (SD) of 75.2(7.7) years. Compared to non-dually eligible beneficiaries, dually eligible beneficiaries had a higher rates of unplanned surgery for access-sensitive surgical conditions (45.1% vs. 31.8%, P<0.001), 30-day mortality (2.9% vs. 2.6%, aOR=1.10 (1.07-1.14), P<0.001), complications (23.6% vs. 20.1%, aOR=1.23 (1.20-1.25), P<0.001), and 30-day readmissions (15.5% vs. 12.9%, aOR=1.24 (1.22-1.27), P<0.001). These differences narrowed significantly when evaluating elective procedures only. CONCLUSIONS: Dually eligible beneficiaries were more likely to undergo unplanned surgery for access-sensitive surgical conditions, leading to worse rates of mortality, complications and readmissions. Our findings suggest that improving rates of elective surgery for these conditions represents an actionable target to narrow the difference in post-operative outcomes between dually eligible and non-dually eligible beneficiaries.

Rate of Emergency Lower Extremity Amputations in the United States Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of emergency versus elective lower extremity amputations in the United States. BACKGROUND: Lower extremity amputation is a common endpoint for patients with poorly controlled diabetes and multilevel peripheral vascular disease. Although the procedure is ideally performed electively, patients with limited access may present later and require an emergency operation. To what extent rates of emergency amputation for lower extremities vary across the United States is unknown. METHODS: Evaluation of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent lower extremity amputation between 2015 and 2020. The rate was determined for each zip code and placed into rank order from lowest to highest rate. We merged each beneficiary's place of residence and location of care with the American Hospital Association Annual Survey using Google Maps Application Programming Interface to determine the travel distance for patients to undergo their procedure. RESULTS: Of 233,084 patients, 66.3% (154,597) were men, 69.8% (162,786) were White. The average age (SD) was 74 years (8). There was wide variation in rates of emergency lower extremity amputation. The lowest quintile of zip codes demonstrated an emergency amputation rate of 3.7%, whereas the highest quintile demonstrated 90%. The median travel distance in the lowest emergency surgery rate quintile was 34.6 miles compared with 10.5 miles in the highest quintile of emergency surgery ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the rate of emergency lower extremity amputations among Medicare beneficiaries, suggesting variable access to essential vascular care. Travel distance and rate of amputation have an inverse relationship, suggesting that barriers other than travel distance are playing a role.

Trends in End-of-Life Care and Satisfaction Among Veterans Undergoing Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in end-of-life care services and satisfaction among Veterans undergoing any inpatient surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The Veterans Health Administration has undergone system-wide transformations to improve end-of-life care yet the impacts on end-of-life care services use and family satisfaction are unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of Veterans who died within 90 days of undergoing inpatient surgery between 01/2010 and 12/2019. Using the Veterans Affairs (VA) Bereaved Family Survey (BFS), we calculated the rates of palliative care and hospice use and examined satisfaction with end-of-life care. After risk and reliability adjustment for each VA hospital, we then performed multivariable linear regression model to identify factors associated with the greatest change. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 155,250 patients with a mean age of 73.6 years (standard deviation 11.6). Over the study period, rates of palliative care consultation and hospice use increased more than two-fold (28.1% to 61.1% and 18.9% to 46.9%, respectively) while the rate of BFS excellent overall care score increased from 56.1% to 64.7%. There was wide variation between hospitals in the absolute change in rates of palliative care consultation, hospice use and BFS excellent overall care scores. Rural location and ACGME accreditation were hospital-level factors associated with the greatest changes. CONCLUSIONS: Among Veterans undergoing inpatient surgery, improvements in satisfaction with end-of-life care paralleled increases in end-of-life care service use. Future work is needed to identify actionable hospital-level characteristics that may reduce heterogeneity between VA hospitals and facilitate targeted interventions to improve end-of-life care.

