Predictors of sac regression after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysm sac regression after standard endovascular aortic repair is associated with improved outcomes, but similar data are limited after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). We sought to evaluate sac regression after FEVAR, and identify any predictors of this favorable outcome. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective FEVAR using the commercially available Zenith Fenestrated device (ZFEN; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) from 2012 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The maximal aortic diameter was compared between the preoperative scan and those obtained in follow-up. Patients with of 5 mm or more sac regression were included in the regression (REG) group, with all others in the nonregression (NONREG) group. Outcomes were compared between groups using univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify any predictive factors for sac regression. RESULTS: We included 132 patients undergoing FEVAR in the analysis. At a mean follow-up of 33.1 months, 65 patients (49.2%) had sac regression of 5 mm or more and comprised the REG group (n = 65 [49.2%]). The REG group had smaller diameter devices, and were less likely to have had concomitant chimney grafts placed (P < .05). The NONREG group had a higher incidence of type II endoleak (35.8% vs 12.3%; P = .002). Sac regression was associated with a significant mortality benefit on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank P = .02). Multivariate analysis identified adjunctive parallel grafting (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.36; P < .01), persistent type II endoleak (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P < .01), and a greater number of target vessels (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62; P = .002) as independent predictors of failure to regress. CONCLUSIONS: Sac regression after FEVAR occurred in nearly one-half of patients, but seems to be less common in patients with persistent type II endoleaks and those undergoing concomitant parallel grafting. Sac regression was associated with a significant survival advantage, and can be used as a clinical marker for success after FEVAR.

Fenestrated Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients Treated Inside Versus Outside of Instructions for Use.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients treated with the Cook Zenith Fenestrated (ZFEN) device for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms inside versus outside the IFU. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional ZFEN database for cases performed between 2012 and 2018, with analysis performed in 2020 in order to report midterm outcomes. The cohort was stratified based on treatment inside (IFU group) and outside (non-IFU group) the IFU for criteria involving the proximal neck: neck length 4 to 14 mm, neck diameter 19 to 31 mm, and neck angulation ≤45°. Patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms or concurrent chimney grafting were excluded. The primary outcomes in question were mortality, type 1a endoleak, and reintervention. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine associations between adherence to IFU criteria and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 100 consecutive patients (19% female, mean age 73.6 years) for inclusion in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 21.6 months. Fifty-four patients (54%) were treated outside the IFU because of inadequate neck length (n=48), enlarged neck diameter (n=10), and/or excessive angulation (n=16). Eighteen patients were outside IFU for two criteria, and one patient was outside IFU for all three. Non-IFU patients were exposed to higher radiation doses (3652 vs 5445 mGy, p=0.008) and contrast volume (76 vs 95 mL, p=0.004). No difference was noted between IFU and non-IFU groups for 30-day mortality (0% vs 3.7%, p=0.18), or type 1a endoleak (0% vs 1.9%, p=0.41). Reintervention was also similar between cohorts (13% vs 27.8%, p=0.13). Being outside IFU for neck diameter or length was each borderline significant for higher reintervention on univariate analysis (p=0.05), but this was not significant on multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling (HR 1.82 [0.53-6.25]; 2.03 [0.68-7.89]), respectively. No individual IFU deviations were associated with the primary outcomes on multivariate analysis, nor being outside IFU for multiple criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms may be treated with the ZFEN device with moderate deviations from the IFU. While no differences were seen in mortality or proximal endoleak, larger studies are needed to examine the potential association between IFU nonadherence and reinterventions and close follow-up is warranted for all patients undergoing such repair.

