Treatment of Acute Renal Colic in US and French EDs: Simulated Cases and Real Cases in Acute Pain Management.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prescribing patterns in acute renal colic in emergency departments in US and France, by comparing physicians' intended prescription practices with actual prescription data in a sample of emergency practitioners. METHODS: Pharmaco-epidemiological international study in two phases. First, we surveyed emergency physicians in US and France as to what analgesics they would use for simulated cases of renal colic. We then conducted a retrospective review of actual cases of emergency department patients with pain scores ≥6/10 with acute renal colic during a period of 6 months before the survey. We compared nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids used for pain treatment in the two groups, and the differences between the two countries. RESULTS: One hundred six prescribers and 100 patients were included in the study. Comparison between simulated and real cases showed that NSAIDs and opioids were less frequently prescribed in real life (78% vs 99% and 51% vs 100% respectively). Morphine was the most prescribed opioid (96% of simulated cases and 34% of real ones). Acetaminophen use was increased in real life cases (58% vs 0%). Concerning the differences between countries, US physicians are more likely to administer morphine (64% vs 38%) and French physicians NSAIDs (88% vs 68%). The NSAIDs used are ketorolac in the United States (94% of simulated cases vs 64%) and ketoprofen in France (94% and 88% respectively). DISCUSSION: We showed clear differences between intended and real analgesic prescription practices for patients suffering from renal colic. Some differences exist for pain perceptions and treatments between US and France.

Quality of publications in emergency medicine.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe emergency medicine (EM) publications in terms of methodology, approval by institutional review board, method of consent, external validity, and setting (eg, prehospital or emergency department). METHODS: The 12 top-ranked emergency journals were selected. We manually reviewed the last 30 original articles in each EM journal, to represent more than 2 months of publications for all EM journals (range, 2-6 months). Only clinical original articles on human subjects were included. To ensure accurate data transcription, each article was read at least twice by 2 different reviewers and graded by written criteria using an extraction standard chart. RESULTS: Over the articles reviewed, 330 were analyzed. One hundred eighty-nine (57.3%) were prospective studies; 29 (8.8%) were randomized studies. Two hundred twenty-six studies (68.5%) mentioned an institutional review board approval or a waiver of authorization, and an informed consent was not mentioned in 227 (68.8%) of studies. Fifty-nine (17.9%) were conducted in a prehospital setting. Two hundred thirty-eight (72.1%) of these studies were at single-center institutions; the Unite States contributed 158 (47.9%) of the total publications. CONCLUSION: This study describes publications in the field of EM. Randomized studies represent 9% of publications, most studies are cross-sectional, and more than half have a retrospective design. We found that, in one-third of the studies, an institutional review board review was not mentioned and informed consent was not specified in two-thirds of the studies. Emergency medicine research volume, quality, and grants activity must increase in order for EM to progress within academic medicine.

Predictors of pain relief and adverse events in patients receiving opioids in a prehospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze factors predicting pain relief and adverse events in patients receiving opioids for acute pain in a prehospital setting. METHODS: In this prospective, observational clinical study, adult patients with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 5 of 10 or higher who required treatment with intravenous opioids for pain control were included. The primary outcome variable was final analgesia defined by an NRS score of 3 of 10 or lower upon arrival to the emergency department. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of pain relief and adverse effects. RESULTS: In total, 277 patients (age, 49 ± 22 years), 205 (74%) of whom were male and 154 (56%) with a traumatic pain were included in the analysis. Median (interquartile range) NRS scores at baseline and at discharge were 8 of 10 (7-10) and 3 of 10 (2-5), respectively. The final model had 3 independent variables reaching significance. Physician-staffed ambulance transportation (odds ratio [OR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-5.49) was the only independent predictor of patients' final pain relief. High initial pain scores and acetaminophen use were predictive factors for failure of analgesia (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93 for one unit/10; P < .01; and OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.77; P < .01, respectively). In the entire sample, 25 (9.0%) presented one adverse effect, all mild to moderate in severity, with no significant predictive factors. CONCLUSION: Despite advancement in prehospital pain management, pain relief at discharge is still inadequate in some patients. Finally, one important message of our study is that patients in pain have to be transported by well-equipped and staffed ambulances to reevaluate and alleviate pain.