Hepatic Resection as the Primary Treatment Method for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and certain malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data on the surgical management of de novo or recurrent tumors that develop in the transplanted allograft are limited. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for de novo or recurrent tumors after liver transplantation. METHODS: The study enrolled adult and pediatric patients from 12 centers across North America who underwent hepatic resection for the treatment of a solid tumor after LT. Perioperative outcomes were assessed as well as recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for those undergoing resection for HCC. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2023, 54 patients underwent hepatic resection of solid tumors after LT. For 50 patients (92.6 %), resection of malignant lesions was performed. The most common lesion was HCC (n = 35, 64.8 %), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6, 11.1 %) and colorectal liver metastases (n = 6, 11.1 %). The majority of the 35 patients underwent resection of HCC did not receive any preoperative therapy (82.9 %) or adjuvant therapy (71.4 %), with resection their only treatment method for HCC. During a median follow-up period of 50.7 months, the median RFS was 21.5 months, and the median OS was 49.6 months. CONCLUSION: Hepatic resection following OLT is safe and associated with morbidity and mortality rates that are comparable to those reported for patients undergoing resection in native livers. Hepatic resection as the primary and often only treatment modality for HCC following LT is associated with acceptable RFS and OS and should be considered in well selected patients.

Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in US Immigrants: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Timely colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to improve CRC-related morbidity and mortality rates. However, even with this preventative care tool, CRC screening rates remain below 70% among eligible United States (US) adults, with even lower rates among US immigrants. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the barriers to CRC screening faced by this unique and growing immigrant population and discuss possible interventions to improve screening. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched for all original research articles related to CRC screening in US immigrants published after 2010. Following a full-text review of articles for inclusion in the final analysis, data extraction was conducted while coding descriptive themes. Thematic analysis led to the organization of this data into five themes. RESULTS: Of the 4637 articles initially identified, 55 met inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis of the barriers to CRC screening identified five unique themes: access, knowledge, culture, trust, health perception, and beliefs. The most cited barriers were in access (financial burden and limited primary care access) and knowledge (CRC/screening knowledge). CONCLUSIONS: US immigrants face several barriers to the receipt of CRC screening. When designing interventions to increase screening uptake among immigrants, gaps in physician and screening education, access to care, and trust need to be addressed through culturally sensitive supports. These interventions should be tailored to the specific immigrant group, since a one-size-fits approach fails to consider the heterogeneity within this population.

Evaluation of an opioid restrictive pain management initiative in adult kidney transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Evidence to guide opioid utilization following kidney transplantation is lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of an opioid restrictive post-operative pain management protocol in adult kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent kidney transplant between 1/1/2017 to 8/15/2018. A standardized, opioid restrictive pain management protocol was implemented in February 2018. The primary outcome was quantity of opioid tablets prescribed at discharge. Secondary outcomes included amount of opioid prescribed within first 30 days, number of patient calls for pain, and opioid prescription in electronic medical record (EMR) at 90 days and 1 year. RESULTS: After implementation, significantly fewer opioid tablets were prescribed at discharge (4 vs. 60 tablets, p < .001) and less oral morphine milligram equivalence (OME) were prescribed within 30 days of transplant (38 vs. 300, p < .001). In cohort 2, fewer patients received more than one opioid prescription, more patients received truncal block and only 5 patients received patient controlled analgesia compared to all in cohort 1. CONCLUSION: A standardized, patient-centered pain management strategy after kidney transplantation reduced opioid prescribing without increasing readmissions or clinic calls. This data may be used to inform guidelines for appropriate OME prescribing at discharge after kidney transplantation.

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ghana: Physicians' Practices and Perceived Barriers.

INTRODUCTION: Ghana has seen a rise in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) over the past decade. In 2011, the Ghana National Cancer Steering Committee created a guideline recommending fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for CRC screening in individuals over the age of 50. There is limited data available on current Ghanaian CRC screening trends and adherence to the established guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 39 physicians working at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. The survey evaluates physician knowledge, practice patterns, and perceived personal-, patient- and system-level barriers pertaining to CRC screening. RESULTS: Almost 10% of physicians would not recommend colorectal cancer screening for asymptomatic, average risk patients who met the age inclusion criteria set forth in the national guidelines. Only 1 physician would recommend FOBT as an initial screening test for CRC. The top reasons for not recommending CRC screening with FOBT were the lack of equipment/facilities for the test (28.1%) and lack of training (18.8%). The two most commonly identified barriers to screening identified by >85% of physicians, were lack of awareness of screening/not perceiving colorectal cancer as a serious health threat (patient-level) and high screening costs/lack of insurance coverage (system-level). CONCLUSION: Despite creation of national guidelines for CRC screening, there has been low uptake and implementation. This is due to several barriers at the physician-, patient- and system-levels including lack of resources and physician training to follow-up on positive screening results, limited monetary support and substantial gaps in knowledge at the patient level.