Hydrogen Sulphide Release via the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Zofenopril Prevents Intimal Hyperplasia in Human Vein Segments and in a Mouse Model of Carotid Artery Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is a major risk factor for intimal hyperplasia (IH) and re-stenosis following vascular and endovascular interventions. Preclinical studies suggest that hydrogen sulphide (H2S), an endogenous gasotransmitter, limits re-stenosis. While there is no clinically available pure H2S releasing compound, the sulfhydryl containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril is a source of H2S. Here, it was hypothesised that zofenopril, due to H2S release, would be superior to other non-sulfhydryl containing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in reducing intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Spontaneously hypertensive male Cx40 deleted mice (Cx40-/-) or wild type (WT) littermates were randomly treated with enalapril 20 mg or zofenopril 30 mg. Discarded human vein segments and primary human smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were treated with the active compound enalaprilat or zofenoprilat. IH was evaluated in mice 28 days after focal carotid artery stenosis surgery and in human vein segments cultured for seven days ex vivo. Human primary smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and migration were studied in vitro. RESULTS: Compared with control animals (intima/media thickness 2.3 ± 0.33 µm), enalapril reduced IH in Cx40-/- hypertensive mice by 30% (1.7 ± 0.35 µm; p = .037), while zofenopril abrogated IH (0.4 ± 0.16 µm; p < .002 vs. control and p > .99 vs. sham operated Cx40-/- mice). In WT normotensive mice, enalapril had no effect (0.9665 ± 0.2 µm in control vs. 1.140 ± 0.27 µm; p > .99), while zofenopril also abrogated IH (0.1623 ± 0.07 µm; p < .008 vs. control and p > .99 vs. sham operated WT mice). Zofenoprilat, but not enalaprilat, also prevented IH in human vein segments ex vivo. The effect of zofenopril on carotid and SMCs correlated with reduced SMC proliferation and migration. Zofenoprilat inhibited the mitogen activated protein kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways in SMCs and human vein segments. CONCLUSION: Zofenopril provides extra beneficial effects compared with non-sulfhydryl ACEi in reducing SMC proliferation and re-stenosis, even in normotensive animals. These findings may hold broad clinical implications for patients suffering from vascular occlusive diseases and hypertension.

Fenestrated Endovascular Repair With Large Device Diameters (34-36 mm) is Associated With Type 1 and 3 Endoleak and Reintervention.

BACKGROUND: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing EVAR with larger device diameters (34-36 mm) have worse outcomes due to proximal fixation failure and need for reintervention. We examine outcomes relating to standard fenestrated repair (FEVAR) with larger device diameters, and investigate whether a similar relationship exists. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single institution database of patients treated with the Cook ZFEN device between 2012-2017. Outcomes were stratified by device diameter into normal-diameter (ND,≤ 32 mm) and large-diameter (LD,34-36 mm). Primary endpoints were need for reintervention and composite type I/III endoleak. RESULTS: One-hundred consecutive patients treated were identified for inclusion. Overall mean age was 73.6 years and mean aortic diameter was 59.1 mm. Mean follow-up was 22 months. A total of 26 (26%) patients were treated with LD devices. Number of target vessels per patient was 2.8 in both groups. Infrarenal neck length and diameter were significantly different in the LD and ND patients, respectively (2.6 mm vs. 4.7 mm (P < 0.01) and 30.1 mm vs. 23.4 mm (P < 0.01)). Percent graft oversizing was lower in the LD cohort (19% vs. 24%; P = 0.006). No difference was seen in overall mortality at 30-days (0% vs. 2%; P = 0.4) or at latest follow up (6% vs. 14%; P = 0.6). Reinterventions were not significantly different at 30 days, but were significantly higher over the follow-up period in the LD cohort (46.2 vs. 17.6%; P = 0.002). LD diameter was associated with reintervention on univariate (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.37), but not multivariate analysis. The composite endpoint of type I/III endoleak was higher in the LD cohort (15.4% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: FEVAR requiring 34- or 36-mm device diameters is associated with an increased risk of composite type I/III endoleak and reintervention. Patients undergoing fenestrated repair requiring LD devices should be closely monitored, with consideration for proximal or open repair.

Predictive Factors of Surgical Complications in the First Year Following Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the recent years, an increased use of marginal donors and grafts and a growing prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in the recipients have been observed. Meanwhile, the open surgical technique for kidney transplantation has not changed. The aim of this study is to analyze all surgical complications occurring in the first year after kidney transplant and to determine potential predictive risk factors. METHODS: Data of the 399 patients who underwent kidney transplant in our University Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of vascular, parietal and urological complications at 1 year following kidney transplantation. The secondary outcomes were graft and patient' survival rates, and the identification of predictive factors of the surgical complications. RESULTS: 24% of patients developed 134 complications. Vascular complication represented 39% of all complications and resulted in 9 graft losses. Parietal and urological complications represented 46-15% of all complications, respectively, No parietal or urological complications were associated with graft loss. 5 patients died during the 1st year, none of these cases was associated with graft loss. The graft survival rate reached 96% at 1 year, including patients still alive. The occurrence of surgical complication was associated with reduced graft survival at 1 year. Using a multivariate analysis, 4 predictive factors were identified: age, deceased donor, operative time and dyslipidemia. CONCLUSION: Surgical complications after kidney transplantation remained frequent and age, deceased kidney donors, and operative time were identified as risk factors. As vascular complications were a major cause of early graft loss, efforts should aim to reduce their occurrence to increase graft survival.