Continuous positive airway pressure for cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the immediate and delayed effects of noninvasive ventilation for patients in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) in addition to aggressive usual care in a medical prehospital setting. METHODS: Out-of-hospital patients in severe ACPE were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized to receive either usual care, including conventional optimal treatment with furosemide, oxygen, and high-dose boluses of isosorbide dinitrate plus oxygen, or conventional medications plus out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The primary outcome was the treatment success defined as all of respiratory rate less than 25 breaths per minute and oxygen saturation of greater than 90% at the end of 1-hour study. Secondary end points included death during 30 days after inclusion. Lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays were also recorded. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients were enrolled into the study. The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. For the primary outcome analysis, 22 (35.5%) of 62 patients were considered as experiencing a treatment success in the usual care group vs 19 (31.7%) of 60 in the CPAP group (P = .65). Seven patients died within 30 days in the usual care group vs 6 in the CPAP group (P = .52). There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for length of stay either in hospital or in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: In the prehospital setting, in spite of its potential advantages for patients in ACPE, CPAP may not be preferred to a strict optimal intravenous treatment.

Usefulness of initial glucose level to improve acute coronary syndrome diagnosis in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to analyse the incremental usefulness of high blood glucose level for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) for chest pain and suspected ACS. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational study of 11 months duration was carried out. Initial glucose levels were analysed in 672 consecutive patients admitted to the ED with chest pain and suspected non-ST elevation ACS. A cut-off glucose level (>140 mg/dl) for high glucose level diagnosis was defined. Based on hospital diagnostic test results, patients were classified as having non-ST elevation ACS by two independent physicians. The association and performance of high glucose level for ACS diagnosis were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Out of the 672 eligible patients who were recruited, 181 (26.9%) had a confirmed non-ST elevation ACS. The independent factors associated with a diagnosis of ACS were age, previous coronary artery disease, hyperlipidaemia, smoking status and glucose level >140 mg/dl (OR 1.98 95% CI 1.14 to 3.45). In addition to a predictive model that included the usual diagnostic tools for non-ST elevation ACS management, a glucose level >140 mg/dl added significant incremental information (p=0.03). However, the addition of blood glucose level >140 mg/dl to the conventional diagnostic tool resulted in small increases in the ability to classify ACS, as measured by the c-statistic (0.82, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.85). CONCLUSION: An initial serum glucose level >140 mg/dl is associated with non-ST elevation ACS in patients admitted to an ED for chest pain but added moderately to conventional tools used for ACS diagnosis. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00714298.

Generalized convulsive status epilepticus management in adults: a cohort study with evaluation of professional practice.

PURPOSE: Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) needs immediate management. Despite guidelines, adherence to management protocols is often poor, this contributing to poor outcome. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a management protocol in GCSE. METHODS: This is a prospective population-based study of consecutive adults with GCSE in Haute-Garonne district, France. Demographics and treatment procedures were documented. Factors associated with seizure termination and refractoriness were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen episodes in 111 adults (mean age 55 years) between October 2006 and February 2008 were included. SE was convulsive in 101 episodes. Incidence was 6.6 per 100,000 and case fatality was 9%. Adequate initial treatment according to protocol was observed in 38%; 64% were treated out-of-hospital, and SE was refractory in 27% [no response after two antiepileptic drugs (AED)]. Patients who received adequate first-line treatment were 6.8 times [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-16.9] more likely to have seizure termination, with 74% versus 29% efficacy rate (p < 0.0001). Inadequate initial management was 4.7 times (1.9-11.1) more likely to need several benzodiazepine doses (p = 0.0004) and 9.1 times (3.7-20) more likely to require a long-acting AED as next treatment (p < 0.0001). Seizure termination after initial treatment was associated with decreased intensive care unit stay [1 (1-2) versus 2 (1-5.5) days, p < 0.0001] and hospital stay [3 (2-11) versus 7 (3-18) days, p = 0.009]. DISCUSSION: GCSE termination and outcome seem clearly associated with adherence to treatment protocol. Results add to the debate on appropriate allocation of resources for out-of-hospital treatment, licensed drugs, and achievement of guideline implementation to improve SE outcome.