Health Insurance Status and Unplanned Surgery for Access-Sensitive Surgical Conditions.

Importance: Access-sensitive surgical conditions, such as abdominal aortic aneurysm, ventral hernia, and colon cancer, are ideally treated with elective surgery, but when left untreated have a natural history requiring an unplanned operation. Patients' health insurance status may be a barrier to receiving timely elective care, which may be associated with higher rates of unplanned surgery and worse outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the association between patients' insurance status and rates of unplanned surgery for these 3 access-sensitive surgical conditions and postoperative outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional cohort study examined a geographically broad patient sample from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, including data from 8 states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin). Participants were younger than 65 years who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, ventral hernia repair, or colectomy for colon cancer between 2016 and 2020. Patients were stratified into groups by insurance status. Data were analyzed from June 1 to July 1, 2023. Exposure: Health insurance status (private insurance, Medicaid, or no insurance). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of unplanned surgery for these 3 access-sensitive conditions. Secondary outcomes were rates of postoperative outcomes including inpatient mortality, any hospital complications, serious complications (a complication with a hospital length of stay longer than the 75th percentile for that procedure), and hospital length of stay. Results: The study included 146 609 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.9 [10.3] years; 73 871 females [50.4%]). A total of 89 018 patients (60.7%) underwent elective surgery while 57 591 (39.3%) underwent unplanned surgery. Unplanned surgery rates varied significantly across insurance types (33.14% for patients with private insurance, 51.46% for those with Medicaid, and 72.60% for those without insurance; P < .001). Compared with patients with private insurance, patients without insurance had higher rates of inpatient mortality (1.29% [95% CI, 1.04%-1.54%] vs 0.61% [0.57%-0.66%]; P < .001), higher rates of any complications (19.19% [95% CI, 18.33%-20.05%] vs 12.27% [95% CI, 12.07%-12.47%]; P < .001), and longer hospital stays (7.27 [95% CI, 7.09-7.44] days vs 5.56 [95% CI, 5.53-5.60] days, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that uninsured patients more often undergo unplanned surgery for conditions that can be treated electively, with worse outcomes and longer hospital stays compared with their counterparts with private health insurance. As efforts are made to improve insurance coverage, tracking elective vs unplanned surgery rates for access-sensitive surgical conditions may be a useful measure to assess progress.

Higher Rates Of Emergency Surgery, Serious Complications, And Readmissions In Primary Care Shortage Areas, 2015-19.

Primary care physicians are often the first to screen and identify patients with access-sensitive surgical conditions that should be treated electively. These conditions require surgery that is preferably planned (elective), but, when access is limited, treatment may be delayed and worsening symptoms lead to emergency surgery (for example, colectomy for cancer, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and incisional hernia repair). We evaluated the rates of elective versus emergency surgery for patients with three access-sensitive surgical conditions living in primary care Health Professional Shortage Areas during 2015-19. Medicare beneficiaries in more severe primary care shortage areas had higher rates of emergency surgery compared with rates in the least severe shortage areas (37.8 percent versus 29.9 percent). They were also more likely to have serious complications (14.9 percent versus 11.7 percent) and readmissions (15.7 percent versus 13.5 percent). When we accounted for areas with a shortage of surgeons, the findings were similar. Taken together, these findings suggest that residents of areas with greater primary care workforce shortages may also face challenges in accessing elective surgical care. As policy makers consider investing in Health Professional Shortage Areas, our findings underscore the importance of primary care access to a broader range of services.

Patient adherence to an oral rehydration solution intervention to prevent dehydration following ileostomy creation: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery for ileostomy creation frequently experience postoperative dehydration and subsequent renal injury. The use of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) has been shown to prevent dehydration, but compliance may be variable. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 patients who received a postoperative hydration kit and dehydration education to assess barriers and facilitators to compliance with ORS kit instructions. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed five themes affecting patient adherence to the ORS intervention: (1) patient's perception of the effectiveness of the ORS solution, (2) existing co-morbidities, (3) kit quality and taste of the ORS product, (4) quality of the dehydration education, and (5) social support. CONCLUSIONS: Given that patient adherence can greatly affect the success of an ORS intervention, the design of future ORS interventions should emphasize the educational component, the "patient friendliness" of the ORS kit, and ways that social supports can be leveraged to increase adherence.