Quantification of suprarenal aortic neck dilation after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Suprarenal aortic neck dilation (AND) after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with commercially available devices has not yet been well characterized. The aim of this study was to measure diameter changes in the supravisceral aorta after FEVAR. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review involving patients with juxtarenal aneurysms treated with Cook ZFEN devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). Patients with at least 1 year of cross-sectional radiologic follow-up were included. AND was defined as ≥3 mm at any measured location. Aortic diameter, defined as the average outer to outer diameter on three-dimensional centerline imaging, was measured at seven locations along the length of the ZFEN device from the proximal fixation struts to the bottom of the second seal stent. The first postoperative CT scan (≤1 month) served as a baseline from which subsequent measurements at annual intervals were compared. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients who underwent FEVAR from 2012 to 2018 met inclusion criteria, with a total of 119 target vessels (83 renal stents, 41 superior mesenteric artery scallops or large fenestrations). Mean follow-up time was 30.3 months. Any AND was found to occur in 32 (74.4%) patients. Aortic diameter dilation at latest follow-up was found to occur at all measured locations from the top of the fixation struts (1.9 ± 2.4 mm; P < .0001) to the middle of the second seal stent (1.3 ± 3.8 mm; P < .01). Diameter growth was most pronounced in the middle of the first seal stent, with mean AND of 3.6 ± 3.2 mm. At this location, the aorta experienced nearly linear annual growth of 0.99 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.28 mm) per year. Increasing device oversizing relative to the native visceral aorta was the strongest predictor of postoperative neck diameter growth (1.34 mm per 10% increase in oversizing; P = .02), whereas increasing proximal seal length was protective of growth (-1.82 mm per 10-mm increase in seal length; P = .016). Proximal seal lengths ≥3 cm were associated with less neck dilation compared with <3 cm (2.6 mm vs 4.9 mm; P = .022). Type IA endoleak in this cohort was rare (n = 1) and not associated with AND (P = .256). CONCLUSIONS: Dilation of the suprarenal aorta is a common finding in midterm follow-up after FEVAR and not associated with proximal endoleak. Aggressive device oversizing is predictive of dilation, whereas longer seal lengths are associated with less dilation along the suprarenal seal zone. These results support the continued use of FEVAR for juxtarenal aneurysms, particularly in patients in whom ≥3 cm of healthy seal length can be obtained.

In situ bypass and extra-anatomic bypass procedures result in similar survival in patients with secondary aortoenteric fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal revascularization modality in secondary aortoenteric fistula (SAEF) remains unclear in the literature. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the revascularization approach associated with the lowest morbidity and mortality using real-world data in patients with SAEF. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional study of SAEF from 2002 to 2014 was performed using a standardized database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and operative and postoperative variables were recorded. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 182 patients at 34 institutions from 11 countries presented with SAEF (median age, 72 years; 79% male). The initial aortic procedures that resulted in SAEF were 138 surgical grafts (76%) and 42 endografts (23%), with 2 unknown; 102 of the SAEFs (56%) underwent complete excision of infected aortic graft material, followed by in situ (in-line) bypass (ISB), including antibiotic-soaked prosthetic graft (53), autogenous femoral vein (neoaortoiliac surgery; 17), cryopreserved allograft (28), and untreated prosthetic grafts (4). There were 80 patients (44%) who underwent extra-anatomic bypass (EAB) with infected graft excision. Overall median Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 319 days (interquartile range, 20-2410 days). Stratified by EAB vs ISB, there was no significant difference in Kaplan-Meier estimated survival (P = .82). In comparing EAB vs ISB, EAB patients were older (74 vs 70 years; P = .01), had less operative hemorrhage (1200 mL vs 2000 mL; P = .04), were more likely to initiate dialysis within 30 days postoperatively (15% vs 5%; P = .02), and were less likely to experience aorta-related hemorrhage within 30 days postoperatively (3% aortic stump dehiscence vs 11% anastomotic rupture; P = .03). There were otherwise no significant differences in presentation, comorbidities, and intraoperative or postoperative variables. Multivariable Cox regression showed that the duration of antibiotic use (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98; P = .01) and rifampin use at time of discharge (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.86; P = .03) independently decreased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ISB does not offer a survival advantage compared with EAB and does not decrease the risk of postoperative aorta-related hemorrhage. After repair, <50% of SAEF patients survive 10 months. Each week of antibiotic use decreases mortality by 8%. Further study with risk modeling is imperative for this population.

