RESUMO
Introduction: Plant species composition in forest ecosystems can alter soil greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets by affecting soil properties and microbial communities. However, little attention has been paid to the forest types characterized by understory vegetation, especially in boreal forests where understory species contribute significantly to carbon and nitrogen cycling. Method: In the present study, soil GHG fluxes, soil properties and bacterial community, and soil environmental conditions were investigated among three types of larch forest [Rhododendron simsii-Larix gmelinii forest (RL), Ledum palustre-Larix gmelinii forest (LL), and Sphagnum-Bryum-Ledum palustre-Larix gmelinii forest (SLL)] in the typical boreal region of northeast China to explore whether the forest types characterized by different understory species can affect soil GHG fluxes. Results: The results showed that differences in understory species significantly affected soil GHG fluxes, properties, and bacterial composition among types of larch forest. Soil CO2 and N2O fluxes were significantly higher in LL (347.12 mg m-2 h-1 and 20.71 µg m-2 h-1) and RL (335.54 mg m-2 h-1 and 20.73 µg m-2 h-1) than that in SLL (295.58 mg m-2 h-1 and 17.65 µg m-2 h-1), while lower soil CH4 uptake (-21.07 µg m-2 h-1) were found in SLL than in RL (-35.21 µg m-2 h-1) and LL (-35.85 µg m-2 h-1). No significant differences between LL and RL were found in soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes. Soil bacterial composition was mainly dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi among the three types of larch forest, while their abundances differed significantly. Soil environmental variables, soil properties, bacterial composition, and their interactions significantly affected the variations in GHG fluxes with understory species. Specifically, structural equation modeling suggested that soil bacterial composition and temperature had direct close links with variations in soil GHG fluxes among types of larch forest. Moreover, soil NO3 --N and NH4 + - N content also affected soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes indirectly, via their effects on soil bacterial composition. Discussion: Our study highlights the importance of understory species in regulating soil GHG fluxes in boreal forests, which furthers our understanding of the role of boreal forests in sustainable development and climate change mitigation.
RESUMO
Forest succession is an important process regulating the carbon and nitrogen budgets in forest ecosystems. However, little is known about how and extent by which vegetation succession predictably affects soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes, especially in boreal forest. Here, a field study was conducted along a secondary forest succession trajectory from Betula platyphylla forest (early stage), then Betula platyphylla-Larix gmelinii forest (intermediate stage), to Larix gmelinii forest (late stage) to explore the effects of forest succession on soil greenhouse gas fluxes and related soil environmental factors in Northeast China. The results showed significant differences in soil greenhouse gas fluxes during the forest succession. During the study period, the average soil CO2 flux was greatest at mid-successional stage (444.72 mg m-2 h-1), followed by the late (341.81 mg m-2 h-1) and the early-successional (347.12 mg m-2 h-1) stages. The average soil CH4 flux increased significantly during succession, ranging from -0.062 to -0.036 mg m-2 h-1. The average soil N2O flux was measured as 17.95 µg m-2 h-1 at intermediate successional stage, significantly lower than that at late (20.71 µg m-2 h-1) and early-successional (20.85 µg m-2 h-1) stages. During forest succession, soil greenhouse gas fluxes showed significant correlations with soil and environmental factors at both seasonal and successional time scales. The seasonal variations of soil GHG fluxes were mainly influenced by soil temperature and water content. Meanwhile, soil MBN and soil NO3--N content were also important factors for soil N2O fluxes. Structural equation modelling showed that forest succession affected soil CO2 fluxes by changing soil temperature and microbial biomass carbon, affected soil CH4 fluxes mainly by changing soil water content and soil pH value, and affected soil N2O fluxes mainly by changing soil temperature, microbial biomass nitrogen, and soil NO3--N content. Our study suggests that forest succession mainly alters soil nutrient and soil environment/chemical properties affecting soil CO2 and N2O fluxes and soil CH4 fluxes, respectively, in the secondary forest succession process.