Association of timing and agent for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury on venous thromboembolism events, mortality, neurosurgical intervention, and discharge disposition.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism events (VTEs). The decision of when to initiate VTE chemoprophylaxis (VTEP) and with what agent remains controversial in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: This comparative effectiveness study evaluated the impact of timing and agent for VTEP on outcomes for patients with severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale head score of 3, 4, or 5). Data were collected at 35 Level 1 and 2 trauma centers from January 1, 2017, to June 1, 2022. Patients were placed into analysis cohorts: no VTEP, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) ≤48 hours, LMWH >48 hours, heparin ≤48 hours, and heparin >48 hours. Propensity score matching accounting for patient factors and injury characteristics was used with logistic regression modeling to evaluate in-hospital mortality, VTEs, and discharge disposition. Neurosurgical intervention after initiation of VTEP was used to evaluate extension of intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: Of 12,879 patients, 32% had no VTEP, 36% had LMWH, and 32% had heparin. Overall mortality was 8.3% and lowest among patients receiving LMWH ≤48 hours (4.1%). Venous thromboembolism event rates were lower with use of LMWH (1.6% vs. 4.5%; odds ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-6.34; p = 0.005) without increasing mortality or neurosurgical interventions. Venous thromboembolism event rates were lower with early prophylaxis (2.0% vs. 3.5%; odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.71; p = 0.01) without increasing mortality ( p = 1.0). Early VTEP was associated with more nonfatal intracranial operations ( p < 0.001). However, patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention after VTEP initiation had no difference in rates of mortality, withdrawal of care, or unfavorable discharge disposition ( p = 0.7, p = 0.1, p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: In patients with severe TBI, LMWH usage was associated with lower VTE incidence without increasing mortality or neurosurgical interventions. Initiation of VTEP ≤48 hours decreased VTE incidence and increased nonfatal neurosurgical interventions without affecting mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the preferred VTEP agent for severe TBI, and initiation ≤48 hours should be considered in relation to these risks and benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Outcomes for High-Risk Surgical Procedures Across High- and Low-Competition Hospital Markets.

Importance: Maintaining competition among hospitals is increasingly seen as important to achieving high-quality outcomes. Whether or not there is an association between hospital market competition and outcomes after high-risk surgery is unknown. Objective: To evaluate whether there is an association between hospital market competition and outcomes after high-risk surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries who received care in US hospitals. Participants were 65 years and older who electively underwent 1 of 10 high-risk surgical procedures from 2015 to 2018: carotid endarterectomy, mitral valve repair, open aortic aneurysm repair, lung resection, esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, rectal resection, hip replacement, knee replacement, and bariatric surgery. Hospitals were categorized into high-competition and low-competition markets based on the hospital market Herfindahl-Hirschman index. Comparisons of 30-day mortality and 30-day readmissions were risk-adjusted using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for patient factors (age, sex, comorbidities, and dual eligibility), year of procedure, and hospital characteristics (nurse ratio and teaching status). Data were analyzed from May 2022 to March 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day postoperative mortality and readmissions. Results: A total of 2 242 438 Medicare beneficiaries were included in the study. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 74.1 (6.4) years, 1 328 946 were women (59.3%), and 913 492 were men (40.7%). When examined by procedure, compared with low-competition hospitals, high-competition market hospitals demonstrated higher 30-day mortality for 2 of 10 procedures (mitral valve repair: odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14; and carotid endarterectomy: OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09) and no difference for 5 of 10 procedures (open aortic aneurysm repair, bariatric surgery, esophagectomy, knee replacement, and hip replacement; ranging from OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00, for hip replacement to OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.26, for bariatric surgery). High-competition hospitals also demonstrated 30-day readmissions that were higher for 5 of 10 procedures (open aortic aneurysm repair, knee replacement, mitral valve repair, rectal resection, and carotid endarterectomy; ranging from OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02, for knee replacement to OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08, for rectal resection) and no difference for 3 procedures (bariatric surgery: OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.07; esophagectomy: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; and pancreatectomy: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01). Hospitals in high-competition compared with low-competition markets cared for patients who were older (mean [SD] age of 74.4 [6.6] years vs 74.0 [6.2] years, respectively; P < .001), were more likely to be racial and ethnic minority individuals (77 322/450 404 [17.3%] vs 23 328/444 900 [5.6%], respectively; P < .001), and had more comorbidities (≥2 Elixhauser comorbidities, 302 415/450 404 [67.1%] vs 284 355/444 900 [63.9%], respectively; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that hospital market competition was not consistently associated with improved outcomes after high-risk surgery. Efforts to maintain hospital market competition may not achieve better postoperative outcomes.