Renal Stent Complications and Impact on Renal Function after Standard Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: To report renal outcomes including long-term patency, secondary interventions, and related renal function after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (fEVAR). METHODS: Single-center retrospective review of patients undergoing fEVAR between 2012 and 2018 using the Cook ZFEN device. Renal stent complications, defined as any stenosis, occlusion, kink, renal stent-related endoleak, and reinterventions were tabulated. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. RESULTS: During the study period, 114 patients underwent elective fEVAR. Of 329 total target vessels, 193 renal arteries were stented (133 Atrium iCAST, 60 Gore VBX). Technical success was achieved in 97.4%, and the mean follow-up was 23.3 months. Seventeen renal complications occurred in 14 patients (12.3%), including 4 occlusions, 9 stenosis, 3 dislocations, and 1 type III endoleak. All stent complications underwent endovascular reintervention with a median hospital stay of 1 day (0-10) and a technical success of 94.2%. One patient suffered renal hemorrhage that warranted embolization. Patients with occlusion were treated the day of diagnosis, and mean time from diagnosis to intervention for stenosis was 21.5 days. Estimated primary patency was 92.1 % and 81.5% at 24 and 48 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, larger native renal artery diameter was the only independent protective factor against patency loss (HR 0.23 (0.09-0.59)). Secondary patency at latest follow-up was 99.4%. Mean eGFR was not significantly different at latest follow-up between patients with renal complications versus those without (43.75 vs. 55.58 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.09). Comparing patients with and without renal stent complications, 81.4% and 72.7% of patients had stable or improved renal disease by chronic kidney disease staging compared with baseline (P = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: fEVAR is a durable option for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms and is associated with excellent secondary patency. Renal stent complications have no significant impact on renal function, but smaller native renal arteries are at higher risk of stent-graft complications.

The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: A near miss disaster.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread postponement and cancelation of elective vascular surgeries in Switzerland. The consequences of these decisions are poorly understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study, we describe the impact of COVID-19 pandemic containment strategies on patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) referred during the period March 11, to May 11, 2020, compared to the same time frames in 2018 to 2019. Patients admitted for acute limb ischemia (ALI) or chronic PAD and undergoing urgent or elective vascular surgery or primary amputation were included. Patients' characteristics, indications for admission, and surgical features were analyzed. The occurrence of 30 day outcomes was assessed, including length of stay, rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE), and procedural and hemodynamic success. RESULTS: Overall, 166 patients were included. Fewer subjects per 10 day period were operated in 2020 compared to, 2018 to 2019 (6.7 vs. 10.5, respectively; P < 0.001). The former had higher rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (25% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.029), and ASA score (3.13 vs. 2.90; P = 0.015). The percentage of patients with ALI in 2020 was about double that of the same period in 2018 to 2019 (47.5% vs. 24.6%; P = 0.006). Overall, the types of surgery were similar between 2020 and 2018 to 2019, while palliative care and primary amputations occurred only in 2020 (5 out 40 cases). The rate of post-operative MACE was significantly higher in 2020 (10% vs. 2.4%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: During the first state of emergency for COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, less regular medical follow-up and hindered hospital access could have resulted in more acute and advanced clinical presentations of patients with PAD undergoing surgery. Guidelines are needed to provide appropriate care to this vulnerable population and avoid a large-scale disaster.