Sufentanil is not superior to morphine for the treatment of acute traumatic pain in an emergency setting: a randomized, double-blind, out-of-hospital trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We determine the best intravenous opioid titration protocol by comparing morphine and sufentanil for adult patients with severe traumatic acute pain in an out-of-hospital setting, with a physician providing care. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, patients were eligible for inclusion if aged 18 years or older, with acute severe pain (defined as a numeric rating scale score ≥ 6/10) caused by trauma. They were assigned to receive either intravenous 0.15 µg/kg sufentanil, followed by 0.075 µg/kg every 3 minutes or intravenous 0.15 mg/kg morphine and then 0.075 mg/kg. The primary endpoint of the study was pain relief at 15 minutes, defined as a numeric rating scale less than or equal to 3 of 10. Secondary endpoints were time to analgesia, adverse events, and duration of analgesia during the first 6 hours. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included, 54 in each group. At 15 minutes, 74% of the patients in the sufentanil group had a numeric rating scale score of 3 or lower versus 70% of those in the morphine group (Δ4%; 95% confidence interval -13% to 21%). At 9 minutes, 65% of the patients in the sufentanil group experienced pain relief versus 46% of those in the morphine group (Δ18%; 95% confidence interval 0.1% to 35%). The duration of analgesia was in favor of the morphine group. Nineteen percent of patients experienced an adverse event in both groups, all mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Intravenous morphine titration using a loading dose of morphine followed by strictly administered lower doses at regular intervals remains the criterion standard. Moreover, this study supports the idea that the doses studied should be considered for routine administration in severe pain protocols.

Pancreatic cholangiocarcinoma as an ST-elevation myocardial infarction with thrombolytic therapy.

We report the case of a 46-year-old patient who presented a chest pain with ST-segment elevation in precordial leads V1 (2 mm), V2 (4 mm), and V3 (3 mm). Thrombolytic therapy was initiated with the combination tenecteplase tissue plasminogene activator, aspirin, and heparin. Further electrocardiogram and cardiac enzymes measured every 2 hours during the first 24 hours remained normal, and after a computed tomography of the abdomen, the patient was taken to surgery for an exploratory abdominal operation that revealed pancreatic cholangiocarcinoma. No adverse effects were attributed to the initial thrombolytic therapy. Finally, myocardial ischemia was excluded because the electrocardiogram, cardiac enzymes, and a 1-month later cardiac stress test remained normal and because no coronary event occurred during the first year after surgery. Our case shows that it is sometimes difficult to make the share, in prehospital field, between coronary syndrome and other pathology, particularly digestive pathology. However, in the appropriate chest pain patient with presumed acute myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation remains the primary criterion for the initiation of thrombolytic therapy, primary angioplasty, and/or other pharmacologic interventions.

Rupture of splenic artery aneurysm during early pregnancy: a rare and catastrophic event.

Spontaneous rupture of splenic artery aneurysm during pregnancy is a rare, life-threatening event with a catastrophic prognosis. Splenic artery aneurysm, known to be more frequent in women, especially among multiparous ones, is generally asymptomatic until rupture. Because of increased blood flow and hormonal modifications, this rupture occurs frequently during pregnancy, most often at the end of the third trimester. We present the case of a second parous woman in early pregnancy with a rupture of splenic artery aneurysm initially diagnosed as a complicated ectopic pregnancy, which profoundly modifies surgical treatment. Through this case report, we want to draw attention to the fact that even if complicated ectopic pregnancy is much more frequent, ruptured splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) needs to be considered as a part of differential diagnosis of hemoperitoneum during the first trimester as well.

Prehospital mechanical ventilation of a critical cardiac tamponade.

Mechanical ventilation of a critical cardiac tamponade is a high-risk situation that can lead to asystolic cardiac arrest. We report a prehospital mechanical ventilation of a penetrating cardiac injury complicated with tamponade. Onset diagnosis of the circulatory arrest allowed by prehospital continuous ultrasonography led to earlier initiation of the resuscitation and might have favored successful outcome. Electrocardiographic signs are too late to diagnose circulatory arrest.

Predicting acute coronary syndrome in males and females with chest pain who call an emergency medical communication centre.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a frequent reason for calls in emergency medical communication centre (EMCC). Detecting a coronary origin by phone is a challenge. This is especially so as the presentations differ according to gender. We aimed to establish and validate a sex-based model to predict a coronary origin of chest pain in patients calling an EMCC. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients at 18 years of age or older who called the EMCC because of non-traumatic chest pain. The main outcome was the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) determined by expert evaluation of patient files. RESULTS: During 18 months, 3727 patients were enrolled: 2097 (56%) men and 1630 (44%) women. ACS was diagnosed in 508 (24%) men and 139 (9%) women. For men, independent factors associated with an ACS diagnosis were age, tobacco use, severe and permanent pain; retrosternal, breathing non-related and radiating pain; and additional symptoms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.79) for predicting ACS. The accuracy of the male model to predict ACS was validated in a validation dataset (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.554); the AUC was 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.80). For women, independent factors associated with an ACS diagnosis were age ≥ 60 years, personal history of coronary artery disease, and breathing non-related and radiating pain. The AUC was 0.79 (95%CI 0.75-0.83). The accuracy of the female model to predict ACS was not validated in the validation dataset (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.035); the AUC was 0.67 (95%CI 0.60-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of an ACS diagnosis in patients calling an EMCC for chest pain differ between men and women. We developed an accurate predictive model for men, but for women, the accuracy was poor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02042209 ).