The combined effect of race, dual-eligibility and neighborhood deprivation on medicare spending after cancer surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Disparities in clinical outcomes following high-risk cancer operations are well documented, but, whether these disparities contribute to higher Medicare spending is unknown. METHODS: Using 100% Medicare claims, White and Black beneficiaries undergoing complex cancer surgery between 2016 and 2018 with dual eligibility status and census tract Area Deprivation Index score were included. Linear regression was used to assess the association of race, dual-eligibility, and neighborhood deprivation on Medicare payments. RESULT: Overall, 98,725 White(93.5%) and 6900 Black(6.5%) patients were included. Black beneficiaries were more likely to live in the most deprived neighborhoods(33.4% vs. 13.6%; P < 0.001) and be dual-eligible(26.6% vs. 8.5%; P < 0.001) compared to White beneficiares. Overall, Medicare spending was higher for Black compared to White patients($27,291 vs. 26,465; P < 0.001). Notably, when comparing Black dual-eligible patients living in the most deprived neighborhoods to White non-dual eligible patients living in the least deprived spending($29,507 vs. $25,596; abs diff $3911; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, Medicare spending was significantly higher for Black patients undergoing complex cancer operations compared to White patients due to higher index hospitalization and post-discharge care payments.

Disparities in unplanned surgery amongst medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: While significant efforts have been made to understand surgical disparities for procedures that are performed in either the elective or unplanned settings, far less is known about procedures performed in both settings. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 1,135,743 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing incisional hernia repair, colectomy, or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 2014 and 2018. Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared to White beneficiaries, unplanned surgery rates were higher for Black (44.0%vs38.8%, OR = 1.29,p < 0.001) and Asian beneficiaries(40.4%vs38.8%,OR = 1.09,p < 0.001). While there were minimal differences in 30-day mortality for elective procedures, unplanned procedures demonstrated wider disparities (Black vs White 12.4%vs11.3%,OR = 1.11,p < 0.001; Asian vs White 13.2%vs11.3%,OR = 1.18,p < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed for readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned procedures are more common and demonstrate wider disparities in outcomes among minority Medicare beneficiaries. Reducing unplanned surgery rates among these groups may be an effective strategy to limit overall disparities in postoperative outcomes.

Hospital-Level Segregation Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Recent research has raised concern that health care segregation, the high concentration of racial groups within a subset of hospitals, is a key contributor to persistent disparities in surgical care. However, to date the extent and effect of hospital level segregation among patients undergoing resection for lung cancer remains unclear. METHODS: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to evaluate the degree of hospital-level racial segregation for patients undergoing resection for lung cancer between 2014 and 2018. Hospitals serving a high volume of minority patients were defined as the top decile of hospitals by volume of racial and ethnic minority beneficiaries served. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare surgical outcomes between hospitals serving high vs low volumes of minority patients. RESULTS: A total of 122,943 patients were included, with racial/ethnic composition of 360 American Indian or Native American (0.3%), 2077 Asian or Pacific Islander (1.7%), 1146 Hispanic or Latino (0.9%), 8707 non-Hispanic Black (7.1%), and 108,665 non-Hispanic White patients. Overall, 31.6%, 15.9%, 15.0%, and 7.8% of all hospitals performed 90% of lung cancer resection for Black, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American patients, respectively. Hospitals performing higher volumes of operations for racial and ethnic minorities had higher mortality (3.9% vs 3.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15-1.23; P < .001), complications (18.1% vs 15.9%; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.14-1.19; P < .001), and readmissions (11.7% vs 11.2%; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05; P < .001) for resections for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a small proportion of hospitals provide a disproportionate amount of surgical care for racial and ethnic minorities with lung cancer with inferior surgical outcomes.