Contemporary Outcomes After Partial Resection of Infected Aortic Grafts.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic graft infection remains a considerable clinical challenge, and it is unclear which variables are associated with adverse outcomes among patients undergoing partial resection. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional study of patients who underwent partial resection of infected aortic grafts from 2002 to 2014 was performed using a standard database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative, and postoperative variables were recorded. The primary outcome was mortality. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis, and Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients at 22 medical centers in 6 countries underwent partial resection of an infected aortic graft. Seventy percent were men with median age 70 years. Ninety-seven percent had a history of open aortic bypass graft: 88 (77%) patients had infected aortobifemoral bypass, 18 (16%) had infected aortobiiliac bypass, and 1 (0.8%) had an infected thoracic graft. Infection was diagnosed at a median 4.3 years post-implant. All patients underwent partial resection followed by either extra-anatomic (47%) or in situ (53%) vascular reconstruction. Median follow-up period was 17 months (IQR 1, 50 months). Thirty-day mortality was 17.5%. The KM-estimated median survival from time of partial resection was 3.6 years. There was no significant survival difference between those undergoing in situ reconstruction or extra-anatomic bypass (P = 0.6). During follow up, 72% of repairs remained patent and 11% of patients underwent major amputation. On univariate Cox regression analysis, Candida infection was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 2.4; P = 0.01) as well as aortoenteric fistula (HR 1.9, P = 0.03). Resection of a single graft limb only to resection of abdominal (graft main body) infection was associated with decreased risk of mortality (HR 0.57, P = 0.04), as well as those with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification less than 3 (HR 0.35, P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis did not reveal any factors significantly associated with mortality. Persistent early infection was noted in 26% of patients within 30 days postoperatively, and 39% of patients were found to have any post-repair infection during the follow-up period. Two patients (1.8%) were found to have a late reinfection without early persistent postoperative infection. Patients with any post-repair infection were older (67 vs. 60 years, P = 0.01) and less likely to have patent repairs during follow up (59% vs. 32%, P = 0.01). Patients with aortoenteric fistula had a higher rate of any post-repair infection (63% vs. 29%, P < 0.01) CONCLUSION: This large multi-center study suggests that patients who have undergone partial resection of infected aortic grafts may be at high risk of death or post-repair infection, especially older patients with abdominal infection not isolated to a single graft limb, or with Candida infection or aortoenteric fistula. Late reinfection correlated strongly with early persistent postoperative infection, raising concern for occult retained infected graft material.

Multivessel tibial revascularization does not improve outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Multivessel tibial revascularization for critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate single vs multiple tibial vessel interventions in patients with multivessel tibial disease. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in amputation-free survival between the groups. METHODS: Using the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, we reviewed patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions involving the tibial arteries. Patients with CLI were included only if at least two tibial vessels were diseased and adequate perioperative data and clinical follow-up were available for review. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival. RESULTS: There were 10,849 CLI patients with multivessel tibial disease evaluated from 2002 to 2017; 761 limbs had adequate data and follow-up available for review. Mean follow-up was 337 ± 62 days. Of these, 473 (62.1%) underwent successful single-vessel tibial intervention (group SV), whereas 288 (37.9%) underwent successful multivessel (two or more) intervention (group MV). Patients in group MV were younger (69.1 vs 73.2 years; P < .001), with higher tobacco use (29.5% vs 18.2%; P < .001). Group SV more commonly had concurrent femoral or popliteal inflow interventions (83.7% vs 78.1%; P = .05). Multivessel runoff on completion was significantly greater for group MV (99.9% vs 39.9%; P < .001). No differences were observed between group SV and group MV for major amputation (9.0% and 7.6%; P = .6), with similar amputation-free survival at 1 year (90.6% vs 92.9%; P = .372). In a multivariate Cox model, loss of patency was the only significant predictor of major amputation (hazard ratio, 5.36 [2.7-10.6]; P = .01). A subgroup analysis of 355 (46.6%) patients with tissue loss data showed that tissue loss before intervention was not predictive of future major amputation. CONCLUSIONS: In the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, patients with CLI and occlusive disease involving multiple tibial vessels did not appear to have a limb salvage benefit from multiple tibial revascularization compared with single tibial revascularization.

Long-term Functional Outcomes Follow-up after 188 Rib Resections in Patients with TOS.