Acute copper sulphate poisoning: a case report and literature review.

Voluntary copper poisoning is a rare mode of suicide. We report a case of copper sulphate poisoning in a patient presenting delusions with mystic demands for purification. The initial gastrointestinal symptoms were followed by intravascular haemolysis and renal failure. The course was favourable after symptomatic treatment and specific copper chelation therapy. However, the pathogenesis is not fully understood and with the present state of knowledge, no one treatment can be said to be superior to another. The authors discuss the various treatments of this rare poisoning through a review of the available literature.

Is there an ideal morphine dose for prehospital treatment of severe acute pain? A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 doses.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the best intravenous morphine titration protocol by comparing 2 protocols for prehospital treatment of patients with severe acute pain. METHODS: Eligible patients with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 60/100 or higher were randomly allocated to receive either 0.05 mg/kg morphine then 0.025 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group A) or 0.1 mg/kg morphine then 0.05 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group B) intravenously. The protocol-defined primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with pain relief (with a NRS score of 30/100 or lower) 30 minutes after the first injection. RESULTS: A total of 106 consecutive patients were randomized. Thirty minutes after the injection, 66% of the patients in group A had an NRS of 30 or lower vs 76% of those in group B (P = .25). Ten minutes after the injection, 17% of the patients in group A had an NRS score of 30 or lower vs 40% of those in group B, (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.8; P < .01). Patients in group B were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia. In addition, there were no serious complications in either group. However, patients in group B did experience almost twice the incidence of adverse effects overall and in particular 4 times the level of emesis, although neither of these observations were statistically significant. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, only an initial NRS score of 100 was an independent predictive factor for failure of analgesia (odds ratio, 0.125; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.68; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The high-dose morphine regimen showed a similar analgesic response pattern to the low-dose one in severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Patients in the high-dose group were more likely to experience pain relief 10 minutes after the injection. In the interests of achieving rapid pain relief, an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg should no longer be recommended for treating severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Another important message arising from our study is that a regimented dose of morphine, with an initial dose and strictly administered lower doses at regular intervals, is safe in the prehospital setting.

[From the call to the advanced life support: management of emergency care units in France]. / De l'appel à la réanimation: l'organisation des secours d'urgence en France.

The French major emergency management system has created a consistent structure for the management of patients in emergency situations. French emergency call centers (dial 15) are staffed by people trained to identify distress situations. Medical management at the accident or failure site ensures early implementation of medical check-up, resuscitation treatment and rapid transportation to an adapted department. At the hospital, the organization of the emergency care unit is based on the same principles: identification of distress, precise assessment of the situation and optimization of the referral process.

Management of non-traumatic chest pain by the French Emergency Medical System: Insights from the DOLORES registry.

BACKGROUND: The early recognition of acute coronary syndromes is a priority in health care systems, to reduce revascularization delays. In France, patients are encouraged to call emergency numbers (15, 112), which are routed to a Medical Dispatch Centre where physicians conduct an interview and decide on the appropriate response. However, the effectiveness of this system has not yet been assessed. AIM: To describe and analyse the response of emergency physicians receiving calls for chest pain in the French Emergency Medical System. METHODS: From 16 November to 13 December 2009, calls to the Medical Dispatch Centre for non-traumatic chest pain were included prospectively in a multicentre observational study. Clinical characteristics and triage decisions were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1647 patients were included in the study. An interview was conducted with the patient in only 30.5% of cases, and with relatives, bystanders or physicians in the other cases. A Mobile Intensive Care Unit was dispatched to 854 patients (51.9%) presenting with typical angina chest pains and a high risk of cardiovascular disease. Paramedics were sent to 516 patients (31.3%) and a general practitioner was sent to 169 patients (10.3%). Patients were given medical advice only by telephone in 108 cases (6.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians in the Medical Dispatch Centre sent an effecter to the majority of patients who called the Emergency Medical System for chest pain. The response level was based on the characteristics of the chest pain and the patient's risk profile.

