Vasectomy: An increasingly common procedure in France.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolutionary trends concerning vasectomy over the last 8 years in order to better understand the situation and identify measures to be implemented to develop this activity. METHODS: The number of vasectomy procedures performed between 2015 and 2022 was extracted from the Open CCAM file compiled from the national database of the Programme de médicalisation du système d'informations français (PMSI). RESULTS: Over the period 2015-2022, the number of vasectomy procedures increased from 3743 in 2015 to 29,890 in 2022. This increase was observed in all French metropolitan and overseas regions. The number of minimally invasive vasectomies (notably without scalpel) rose sharply, from 313 to 7760. Almost all vasectomies were performed during outpatient hospitalization (0 nights), with fewer than 300 acts reported/year in outpatient care. CONCLUSION: In France, vasectomy is becoming an increasingly frequent contraceptive method. This analysis is in line with recent surveys carried out in France, and tends to prove that more and more couples of childbearing age are in favour of sharing the contraceptive burden.

Survey on vasectomy practices in France in 2022.

OBJECTIVES: Prior to the publication of the recommendations of the French Association of Urology (AFU) on vasectomy, we conducted a survey to assess current practices and required training interventions in France regarding vasectomy. METHOD: An invitation with a link to a 38-item questionnaire on MonkeySurvey was sent in November 2022 to the 1760 urologist members of the AFU. RESULTS: A total of 352 (20%) urologists completed the survey. Among the participants, 20% reported refusing the surgery to patients aged 25 to 30 years old and 17% if they had no children, respectively. Three quarters of participants mentioned systematically performing a scrotal exam at the time of the pre-vasectomy consultation. Forty-one percent of respondents reported systematically performing vasectomy under general anesthesia. While 56% of participants mentioned performing a minimally invasive technique for exposing the vas, 70% said they were willing to learn the no-scalpel technique for this purpose. The most frequently reported occlusion techniques combine excision of a vas segment and ligation of both ends of the divided vas. Only 26% reported performing fascial interposition and 4% using the "open end" technique. A post-vasectomy semen analysis showing less than 100,000 non-motile sperm per millilitre makes only 38% of respondents recommending stopping other contraceptive methods. Half of the respondents considered that current reimbursement fee structure for the procedure restrains the development of this clinical activity. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests that vasectomy practice and services in France do not meet the international standards. We identified the clinical and organizational changes needed to improve practices and access to vasectomy services in France. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 3.

French translation of the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) was designed to quantitatively assess the symptoms and psychosexual consequences of Peyronie's disease but has only been validated in four languages. The aim of the study was to provide a French translation of the PDQ, to make it available to the French-speaking urology community. METHODS: After a double translation of the PDQ from English into French, followed by a back translation by four expert translators, a conciliation process enabled the creation of the final French version. For each item, participants were asked to answer two sub-questions. The percentage of responses "I fully understood the question" to sub-question a) constituted the validation criterion for the translation. RESULTS: The final French version was submitted to a series of 30 men with Peyronie's disease whose average age was 59 (±12) years. For each question, the comprehension rate was over 95%, and for 12/15 items it was 100%. For the remaining 3 items, men declared that they did not feel disturbed or bothered by the questions and none of the questions were misunderstood. CONCLUSION: This pilot study shows that our translation of the PDQ is valid and comprehensible by all participants, regardless of the age or level of education. This French version should be validated further in other French-speaking populations before final validation.