BACKGROUND: Short-term outcomes in patients with all forms of TOS have been widely reported in the literature and have established that rib resection can be beneficial in decompressing the thoracic outlet and relieving pressure on traversing structures. We sought to determine long-term functional outcomes using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) survey in patients with TOS who underwent rib resection. METHODS: Clinical records for patients who underwent rib resection for TOS at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were contacted via telephone and long-term functional outcome was assessed at latest follow-up via the 11-item version of the QuickDASH questionnaire. Demographics, TOS type, preoperative QuickDASH score, and athletic status were recorded. Patients were asked if they returned to baseline activity since their surgery, would have the procedure again, and if they were subjectively better postoperatively. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2018, 261 patients underwent rib resection surgery. One hundred seventy patients (65.1%) were able to be contacted via telephone for long-term follow-up. A total of 188 surgeries (102 neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome, 82 venous thoracic outlet syndrome, 4 arterial thoracic outlet syndrome) were performed in these 170 patients. The mean follow-up time for the cohort was 5.3 years (range 1-18). Overall, 167 (88.9%) patients returned to baseline activity postoperatively. Postop QuickDASH decreased to 12 from 44 preoperatively for the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: First rib resection and thoracic outlet decompression for all forms of TOS is a durable surgical treatment which results in excellent long-term functional outcomes as determined by both the QuickDASH score and subjective patient reporting.

Long-Term Quality of Life Comparison between Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Rib Resection in Patients with vTOS.

BACKGROUND: Rib resection in venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) may be approached via a transaxillary, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular approach based on surgeon preference. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term postoperative quality of life function after surgery for vTOS and to determine if there were long-term patency differences associated with the surgical approach or whether prophylactic postoperative venography was performed. METHODS: All patients with vTOS undergoing rib resection at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. In 2012, we switched our approach to infraclavicular with postoperative venogram performed within 2 weeks of rib resection. Clinical records and imaging results were tabulated, and postoperative outcomes, complications, and long-term symptom follow up via the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score surveys. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score ranges from 0 to 100 with lower numbers indicating better functional status (100 = worst). RESULTS: During the 19-year study period, we performed 109 rib resections in patients with vTOS (mean age, 29.8 years). From 2000 to 2012, 54 patients were approached via a supraclavicular approach, and from 2012 to 2018, 55 patients were approached via an infraclavicular approach. There was a significant decrease in the number of complications in the infraclavicular cohort compared with the supraclavicular group. There was no difference in patency between the 2 groups even with a higher rate of postoperative venogram in the infraclavicular cohort. There was no difference in long-term the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores. There was an increased rate of complications in the supraclavicular cohort as compared with the infraclavicular group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The infraclavicular approach in patients with vTOS is associated with a lower rate of complications, but long-term quality of life outcomes and patency are not different between groups.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis after Radiofrequency and Laser Ablation of the Lower Extremity Veins.

BACKGROUND: The rates of thromboembolic complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after venous ablation procedures for symptomatic superficial venous insufficiency are controversial. We sought to describe the risk factors for and incidence of DVT after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA). METHODS: We queried the Truven Health Marketscan Database from 2007-16 for patients who underwent RFA or LA and had a follow-up duplex ultrasound within 30 days of the ablation procedure. The primary outcome was DVT at 7 and 30 days identified by International Classification of Diseases-9 and International Classification of Diseases-10 codes. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the patient and procedural variables associated with a DVT at 30 days, expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Patients and procedures with a previous DVT diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 256,999 patients underwent 433,286 ablation procedures: 192,195 (44.4%) RFA and 241,091 LA. Of these, 8,203 (1.9%) had a newly diagnosed DVT within 7 days and 13,347 (3.1%) within 30 days of the procedure. The incidence of DVT decreased over the study period. LA (2.8%) demonstrated a lower incidence of DVT at 30 days compared with RFA (3.4%), P < 0.001. On multivariable regression, LA (OR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.80-0.85) was again associated with a decreased risk for 30-day DVT, as was female gender (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.77), and sclerotherapy performed on the same day (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). A diagnosis of peripheral artery disease (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16-1.31) and concomitant stab phlebectomy (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.37-1.49) was associated with an increased risk of DVT within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of newly diagnosed DVT within 30 days of an ablation procedure was 3.2%. The risk for DVT decreased in recent years, and LA was associated with an 18% decreased risk compared with RFA.