The predictive power of peritraumatic dissociation and acute stress symptoms for posttraumatic stress symptoms: a three-month prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The authors prospectively examined the power of peritraumatic dissociation and acute stress symptoms in predicting posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. METHOD: Thirty-five assault victims were assessed with the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire within 24 hours of the assault. Participants were reassessed 2 weeks after the trauma with the Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire and 3 months after the trauma with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale and the Impact of Event Scale. Correlational analyses and a hierarchical multiple regression were conducted. RESULTS: Peritraumatic dissociation and acute stress symptoms were correlated with later PTSD symptoms and diagnosis. Together, peritraumatic dissociation and acute stress symptoms accounted for 33% of the variance in PTSD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results support earlier findings that peritraumatic dissociative experiences and acute stress are robust predictors of PTSD. Such symptoms may be of use for identifying at an early stage individuals at highest risk of remaining symptomatic. Future studies should investigate the predictive power of specific peritraumatic and acute stress disorder symptom clusters.

Diagnostic performance of complete lower limb venous ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

A limited ultrasound (US) confined to the popliteal and femoral veins is usually performed to detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Our objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of complete lower limb US examining both the proximal and distal veins in this setting. In this prospective study, 210 consecutive patients were included. Complete US was performed by independent operators and compared blindly with a reference strategy combining clinical probability, ventilation perfusion scan and pulmonary angiography to a three-month clinical follow-up. Simultaneously, VIDAS D-dimer (DD) assay and helical computed tomography (HCT) of the lungs were assessed independently and blindly. PE was present in 74 patients (35%). Complete US detected DVT in 91 patients (43%), proximal in 51 and distal in 40. Sensitivity and specificity with a 0.95 confidence interval were respectively 0.93 [0.85 - 0.97] and 0.84 [0.77 - 0.89]. Limited US detected DVT in only 46 patients (22%). Sensitivity and specificity were respectively 0.55 [0.44 - 0.66] and 0.96 [0.92 - 0.98]. For DD they were 0.92 [0.83 - 0.96] and 0.24 [0.17 - 0.32] and for HCT 0.84 [0.73 - 0.90] and 0.87 [0.80 - 0.92]. Complete lower limb US has higher sensitivity and capacity to exclude PE than limited US, but a slightly lower specificity. Complete US results also compared favourably with those of HCT and DD. The utility of including this method in diagnostic strategies for PE needs to be assessed in cost-effectiveness analysis and in outcome studies.

Quality control programme for acute pain management in emergency medicine: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: This national survey was carried out to evaluate the quality programme for acute pain management in the emergency department (ED) and in pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS). METHODS: Two types of questionnaires were sent to the chief consultant and the chief nurse of all ED and EMS. Data collected were: the type of structure, quality programme organization, acute pain management, and the training needs to initiate a pain quality programme. RESULTS: A total of 363 questionnaires were recorded (198 from chief consultants) with 98% of questionnaires being usable. A pain management committee existed in 71% of cases, a quality committee in 83%. A complete quality control procedure existed in 53% of units. An audit on pain management was carried out in only 23% of cases. Training in quality was performed for 64% of physicians and 68% of nurses. Training specifically for pain management was carried out for physicians in 56% of cases and for nurses in 68% of cases. Pain therapeutics protocols existed in 69% of cases. Pain intensity was evaluated 'systematically or often' in 64% at the beginning of patient management, and in 56% at the end of patient management. The staff was 'not very motivated' for a pain management quality programme in less than 3% of responses. A total of 61% of chief consultants and 58% of chief nurses requested advice. CONCLUSION: Most ED and EMS units seem to master the quality control programme methodology. Units are highly motivated to initiate a quality control programme on pain. Nevertheless, its implementation could benefit from some external support.

[Disaster medicine, organization and management]. / Médecine de catastrophe, organisation et prise en charge.

A disaster situation requires an organised command of the emergency services as well as of the treatment of victims and their orientation. The aim is to avoid any deterioration in the quality of the emergency care provided to the patients. A medical speciality, disaster medicine requires specific training.

New diploma in emergency medicine in France: the students' perspective.

French emergency medicine (EM) has undergone rapid changes with the establishment of a diploma in emergency medicine (DES). We aimed to question medicine students on their knowledge of and apprehensions regarding this new DES. We conducted an email cross-sectional survey among second-cycle medical students before their choice of resident speciality. This included a demographic study and an evaluation of the willingness to choose emergency specialization. Two thousand and three fully completed questionnaires were analysed. Twenty-six per cent of the students (n=524) planned to choose emergency specialization and 54% of the students (n=1084) knew that emergency specialization would be proposed as a full speciality. Seventy-six per cent of students considered it tough to practice as an entire career. This study clearly shows that EM represents an attractive option for medical students. The establishment of DES represents a major step in the improvement of EM.