Ten Year Experience of Using Cryopreserved Arterial Allografts for Distal Bypass in Critical Limb Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: In critical limb ischaemia (CLI), current guidelines recommend revascularisation whenever possible, preferentially through endovascular means. However, in the case of long occlusions or failed endovascular attempts, distal bypasses still have a place. Single segment great saphenous vein (GSV), which provides the best conduit, is often not available and currently there is no consensus about the best alternative graft. METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2015, 42 cryopreserved arterial allografts were used for a distal bypass. Autologous GSVs or alternative autologous conduits were unavailable for all patients. The patients were observed for survival, limb salvage, and allograft patency. The results were analysed with Kaplan-Meier graphs. RESULTS: Estimates of secondary patency at one, two and five years were 81%, 73%, and 57%, respectively. Estimates of primary patency rates at one, two and five years were 60%, 56%, and 26%, respectively. Estimates of limb salvage rates at one, two and five years were 89%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. Estimates of survival rates at one, two and five years were 92%, 76% and 34%, respectively. At 30 days, major amputations and major adverse cardiac events were one and zero, respectively. Six major amputations occurred during the long-term follow up. CONCLUSION: Despite a low primary patency rate at two years, the secondary patency of arterial allografts is acceptable for distal bypasses. This suggests that cryopreserved arterial allografts are a suitable alternative for limb saving distal bypasses in the absence of venous conduits, improving limb salvage rates and, possibly, quality of life.

Early Experience with the Octopus Endovascular Strategy in the Management of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The Octopus endovascular strategy involves placement of multiple, stacked bifurcated grafts in the thoracic segment of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA) to facilitate deployment of multiple parallel covered stents for visceral perfusion. This study aimed to review early outcomes of the Octopus TAAA repair strategy at a tertiary, high-volume referral center. METHODS: All patients who underwent this Octopus procedure from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed from a prospectively collected single-institution registry. Demographics, comorbidities, and aneurysm anatomy including side and extent, perioperative data including blood loss, length of procedure length of stay, morbidity, and mortality up to 3 years after the procedure were elevated. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (48% female, age 72.9 years) underwent the Octopus procedure over the study period. Mean TAAA diameter was 6.7 cm, with 14% dissection related and 86% degenerative TAAA. All patients had been turned down for open repair and 3 (14%) were performed urgently of which 2 were ruptures. TAAA extent was 9% type 2, 62% type 3, and 29% type 4. A mean of 3.04 branches were revascularized per patient, with the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (90%) perfused through its own limb, and both renals usually reconstructed in parallel graft fashion (left 90%, right 85.7%) with the distal abdominal extension through one of the limbs. Mean operative time was 8 hr, fluoroscopy time 164 min, contrast 182 mL, and blood loss 807 mL. We staged the thoracic and juxtavisceral portions of the cases in 24% of patients. 90% of cases were able to be completed with exclusion of the TAAA and all planned visceral branches cannulated. Perioperative complications included paraplegia (19%) (13.3% permanent, 26.6% temporary), acute kidney injury (24%), prolonged ventilation (19%), myocardial infarction (4.9%), and ischemic bowel (4.8%). Median follow-up was 13.5 months (range 1-26 months). At latest follow-up, type I endoleak rate was 9.5%, with all being treated with proximal cuffs. Other second interventions included restenting of a right renal, angioplasty of an iliac limb kink, and type 2 endoleak coiling. Primary patency of visceral branches was 93.8% at latest follow-up (celiac 100%, SMA 94.7%, right renal 88.9%, left renal 94.8%). In-hospital all-cause mortality rate was 14.2%, with 30-day survival being 90.5%, 6-month survival was 88.3%, one-year survival 71.4%, and 3-year survival was 52.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The Octopus procedure is a high-risk option for urgent or emergent endovascular TAAA repair with off-the-shelf devices in patients who are not candidates for open repair.

[Exercise training therapy in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease]. / Traitement par l'exercice physique chez le patient avec une artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs.

Patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) have decreased functional capacities leading to decreased quality of life and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Exercise therapy is recommended among first-choice therapeutic options and improves overall physical function and quality of life in symptomatic patients with PAD. Exercise therapy is also effective in patients with PAD following revascularization. Other than walking, different training modalities are safe, feasible and effective to induce clinical benefits for these patients. We present here the role of exercise therapy and its specificities in the management of PAD.

Les patients avec une artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs (AOMI) présentent une diminution des capacités fonctionnelles qui conduit souvent à une baisse de la qualité de vie et une augmentation de la morbi-mortalité cardiovasculaire. L'exercice physique fait partie de la prise en charge optimale des patients avec AOMI et permet d'améliorer leur état fonctionnel général et leur qualité de vie. Les effets bénéfiques de l'exercice sont également présents après un geste de revascularisation. Plusieurs types et modalités d'entraînement sont efficaces afin d'obtenir des bénéfices cliniques pour ces patients. Nous présenterons ici le rôle de l'exercice physique et ses spécificités dans la prise en charge de l'AOMI.

Surgical and endovascular hybrid approach in peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs.

BACKGROUND: Multilevel peripheral arterial disease is frequently observed in patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia. This report evaluates the efficacy of one-stage hybrid revascularization in patients with multilevel arterial peripheral disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database included all consecutive patients treated by a hybrid approach for a multilevel arterial peripheral disease. The primary outcome was the patency rate at 6 months and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were early and midterm complication rate, limb salvage and mortality rate. Statistical analysis, including a Kaplan-Meier estimate and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out with the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency, comparing the impact of various risk factors in pre- and post-operative treatments. RESULTS: 64 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 428 days (range: 4 - 1140). The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 1 year were 39 %, 66 % and 81 %, respectively. The limb-salvage rate was 94 %. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Early and midterm complication rates were 15.4 % and 6.4 %, respectively. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid approach is a major alternative in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease in multilevel disease and comorbid patients, with low complication and mortality rates and a high limb-salvage rate.

Patient-specific computational flow simulation reveals significant differences in paravisceral aortic hemodynamics between fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair.

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair with four-vessel fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) or branched endovascular aneurysm repair (bEVAR) currently represent the forefront of minimally invasive complex aortic aneurysm repair. This study sought to use patient-specific computational flow simulation (CFS) to assess differences in postoperative hemodynamic effects associated with fEVAR vs bEVAR. Methods: Patients from two institutions who underwent four-vessel fEVAR with the Cook Zenith Fenestrated platform and bEVAR with the Jotec E-xtra Design platform were retrospectively selected. Patients in both cohorts were treated for paravisceral and extent II, II, and V thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Three-dimensional finite element volume meshes were created from preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans. Boundary conditions were adjusted for body surface area, heart rate, and blood pressure. Pulsatile flow simulations were performed with equivalent boundary conditions between preoperative and postoperative states. Postoperative changes in hemodynamic parameters were compared between the fEVAR and bEVAR groups. Results: Patient-specific CFS was performed on 20 patients (10 bEVAR, 10 fEVAR) with a total of 80 target vessels (40 renal, 20 celiac, 20 superior mesenteric artery stents). bEVAR was associated with a decrease in renal artery peak flow rate (-5.2% vs +2.0%; P < .0001) and peak pressure (-3.4 vs +0.1%; P < .0001) compared with fEVAR. Almost all renal arteries treated with bEVAR had a reduction in renal artery perfusion (n = 19 [95%]), compared with 35% (n = 7) treated with fEVAR. There were no significant differences in celiac or superior mesenteric artery perfusion metrics (P = .10-.27) between groups. Time-averaged wall shear stress in the paravisceral aorta and branches also varied significantly depending on endograft configuration, with bEVAR associated with large postoperative increases in renal artery (+47.5 vs +13.5%; P = .002) and aortic time-averaged wall shear stress (+200.1% vs -31.3%; P = .001) compared with fEVAR. Streamline analysis revealed areas of hemodynamic abnormalities associated with branched renal grafts which adopt a U-shaped geometry, which may explain the observed differences in postoperative changes in renal perfusion between bEVAR and fEVAR. Conclusions: bEVAR may be associated with subtle decreases in renal perfusion and a large increase in aortic wall shear stress compared with fEVAR. CFS is a novel tool for quantifying and visualizing the unique patient-specific hemodynamic effect of different complex EVAR strategies. Clinical Relevance: This study used patient-specific CFS to compare postoperative hemodynamic effects of four-vessel fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (bEVAR) in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. The findings indicate that bEVAR may result in subtle reductions in renal artery perfusion and a significant increase in aortic wall shear stress compared with fEVAR. These differences are clinically relevant, providing insights for clinicians choosing between these approaches. Understanding the patient-specific hemodynamic effects of complex EVAR strategies, as revealed by CFS, can aid in future personalized treatment decisions, and potentially reduce postoperative complications in aortic aneurysm repair.